Conquer Club

qeee1 wrote:

Also I thought you rogue statists were anarchists, yet here you are trying to suggest curtailing free speech out of support for authority.

Rogue state is against the norm. Most people feel that it is their right to complain. thus that is the norm. I am here standing against that!

If dug goes, the so does kilroy

AndrewB wrote:

hendy wrote:I still stand by this comment I made in flame wars

hendy wrote:blitz get your head out of your vagina and grow some balls

There he comes, the Dugcarr's left hand. Or is it a right hand? Which one do you like to use, Dugcarr?

nah dug and I just have the same point of view. Including the fact that we both think blitz is a pussy.

if dug goes, so should hendy

hence he feel it is ok to bribe others to play on their accounts to cheat other players.

its obvious dug is paying you hendy!

I don't see how any normal person could agree that what dug has done is just ok?

and capt didn't do anything wrong, he just told blitz.

what's so wrong with that?

wicked wrote:It is being a discussed among the mods & lack, and we're close to a decision. We don't like to rush judgment on anyone, and this is certainly an unprecedented case.

yeh. i think that watever the decision there r gonna b some strong opinions but i suppose its good that its taking a long time coz that means its being done properly

Beastly wrote:if dug goes, so should hendy

hence he feel it is ok to bribe others to play on their accounts to cheat other players.

its obvious dug is paying you hendy!

I don't see how any normal person could agree that what dug has done is just ok?

and capt didn't do anything wrong, he just told blitz.

what's so wrong with that?

Did I ever say that it was okay? And yes capt did do soemthing wrong. He played along with dugcar1 to get more shit out of him to get him him more in trouble. RETARD

Beastly wrote:if dug goes, so should hendy

hence he feel it is ok to bribe others to play on their accounts to cheat other players.

its obvious dug is paying you hendy!

I don't see how any normal person could agree that what dug has done is just ok?

and capt didn't do anything wrong, he just told blitz.

what's so wrong with that?

and this definetly doesnt wwarent a bann. What osu showed you were not the full pms.

hendy wrote:
Did I ever say that it was okay? And yes capt did do soemthing wrong. He played along with dugcar1 to get more shit out of him to get him him more in trouble. RETARD

Like i said before moron PROVE IT!!


and how do you know so much? were you in on the whole thing hendy?

Sammy gags wrote:And I have to say that if Dug gets banned for playing RISK competitively, the gameplay will never be at the same level of competition because people will always be afraid of being banned.

Aww, come on. Trying to bribe your way into an account to sabotage someone's game can hardly be called "competitively". In my book it's low and just plain stupid.

Just play the game and have fun.

I'd like to see things from your point of view Hendy..but I can't seem to get my head that far up my ass.



Hendy discussing dugcarr1

I don't think Dug has broken any rules.

People wish Dug to be banned because he is a pain in the ass. But his words do not merit a banning.

quotes from dugcarr1 showing admitance

dugcarr1 wrote:i didnt break any rules.

but maby u should take EVERY one of my points and give them to blitz, then i could start at zero.

i would not protest that

dugcarr1 wrote:oh , u guys..


i said i didnt deny it. i didnt say those were my exact words, and they could have be easily been changed.



and do u guys really not think i woulda thought that there was about a 90% chance killroy woulda told blitz?
.

It's easy to give my account access to the mods to prove that your words were not changed.

dugcarr1 wrote:1) i do not deny it.


2) how would that be cheating?
.

Beastly wrote:

hendy wrote:
Did I ever say that it was okay? And yes capt did do soemthing wrong. He played along with dugcar1 to get more shit out of him to get him him more in trouble. RETARD

Like i said before moron PROVE IT!!


and how do you know so much? were you in on the whole thing hendy?

Wow how many speds are on this site? Look on the pms capt could have just said no I dont want to do this I am rpeorting you. Instead he said okay sure I wont tell anyone. And I know so much because blitz and I had a 20 pm discussion about it, I've seen all the pms dug sent capt

And can anyone please tell me where in the rules it says"you cannot pay anyone to make someone else lose games". Dug did not at all cheat. Please lock this thread

STOP THE MADNESS !!

Wow, you know I have been sitting back and laughing at this all, now to tell the truth I feel a little for blitz HOWEVER I do not know all the history. Frankly I dont care what blitz and dugcarr have between them, heck it may all be strategy ( probably not of course but hey?) Now the mods said they are discussing the issue so let them discuss it and see what unfolds from there. I personally think Dugcarr is great for the site...he adds the rebel factor with alot of entertainment which I enjoy , and to tell the truth I am a little partial as he taught me how to play this damn game!!! And I have done very well since leaving as his wingman. Now instead of many uninformed people bantering back and forth let the mods do what they wish....I am not here to make any enemies ( or friends for that matter) however I would like to go on record and say I am on Duggcarr's side on this one. Now you guys are talking multiple banning? What the hell....then I walk with dugcarr as well...at least I can go back to 16 hours of poker a day and not this damn place !!

-Sub-

--EDIT-- Actually after calming down a bit I guess I only have a problem with beastly wanting to ban others as well...whatever like I said let the mods do what they may.

^
He's right you know - what would we get all worked up about if he left, the stupid fucking asshole - see - it's fun to get angry at him for doing so many fucking stupid things!

subjekt wrote:STOP THE MADNESS !!

Wow, you know I have been sitting back and laughing at this all, now to tell the truth I feel a little for blitz HOWEVER I do not know all the history. Frankly I dont care what blitz and dugcarr have between them, heck it may all be strategy ( probably not of course but hey?) Now the mods said they are discussing the issue so let them discuss it and see what unfolds from there. I personally think Dugcarr is great for the site...he adds the rebel factor with alot of entertainment which I enjoy , and to tell the truth I am a little partial as he taught me how to play this damn game!!! And I have done very well since leaving as his wingman. Now instead of many uninformed people bantering back and forth let the mods do what they wish....I am not here to make any enemies ( or friends for that matter) however I would like to go on record and say I am on Duggcarr's side on this one. Now you guys are talking multiple banning? What the hell....then I walk with dugcarr as well...at least I can go back to 16 hours of poker a day and not this damn place !!

-Sub-

--EDIT-- Actually after calming down a bit I guess I only have a problem with beastly wanting to ban others as well...whatever like I said let the mods do what they may.

very well spoken. Dugcar better not leave mods.

this has been quite an interesting thread

Aries wrote:this has been quite an interesting thread

heres a summary for everyone just joining us, blitz is a bitch

thats all

GrazingCattle wrote:

qeee1 wrote:

Also I thought you rogue statists were anarchists, yet here you are trying to suggest curtailing free speech out of support for authority.

Rogue state is against the norm. Most people feel that it is their right to complain. thus that is the norm. I am here standing against that!

First of all campaigning against the norm (as a general policy) is silly for obvious reasons, that I'm too lazy to go into. Second of all, given it's 3568 views versus 168 posts, posting to complain is obviously not the norm.

Capt Killroy wrote:quotes from dugcarr1 showing admitance

Dugg's admitted to what's been said, several times, no one's disputing that... but it isn't explicitly against the rules.

if civilization (or any aspect thereof) was based on everything being explicitly stated in the rules, society wouldn't function. dugcarr1 is obviously a little, little man if he needs to strategize so extensively in order to pursue a petty feud with blitz. I don't give two shits whether he gets banned or not, here, but I'm sure whatever the mods come up with will solve the problem just fine. But arguing that anything that isn't explicitly stated in the rules is cool is just silly.

He may not have "technically" broken any of the current CC rules, but that does not mean that he didn't do anything wrong.
It's obvious to any ethical human being that his actions were unacceptable and should have consequences.

Colossus wrote:if civilization (or any aspect thereof) was based on everything being explicitly stated in the rules, society wouldn't function. dugcarr1 is obviously a little, little man if he needs to strategize so extensively in order to pursue a petty feud with blitz. I don't give two shits whether he gets banned or not, here, but I'm sure whatever the mods come up with will solve the problem just fine. But arguing that anything that isn't explicitly stated in the rules is cool is just silly.

Actually I think you'll find most of the judicial systems in the world are based on following the rules to the letter, hence why we have so many fucking draftsmen and lawyers and such. My point is it's not clear that he broke any rules, in my opinion he didn't break any of the rules. Explicit was perhaps the wrong word to use on my part, but you can see what I'm saying.


The only reason he should be sanctioned is the part that says

proactive measures are employed to enforce fair-play.

but some people seem to think it is fair game to do what he did. On that the mods can decide whatever they want. You guys though should be arguing that point, not constantly asking for a ban because dug is a "little, little man".

It's obvious to any ethical human being that his actions were unacceptable and should have consequences.

Some people seem to disagree.

Colossus wrote:I don't give two shits whether he gets banned or not,

wow You dont give 2 shits! You must really mean it!!!!!!

those would be the unethical humans who disagree qeee1