Conquer Club

Juan_Bottom wrote:One thing that I learned very quickly after joining CC and entering the OT forums was that the Atheists of the world own this forum.

My suspicion is that they have slapped the sh*t out of so many that this forum today is largely one sided.

Juan_Bottom wrote:Atheists are the smart ones.

jsholty4690 wrote:I'll throw my two cents in, even though it won't make a dent in any conversation.

I'm morally against gay marriage. I think its a sin and well everything else you've heard against it before. But, here comes the contravesy in my mind, I'm a strict Constitutionalist and looking at gay marriage, I think it is unconstitutional to deny them the same rights as heterosexuals. So although its against every single of my beliefs, I think gay marriage should be legal.

One more thing, I think the voters voices should be heard. I don't think that activist judges should make the decsion of whether or not a state should legalize gay marriage. I think it should be up to the populas.

What I think should happen is that all the states should hold referendums to vote on whether or not their state should have gay marriage or not (such as California, Vermont, and others). And both sides should not try to overturn the results, via the courts, like the gay rights activists did in California last year.

Snorri1234 wrote:

Burrito wrote:

Snorri1234 wrote:

Burrito wrote:I looks to me like you liberals are getting way outvoted. I just wish that all those intelligent people out there would actually say stuff in the forums.

Yeah strangely we already saw that a few pages into this thread. We concluded that those who said no weren't actually intelligent people but brainwashed morons who's computer-savvy makes them able to vote on a topic and nothing else. Since none of them stepped up to dispute that it's a fairly safe assumption.

Or maybe they have better things to do than to argue with some guy who lives a thousand miles away, and whom they will never convince of anything because said person does not consider what they have to say, they just automatically disagree with it. I honestly have nothing better to do while I am working on my homework, so I am on here a lot.

I have already considered what they have to say. I concluded that they're talking out of their ass. I grew tired of arguing with morons who instead of reading up on a topic just post whatever they heard from a homeless man standing outside wallmart.

Read this thread. Seriously read it. After that you can post about how homosexuality is unnatural or whatever (like cooking food and driving cars is) but I simply don't have any interest in responding to someone who brings up points which have been shown to be irrational and contradictory in this very thread.

jsholty4690 wrote:I'll throw my two cents in, even though it won't make a dent in any conversation.

I'm morally against gay marriage. I think its a sin and well everything else you've heard against it before. But, here comes the contravesy in my mind, I'm a strict Constitutionalist and looking at gay marriage, I think it is unconstitutional to deny them the same rights as heterosexuals. So although its against every single of my beliefs, I think gay marriage should be legal.

One more thing, I think the voters voices should be heard. I don't think that activist judges should make the decsion of whether or not a state should legalize gay marriage. I think it should be up to the populas.

What I think should happen is that all the states should hold referendums to vote on whether or not their state should have gay marriage or not (such as California, Vermont, and others). And both sides should not try to overturn the results, via the courts, like the gay rights activists did in California last year.