Conquer Club

This all goes back to the age old suggestion of "no dice" games.

I for one would love to have an option where I don't get rammed in the arse by dice every game i play.

Starting using Dominating12.com the other day, dice are a hell of a lot different & as of yet, I haven't received any unquestionable random!

Agent 86 wrote:For me it's the No.2..not a good number to roll the most in either attack or defense.

same here...number 2. That's considered crap in most languages.

However, my average is 3.50 overall. Still, pretty crappy dice.

AslanTheKing wrote:can u see the naked woman in my avatar?
its like a hidden mona lisa.

I jerk off to your avatar every time I see it.

I believe the discrepancy for dice "1" rolls lies in the behavior of risk attacks.

A roll of a "1" on an individual die by an attacker will more likely result in the loss of an attacking troop. This reduces the chance of a future attack. A stack of 4 attackers versus a stack of 20 defenders has the possibility of rolling "6" 30 times, but can only roll "1" a maximum of 4 times.

jwiedlin wrote:I believe the discrepancy for dice "1" rolls lies in the behavior of risk attacks.

A roll of a "1" on an individual die by an attacker will more likely result in the loss of an attacking troop. This reduces the chance of a future attack. A stack of 4 attackers versus a stack of 20 defenders has the possibility of rolling "6" 30 times, but can only roll "1" a maximum of 4 times.

No. While your first sentence is correct -- rolling a 1 does make you less likely to attack next than rolling a 6 -- the distribution is theoretically independent of what has previously happened. If I roll ten winning battles in a row, I'm just as likely to roll a 1 in the next roll as a 6. The problem is indeed that the dice were drawn from a non-uniform distribution.