Page 49 of 65
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:41 pm
by for dummies
Yes i never did feel good about the wicked. Too many excuses from all party's.
Vote:Xenhu
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:15 pm
by spinwizard
unvote
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:28 pm
by The1exile
I'll vote X if his defence doesn't convince me.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 3:22 pm
by dcowboys055
One thing about xen, if he was to be lynched and turn up mafia, wicked/replacement would probably be next. And if he ends up townie, wicked/replacement would be for the most part, cleared.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 3:24 pm
by Anarkistsdream
dcowboys055 wrote:One thing about xen, if he was to be lynched and turn up mafia, wicked/replacement would probably be next. And if he ends up townie, wicked/replacement would be for the most part, cleared.
Excellent point.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 4:28 pm
by wicked
OK guys, my situation has changed, and I can play again. Sorry for the confusion, I had a real life emergency to deal with, but it's been resolved now thankfully. Auto had not found a replacement yet, so said I could just resume again. I need to go back and catch up, as well as catch up on the eating and sleeping I had not been doing for the past week. So bear with me, I know we're close to the deadline.
All I have to say about Xenhu is he knew the word ordinary. that part about not initially knowing it was 7 words does look very suspicious though. should we ask him the WC? I doubt we can even trust that though, as it's been revealed little bit by little bit. Anyone smart enough could piece it together most likely.
So... I'd be more likely to want to lynch a low-poster, submarine type player, but I don't have the time to see who that is yet. I will try to read through this all tonight as quickly as possible. Right now I need to catch up on my real work I haven't been doing for a week.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 4:33 pm
by hecter
Okay wicked. Sorry about your emergency. Hope everything is okay. And I will watch some more before I vote anybody, though Xen is suspicious…
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 4:33 pm
by autoload
Vote Count
4 XenHu(trestain, moz976, Anarkistsdream, for dummies)
1 dcowboys055(wicked)
8 Not Voting (XenHu, Fircoal, The1exile, dcowboys055, Incandenza, vgmmaster, Minkish, spinwizard)
With 13 alive it takes 7 to Lynch!
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 5:30 pm
by Minkish
Just so everyone knows, I'm having a bit of a family crisis at the moment, so if I don't post a lot, that is why. I'm still going to play, but right now I have other priorities that need to come first.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 5:51 pm
by Anarkistsdream
wicked wrote:So... I'd be more likely to want to lynch a low-poster, submarine type player
As opposed to lynching her ACCOMPLICE!!!
Unvote: XenHu
Vote: Wicked
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 5:55 pm
by hecter
I think that you are parinoid dude. Calm down.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:01 pm
by wicked
Ank, give me a break.

If I appear scummy to you, than it's obvious you haven't played this game that much. Scum don't put themselves center stage, prodding all the players, looking for clues/tells.
I went ahead and caught up now since we're so close to the deadline, and because I foresee myself sleeping a LOT tonight. There's a couple people who haven't posted that much, but I need to go back and look at their posts in isolation.
For now, I'm going to
FOS Fircola, Exile & VGM/Hector.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:13 pm
by Incandenza
hecter wrote:Okay wicked. Sorry about your emergency. Hope everything is okay. And I will watch some more before I vote anybody, though Xen is suspicious…
Well, while you're watching, I would assume that you've gone back and read the staggering amount of pages preceding your arrival. Any thoughts or theories?
Oh, and wb wicked.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:34 pm
by hecter
I haven't really had much time to post on this thread, because of the fact that I have only been in this game for two days. But you are right in the fact that scum GENERALLY don't go prodding players looking for clues. Anyways, I would like to see what exile has to say about the FOS.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:45 pm
by wicked
Hecter, you're not in a good spot as some of us were suspicious of vgm, and therefore naturally transfer that to you. Good luck catching up though. Thanks for hopping in so quickly.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:54 pm
by Incandenza
Anarkistsdream wrote:wicked wrote:So... I'd be more likely to want to lynch a low-poster, submarine type player
As opposed to lynching her ACCOMPLICE!!!
Unvote: XenHu
Vote: Wicked
AD, wicked knew a particular bit of info about the WC that would have been pretty tricksy to get right were she not privy to it in the first place. At this point I'm inclined to believe that wicked is town. Of course, for the 80th time, the WC isn't everything, but the info she knew had a reasonably high degree of difficulty, and if she'd been wrong, MB would've nailed her. More to the point, she wouldn't have pointed the zero code out to us yesterday. Either way, wicked is not very suspicious-looking right now. Our several (relative) submarines are.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:55 pm
by Anarkistsdream
Incandenza wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:wicked wrote:So... I'd be more likely to want to lynch a low-poster, submarine type player
As opposed to lynching her ACCOMPLICE!!!
Unvote: XenHu
Vote: Wicked
AD, wicked knew a particular bit of info about the WC that would have been pretty tricksy to get right were she not privy to it in the first place. At this point I'm inclined to believe that wicked is town. Of course, for the 80th time, the WC isn't everything, but the info she knew had a reasonably high degree of difficulty, and if she'd been wrong, MB would've nailed her. More to the point, she wouldn't have pointed the zero code out to us yesterday. Either way, wicked is not very suspicious-looking right now. Our several (relative) submarines are.
And submarines should be replaced...
Until then, the vote stays.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 7:01 pm
by wicked
wow you are dense Ank. Submariners usually tend to have a high probability of being scum... THAT is why we target them.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 7:03 pm
by Fircoal
wicked wrote:Ank, give me a break.

If I appear scummy to you, than it's obvious you haven't played this game that much. Scum don't put themselves center stage, prodding all the players, looking for clues/tells.
I went ahead and caught up now since we're so close to the deadline, and because I foresee myself sleeping a LOT tonight. There's a couple people who haven't posted that much, but I need to go back and look at their posts in isolation.
For now, I'm going to
FOS Fircola, Exile & VGM/Hector.

I've been posting somewhat. I'm pretty sure that some other people have been posting less.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 7:04 pm
by Fircoal
wicked wrote:wow you are dense Ank. Submariners usually tend to have a high probability of being scum... THAT is why we target them.
That is true, they're called Lurkers in that case. Know what's going on but don't want to help and don't post.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 7:05 pm
by Anarkistsdream
wicked wrote:wow you are dense Ank. Submariners usually tend to have a high probability of being scum... THAT is why we target them.
And you have a high probability of twisting words to mean whatever you need them to at the time... It's one vote, Wicked... Chill out.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 7:20 pm
by wicked
LMAO!! you think I'm disagreeing with you b/c you voted me? LMAO!!! too funny. I'm not worried about a vote, especially yours.
Fircola, I'm used to seeing long elaborate posts from you, I'm not sure if I'm seeing that this game. Like I said, I need to go back and check. I'm a bit brainfried ATM, forgive me.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 7:37 pm
by Fircoal
wicked wrote:LMAO!! you think I'm disagreeing with you b/c you voted me? LMAO!!! too funny. I'm not worried about a vote, especially yours.
Fircola, I'm used to seeing long elaborate posts from you, I'm not sure if I'm seeing that this game. Like I said, I need to go back and check. I'm a bit brainfried ATM, forgive me.
I don't think my posts are usually that long, but usually I do post a lot more. But I think I've been posting more lately.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 7:47 pm
by Anarkistsdream
wicked wrote:LMAO!! you think I'm disagreeing with you b/c you voted me? LMAO!!! too funny. I'm not worried about a vote, especially yours.
Fircola, I'm used to seeing long elaborate posts from you, I'm not sure if I'm seeing that this game. Like I said, I need to go back and check. I'm a bit brainfried ATM, forgive me.
Ouch, that was fairly demeaning...
And, yes, I think you ARE worried about a vote. I still have no reason to blindly trust you like everyone else, no matter whether you are good or not.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:12 pm
by Incandenza
Anarkistsdream wrote:wicked wrote:LMAO!! you think I'm disagreeing with you b/c you voted me? LMAO!!! too funny. I'm not worried about a vote, especially yours.
Fircola, I'm used to seeing long elaborate posts from you, I'm not sure if I'm seeing that this game. Like I said, I need to go back and check. I'm a bit brainfried ATM, forgive me.
Ouch, that was fairly demeaning...
And, yes, I think you ARE worried about a vote.
I still have no reason to blindly trust you like everyone else, no matter whether you are good or not.
Emphasis added.
The point is that we're not blindly trusting her. Blindly trusting wicked is about as safe as blindly trusting a rabid wolverine that just smoked a big bag of crack.
It's not blind trust, it's conditional and provisional trust, based on information that she provided to MB and subsequently revealed to the rest of us.
Believe me, I'm abjectly terrified of the prospect of wicked as mafia. But the probability of that is pretty low, given the information we have at hand.