2010 FIFA World Cup
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
- the.killing.44
- Posts: 4724
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 7:43 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: now tell me what got two gums and knows how to spit rhymes
- Contact:
Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup
1000th reply!
Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup
grifftron wrote:nagerous wrote:Well, some of the crowd are on the pitch
Look at that nasty mullet! It will be a fun game.
-griff
Forget the lads of '66, it's all about the lads of '90 who will be forever be immortalised by that song.

Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup
IF MEXICO LOSES I SHAVE MY HEAD.
MEXICO!! MEXICO!!
MEXICO!! MEXICO!!
el cartoncito mas triste del mundo
Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup
Higuainnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! BEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAST

- edwinissweet
- Posts: 1342
- Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 7:59 pm
- Location: cozumel
- Night Strike
- Posts: 8512
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:52 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup
I guess FIFA soccer is the only sport where 3 competitive teams are on the court/field at the same time. They should get rid of the headsets if they aren't going to make correct calls.
- obliterationX
- Posts: 953
- Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 1:52 pm
- Gender: Female
- Location: Yeah
Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup
It's an embarrassment to the sport that human error on the part of the referree can decide the game as much as it can/already has.
Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup
Well the quality of viewing for us has increased greatly and all the angles have. There has always been big human error, so we should try to kind of fixx that. Now that we have the technology it's ridiculous that they don't even consider it.

Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup
AT least neither of today's blown goal/no-goal calls haven't been deciders (yet).
- edwinissweet
- Posts: 1342
- Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 7:59 pm
- Location: cozumel
Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup
parker4s wrote:TEVEZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ I dont care if it was offside.
f*ck YOU COCKBREATH. I DON'T CARE IF YOUR MOM IS A WHORE.
el cartoncito mas triste del mundo
Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup
Haha just watch it buddy
. Dude it doesnt even matter if we beat u by more than one.

Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup
Timminz wrote:AT least neither of today's blown goal/no-goal calls haven't been deciders (yet).
are you kidding? that totally fucked up the players' minds.
the same happened with england.
el cartoncito mas triste del mundo
Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup
parker4s wrote:Haha just watch it buddy. Dude it doesnt even matter if we beat u by more than one.
f*ck you idiot
el cartoncito mas triste del mundo
Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup
I think you should really cool down buddy. We dont want this thread to be locked because of flames and baits. How do u think i as an American felt in Slovenia and Algeria game. It stinks but deal with it cooly

- the.killing.44
- Posts: 4724
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 7:43 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: now tell me what got two gums and knows how to spit rhymes
- Contact:
Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup
nietzsche wrote:you better shut the f*ck up now
Let him have his threesome with Ronaldo and Messi
- obliterationX
- Posts: 953
- Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 1:52 pm
- Gender: Female
- Location: Yeah
Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup
Timminz wrote:AT least neither of today's blown goal/no-goal calls haven't been deciders (yet).
Trust me to throw this into the mix being an Englishman, but although I appreciate how poor England's performance was, the momentum from drawing level 2-2 could have proved pivotal and would most likely have swung the game in England's favour. Regardless, these kinds of decision don't really need to happen. In his interview, Frank Lampard states that had the goal been rightfully given, it would have affected the teams totally.
It's just not necessary that a goal as blatent as Frank Lampard's should have been disallowed. It was a goal, and would have changed the game, not just because the teams would have gone in 2-2 at half time.
Last edited by obliterationX on Sun Jun 27, 2010 2:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup
the.killing.44 wrote:nietzsche wrote:you better shut the f*ck up now
Let him have his threesome with Ronaldo and Messi
*shivers* Man...........

Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup
obliterationX wrote:Timminz wrote:AT least neither of today's blown goal/no-goal calls haven't been deciders (yet).
Trust me to throw this into the mix being an Englishman, but although I appreciate how poor England's performance was, the momentum from drawing level 2-2 could have proved pivotal and would most likely have swung the game in England's favour. Regardless, these kinds of decision don't really need to happen. In his interview, Frank Lampard states that had the goal been rightfully given, it would have affected the teams totally.
It's just not necessary that a goal as blatent as Frank Lampard's should have been disallowed. It was a goal, and would have changed the game, not just because the teams would have gone in 2-2 at half time.
Just like the U.S goals would have changed the group a lot. But We won it and screwed ourselves against Ghana. Germany was the better team but i totally agree it changes the whole mentallity of the game.


