Page 5 of 7

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:27 pm
by The Fuzzy Pengui
hecter wrote:Great mod you are... With the text underneath, it brings fruitcakes signature to a grand total of 160 pixels. ownens I'm not sure...

Apologies hecter, I just looked at Owens (which didn't have text), and knew FC had the same...I didn't pay attention to whether or not FC had text underneath, or not.

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:29 pm
by timmytuttut88
owenshooter wrote:twill outlined it pretty clearly, and i don't really think you can argue with his decision. he stated the reasons very clearly and concisely.

No he didn't. T-o-m said himself in livechat when he got the warning it never said the post he had spammed or flamed in. It just said he had spammed and flamed.

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:30 pm
by LFAW
Frop wrote:You've proven time and time again that you're not the most perceptive person around, so please allow me to remind you that I'm not particularly bothered whether or not people like me on a forum.

I would however like to urge you to seek professional help as you're clearly very much concerned with how people perceive you on the internet. You shouldn't be ashamed though, you are definitely not the only person who feels insecure about his/her sexuality.

Occupation: Super Sexy Person, Dice Charmer and Sex God


And yet again you've proven that you also have no sense of humour along with your lack of brain cells.

So what is really inside that strange shaped head of yours? Its not wit, its not humour, its not intelligence so i'm guessing either a vast emptiness or just a sense of longing for a social life?

Right? Don't be ashamed to admit it, we're all friends here.

I wonder who's really in need of professional help ;)

Oh and to keep on topic. I Miss Tom :(

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:30 pm
by Frop
cena-rules wrote:yeah it probably is paranoia but if you compare t-o-m to frop they are about equal and only one of them is posting in here

07:24:08 ‹cena-rules› frop is a flaming baitiing little wanker

I guess you solved your own thread, genius.

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:31 pm
by hecter
owenshooter wrote:
hecter wrote:No, but if somebody only got 8 warnings, two of which were for signature infractions, they shouldn't be permabanned.

well, thankfully you are an admin and can correct this error... oh, wait... oops... seriously, twill outlined it pretty clearly, and i don't really think you can argue with his decision. he stated the reasons very clearly and concisely. t-o-m can still post in his clan forum and can still play games and can still order CC t-shirts from the CC Store, so he will be ok.-0

No, he can't post in any forum. It is a forum ban after all. I can also argue with Twill all I want. Doesn't mean it'll change anything, but I'll still argue. Also, slight correction, 3 of his warnings would be for signatures, as one of his ban was a signature ban, and another was a duplicate ban.
The Fuzzy Pengui wrote:
hecter wrote:Great mod you are... With the text underneath, it brings fruitcakes signature to a grand total of 160 pixels. ownens I'm not sure...

Apologies hecter, I just looked at Owens (which didn't have text), and knew FC had the same...I didn't pay attention to whether or not FC had text underneath, or not.

It *had* a quote by Twill underneath, which he appears to have edited out. Would you like me to PM you if I see any further signature infractions? As I do see them constantly around the forums...

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:33 pm
by DaGip
t-o-m is a good chap. Sorry to hear that the nazi mods struck again...but t-o-m knew it was coming a while ago. Oh well. I got t-o-m's email, as long as he can still play games, that's cool. I would rather have him in the forums though. Some of you people treat these forums like they are fucking made of goddamn gold or something! Give us break and lighten the <mod edit>

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:38 pm
by Frop
LFAW wrote:And yet again you've proven that you also have no sense of humour along with your lack of brain cells.

So what is really inside that strange shaped head of yours? Its not wit, its not humour, its not intelligence so i'm guessing either a vast emptiness or just a sense of longing for a social life?

Right? Don't be ashamed to admit it, we're all friends here.

I wonder who's really in need of professional help ;)

Oh and to keep on topic. I Miss Tom :(

Look champ, I did you a favour by pretending to be baited the first time around. It's just not worth writing a proper reply when you keep coming up with crap like that. Try harder.

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:40 pm
by timmytuttut88
Frop wrote:Timmy - I hate to break it to you, but a lot of people thought t-o-m was an annoying retard. You're just blinded by your love for little British boys with severe brain damage.

Yes, you and owenshooter. Who hardly even talked to the guy....

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:43 pm
by LFAW
Frop wrote:Look champ, I did you a favour by pretending to be baited the first time around. It's just not worth writing a proper reply when you keep coming up with crap like that. Try harder.


Champ? :lol: Are you in an old peoples home? Geez must have been born in the 30's...

Soon you'll be saying 'Whoopsie Daisy!' and have a heart attack over the fact that Hitler is going to come and occupy your little country. WWII is over gramps get with the times.

On topic: Its a shame that he had to be banned, he had so many projects on work (tournaments and madagascar). A real shame...

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:49 pm
by RjBeals
Too bad. He kind of grew on me. He always posted positive feedback in my map threads.

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:54 pm
by timmytuttut88
RjBeals wrote:Too bad. He kind of grew on me. He always posted positive feedback in my map threads.

He had a bad side though! I mean look at this post! He got a warning from it! What a bad person! No wonder he was forum banned!

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=276&t=62280

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 8:33 pm
by Incandenza
RjBeals wrote:Too bad. He kind of grew on me. He always posted positive feedback in my map threads.


I'm with RJ. I'm not the world's biggest tom fan, but he was a solid contributor to the foundry (in an era where solid contributors are far too few).

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:40 pm
by owenshooter
timmytuttut88 wrote:Yes, you and owenshooter. Who hardly even talked to the guy....

wait, why am i being lumped in here? i have never said a bad word about t-o-m and enjoyed him in the forums. i made fun of his sig, period. timmy, you always jump to conclusions which are baseless... can you please discuss t-o-m and his ban, and not what you believe to be my feelings toward him? if you want to know something i think, try pm'ing me, before you post garbage which is not true.-0

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:51 pm
by Scott-Land
Incandenza wrote:
RjBeals wrote:Too bad. He kind of grew on me. He always posted positive feedback in my map threads.


I'm with RJ. I'm not the world's biggest tom fan, but he was a solid contributor to the foundry (in an era where solid contributors are far too few).


I liked Tom as well, from skimming the posts it seems to be irrelevant. I'm sure he did break forum guidelines but to be completely banned. Wow...
I didn't notice any totally awful posts by him- a lot were helpful. I could name a couple that are worse offenders.

As what Incand said, a big contributor to the Map Foundry. 'It's a shame that it had to come to this....

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 10:47 pm
by timmytuttut88
owenshooter wrote:
timmytuttut88 wrote:Yes, you and owenshooter. Who hardly even talked to the guy....

wait, why am i being lumped in here? i have never said a bad word about t-o-m and enjoyed him in the forums. i made fun of his sig, period. timmy, you always jump to conclusions which are baseless... can you please discuss t-o-m and his ban, and not what you believe to be my feelings toward him? if you want to know something i think, try pm'ing me, before you post garbage which is not true.-0


He hangs in IK and you hang in GD.
I've never seen you two post talking to each other.
You've never played any games with each other.
Not in the same clans.

That was my base.

Now if what I said is not true, feel free to post any PMs or topics where you guys were talking to each other. I mean I can't say i'm always right. Who knows maybe i'm wrong and you guys talk a lot...

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 11:30 pm
by owenshooter
timmytuttut88 wrote:
Now if what I said is not true, feel free to post any PMs or topics where you guys were talking to each other. I mean I can't say i'm always right. Who knows maybe i'm wrong and you guys talk a lot...

against the rules to post PM's... but nice try... and i have yet to say a bad thing about him, just the bad spelling gaffe in his clan sig. he got himself banned, i had nothing to do with it, and i have never said a bad thing about him. OH THE HUMANITY!!!!-0

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 11:32 pm
by Kegeratorist
Is that you Tom?
mod edit, link removed

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 11:49 pm
by timmytuttut88
owenshooter wrote:
timmytuttut88 wrote:
Now if what I said is not true, feel free to post any PMs or topics where you guys were talking to each other. I mean I can't say i'm always right. Who knows maybe i'm wrong and you guys talk a lot...

against the rules to post PM's... but nice try... and i have yet to say a bad thing about him, just the bad spelling gaffe in his clan sig. he got himself banned, i had nothing to do with it, and i have never said a bad thing about him. OH THE HUMANITY!!!!-0

Well then I guess I was right...you guys haven't talked much. It's not against the rules to post PMs.

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 11:50 pm
by timmytuttut88
Kegeratorist wrote:Is that you Tom?
mod edit, link removed

Oh please, this better not be tom

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 12:03 am
by Simon Viavant
Ok, this time the mods have gone too far. Wicked and suggs and lion actually did something to deserve it, and I like wicked and suggs but I'll admit their bans were justified. All the others were banned before I joined, but it seems their bans were also justified. This is just uncalled for. He got 3 bans and five warnings (not counting sig infringements), and his main misdeeds are flaming outside of FW now and then, which everyone does, plus baiting ans spamming, which the mods can't even define. Who are they gonna ban next? Snorri? DM?

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 12:06 am
by timmytuttut88
Simon Viavant wrote:Ok, this time the mods have gone too far. Wicked and suggs and lion actually did something to deserve it, and I like wicked and suggs but I'll admit their bans were justified. All the others were banned before I joined, but it seems their bans were also justified. This is just uncalled for. He got 3 bans and five warnings (not counting sig infringements), and his main misdeeds are flaming outside of FW now and then, which everyone does, plus baiting ans spamming, which the mods can't even define. Who are they gonna ban next? Snorri? DM?

No 6 warnings actually, but still it really isn't fair. He even got a ban and warning for rick rolling. Also a warning for typing grazie in the italian language forum when he didn't speak italian.

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 12:41 am
by owenshooter
Kegeratorist wrote:Is that you Tom?
mod edit, link removed

hey, wicked!!! nice to see you still around!-0

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 2:24 am
by lord voldemort
Optimus Prime wrote:Because of course it has nothing to do with the behavior of multiple members of your clan? No, of course not. Don't be naive cena-rules, you know as well as everyone else here that several members of your clan can be listed as baiting, flaming, and being general nuisances across the forums.

i shouldnt have gone to work today...
whats that supposed to mean opie...
yer tom got his warnings...but its the degree
sure cc's current things is to ban for the lil things and the bans increase the more you get. which is fair enuf.
however they need a evaluation...what actually deserves a ban....a sig too big..come on thats pathetic.
spamming out of a spam thread...
im still yet to see a mod define spam.. (not to mention like 1 in 5 threads get off topic...they cant all be tom?)
the whole banning warning system needs to be fixed, i know for a fact owen lets all his warnings filter out of his inbox :roll:

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 2:41 am
by owenshooter
lord voldemort wrote: i know for a fact owen lets all his warnings filter out of his inbox :roll:

mention number 45 for me in this thread, despite the thread being about t-o-m!!! keep trying to throw me under the bus, too... one big difference, i heed my warnings and adhere to the rules as closely as i can... thanks LV!!! gone less than 24 hours out of the BpB and you try to throw me under the bus, wow...-0

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 2:46 am
by lord voldemort
owenshooter wrote:
lord voldemort wrote: i know for a fact owen lets all his warnings filter out of his inbox :roll:

mention number 45 for me in this thread, despite the thread being about t-o-m!!! keep trying to throw me under the bus, too... one big difference, i heed my warnings and adhere to the rules as closely as i can... thanks LV!!! gone less than 24 hours out of the BpB and you try to throw me under the bus, wow...-0

who says i threw you under a bus...stay on track owen...
i a staying on topic talking about the terrible standards of the banning system... :roll: