Page 5 of 5

Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (23) - S&M (15)

Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2019 6:11 pm
by betiko
4 it is!

Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (23) - S&M (15)

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 2:35 am
by betiko
3!

ok, there are at least 3 games that we are cleaning up, even if it's not completely official... back to the finals!
Good war S&M, I guess we were more often than you guys on the lucky side this time.

FOED get ready!

Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (25) - S&M (16)

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 11:56 am
by Donelladan
As betiko said, it's not "official" yet but LHDD got 28 wins secured.
Final score should be between 28-27 and 32-23.

Some words may have been exchanged but well, we're both highly competitive, nothing wrong with that.
That put aside I've had a log of highly competitive game, and really enjoyed the war.

Couldn't have expected a better result for our first war and really proud to become the 3rd clan to defeat S&M in a regular war !

Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (25) - S&M (16)

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 3:45 pm
by benga
You mean 4th?

Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (25) - S&M (16)

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 3:51 pm
by Donelladan
I thought only FALL and TOFU defeated S&M.
Which war am I missing ?

Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (25) - S&M (16)

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 3:55 pm
by Mad777
OSA en RL7

Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (25) - S&M (16)

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 4:41 pm
by betiko
Donelladan wrote:I thought only FALL and TOFU defeated S&M.
Which war am I missing ?


It made me have a look, and no, just the 2 you mentionned. I looked quickly though. Their record says 5 losses, 4 against tofu 1 against fall? Damn i'm lazy to recheck, but those league skirmish results are a pain in the ass in the middle the war results. I've said it before but there should be some sort of tabs that could classify results by competition or something. Or just put a simple colour code... something! This is just unreadable as it is.

Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (25) - S&M (16)

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 5:24 pm
by rockfist
I’m pretty sure we are 3-3 against them so you have one wrong.

Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (25) - S&M (16)

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 6:17 pm
by MTIceman41
Lhdd played well and are focused. They deserve the win. There are 4 games which were utterly botched by S&M that were the difference.

I like French wine, cheese, culture, and women...but same goes for Italian and American as well. GL LHDD in the finals you earned it...zabeast I still love you ;)

Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (25) - S&M (16)

Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2019 1:58 pm
by IcePack
betiko wrote:
Donelladan wrote:I thought only FALL and TOFU defeated S&M.
Which war am I missing ?


It made me have a look, and no, just the 2 you mentionned. I looked quickly though. Their record says 5 losses, 4 against tofu 1 against fall? Damn i'm lazy to recheck, but those league skirmish results are a pain in the ass in the middle the war results. I've said it before but there should be some sort of tabs that could classify results by competition or something. Or just put a simple colour code... something! This is just unreadable as it is.


You can filter out league results by going to clan war tab instead of clan tab, and using drop down and selecting S&M. You can also filter by league on the clan league tab I believe, but not by event for wars.

Ties aren’t marked as wins or loses, S&M has 30 wins, and one tie vs G1.

But the issue lies within https://www.conquerclub.com/public.php? ... nWarId=203. From back in the KORT days of controversy.
But this dates back to chemefreak even, he marked that war as a tie due to its controversial end (I know cuz I inquired about the discrepancy when I took over the database).

However the score being marked as 1-1 is new not sure who / when that changed (after I left), before it was a confusing entry cuz it showed KORT win via score, but was manually entered as a tie. So over ridden the system.

That’s the one win not marked as a win. Otherwise, S&M/KORT have one loss vs FALL, and 3 vs TOFU. 4 losses, and one weird entry that’s been that way forever.

——

Anyway came to congratulate LHDD =D> Good luck in the Finals

Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (25) - S&M (16)

Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2019 5:43 pm
by Doc_Brown
IcePack wrote:But the issue lies within https://www.conquerclub.com/public.php? ... nWarId=203. From back in the KORT days of controversy.
But this dates back to chemefreak even, he marked that war as a tie due to its controversial end (I know cuz I inquired about the discrepancy when I took over the database).

However the score being marked as 1-1 is new not sure who / when that changed (after I left), before it was a confusing entry cuz it showed KORT win via score, but was manually entered as a tie. So over ridden the system.

It's been that way for several years. That is definitely not a recent change. I think there are a couple other oddities in the war register with wars that had some issues associated with them that were manually reset to 1-1 as the logged score.

Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (25) - S&M (16)

Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2019 5:59 pm
by IcePack
Doc_Brown wrote:
IcePack wrote:But the issue lies within https://www.conquerclub.com/public.php? ... nWarId=203. From back in the KORT days of controversy.
But this dates back to chemefreak even, he marked that war as a tie due to its controversial end (I know cuz I inquired about the discrepancy when I took over the database).

However the score being marked as 1-1 is new not sure who / when that changed (after I left), before it was a confusing entry cuz it showed KORT win via score, but was manually entered as a tie. So over ridden the system.

It's been that way for several years. That is definitely not a recent change. I think there are a couple other oddities in the war register with wars that had some issues associated with them that were manually reset to 1-1 as the logged score.


Interesting, news to me. I don’t remember ever having that discussion / changing it. I know it’s been marked as a tie forever, but the physical 1-1 score I thought was different. Doesn’t matter really, the impact (30/35) is the same / the reason for the discrepancy which Isn’t a new thing.

Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (26) - S&M (20)

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 12:34 am
by emilywink
i know i botched one game, and think i could have had better strategy as a leader in the other. but very well fought war by you guys.

congrats! it was super fun.

Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (29) - S&M (21) /// LHDD

Posted: Fri Oct 25, 2019 2:06 pm
by Mad777
5 games remaining, may not complete before year end...

Game 19298885
Game 19339296
Game 19339362
Game 19339716
Game 19339724

Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (29) - S&M (21) /// LHDD

Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2019 7:25 pm
by Jdsizzleslice
Tournament privileges removed, databases updated, medals issued.

This war has been completed, and this topic has been MOVED.