Conquer Club

codeblue1018 wrote:

hatchman wrote:
Same here. It's 99% BS.

As these games are

Maybe you mean 44.4%.

chapcrap wrote:

codeblue1018 wrote:

hatchman wrote:
Same here. It's 99% BS.

As these games are

Maybe you mean 44.4%.

Yes Code let us be more accurate, but I do catch your drift.

Still a close match, with lot of undecided games.

IcePack wrote:Still a close match, with lot of undecided games.

Yeah it could still go either way, but we respect the competition you're giving us. We are getting our butts kicked in a few games from which we expected our butts to come out unbruised.

hatchman wrote:

IcePack wrote:Still a close match, with lot of undecided games.

Yeah it could still go either way, but we respect the competition you're giving us. We are getting our butts kicked in a few games from which we expected our butts to come out unbruised.

Sometimes I don't mind a bruised butt, right [player]cardinal.baby[/player]?

friendly1 wrote:

agentcom wrote:Hi everybody. Thanks for the war if I haven't said so already.

I see 18 games this round, out of I think 36 that are not filled. Nearly all of those (maybe 1 or two exceptions) are TSM ... even on your home maps. Let's get this thing moving!

We will get around to spanking you in All Your Bases Agent, don't blow your load

(your fricken plus 8 million on that map through map rank - who does that )

Dubs Das Schloss is only game needing to have invites sent, we had some confusion on players but it will go out tonight. I see most of the other games are filled or close.

8,000,020 now ... AYB has Fallen in a game that I was definitely worried about. GG guys.

Good luck to all involved in the war, many thanks to the organizers. Game 12638478 is looking like it's Fallen!

farm wrote:Good luck to all involved in the war, many thanks to the organizers. Game 12638478 is looking like it's Fallen!

Yea, looks that way; perhaps you should update this in the LOW thread.

codeblue1018 wrote:

farm wrote:Good luck to all involved in the war, many thanks to the organizers. Game 12638478 is looking like it's Fallen!

Yea, looks that way; perhaps you should update this in the LOW thread.

Hehe yeah i thought that was another war!

codeblue1018 wrote:

farm wrote:Good luck to all involved in the war, many thanks to the organizers. Game 12638478 is looking like it's Fallen!

Yea, looks that way; perhaps you should update this in the LOW thread.

I'll make sure to notify benga asap.

AYB dubs has Fallen

good luck monkis!

Seulessliathan wrote:good luck monkis!

thx seul; their luck has been unbelievable; never seen anything like this in a war. its crazy

codeblue1018 wrote:

Seulessliathan wrote:good luck monkis!

thx seul; their luck has been unbelievable; never seen anything like this in a war. its crazy

I was going to mention another war, Code. But yeah, I've been getting my ass whipped in this war... Sometimes before my first turn! I think as a showing of good sportsmanship, Fallen members should donate points to the "Save Ferris... er... Save Nate" fund! Maybe also throw a few wins our way too?! We Monkis have delicate egos!

codeblue1018 wrote:

Seulessliathan wrote:good luck monkis!

thx seul; their luck has been unbelievable; never seen anything like this in a war. its crazy

I've seen you talk about luck so many times now. I'm just gonna say it, in my games, we've been playing well. Like in Montreal, you basically said gg when the troop count was even, but we cut two players off so that you could only attack with one and we were still able to attack with all 3. Not to mention, the bonus I picked up. Of course we got you then, it's called attacker's advantage.

Montreal wrote:2013-04-28 22:04:42 - codeblue1018: How you guys won this game is beyond me
2013-04-28 22:18:57 - farm [team]: Need to get red down 2
2013-04-28 22:19:24 - farm [team]: I'll hopefully take Verdun
2013-04-29 08:43:03 - chapcrap: jefjef is mentoring us along the way
2013-04-29 08:45:47 - chapcrap [team]: this is still a really close game, I'm not really sure how red can say that...

I mean, we can go game by game if you want, but in my opinion, we haven't been getting simply amazing dice. The only game I have seen (of my 14) that dice really decided the outcome was KCII, where our dice were awful the whole time. Not saying that your guys wouldn't have beat us anyway, I don't know. But to me, most of the other games have been a good battle of strategy so far.

chapcrap wrote:

codeblue1018 wrote:

Seulessliathan wrote:good luck monkis!

thx seul; their luck has been unbelievable; never seen anything like this in a war. its crazy

I've seen you talk about luck so many times now. I'm just gonna say it, in my games, we've been playing well. Like in Montreal, you basically said gg when the troop count was even, but we cut two players off so that you could only attack with one and we were still able to attack with all 3. Not to mention, the bonus I picked up. Of course we got you then, it's called attacker's advantage.

Montreal wrote:2013-04-28 22:04:42 - codeblue1018: How you guys won this game is beyond me
2013-04-28 22:18:57 - farm [team]: Need to get red down 2
2013-04-28 22:19:24 - farm [team]: I'll hopefully take Verdun
2013-04-29 08:43:03 - chapcrap: jefjef is mentoring us along the way
2013-04-29 08:45:47 - chapcrap [team]: this is still a really close game, I'm not really sure how red can say that...

I mean, we can go game by game if you want, but in my opinion, we haven't been getting simply amazing dice. The only game I have seen (of my 14) that dice really decided the outcome was KCII, where our dice were awful the whole time. Not saying that your guys wouldn't have beat us anyway, I don't know. But to me, most of the other games have been a good battle of strategy so far.

I agree. I've been seeing a combination of excellent play and good fortune from you guys.

chapcrap wrote:

codeblue1018 wrote:

Seulessliathan wrote:good luck monkis!

thx seul; their luck has been unbelievable; never seen anything like this in a war. its crazy

I've seen you talk about luck so many times now. I'm just gonna say it, in my games, we've been playing well. Like in Montreal, you basically said gg when the troop count was even, but we cut two players off so that you could only attack with one and we were still able to attack with all 3. Not to mention, the bonus I picked up. Of course we got you then, it's called attacker's advantage.

Montreal wrote:2013-04-28 22:04:42 - codeblue1018: How you guys won this game is beyond me
2013-04-28 22:18:57 - farm [team]: Need to get red down 2
2013-04-28 22:19:24 - farm [team]: I'll hopefully take Verdun
2013-04-29 08:43:03 - chapcrap: jefjef is mentoring us along the way
2013-04-29 08:45:47 - chapcrap [team]: this is still a really close game, I'm not really sure how red can say that...

I mean, we can go game by game if you want, but in my opinion, we haven't been getting simply amazing dice. The only game I have seen (of my 14) that dice really decided the outcome was KCII, where our dice were awful the whole time. Not saying that your guys wouldn't have beat us anyway, I don't know. But to me, most of the other games have been a good battle of strategy so far.

You guys are playing well but I can give you plenty of examples where luck decided things in your favor

chapcrap wrote:

codeblue1018 wrote:

Seulessliathan wrote:good luck monkis!

thx seul; their luck has been unbelievable; never seen anything like this in a war. its crazy

I've seen you talk about luck so many times now. I'm just gonna say it, in my games, we've been playing well. Like in Montreal, you basically said gg when the troop count was even, but we cut two players off so that you could only attack with one and we were still able to attack with all 3. Not to mention, the bonus I picked up. Of course we got you then, it's called attacker's advantage.

Montreal wrote:2013-04-28 22:04:42 - codeblue1018: How you guys won this game is beyond me
2013-04-28 22:18:57 - farm [team]: Need to get red down 2
2013-04-28 22:19:24 - farm [team]: I'll hopefully take Verdun
2013-04-29 08:43:03 - chapcrap: jefjef is mentoring us along the way
2013-04-29 08:45:47 - chapcrap [team]: this is still a really close game, I'm not really sure how red can say that...

I mean, we can go game by game if you want, but in my opinion, we haven't been getting simply amazing dice. The only game I have seen (of my 14) that dice really decided the outcome was KCII, where our dice were awful the whole time. Not saying that your guys wouldn't have beat us anyway, I don't know. But to me, most of the other games have been a good battle of strategy so far.

My record on that map is phenomenal mate; I know when games are won and when games lost; seems when I said that, I was correct, no? We can argue all day long on who outplayed who; we played better in that game and had round after round of bad dice even with "attackers" advantage mate, lol. Thx for pointing attackers advantage out to me; I've never heard of it. So, we'll just bury this now and agree to disagree. Gl on the rest.

We were +12 with 2 bonuses after rd 2 to your zero. Of course 1 person was attacking eventually; it was me trying to take DT which you eventually got on perfect dice on and the bonus that you held. You cut no fort routes off; hence why I was attacking your bonuses from drops and forts that my mates gave me. Not sure what game you are referring too and the last attack by pink to hit our only bonus with, wait, yep, perfect dice. See the picture?

There are plenty of games and rolls that have gone your way as well. If you think it's one way luck highway than I'm pretty sure nothing we say is going to convince you otherwise.

Good luck in the rest of the games.

IcePack wrote:There are plenty of games and rolls that have gone your way as well. If you think it's one way luck highway than I'm pretty sure nothing we say is going to convince you otherwise.

Good luck in the rest of the games.

I'm sure there are plenty of them. I don't doubt that at all. I jut wish I could be a part of them

codeblue1018 wrote:My record on that map is phenomenal mate; I know when games are won and when games lost; seems when I said that, I was correct, no?

61% in team games for +68? I think we have different definitions of phenomenal.

codeblue1018 wrote:We can argue all day long on who outplayed who; we played better in that game and had round after round of bad dice even with "attackers" advantage mate, lol. Thx for pointing attackers advantage out to me; I've never heard of it. So, we'll just bury this now and agree to disagree. Gl on the rest.

Not sure how you can say to bury it and then go on, but I'll go on with you.

codeblue1018 wrote:We were +12 with 2 bonuses after rd 2 to your zero. Of course 1 person was attacking eventually; it was me trying to take DT which you eventually got on perfect dice on and the bonus that you held. You cut no fort routes off; hence why I was attacking your bonuses from drops and forts that my mates gave me. Not sure what game you are referring too and the last attack by pink to hit our only bonus with, wait, yep, perfect dice. See the picture?

You said that I had perfect dice on an attack when I lost troops and had about normal dice, so I'm not really sure I can trust what you see in the dice. Yeah, you point to a turn where the game was basically decided already where farm did have a round with no losses. But, that wasn't how the game was decided.

chapcrap wrote:

codeblue1018 wrote:My record on that map is phenomenal mate; I know when games are won and when games lost; seems when I said that, I was correct, no?

61% in team games for +68? I think we have different definitions of phenomenal.

codeblue1018 wrote:We can argue all day long on who outplayed who; we played better in that game and had round after round of bad dice even with "attackers" advantage mate, lol. Thx for pointing attackers advantage out to me; I've never heard of it. So, we'll just bury this now and agree to disagree. Gl on the rest.

Not sure how you can say to bury it and then go on, but I'll go on with you.

codeblue1018 wrote:We were +12 with 2 bonuses after rd 2 to your zero. Of course 1 person was attacking eventually; it was me trying to take DT which you eventually got on perfect dice on and the bonus that you held. You cut no fort routes off; hence why I was attacking your bonuses from drops and forts that my mates gave me. Not sure what game you are referring too and the last attack by pink to hit our only bonus with, wait, yep, perfect dice. See the picture?

You said that I had perfect dice on an attack when I lost troops and had about normal dice, so I'm not really sure I can trust what you see in the dice. Yeah, you point to a turn where the game was basically decided already where farm did have a round with no losses. But, that wasn't how the game was decided.

As I said; ill bury it; no need for me to comment on something that you clearly can't see or understand.

You have a strange way of burying it, saying that you will and then afterwards coming back editing the message and continuing on with the discussions lol

Can't wait til this is over so I can go back to ignoring the open forums

IcePack wrote:You have a strange way of burying it, saying that you will and then afterwards coming back editing the message and continuing on with the discussions lol

Lol; last time - editing the message was done immediately after I posted my original message Ice as I forgot to obviously add something further.