Conquer Club

stahrgazer wrote:

silent wind wrote:if you compare an apple to an orange, then you are seeing the similarities between apples and oranges, as in, they are both seed bearing fruits. when you compare the idea of a test for someone to determine their eligibility to vote... to the notion that it once was a racially motivated ploy to keep blacks from voting, then you are drawing conclusions that they are both intended to keep specific minorities from voting... which is a racist ploy still. I am not, nor have I ever been, racist. I just happen to think that you have to give a shit about what you are voting on... more than say... "yippie screw! I get a pack of smokes if I put x's in this here box!"

I read and comprehend quite well, thank you.

No, I'm telling you the reason certain Consitutional elements were passed, historically, to fight against the idea that someone, anyone, who's a citizen of the United States, who hasn't had their rights taken away for committing some abhorrent offense and not yet paid society's cost for it (felons), should be prohibited from voting because they can't spell or because you (or anyone) believes they're insufficiently informed.

Although, if someone did happen to think laws like that were a good idea after all, I'd say, "inability to discuss intelligently without use of profanity" should disqualify a person from voting; there are other adjectives, after all.

go fucking f*ck yourself... you're a blow hard back fucking peddling your ass back to fucking kansas...

silent wind wrote:go fucking f*ck yourself... you're a blow hard back fucking peddling your ass back to fucking kansas...

What an elegant display of your supreme ability to discuss with intelligence.

stahrgazer wrote:

silent wind wrote:go fucking f*ck yourself... you're a blow hard back fucking peddling your ass back to fucking kansas...

What an elegant display of your supreme ability to discuss with intelligence.

Indeed, it is true, I am a fan of explicative language, but that should not suggest in the slightest that I am incapable of making a sincere argument against... hmmm... what were we talking about... oh, yes, your slanderous attempts at painting me to be a racist. It is utterly absurd of you to suggest that I am a racist when I am merely stating my opinion. It really suggests that you are prejudiced against those that you even suspect are racially motivated in their arguments. I made no mention of skin color, nationality or gender, whatsoever. In fact, like so many in our media today, it was you that played the race card, making this conversation about race while my point was strictly on the merit of the person casting the vote. After all... If you do not know what an abortion is, have never seen documents of testimony, or otherwise researched the procedure, how can you actually vote one way or the other on the issue... how can you have an opinion on the matter?

No sir... were this a serious forum, with serious people, and serious opinion, then you just might see more responses such as this from me... but it is a matter of fact that just a few threads down, is the comparison of homosexuality to ass sex with a horse. Friend, I fucking can tell you with a fucknig straight face, this is a joke of a forum... it is fucking called monkey business, after fucking all... and you can still go fist your ass hole, and that of your fucking mother for all I care.

silent wind wrote:

stahrgazer wrote:

silent wind wrote:go fucking f*ck yourself... you're a blow hard back fucking peddling your ass back to fucking kansas...

What an elegant display of your supreme ability to discuss with intelligence.

Indeed, it is true, I am a fan of explicative language, but that should not suggest in the slightest that I am incapable of making a sincere argument against... hmmm... what were we talking about... oh, yes, your slanderous attempts at painting me to be a racist. It is utterly absurd of you to suggest that I am a racist when I am merely stating my opinion. It really suggests that you are prejudiced against those that you even suspect are racially motivated in their arguments. I made no mention of skin color, nationality or gender, whatsoever. In fact, like so many in our media today, it was you that played the race card, making this conversation about race while my point was strictly on the merit of the person casting the vote. After all... If you do not know what an abortion is, have never seen documents of testimony, or otherwise researched the procedure, how can you actually vote one way or the other on the issue... how can you have an opinion on the matter?

No sir... were this a serious forum, with serious people, and serious opinion, then you just might see more responses such as this from me... but it is a matter of fact that just a few threads down, is the comparison of homosexuality to ass sex with a horse. Friend, I fucking can tell you with a fucknig straight face, this is a joke of a forum... it is fucking called monkey business, after fucking all... and you can still go fist your ass hole, and that of your fucking mother for all I care.

There you are with your use of adjectives again; and there you are assuming people didn't inform themselves of things before they voted; and there you are assuming that because you're walking like an historical duck, and quacking like an historical duck, I'm accusing you of being a duck, simply because I point out where people have walked and quacked before.

stahrgazer wrote:

silent wind wrote:

stahrgazer wrote:

silent wind wrote:go fucking f*ck yourself... you're a blow hard back fucking peddling your ass back to fucking kansas...

What an elegant display of your supreme ability to discuss with intelligence.

Indeed, it is true, I am a fan of explicative language, but that should not suggest in the slightest that I am incapable of making a sincere argument against... hmmm... what were we talking about... oh, yes, your slanderous attempts at painting me to be a racist. It is utterly absurd of you to suggest that I am a racist when I am merely stating my opinion. It really suggests that you are prejudiced against those that you even suspect are racially motivated in their arguments. I made no mention of skin color, nationality or gender, whatsoever. In fact, like so many in our media today, it was you that played the race card, making this conversation about race while my point was strictly on the merit of the person casting the vote. After all... If you do not know what an abortion is, have never seen documents of testimony, or otherwise researched the procedure, how can you actually vote one way or the other on the issue... how can you have an opinion on the matter?

No sir... were this a serious forum, with serious people, and serious opinion, then you just might see more responses such as this from me... but it is a matter of fact that just a few threads down, is the comparison of homosexuality to ass sex with a horse. Friend, I fucking can tell you with a fucknig straight face, this is a joke of a forum... it is fucking called monkey business, after fucking all... and you can still go fist your ass hole, and that of your fucking mother for all I care.

There you are with your use of adjectives again; and there you are assuming people didn't inform themselves of things before they voted; and there you are assuming that because you're walking like an historical duck, and quacking like an historical duck, I'm accusing you of being a duck, simply because I point out where people have walked and quacked before.

but you're not... you are comparing me with racists... drawing a conclusion that I am racist. If dumb asses that have the audacity to walk into a pole and not even know who the f*ck they are voting for or what those candidates represent... or the issues surrounding their platform comprise a race... then maybe you would be right. But the fact is that all races are pretty well equally represented in that group.

and yes... if you have to be coaxed to the poll's... you really stand a good chance of being a dumb ass.

notyou2 wrote:I thought america stood for freedom and democracy silent wind. Apparently in your book it doesn't. You clearly state that you believe everyone should be educated before they can vote. Next it will be only men can vote. Then only whites. Then only protestants. Where do you draw the line? Aren't all these people citizens? Are there certain things people need to have before they can be citizens? A certain IQ? A certain education?

Silent, you seem to be silent on this, but vocal on your insistence that you were called a racist. I am interested in your response to my questions without the expletives.

stahrgazer wrote:

silent wind wrote:

stahrgazer wrote:

silent wind wrote:go fucking f*ck yourself... you're a blow hard back fucking peddling your ass back to fucking kansas...

What an elegant display of your supreme ability to discuss with intelligence.

Indeed, it is true, I am a fan of explicative language, but that should not suggest in the slightest that I am incapable of making a sincere argument against... hmmm... what were we talking about... oh, yes, your slanderous attempts at painting me to be a racist. It is utterly absurd of you to suggest that I am a racist when I am merely stating my opinion. It really suggests that you are prejudiced against those that you even suspect are racially motivated in their arguments. I made no mention of skin color, nationality or gender, whatsoever. In fact, like so many in our media today, it was you that played the race card, making this conversation about race while my point was strictly on the merit of the person casting the vote. After all... If you do not know what an abortion is, have never seen documents of testimony, or otherwise researched the procedure, how can you actually vote one way or the other on the issue... how can you have an opinion on the matter?

No sir... were this a serious forum, with serious people, and serious opinion, then you just might see more responses such as this from me... but it is a matter of fact that just a few threads down, is the comparison of homosexuality to ass sex with a horse. Friend, I fucking can tell you with a fucknig straight face, this is a joke of a forum... it is fucking called monkey business, after fucking all... and you can still go fist your ass hole, and that of your fucking mother for all I care.

There you are with your use of adjectives again; and there you are assuming people didn't inform themselves of things before they voted; and there you are assuming that because you're walking like an historical duck, and quacking like an historical duck, I'm accusing you of being a duck, simply because I point out where people have walked and quacked before.

Are you saying windy is a duckhead?

... DrudgeReport link states Obama White House shut down investigation into ACORN for voter fraud.

... The link is to Judicial Watch. Either their server is overloaded or somebody pulled the plug.

... Maybe it will open later.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/news/2010/ ... uments-obt

... <EDIT> Drudge hot-linked it to a news site giving details.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id ... _article=1

...

bradleybadly wrote:

Woodruff wrote:If you believe that was a case of stahrgazer implying you were a racist, then you really need to work on your reading comprehension. Your capability in that area is strongly lacking.

You're full of shit

Dear silent wind...here is the proof that I was correct - bradleybadly disagrees with me and agrees with you. No further evidence is necessary.

silent wind wrote:
but you're not... you are comparing me with racists... drawing a conclusion that I am racist. If dumb asses that have the audacity to walk into a pole and not even know who the f*ck they are voting for or what those candidates represent... or the issues surrounding their platform comprise a race... then maybe you would be right. But the fact is that all races are pretty well equally represented in that group.

and yes... if you have to be coaxed to the poll's... you really stand a good chance of being a dumb ass.

Did you help register anyone to vote this past year? I did. I happen to know from that personal experience that for the most part, the reason most of the citizens of my community weren't registered is that they'd given up; not that they weren't informed, but that they'd given up on having a candidate that would listen to them on the issues they cared about. Most of these people were quite informed, asked intelligent questions with proper adjectives and had specific viewpoints. There were a couple who were asking for information and where to read up; many did so. A couple had lost their voting rights (felonies) but had paid the price, so merely needed information on how to clear that up so they could vote NEXT time.

A few of these people saw me and waved on Election Day as I was walking the lines to help ensure people were in their proper polling place (Florida's a bit notorious for screwing things up by changing poll locations just before elections, and this election was no different). Several spoke to me after, thanking me for helping them get involved in voting again, saying it was because I'd brought them hope that someone cared enough to listen, and that even if the candidates they voted for didn't listen, they were participating in what makes America great: the democratic right that all citizens in good standing get to vote, something people overseas are dying (literally) to have.

Do your sentiments concur with that? No, you compared yourself to racists. You also assumed that just because someone hadn't registered to vote meant they weren't informed about candidates or issues. I simply pointed out the history of Constitutional changes to voting, why they occurred, and that your sentiments look much like why those changes had to occur. I didn't call you a racist; but you did.

stahrgazer wrote:

silent wind wrote:
but you're not... you are comparing me with racists... drawing a conclusion that I am racist. If dumb asses that have the audacity to walk into a pole and not even know who the f*ck they are voting for or what those candidates represent... or the issues surrounding their platform comprise a race... then maybe you would be right. But the fact is that all races are pretty well equally represented in that group.

and yes... if you have to be coaxed to the poll's... you really stand a good chance of being a dumb ass.

Did you help register anyone to vote this past year? I did. I happen to know from that personal experience that for the most part, the reason most of the citizens of my community weren't registered is that they'd given up; not that they weren't informed, but that they'd given up on having a candidate that would listen to them on the issues they cared about. Most of these people were quite informed, asked intelligent questions with proper adjectives and had specific viewpoints. There were a couple who were asking for information and where to read up; many did so. A couple had lost their voting rights (felonies) but had paid the price, so merely needed information on how to clear that up so they could vote NEXT time.

A few of these people saw me and waved on Election Day as I was walking the lines to help ensure people were in their proper polling place (Florida's a bit notorious for screwing things up by changing poll locations just before elections, and this election was no different). Several spoke to me after, thanking me for helping them get involved in voting again, saying it was because I'd brought them hope that someone cared enough to listen, and that even if the candidates they voted for didn't listen, they were participating in what makes America great: the democratic right that all citizens in good standing get to vote, something people overseas are dying (literally) to have.

Do your sentiments concur with that? No, you compared yourself to racists. You also assumed that just because someone hadn't registered to vote meant they weren't informed about candidates or issues. I simply pointed out the history of Constitutional changes to voting, why they occurred, and that your sentiments look much like why those changes had to occur. I didn't call you a racist; but you did.

So what the f*ck did you do... lie to their face, because their candidates STILL don't give a f*ck about them... And don't try to turn the fucking table... you fucking compared me to a racist. I defended against it.

I never suggested, not one fucking time, that someone that wasn't fucking registered to vote wasn't informed. You have graciously fucking pointed out that there are those that choose not to, because they believe that it is a fucking waste of their fucking time... guess what... they gave that goddamn right.

If you want to go out and get people to the poll's... have fucking fun with that. but no where in the constitution does it say that you must vote. No where in any law anywhere in the US does it say that you MUST vote... so if you don't fucking want to, you don't have to. Nice job there fancy fucking pants... you just set a bunch of saps up to have their dreams dashed against the fucking rocks... because if they voted for Obama... guess what... turns out that he lied his fucking britches off to get into office... You should be fucking proud of your self... half the people you convinced to come to the polls have probably already realized this and have sucked off the end of a pistol... all thanks to you.

silent wind wrote:. you fucking compared me to a racist. I defended against it.

I merely pointed out that you were walking and quacking like others in the U.S. past have done.

silent wind wrote:I never suggested, not one fucking time, that someone that wasn't fucking registered to vote wasn't informed. .

Yes you did.

And I see your eloquence with dictionary adjectives is as intact as ever.

silent wind wrote:

stahrgazer wrote:

silent wind wrote:
but you're not... you are comparing me with racists... drawing a conclusion that I am racist. If dumb asses that have the audacity to walk into a pole and not even know who the f*ck they are voting for or what those candidates represent... or the issues surrounding their platform comprise a race... then maybe you would be right. But the fact is that all races are pretty well equally represented in that group.

and yes... if you have to be coaxed to the poll's... you really stand a good chance of being a dumb ass.

Did you help register anyone to vote this past year? I did. I happen to know from that personal experience that for the most part, the reason most of the citizens of my community weren't registered is that they'd given up; not that they weren't informed, but that they'd given up on having a candidate that would listen to them on the issues they cared about. Most of these people were quite informed, asked intelligent questions with proper adjectives and had specific viewpoints. There were a couple who were asking for information and where to read up; many did so. A couple had lost their voting rights (felonies) but had paid the price, so merely needed information on how to clear that up so they could vote NEXT time.

A few of these people saw me and waved on Election Day as I was walking the lines to help ensure people were in their proper polling place (Florida's a bit notorious for screwing things up by changing poll locations just before elections, and this election was no different). Several spoke to me after, thanking me for helping them get involved in voting again, saying it was because I'd brought them hope that someone cared enough to listen, and that even if the candidates they voted for didn't listen, they were participating in what makes America great: the democratic right that all citizens in good standing get to vote, something people overseas are dying (literally) to have.

Do your sentiments concur with that? No, you compared yourself to racists. You also assumed that just because someone hadn't registered to vote meant they weren't informed about candidates or issues. I simply pointed out the history of Constitutional changes to voting, why they occurred, and that your sentiments look much like why those changes had to occur. I didn't call you a racist; but you did.

So what the f*ck did you do... lie to their face, because their candidates STILL don't give a f*ck about them... And don't try to turn the fucking table... you fucking compared me to a racist. I defended against it.

I never suggested, not one fucking time, that someone that wasn't fucking registered to vote wasn't informed. You have graciously fucking pointed out that there are those that choose not to, because they believe that it is a fucking waste of their fucking time... guess what... they gave that goddamn right.

If you want to go out and get people to the poll's... have fucking fun with that. but no where in the constitution does it say that you must vote. No where in any law anywhere in the US does it say that you MUST vote... so if you don't fucking want to, you don't have to. Nice job there fancy fucking pants... you just set a bunch of saps up to have their dreams dashed against the fucking rocks... because if they voted for Obama... guess what... turns out that he lied his fucking britches off to get into office... You should be fucking proud of your self... half the people you convinced to come to the polls have probably already realized this and have sucked off the end of a pistol... all thanks to you.

It'd be nice if you'd find your way to a fucking thesaurus.

It's much funnier to read if you think of fucking as being the actual act, and not just a word that adds emphasis.

"you just set a bunch of saps up to have their dreams dashed against the fucking rocks"- the rocks where people f*ck. It's a fun way to look at arguments that use swearing lazily and unimaginatively. Shift the intonation and make "fucking" the adjective that describes the object.

Symmetry wrote:It's much funnier to read if you think of fucking as being the actual act, and not just a word that adds emphasis.

"you just set a bunch of saps up to have their dreams dashed against the fucking rocks"- the rocks where people f*ck. It's a fun way to look at arguments that use swearing lazily and unimaginatively. Shift the intonation and make "fucking" the adjective that describes the object.

what the f*ck ever... here is a thought...

I think there is a fucking "ignore" feature or something... fucking use it.

stahrgazer wrote:

silent wind wrote:. you fucking compared me to a racist. I defended against it.

I merely pointed out that you were walking and quacking like others in the U.S. past have done.

No... you compared me to racists... and you didn't decide to suggest that you did not until someone else failed at that fucking argument... But you can save face... do you think me a racist?

stahrgazer wrote:

silent wind wrote:I never suggested, not one fucking time, that someone that wasn't fucking registered to vote wasn't informed. .

Yes you did.

And I see your eloquence with dictionary adjectives is as intact as ever.

Show me!

silent wind wrote:

Symmetry wrote:It's much funnier to read if you think of fucking as being the actual act, and not just a word that adds emphasis.

"you just set a bunch of saps up to have their dreams dashed against the fucking rocks"- the rocks where people f*ck. It's a fun way to look at arguments that use swearing lazily and unimaginatively. Shift the intonation and make "fucking" the adjective that describes the object.

what the f*ck ever... here is a thought...

I think there is a fucking "ignore" feature or something... fucking use it.

Why would I want to ignore fucking?

Symmetry wrote:

silent wind wrote:

Symmetry wrote:It's much funnier to read if you think of fucking as being the actual act, and not just a word that adds emphasis.

"you just set a bunch of saps up to have their dreams dashed against the fucking rocks"- the rocks where people f*ck. It's a fun way to look at arguments that use swearing lazily and unimaginatively. Shift the intonation and make "fucking" the adjective that describes the object.

what the f*ck ever... here is a thought...

I think there is a fucking "ignore" feature or something... fucking use it.

Why would I want to ignore fucking?

hmmm... pure genius... except that I quoted the word "ignore" indicating, in no way shape or form that you should ignore fucking... just ignore me... or foe me. or what ever the f*ck it is.

silent wind wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

silent wind wrote:

Symmetry wrote:It's much funnier to read if you think of fucking as being the actual act, and not just a word that adds emphasis.

"you just set a bunch of saps up to have their dreams dashed against the fucking rocks"- the rocks where people f*ck. It's a fun way to look at arguments that use swearing lazily and unimaginatively. Shift the intonation and make "fucking" the adjective that describes the object.

what the f*ck ever... here is a thought...

I think there is a fucking "ignore" feature or something... fucking use it.

Why would I want to ignore fucking?

hmmm... pure genius... except that I quoted the word "ignore" indicating, in no way shape or form that you should ignore fucking... just ignore me... or foe me. or what ever the f*ck it is.

I get a great deal of pleasure out of your posts. I don't want to give that up. Watching a grown person throw a hissy fit as if dolly fell out of the pram- well, it has the fascination of watching a slow motion car crash. Disturbing, but I can't bring myself to look away.

Anyway- I should apologise, I've distracted you from your argument on why some people just shouldn't be allowed to vote if that means Obama gets in.

Carry on.

Silent are you twelve soon?

notyou2 wrote:Silent are you twelve soon?

Age or I.Q.?

Symmetry wrote:It's much funnier to read if you think of fucking as being the actual act, and not just a word that adds emphasis.

"you just set a bunch of saps up to have their dreams dashed against the fucking rocks"- the rocks where people f*ck. It's a fun way to look at arguments that use swearing lazily and unimaginatively. Shift the intonation and make "fucking" the adjective that describes the object.

Is that where pebbles come from? I never knew!

stahrgazer wrote:

Symmetry wrote:It's much funnier to read if you think of fucking as being the actual act, and not just a word that adds emphasis.

"you just set a bunch of saps up to have their dreams dashed against the fucking rocks"- the rocks where people f*ck. It's a fun way to look at arguments that use swearing lazily and unimaginatively. Shift the intonation and make "fucking" the adjective that describes the object.

Is that where pebbles come from? I never knew!

Pebbles comes from two fucking Flintstones.
Here

Symmetry wrote:

silent wind wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

silent wind wrote:

Symmetry wrote:It's much funnier to read if you think of fucking as being the actual act, and not just a word that adds emphasis.

"you just set a bunch of saps up to have their dreams dashed against the fucking rocks"- the rocks where people f*ck. It's a fun way to look at arguments that use swearing lazily and unimaginatively. Shift the intonation and make "fucking" the adjective that describes the object.

what the f*ck ever... here is a thought...

I think there is a fucking "ignore" feature or something... fucking use it.

Why would I want to ignore fucking?

hmmm... pure genius... except that I quoted the word "ignore" indicating, in no way shape or form that you should ignore fucking... just ignore me... or foe me. or what ever the f*ck it is.

I get a great deal of pleasure out of your posts. I don't want to give that up. Watching a grown person throw a hissy fit as if dolly fell out of the pram- well, it has the fascination of watching a slow motion car crash. Disturbing, but I can't bring myself to look away.

Anyway- I should apologise, I've distracted you from your argument on why some people just shouldn't be allowed to vote if that means Obama gets in.

Carry on.

Oh my... I don't believe I ever said that... Funny... there seems to be a lot of that going on.

True true, I conflated a couple of your posts. The one where you suggested some people shouldn't be allowed to vote, and the one where you suggested that Obama voters shouldn't have voted. I was, as you say, doing what many people on this thread have done. Add 1 to 1 and arrived at 2. You of course, never mentioned 2.