[Official] British Isles REVAMP [Quenched]

Care to peruse completed maps? Take a stroll through the Atlas.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
iancanton
Foundry Foreman
Foundry Foreman
Posts: 2452
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 5:40 am
Location: europe

Post by iancanton »

yeti_c wrote:BTW - I'd change a couple...

Cambridgeshire can be on it's own...

Norfolk and Suffolk -> become East Anglia

Put Middlesex and Essex into "Greater London"


if we stay with the concept of having borders in their proper places, then cambridgeshire can't be on its own because east anglia must not have a border with london. however, u've given an idea to me. cambridgeshire, suffolk and essex can make up one territory, called essex. london can stay on its own (or be combined with middlesex but still be called london) if the river thames is redrawn so that it is impassable (like the proposed river shannon), to separate kent from essex.

yeti_c wrote:Defs call it "West Midlands" & "East Midlands"

Lancashire & Chesire -> Just call this Lancashire (Which is close enough)


agreed.

ian. :)
User avatar
gimil
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Post by gimil »

guys im lost here lol. Perhaps someone can take te county image and put it on paint and give it big black boarders so i can see what you want.
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
iancanton
Foundry Foreman
Foundry Foreman
Posts: 2452
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 5:40 am
Location: europe

Post by iancanton »

i'm not sure that i have paint on my pc, but i'll list the changes to my previous list in the same format as before.

new name (currently "old name"): counties contained within new territory
norfolk (currently "east anglia"): norfolk
essex (currently "essex and cambridgeshire"): essex, cambridgeshire and suffolk
london (currently "london"): london and middlesex
home counties north (currently "oxfordshire"): oxfordshire, berkshire, buckinghamshire, hertfordshire and bedfordshire
west midlands (currently "cheshire"): shropshire, staffordshire, warwickshire, herefordshire and worcestershire
lancashire (currently "lancashire"): lancashire and cheshire

hope it doesn't mess things up too much!

ian. :)
User avatar
yeti_c
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am
Gender: Male

Post by yeti_c »

And take the borders from that huge map I posted - not the ones that previouls existed...

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
Unit_2
Posts: 1834
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 12:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Pennsylvania, U.S.A, North America, Earth, Milky Way, Universe.

Post by Unit_2 »

hey gimil, can you post the map in the first post please, so its easyer to find.
Image
User avatar
MrBenn
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

Post by MrBenn »

I've just had a quick play with the map that yeti_c posted on p8, and added in some boundaries and names...

Image

I've used the suggestion for the Thames to be the impassable between Kent/Essex; my thought for the Other Impassable is to use Salisbury Plain (lots of Army bases/camps) and/or The New Forest.

I'm still not sure whether SOUTH COAST should be split back into Hampshire/Sussex; somebody else has mentioned the EAST ANGLIA and Cambridgeshire split.
Last edited by MrBenn on Sun Dec 09, 2007 5:32 pm, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
MrBenn
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

Post by MrBenn »

Hmmm... I need to find somehwere shorter to host it, but don't have time right now.... I'll try and do that later - but you can always cut and paste the link if you're desperate to see it!
User avatar
gimil
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Post by gimil »

Your image looks pritty sound to me. Expect the next update smetime tomorrow. (GOT an exam tomoz)
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
unriggable
Posts: 8037
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm

Post by unriggable »

Remember Ireland - Whales attack route!
Image
User avatar
MrBenn
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

Post by MrBenn »

I've updated the link in my above post, so people can easily see my suggested boundaries/names...

I can't remember if there has been any discussion about bonus region names; obviously there's Scotland, Ireland and Wales... for England, the Cornwall/Devon etc. should really be "The West Country"; and how about "Up North" or "T'North" for the Yorkshire area? Not really too sure on ideas for the rest of England??
User avatar
iancanton
Foundry Foreman
Foundry Foreman
Posts: 2452
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 5:40 am
Location: europe

Post by iancanton »

MrBenn wrote:for England, the Cornwall/Devon etc. should really be "The West Country"


what is currently called "land's end" corresponds almost exactly with the anglo-saxon kingdom of wessex (which also included hampshire and berkshire), so i think "wessex" is just as good and, in addition, it cannot be confused with the western part of any other country. the area served by the wessex water company is also similar to "land's end" (excluding devon and cornwall).

http://www.anglo-saxons.net/hwaet/?do=g ... p&id=map9c
http://www.wessexwater.co.uk/developers ... adverts=no

if northern england is "up north", then southern england must surely be "down south"!

ian. :)
User avatar
I GOT SERVED
Posts: 1532
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Good 'ol New England

Post by I GOT SERVED »

I GOT SERVED wrote:A few other things:

-Move the army circle on Hebrides so it's in the center of the island, not on the northern end.

-Move the Dumfries and Galloway name a little bit. It looks awkward where it is right now.


I'm not sure if this got noticed or not, so I'm reposting it.
Image


Highest score: 2512
Highest rank: 424
User avatar
benjikat
Posts: 332
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:03 am

Roman Britain

Post by benjikat »

I'm sure someone must of suggested this before - and I can't believe I've only just thought of it.

The map includes Hadrain's Wall - so why not set the map in Roman times - after 120 AD (when the wall was started) to 410AD.

Further info as ever on Wikipedia (including some maps): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Britain.

The territory names will be a lot less contentious if they are all Roman.
Image
User avatar
gimil
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Post by gimil »

Image

Theres probably a few things missed out, if so let me know. Since theres been alot of infoto go through since hte last update.
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
iancanton
Foundry Foreman
Foundry Foreman
Posts: 2452
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 5:40 am
Location: europe

Post by iancanton »

for gameplay to stay the same, east anglia must border only lincolnshire and essex. in other words, it must not border london, oxon or midland. this can be done if we expand essex to include cambridgeshire, hertfordshire and bedfordshire. this choice of border is not arbitrary, but follows the boundary of the “east of england” government office region. we can change “greater london” to “london”, as this causes no confusion and some people are strongly in favour of simpler names.

http://www.statistics.gov.uk/geography/gor.asp

ian. :)
User avatar
mibi
Posts: 3350
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: The Great State of Vermont
Contact:

Post by mibi »

whats with the mini map?
User avatar
gimil
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Post by gimil »

mibi wrote:whats with the mini map?


It looks pritty.
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
gimil
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Post by gimil »

iancanton wrote:for gameplay to stay the same, east anglia must border only lincolnshire and essex. in other words, it must not border london, oxon or midland. this can be done if we expand essex to include cambridgeshire, hertfordshire and bedfordshire. this choice of border is not arbitrary, but follows the boundary of the “east of england” government office region. we can change “greater london” to “london”, as this causes no confusion and some people are strongly in favour of simpler names.

http://www.statistics.gov.uk/geography/gor.asp

ian. :)


thank you iain i will take it into account
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
nagerous
Posts: 7513
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:39 am
Gender: Male

Post by nagerous »

Its gwent not gwert
Image
User avatar
gimil
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Post by gimil »

Image

need a better name for essex now.
also needto increase the size of the inpassable on wiltshire
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
Sir. Ricco
Posts: 4555
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 2:33 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Making kingdoms burn and bloodshed start.
Contact:

Post by Sir. Ricco »

Good job gimil. I never liked this map before.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
MrBenn
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

Post by MrBenn »

It should be 'Midlands' or 'The Midlands'

You could use 'Lincs' instead of Lincolnshire

I had a thought about the East Anglia problem, but can't remember what it was... I'll have another think!

In the meantime, what about this as an alternative title?
    The British Isles:
    Great Britain & Ireland
User avatar
MrBenn
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

Post by MrBenn »

EDIT: Just realised you've redrawn the Esasex border; here are the suggestions I had anyway :EDIT

I've thought some more about the East Anglia thing, and have some options:

1 - Make Essex bigger, to incorporate Cambridgeshire and Suffolk. Then rename East Anglia 'Norfolk'
2 - Leave the map how it is, but stick in the M1 and make it impassable; although people might wonder what happened to all the other motorways!
3 - Extend Oxon to incorporate Cambridge, and rename it 'Oxbridge'. This would then give East Anglia 3 borders instead of 2...

That's about all I've got at the moment...

Oh, and seriously think about using the New Forest as the impassable instead of those mountains... I mean, there really aren't any mountains there!
Last edited by MrBenn on Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
yeti_c
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am
Gender: Male

Post by yeti_c »

What are we doing about those 4 way borders?

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
gimil
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Post by gimil »

MrBenn wrote:I've thought some more about the East Anglia thing, and have some options:

1 - Make Essex bigger, to incorporate Cambridgeshire and Suffolk. Then rename East Anglia 'Norfolk'
2 - Leave the map how it is, but stick in the M1 and make it impassable; although people might wonder what happened to all the other motorways!
3 - Extend Oxon to incorporate Cambridge, and rename it 'Oxbridge'. This would then give East Anglia 3 borders instead of 2...

That's about all I've got at the moment...

Oh, and seriously think about using the New Forest as the impassable instead of those mountains... I mean, there really aren't any mountains there!


East anglia only has two boarders on the current map. Ill take your inpassables into consideration thou.
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
Post Reply

Return to “The Atlas”