Question about "Cum on Feel the Noise"

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Post Reply

Does the Oasis version suck?

 
Total votes: 0
User avatar
cena-rules
Posts: 9740
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 2:27 am
Gender: Male
Location: Chat

Post by cena-rules »

magneticgoop wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:Same here. Cum on Feel the Noise is meant to be a Hard Rock song, not soft rock or Indie, or whatever they are. :?
indie isn't a style it just means they aren't part of a record label, they fly solo which had advantages and disadvantages,


yeah but indie has a certain style.
19:41:22 ‹jakewilliams› I was a pedo
Top
User avatar
muy_thaiguy
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Gender: Male
Location: Back in Black
Contact:
Contact muy_thaiguy

Post by muy_thaiguy »

magneticgoop wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:Same here. Cum on Feel the Noise is meant to be a Hard Rock song, not soft rock or Indie, or whatever they are. :?
indie isn't a style it just means they aren't part of a record label, they fly solo which had advantages and disadvantages,
Guess that's why I don't know many Indie bands. :lol:
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
Top
Strife
Posts: 2668
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 3:24 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Now something has kept me here too long.

Post by Strife »

I prefer it by quiet riot. IDK why I just do. Maybe it's that they sing it better. :lol:
Top
User avatar
magneticgoop
Posts: 851
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:03 pm
Location: Screaming at the TV as Norv Turner turns the chargers into the worst team in the NFL =(

Post by magneticgoop »

cena-rules wrote:
magneticgoop wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:Same here. Cum on Feel the Noise is meant to be a Hard Rock song, not soft rock or Indie, or whatever they are. :?
indie isn't a style it just means they aren't part of a record label, they fly solo which had advantages and disadvantages,


yeah but indie has a certain style.
nope

in·die (ĭn'dē) Pronunciation Key
n. Informal

1. One, such as a studio or producer, that is unaffiliated with a larger or more commercial organization.
2. An artistic work produced by an independent company or group: "[His film] showed that indies could . . . take in millions at the box office" (Liesl Schillinger).


adj. Of, relating to, or being an indie: an album of indie rock; an indie film company.
Fool me once, strike one. Fool me twice, strike...three.Image
Top
User avatar
muy_thaiguy
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Gender: Male
Location: Back in Black
Contact:
Contact muy_thaiguy

Post by muy_thaiguy »

Strife wrote:I prefer it by quiet riot. IDK why I just do. Maybe it's that they sing it better. :lol:
Probably so, they just basically improved it from Slade, but, in my opinion, Oasis ruined one of rock's greatest songs. :evil:
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
Top
User avatar
2dimes
Posts: 13122
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Post by 2dimes »

Kevin Dubrow died.
Top
User avatar
muy_thaiguy
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Gender: Male
Location: Back in Black
Contact:
Contact muy_thaiguy

Post by muy_thaiguy »

2dimes wrote:Kevin Dubrow died.
Crap. :(

I can't believe you actually went looking for this thread though. :?
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
Top
User avatar
2dimes
Posts: 13122
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Post by 2dimes »

I have not fully absorbed the thing with Kevin, bummer though.

Regarding your second sentance, I'm like that, search is my friend.
Top
User avatar
autoload
Posts: 3735
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:37 am
Gender: Male

Post by autoload »

Amazing!
Top
User avatar
suggs
Posts: 4015
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:16 pm
Location: At the end of the beginning...

Post by suggs »

The oasis version is absolutely awesome.
If you think otherwise, you should end it now.
Its powerful.
So you think i cant post for shit?
Well, that aint no worry...
Norse wrote:But, alas, you are all cock munching rent boys, with an IQ that would make my local spaco clinic blush.
Top
User avatar
Arbustos
Posts: 1589
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 5:28 pm
Location: in a shrub

Post by Arbustos »

muy_thaiguy wrote:
Strife wrote:I prefer it by quiet riot. IDK why I just do. Maybe it's that they sing it better. :lol:
Probably so, they just basically improved it from Slade, but, in my opinion, Oasis ruined one of rock's greatest songs. :evil:


Why do you love it so much? It's a pretty average 80's song to me... just wondering.
Top
User avatar
muy_thaiguy
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Gender: Male
Location: Back in Black
Contact:
Contact muy_thaiguy

Post by muy_thaiguy »

Arbustos wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Strife wrote:I prefer it by quiet riot. IDK why I just do. Maybe it's that they sing it better. :lol:
Probably so, they just basically improved it from Slade, but, in my opinion, Oasis ruined one of rock's greatest songs. :evil:


Why do you love it so much? It's a pretty average 80's song to me... just wondering.
It's one of those songs that makes you want to start moving to the rythm.

BTW suggs, even Norse (whom happens to be a major fan of Oasis) says that version sucks. I have to agree with Norse there.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
Top
User avatar
Arbustos
Posts: 1589
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 5:28 pm
Location: in a shrub

Post by Arbustos »

muy_thaiguy wrote:
Arbustos wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Strife wrote:I prefer it by quiet riot. IDK why I just do. Maybe it's that they sing it better. :lol:
Probably so, they just basically improved it from Slade, but, in my opinion, Oasis ruined one of rock's greatest songs. :evil:


Why do you love it so much? It's a pretty average 80's song to me... just wondering.
It's one of those songs that makes you want to start moving to the rythm.

BTW suggs, even Norse (whom happens to be a major fan of Oasis) says that version sucks. I have to agree with Norse there.


Oh... so you like disco? :P
Top
User avatar
muy_thaiguy
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Gender: Male
Location: Back in Black
Contact:
Contact muy_thaiguy

Post by muy_thaiguy »

Arbustos wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Arbustos wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Strife wrote:I prefer it by quiet riot. IDK why I just do. Maybe it's that they sing it better. :lol:
Probably so, they just basically improved it from Slade, but, in my opinion, Oasis ruined one of rock's greatest songs. :evil:


Why do you love it so much? It's a pretty average 80's song to me... just wondering.
It's one of those songs that makes you want to start moving to the rythm.

BTW suggs, even Norse (whom happens to be a major fan of Oasis) says that version sucks. I have to agree with Norse there.


Oh... so you like disco? :P
Not that kind of music! :x
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
Top
User avatar
suggs
Posts: 4015
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:16 pm
Location: At the end of the beginning...

Post by suggs »

That kinda proves my point. If a right wing xenophobic bigot whos heart is so full of hate he probably woldnt recognise a passionate song if it came up and tongued him, that a good enough reason to like it.
Lets be honest-Oasis just rocked up Slades classic-how you can like one and not the other is beyond me, they are quite similar.
And i love Oasis, but thats all they are, a souped up Slade.
And nowt rong with that.
Norse wrote:But, alas, you are all cock munching rent boys, with an IQ that would make my local spaco clinic blush.
Top
User avatar
muy_thaiguy
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Gender: Male
Location: Back in Black
Contact:
Contact muy_thaiguy

Post by muy_thaiguy »

suggs wrote:That kinda proves my point. If a right wing xenophobic bigot whos heart is so full of hate he probably woldnt recognise a passionate song if it came up and tongued him, that a good enough reason to like it.
Lets be honest-Oasis just rocked up Slades classic-how you can like one and not the other is beyond me, they are quite similar.
And i love Oasis, but thats all they are, a souped up Slade.
And nowt rong with that.
I tried listening to it, and quite frankly, it pissed me off and hurt my ears at the same time.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
Top
User avatar
suggs
Posts: 4015
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:16 pm
Location: At the end of the beginning...

Post by suggs »

Then i guess rock music isnt for you.
You might find "Ode to Joy" a bit too heavy as well.
Pehaps the Osmonds are more your cuppa tea.
Last edited by suggs on Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Norse wrote:But, alas, you are all cock munching rent boys, with an IQ that would make my local spaco clinic blush.
Top
User avatar
muy_thaiguy
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Gender: Male
Location: Back in Black
Contact:
Contact muy_thaiguy

Post by muy_thaiguy »

suggs wrote:Then i guess rock music isnt for you.
You might fing "Ode to Joy" a bit too heavy as well.
Pehaps the Osmonds are more your cuppa tea.
No, Indie Rock isn't for me, Metal and Hard Rock are for me, Country, Jazz, Classical, whatever. I enjoy many types of music and don't need a "high and mighty, know everything," person to tell me what I should and shouldn't listen to. I listened to Oasis to hear what they sounded like, and quite hinestly, it sucked in comparison to both Slade and Quiet Riot, thank you very much.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
Top
User avatar
suggs
Posts: 4015
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:16 pm
Location: At the end of the beginning...

Post by suggs »

I wasnt telling you what to listen to. But Oasis is rock music, pure and simple. Nuff said.
Norse wrote:But, alas, you are all cock munching rent boys, with an IQ that would make my local spaco clinic blush.
Top
User avatar
muy_thaiguy
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Gender: Male
Location: Back in Black
Contact:
Contact muy_thaiguy

Post by muy_thaiguy »

suggs wrote:I wasnt telling you what to listen to. But Oasis is rock music, pure and simple. Nuff said.
Glam Rock at it's finest, of course.

And this is rock, pure and simple.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
Top
User avatar
suggs
Posts: 4015
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:16 pm
Location: At the end of the beginning...

Post by suggs »

Well, early rock! but classic stuff cheers!
Norse wrote:But, alas, you are all cock munching rent boys, with an IQ that would make my local spaco clinic blush.
Top
User avatar
2dimes
Posts: 13122
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Post by 2dimes »

Never really noticed the accordian in the mix on that one.
Top
User avatar
pimphawks70
Posts: 1102
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:21 am

Post by pimphawks70 »

I can't agree more man!
Top
User avatar
Snorri1234
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
Contact:
Contact Snorri1234

Post by Snorri1234 »

I replied "no" on the general principle that I think Oasis is awesome.

I don't really care for the song in question actually. The f*ck if I care if they stole a song or whatever.

What is this about again?
Top
User avatar
muy_thaiguy
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Gender: Male
Location: Back in Black
Contact:
Contact muy_thaiguy

Post by muy_thaiguy »

Snorri1234 wrote:I replied "no" on the general principle that I think Oasis is awesome.

I don't really care for the song in question actually. The f*ck if I care if they stole a song or whatever.

What is this about again?
It was about Oasis' version being crap compared to the 1st two versions of the song.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”