coverup scandle in CC?

Ishmael_yoder · Post by **Ishmael_yoder** » Mon Oct 22, 2007 5:58 am

The following is a message I have left with the admins via the help section , just for everyones reading enjoyment. I find the situation very interesting.

I have just received notice that one of my feedbacks was deleted because it was "Responding to a feedback left for another player" Here is the situation: thefirm and gazza trot made a truce, anounced it in the game and it gave them the advantage. It was appropriate and part of the game. Risko lost the most out of the deal and went balistic. He accused them of cheating, went into all of thefirm's active games and told them they he was a cheater, giving our game number as the proof, attempting to ruin his name for having a truce. Risko was eliminated first and had the first opportunity to place feedback, therefore thefirm's feedback reguarding this was deleted as retaliatory.
What is the approriate way to warn people about players like Risko, I thought it was thru feedback, so I left him a negative feedback, but evidently that is not the appropriate way to warn others because you deleted my feedback left for him.
Here is the most disturbing part of the situation: I went back to look at the game log(1056251) to remind myself exactly what was said, and presto all of Risko's communication is gone. How is that possible, what is the point of that? Other people should be warned of his conduct, and someone is working hard to cover it up, I don't get it.

cena-rules · Post by **cena-rules** » Mon Oct 22, 2007 6:00 am

Im guessing he is on your ignore list

take him off your ignore list and look again

you will be suprised

chessplaya · Post by **chessplaya** » Mon Oct 22, 2007 6:00 am

Ishmael_yoder wrote:The following is a message I have left with the admins via the help section , just for everyones reading enjoyment. I find the situation very interesting.

I have just received notice that one of my feedbacks was deleted because it was "Responding to a feedback left for another player" Here is the situation: thefirm and gazza trot made a truce, anounced it in the game and it gave them the advantage. It was appropriate and part of the game. Risko lost the most out of the deal and went balistic. He accused them of cheating, went into all of thefirm's active games and told them they he was a cheater, giving our game number as the proof, attempting to ruin his name for having a truce. Risko was eliminated first and had the first opportunity to place feedback, therefore thefirm's feedback reguarding this was deleted as retaliatory.
What is the approriate way to warn people about players like Risko, I thought it was thru feedback, so I left him a negative feedback, but evidently that is not the appropriate way to warn others because you deleted my feedback left for him.
Here is the most disturbing part of the situation: I went back to look at the game log(1056251) to remind myself exactly what was said, and presto all of Risko's communication is gone. How is that possible, what is the point of that? Other people should be warned of his conduct, and someone is working hard to cover it up, I don't get it.

lol his chat is gone because he is on ur ignore list now

cena-rules · Post by **cena-rules** » Mon Oct 22, 2007 6:01 am

chessplaya wrote:
Ishmael_yoder wrote:The following is a message I have left with the admins via the help section , just for everyones reading enjoyment. I find the situation very interesting.

I have just received notice that one of my feedbacks was deleted because it was "Responding to a feedback left for another player" Here is the situation: thefirm and gazza trot made a truce, anounced it in the game and it gave them the advantage. It was appropriate and part of the game. Risko lost the most out of the deal and went balistic. He accused them of cheating, went into all of thefirm's active games and told them they he was a cheater, giving our game number as the proof, attempting to ruin his name for having a truce. Risko was eliminated first and had the first opportunity to place feedback, therefore thefirm's feedback reguarding this was deleted as retaliatory.
What is the approriate way to warn people about players like Risko, I thought it was thru feedback, so I left him a negative feedback, but evidently that is not the appropriate way to warn others because you deleted my feedback left for him.
Here is the most disturbing part of the situation: I went back to look at the game log(1056251) to remind myself exactly what was said, and presto all of Risko's communication is gone. How is that possible, what is the point of that? Other people should be warned of his conduct, and someone is working hard to cover it up, I don't get it.

lol his chat is gone because he is on ur ignore list now

fatsposted

chessplaya · Post by **chessplaya** » Mon Oct 22, 2007 6:02 am

damn u cena rules :lol:

cena-rules · Post by **cena-rules** » Mon Oct 22, 2007 6:02 am

chessplaya wrote:damn u cena rules

you love me really :wink:

chessplaya · Post by **chessplaya** » Mon Oct 22, 2007 6:03 am

cena-rules wrote:
chessplaya wrote:damn u cena rules

you love me really

i do but lets stop spamming :wink:

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Mon Oct 22, 2007 7:42 am

Ishmael, You can edit your feedback for this player so that it strictly speaks to gameplay, and not his feedback for you (which is retaliatory). When you are done with the edit, send another note to etix so we can review it for suitability for re-posting.

Ishmael_yoder · Post by **Ishmael_yoder** » Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:02 am

I see, I did not realize past communication in past games dissapeared with the ignore list, good to know.

here is the feedback that was deleted:
"Accused a player in our game of cheating because two people used a truce, then went into all his active games, calling him a cheater, then left Neg feedback, avoid this guy."

is it considered retaliatory because just because I mentioned the Neg. feedback? If that was left out, would it pass? I think others should be warned about people who do what Risko does (accuse others of cheating over a truce and try to ruin a guys name due to a truce).

Visaoni · Post by **Visaoni** » Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:07 am

Ishmael_yoder wrote:I see, I did not realize past communication in past games dissapeared with the ignore list, good to know.

here is the feedback that was deleted:
"Accused a player in our game of cheating because two people used a truce, then went into all his active games, calling him a cheater, then left Neg feedback, avoid this guy."

is it considered retaliatory because just because I mentioned the Neg. feedback? If that was left out, would it pass? I think others should be warned about people who do what Risko does (accuse others of cheating over a truce and try to ruin a guys name due to a truce).

It sounds fine to me. Personally I would have let the original pass. People should be warned when some idiot is going to go into all their go ballistic in game chat, and all the chat of all their active games, and then leave a neg for it. Although I do see how it could be considered retaliatory I still think it is a valid warning.

AAFitz · Post by **AAFitz** » Mon Oct 22, 2007 11:14 am

I was so hoping this was going to be about the coverup of the Lack-Wicked-Twill Love Triangle

but as far as the feedback goes, just modify it as Wicked suggests, if you think its warranted. Refer to his game play and chat in that game, if you feel its unsportsmanlike.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:48 pm

Ishmael_yoder wrote:I see, I did not realize past communication in past games dissapeared with the ignore list, good to know.

here is the feedback that was deleted:
"Accused a player in our game of cheating because two people used a truce, then went into all his active games, calling him a cheater, then left Neg feedback, avoid this guy."

is it considered retaliatory because just because I mentioned the Neg. feedback? If that was left out, would it pass? I think others should be warned about people who do what Risko does (accuse others of cheating over a truce and try to ruin a guys name due to a truce).

Typically any mention of feedback left deems it retaliatory.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:50 pm

AAFitz wrote:I was so hoping this was going to be about the coverup of the Lack-Wicked-Twill Love Triangle

That's SO last year. This year's is Clapper-Bedub-Wicked. What do you think we're doing in chat all that time? :wink:

I bet you wear last year's fashion's too, eh? :lol:

oVo · Post by **oVo** » Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:53 pm

Remove him from your ignore list to see his participation in the chat
and them re-ignore him when you are finished.

so who get's the biggest slice of pie in a love triangle?

gimil · Post by **gimil** » Mon Oct 22, 2007 1:04 pm

oVo wrote:Remove him from your ignore list to see his participation in the chat
and them re-ignore him when you are finished.

so who get's the biggest slice of pie in a love triangle?

im guessing clapper, wicked just aint up to it like she used to.

ever since hte penis reduction

Twill · Post by **Twill** » Mon Oct 22, 2007 1:13 pm

Awww, I was hoping this was going to be a REAL coverup.

To the Original Poster: what wicked said

To everyone else, while I love a good love triangle as much as the next, keep it on topic if ya would, or start up your own love triangle debate thread in the clubhouse to see who gets the biggest slice

Scott-Land · Post by **Scott-Land** » Mon Oct 22, 2007 7:26 pm

chessplaya wrote:
Ishmael_yoder wrote:The following is a message I have left with the admins via the help section , just for everyones reading enjoyment. I find the situation very interesting.

I have just received notice that one of my feedbacks was deleted because it was "Responding to a feedback left for another player" Here is the situation: thefirm and gazza trot made a truce, anounced it in the game and it gave them the advantage. It was appropriate and part of the game. Risko lost the most out of the deal and went balistic. He accused them of cheating, went into all of thefirm's active games and told them they he was a cheater, giving our game number as the proof, attempting to ruin his name for having a truce. Risko was eliminated first and had the first opportunity to place feedback, therefore thefirm's feedback reguarding this was deleted as retaliatory.
What is the approriate way to warn people about players like Risko, I thought it was thru feedback, so I left him a negative feedback, but evidently that is not the appropriate way to warn others because you deleted my feedback left for him.
Here is the most disturbing part of the situation: I went back to look at the game log(1056251) to remind myself exactly what was said, and presto all of Risko's communication is gone. How is that possible, what is the point of that? Other people should be warned of his conduct, and someone is working hard to cover it up, I don't get it.

lol his chat is gone because he is on ur ignore list now

must be the same cover up involving Chessplaya- i can't see any of his [team] chat

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 3:42 am

AAFitz wrote:I was so hoping this was going to be about the coverup of the Lack-Wicked-Twill Love Triangle

but as far as the feedback goes, just modify it as Wicked suggests, if you think its warranted. Refer to his game play and chat in that game, if you feel its unsportsmanlike.

I'm quite sure it was a square AK_Iceman-wicked-lack-twill

coverup scandle in CC?

Sound like a coverup?

coverup scandle in CC?

Re: coverup scandle in CC?

Re: coverup scandle in CC?

Re: coverup scandle in CC?