Haywood Jablomie, Aeternam, CrabNebula [noted]

Amanda1 · Post by **Amanda1** » Fri Sep 14, 2007 1:22 pm

<----begin copy---->

Subject line: Haywood Jablomie , Aeternam , CrabNebula

These are suspected Secret Alliance

Suspect users: Haywood Jablomie , Aeternam , CrabNebula

Game number: game=Game number here 876101

Comments: the game was going olong normaly and we were all chatting then the banter stopped and in rounds 9 and 10 the other 3 players attacked me and not each other at all, nothing had been said in chat about any alliance, when I asked why they were all attacking me they tried to pass it of as a joke, it seems very suspicious to me, although after that they did eventualy attack each other a bit they still all attacked me on most rounds and I was put out of the game

Amanda1

<----end copy---->

CrabNebula · Post by **CrabNebula** » Fri Sep 14, 2007 3:04 pm

Just one thing to say here: Escalating game.

I don't know about others but I was getting my card per turn. Everyone is invited to read the game chat.

rebelman · Post by **rebelman** » Thu Sep 20, 2007 9:34 am

sully800 · Post by **sully800** » Thu Sep 20, 2007 11:50 pm

They aren't multis (I know you didn't say that but I checked anyway)

The secret alliance accusation is noted, but unless there is evidence from more then one game they will remain clear.

CrabNebula · Post by **CrabNebula** » Fri Sep 21, 2007 2:22 am

Even though I have been cleared, I think this requires a final reply from me to clear all doubts pertaining to this matter.

Amanda1 wrote: they still all attacked me on most rounds and I was put out of the game

You were attacked 4 out of 12 rounds by at least 2 other players. That is not "most" in any sense to me. You cannot call being attacked by 1 player as "they".

You were only put of the game on the final round, that is, when everyone were eliminated. It just happened to be that you were on the top end of the cashing chain because you had the least armies and I had a better chance of eliminating you.

Now to what actually happened in Rounds 9-10.

Round 9 - Green attacks Amanda1 in the south only to block Red from eliminating her as she has less armies and 3/4 cards (Escalating game). I attack her in the west for the same reason, because blocking one area wouldn't be enough. Amanda1 cashes in. Red has no choice to attack but her 1 army territory since everything else has more than 1.

Round 10 - Green attacks her to get a card. I cash in but since Amanda1 had already cashed in last turn, it wouldn't be of use to eliminate her. So I just stack up armies and get my card. Amanda1 attacks Red. Red attacks ME and not Amanda1 contrary to what she said in the first post.

In the next few rounds, I build while getting my card each turn. eliminate Amanda1, then Green and then Red to win the game same round.

So all in all, the accusation is false and not factual. My post can be confirmed by game logs and chat.

Amanda1 · Post by **Amanda1** » Fri Sep 21, 2007 3:31 am

Phew ...I'm happy this has been cleared up.
I'm sorry I wrongly accused you. I didn't do it out of spite.
I only did it because I honestly suspected you were cheating, and I didn't want it to happen to anyone else.

I'm really sorry I accused you of cheating

CrabNebula · Post by **CrabNebula** » Fri Sep 21, 2007 5:08 am

Its ok, apology accepted.

I hope the other two do too.

All's well that ends well.

Haywood Jablomie, Aeternam, CrabNebula [noted]

Haywood Jablomie, Aeternam, CrabNebula [noted]

Re: Haywood Jablomie, Aeternam, CrabNebula [noted]