WWII WESTERN FRONT [Quenched]

[gimil]

i preferred the arrows when they were black. i also dont like the light blue number on the star.

for the mountains i think if you adjust the color and tone it down so its color is similar to the color of the siegfield defense it will sit i little better.

also for the stars could you maybe a a littler touch of orange like you did on the bonus numbers for france, britian and vichy france. also those think boarders could you downsize them a little more? maybe make them 3-4px?

a quick question, do you intent to have pictures in the water like the easter front?

[Bavarian Raven]

...just a side thought and maybe should be changed...if it is not too late but northern italy and germany on the right side of switzerland should be able to attack one another...

[Qwert]

gimil Posted: 12 Aug 2007 22:20 Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

i preferred the arrows when they were black. i also dont like the light blue number on the star.

for the mountains i think if you adjust the color and tone it down so its color is similar to the color of the siegfield defense it will sit i little better.

also for the stars could you maybe a a littler touch of orange like you did on the bonus numbers for france, britian and vichy france. also those think boarders could you downsize them a little more? maybe make them 3-4px?

a quick question, do you intent to have pictures in the water like the easter front?

Well original colours is black,but some people thinking that red is better(in first version,like in Eastern front,red arrow is ally attack,and black whas german attack)so how to solve these problem,maybe poll vote?
im not quit understand what you mean with stars?
I think that pictures in water not importan to much.

Bavarian Raven Posted: 12 Aug 2007 22:37 Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

...just a side thought and maybe should be changed...if it is not too late but northern italy and germany on the right side of switzerland should be able to attack one another...

In mine map these is not posible,and i solve problem with italy,conecting touluse with western task force.

[Qwert]

Ok we start moving out of working order,so from now i will ignoring[/size] all sugestion who not conected with present work step-BONUS ISSUE.
So far i have 3 sugestion,and i will give one more day to get more sugestion and then i will put all these sugestion in vote poll.

edbeard

Western Germany 4
Siegfried Defence 5
North Italy 3
Vichy France 3
Britain 2
France 6

onbekende
5 Western Germany
6 Siegfried Defence
3 North Italy
4 Vichy France
4 Britain
7 France

tim02

this what I think

west germany 4
segfried defense 6
france 7
vichy france 4
north Italy if you chenge the marsielle issue 3 if you don't 2
britain because It's so hard to hold with the bombardment 4

[unriggable]

Britain should be 2, 3 tops.

[Qwert]

Unriggable,give me full sugestion not only for 1 continent.

[unriggable]

South France = 3
Italy = 2
Britain = 3
North France = 6
Siegfried Def = 5
Germany = 4

I'm concerned about holding italy and south france and having to defend only two countries.

[Qwert]

Thanks for yours bonus sugestion,and if you dont notice i solve these italy problem with Touluse conection.
If i dont get any new sugestion what concerne bonus issue i will tomorow put all sugestion in poll vote,and people can vote for most suitabile sugestion.

[unriggable]

Thanks for yours bonus sugestion,and if you dont notice i solve these italy problem with Touluse conection.
If i dont get any new sugestion what concerne bonus issue i will tomorow put all sugestion in poll vote,and people can vote for most suitabile sugestion.

Yeah I saw the toulouse connection and it's a good idea, but the fact that you can hold two continents from two countries... maybe you should have a bombardment from brest into toulouse or something to balance it out.

[Qwert]

Yeah I saw the toulouse connection and it's a good idea, but the fact that you can hold two continents from two countries... maybe you should have a bombardment from brest into toulouse or something to balance it out.

two continents from two countries,where?
Do you know that in map world 2.1 you can hold all south america from 3 country.

[Keredrex]

I Preferred the black bombardment arrows... And I think All oneway attack (troop movement arrows) should be RED... I agree don't use light blue # on star

[Qwert]

Keredrex



Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Posts: 178
Location: New York
Posted: 13 Aug 2007 22:35 Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I Preferred the black bombardment arrows... And I think All oneway attack (troop movement arrows) should be RED... I agree don't use light blue # on star

Like i say previos post i will ignore everything what you say. Dont confuse order of map making,now is time for bonus issue.

[mibi]

black arrows are definetly better, the red ones are too up in your face.

[Qwert]

mibi



Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 1138
Location: The Great State of Vermont
Posted: 14 Aug 2007 03:50 Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

black arrows are definetly better, the red ones are too up in your face.

You still continue to insulting.Please go to other place.

[Coleman]

black arrows are definetly better, the red ones are too up in your face.

You still continue to insulting.Please go to other place.

qwert, I don't know how you can take everything mibi says and take it as personal attacks. If someone else had suggested the same thing would you have taken it the same way?

I wish you'd get over whatever your problem is. If you did I'm sure all your maps would benefit.

[Qwert]

I dont have any agains mibi,but he dont read my all topic,and ask some thing what we discused before,and now he just repeating arrows,and he knows that bonus issue is in line.

[Gnome]

ok sorry for getting this thread back on toppic
Wy don't you make the bonus border like, meaning:
Western Germany has 8 terretories, but from this 8 only 4 of them are borders with another coninent so make it a bonus of 4.
Siegfried Defense has only 6 terr. but it can be attacked on 5 of them so bonus =5
North Italy would be 2
Vichy France 4
Britain 3
and France 6
I don't know if those normal arrows are only one way attacks...Becous than I misscount it...I don't know if this is a good idea...But I think It's unfair if you only look to the size...

[Qwert]

Ok yours bonus sugestion is

Gnome
Western Germany 4
Siegfried Defence 5
North italy 2
Vichy france 4
Britain 3
France 6

[unriggable]

I'm a D man myself, Vichy France should be 3.

[jako]

this maybe off-topic to the current issue of bonuses but i have to ask:

if the arrows attacking britain are only bombardment arrows that can only destroy but not conquer the terr, then how ar u suppose to conquer terrs in brit from france or germany?

[Dmunster]

if the arrows attacking britain are only bombardment arrows that can only destroy but not conquer the terr, then how ar u suppose to conquer terrs in brit from france or germany?

LoL. Doh!

[jako]

if the arrows attacking britain are only bombardment arrows that can only destroy but not conquer the terr, then how ar u suppose to conquer terrs in brit from france or germany?

LoL. Doh!

uhh.....real nice answer to my question, care to expand?

[Coleman]

You can't. You either start there or never get to have it.

[jako]

You can't. You either start there or never get to have it.

really? dang, that sucks, thx for finally answering my question coleman

[Qwert]

jako

Coleman wrote:
You can't. You either start there or never get to have it.

really? dang, that sucks, thx for finally answering my question coleman

Yup,if you want britain you must be on britain from begining.