D-Day: Omaha Beach! [Quenched]

Care to peruse completed maps? Take a stroll through the Atlas.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
eye84free
Posts: 1576
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 6:33 pm
Gender: Male
Location: NORTH CAROLINA

Post by eye84free »

now this map...is great....wonderful job on it...cant wait to play it....
User avatar
mibi
Posts: 3350
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: The Great State of Vermont
Contact:

Post by mibi »

KEYOGI wrote:What about using the same style applied to the arrows on the bunkers and artillery?


that didnt work as red and white dont contrast well for text. but i added a black stroke to the numbers to make them pop more.

large
Image
small
Image
User avatar
cairnswk
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Australia

Post by cairnswk »

mibi...i hate to be a pain in the proverbial....but i still can't read the red numbers, and if i can't read them i can't play this map.
R the numbers on the large map smaller than on the small map or R they the same size? Shouldn't they be larger?
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
mibi
Posts: 3350
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: The Great State of Vermont
Contact:

Post by mibi »

cairnswk wrote:mibi...i hate to be a pain in the proverbial....but i still can't read the red numbers, and if i can't read them i can't play this map.
R the numbers on the large map smaller than on the small map or R they the same size? Shouldn't they be larger?


cairns. Im not sure what to say to you. The numbers are perfectly legible. My 7 year old step son just rattled them all off with out hesitation. If you really can't read them you might want to check to see if your monitor or something else.

And the numbers are the same size. I kept the original numbers from the large map and put them into the small map.
User avatar
cairnswk
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Australia

Post by cairnswk »

mibi wrote:
cairnswk wrote:mibi...i hate to be a pain in the proverbial....but i still can't read the red numbers, and if i can't read them i can't play this map.
R the numbers on the large map smaller than on the small map or R they the same size? Shouldn't they be larger?


cairns. Im not sure what to say to you. The numbers are perfectly legible. My 7 year old step son just rattled them all off with out hesitation. If you really can't read them you might want to check to see if your monitor or something else.

And the numbers are the same size. I kept the original numbers from the large map and put them into the small map.


mibi....there is a lot of years between your 7 yr old son and myself. it is not my monitor, and not my glasses, i'm afraid i simply won't play the map as it is i causing me to strain my eyes to read those numbers. sorry. :cry:
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Coleman
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:36 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Midwest

Post by Coleman »

cairnswk wrote:
mibi wrote:
cairnswk wrote:mibi...i hate to be a pain in the proverbial....but i still can't read the red numbers, and if i can't read them i can't play this map.
R the numbers on the large map smaller than on the small map or R they the same size? Shouldn't they be larger?


cairns. Im not sure what to say to you. The numbers are perfectly legible. My 7 year old step son just rattled them all off with out hesitation. If you really can't read them you might want to check to see if your monitor or something else.

And the numbers are the same size. I kept the original numbers from the large map and put them into the small map.


mibi....there is a lot of years between your 7 yr old son and myself. it is not my monitor, and not my glasses, i'm afraid i simply won't play the map as it is i causing me to strain my eyes to read those numbers. sorry. :cry:


I don't have a problem with it either, but I'm 20.
Warning: You may be reading a really old topic.
User avatar
AndyDufresne
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
Contact:

Post by AndyDufresne »

I think the numbers are as clear as they can get.


--Andy
User avatar
cairnswk
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Australia

Post by cairnswk »

AndyDufresne wrote:I think the numbers are as clear as they can get.


--Andy


Fair enough....i will have to get my eyes and monitor updated if i want to play this map.
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
AndyDufresne
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
Contact:

Post by AndyDufresne »

Maybe if you spin around real fast, and turn on strobe lights that will make the map seem clearer and easier to read. Or it will give you a seizure.

Is it just the red numbers you have trouble with? What about the beach and the ships?


--Andy
User avatar
cairnswk
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Australia

Post by cairnswk »

AndyDufresne wrote:Maybe if you spin around real fast, and turn on strobe lights that will make the map seem clearer and easier to read. Or it will give you a seizure.

Is it just the red numbers you have trouble with? What about the beach and the ships?


--Andy

The beach numbers are fine. The red writing above in the "destructions" are fine. the red numbers are just difficult to decipher...i end up taking a guess at what they are because they are not clear enough, and for clarity sake, one shouldn't have to do that. As I said, sorry to be a pain, but if i'm in the minority then i accept everyone else's decision. Perhaps it is simply the font.
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
AndyDufresne
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
Contact:

Post by AndyDufresne »

Would a simple size increase do the job do you think? I'm not sure how you've created the numbers on the map, mibi, but if it's possible (and isn't excessively hard or long), perhaps post a version with slightly bumped up number size.


--Andy
User avatar
mibi
Posts: 3350
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: The Great State of Vermont
Contact:

Post by mibi »

AndyDufresne wrote:Would a simple size increase do the job do you think? I'm not sure how you've created the numbers on the map, mibi, but if it's possible (and isn't excessively hard or long), perhaps post a version with slightly bumped up number size.


--Andy


15% enlargemtn for the cairnsighted, ;)
large
Image
small
Image
Last edited by mibi on Fri Aug 17, 2007 12:13 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
tim02
Posts: 249
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:51 pm
Location: Vancouver

Post by tim02 »

nice the bonuses are kind of confusing
User avatar
cairnswk
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Australia

Post by cairnswk »

mibi wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:Would a simple size increase do the job do you think? I'm not sure how you've created the numbers on the map, mibi, but if it's possible (and isn't excessively hard or long), perhaps post a version with slightly bumped up number size.


--Andy


15% enlargemtn for the cairnsighted, ;)


now "cairnsighted" (i don't know whether that is meant to be humourous or what) can read the numbers. thanks mibi. :)
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
AndyDufresne
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
Contact:

Post by AndyDufresne »

Glad to hear it. Perhaps it's clear for everyone now. :)


--Andy
User avatar
Geoster
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 6:09 pm
Location: L.A.

Post by Geoster »

On the large map, the numbers in the left hand artillery position are dribbling over the lines in a rather unattractive way.

Also, what are the full names for the artillery position territories? "916th German Grenadiers Artillery 3" is kind of a mouthful. Would it make sense to give the artillery positions and bunkers their own nicknames?

G
User avatar
Coleman
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:36 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Midwest

Post by Coleman »

Geoster wrote:On the large map, the numbers in the left hand artillery position are dribbling over the lines in a rather unattractive way.

Also, what are the full names for the artillery position territories? "916th German Grenadiers Artillery 3" is kind of a mouthful. Would it make sense to give the artillery positions and bunkers their own nicknames?

G


In the xml I have it as: 916th Artillery 3, which is what you would see in the drop down.
Warning: You may be reading a really old topic.
User avatar
unriggable
Posts: 8037
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm

Post by unriggable »

Post a picture with the numbers on it, I have a feeling the trench lines are going to obstruct it.
Image
User avatar
Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA
Contact:

Post by Qwert »

Do you use military font for these map Mibi? I dont think that in 1944 americans use these font what you present on yours map.
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
unriggable
Posts: 8037
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm

Post by unriggable »

qwert wrote:Do you use military font for these map Mibi? I dont think that in 1944 americans use these font what you present on yours map.


It's not supposed to be a copy of the military version like your iwo jima, its supposed to be the 'pill form' version that's easy and pleasant to look at (not saying your iwo jima map isn't).
Image
User avatar
Coleman
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:36 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Midwest

Post by Coleman »

qwert wrote:Do you use military font for these map Mibi? I dont think that in 1944 americans use these font what you present on yours map.

No, what's your point?
Warning: You may be reading a really old topic.
User avatar
Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA
Contact:

Post by Qwert »

mibi



Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 1134
Location: The Great State of Vermont
Posted: 13 Aug 2007 05:02 Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

if this is a military map why are you using a comic sans type font. maybe a more military oriented font would give the map a more accurate military feel.

Its these explane situation.Please Mibi If you dont want to researc all IWO JIMA topic,then dont put any post in mine topic,also i will not put any post in yours topic,i dont want to start again war topic with you like we have before.
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
AndyDufresne
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
Contact:

Post by AndyDufresne »

Keep the bickerin' and attacks out of the threads. :)


--Andy
User avatar
unriggable
Posts: 8037
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm

Post by unriggable »

AndyDufresne wrote:Keep the bickerin' and attacks out of the threads. :)


--Andy


Quench?
Image
User avatar
mibi
Posts: 3350
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: The Great State of Vermont
Contact:

Post by mibi »

moved those bunker numbers around

large
Image
small
Image
Post Reply

Return to “The Atlas”