Show Partners Cards

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

User avatar
Gilligan
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Providence, RI

Post by Gilligan »

AK_iceman wrote:I don't like it. Team games are all about communication, if you want to know what cards your partner has, then just ask them.

But, in a very good chance, another partner doesn't even look at the chat. If they do end up losing because of this reason, it's not fair to person that wants to communicate but the other partner won't reply in the chat.
Image
User avatar
wicked
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Post by wicked »

Don't worry about the naysayers Gilligan, it's a good solid idea.
User avatar
Gilligan
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Providence, RI

Post by Gilligan »

You think Lack will go for it?
Image
User avatar
AK_iceman
Posts: 5704
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:39 pm

Post by AK_iceman »

Gilligan wrote:
AK_iceman wrote:I don't like it. Team games are all about communication, if you want to know what cards your partner has, then just ask them.

But, in a very good chance, another partner doesn't even look at the chat. If they do end up losing because of this reason, it's not fair to person that wants to communicate but the other partner won't reply in the chat.

Ok, so if your partner doesn't read the chat... send him a PM.

And, what if the uncommunicative partner has a different strategy in mind, but you kill him off for cards and that totally loses the game for both of you.

I'd like to see communication in team games encouraged, not become self-sufficient and be able to play without talking to your teammate.

I like where your head's at, but just not this particular idea.
User avatar
wicked
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Post by wicked »

Gilligan wrote:You think Lack will go for it?


That's up to lack! Seems most everyone's for it though. Maybe add a poll to show lack how most support it?

It'll be much easier to just see their cards, sometimes I forget to mention it to my teammate and vice versa. I've often been left wondering what my partner is holding when trying to plan a move. Sure you can ask, but who wants to wait for an answer? It's much easier, especially in a sequential game, to plan a strategy at/before your turn, instead of having to wait for a partner to answer and check back and wait. What a hassle. Not many have time for that.
User avatar
Rocketry
Posts: 1416
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 5:33 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Westminster
Contact:

Re: Ability to see teammates cards

Post by Rocketry »

Gilligan wrote:I think we should be able to see your teammates cards in doubles or triples games. Underneath (or next to) your own cards, it could say, for example, if my partner is lackattack, in a doubles game, it could be:

My cards: Alaska Congo Scandinavia lackattack's cards: Indonesia Brazil Kamchatka


Why it is needed:

If a teammate is nearly dead, and has 4 cards, it is your turn, and you are deciding whether he will be safe with a set on his turn. It turns out that he had no set, and then gets eliminated by the other team. I know we could use the chat, but if you have a partner that doesn't even LOOK at the chat, it would be very useful.


just use game chat
User avatar
Gilligan
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Providence, RI

Re: Ability to see teammates cards

Post by Gilligan »

Rocketry wrote:
Gilligan wrote:I think we should be able to see your teammates cards in doubles or triples games. Underneath (or next to) your own cards, it could say, for example, if my partner is lackattack, in a doubles game, it could be:

My cards: Alaska Congo Scandinavia lackattack's cards: Indonesia Brazil Kamchatka


Why it is needed:

If a teammate is nearly dead, and has 4 cards, it is your turn, and you are deciding whether he will be safe with a set on his turn. It turns out that he had no set, and then gets eliminated by the other team. I know we could use the chat, but if you have a partner that doesn't even LOOK at the chat, it would be very useful.


just use game chat



.....Are you kidding? Did you read this thread AT ALL?
Image
User avatar
riskydude21
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 12:35 pm
Location: Mississippi

Post by riskydude21 »

i like it
User avatar
Gilligan
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Providence, RI

Post by Gilligan »

wicked wrote:
Gilligan wrote:You think Lack will go for it?


That's up to lack! Seems most everyone's for it though. Maybe add a poll to show lack how most support it?

It'll be much easier to just see their cards, sometimes I forget to mention it to my teammate and vice versa. I've often been left wondering what my partner is holding when trying to plan a move. Sure you can ask, but who wants to wait for an answer? It's much easier, especially in a sequential game, to plan a strategy at/before your turn, instead of having to wait for a partner to answer and check back and wait. What a hassle. Not many have time for that.


I am totally in agreement with that.
Image
User avatar
AndyDufresne
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
Contact:

Post by AndyDufresne »

The only downside I see is cluttering up the game page.


--Andy
User avatar
Coleman
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:36 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Midwest

Post by Coleman »

AK_iceman wrote:I don't like it. Team games are all about communication, if you want to know what cards your partner has, then just ask them.

I have a tendency to ignore everything anyone without an Avatar says, and with yours gone... Well, it's just, awkward.

I like the idea though, but I wouldn't say it is landslide support like Wicked indicated. Seems to be half & half.
Warning: You may be reading a really old topic.
User avatar
Gilligan
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Providence, RI

Post by Gilligan »

AndyDufresne wrote:The only downside I see is cluttering up the game page.


--Andy


How would it clutter the page if it would be on the same line as your ow cards?
Image
User avatar
Coleman
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:36 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Midwest

Post by Coleman »

Gilligan wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:The only downside I see is cluttering up the game page.


--Andy


How would it clutter the page if it would be on the same line as your ow cards?


Well if someone is using a small map on a bad resolution the cards will word wrap to be 2 or even 3 lines.
Warning: You may be reading a really old topic.
User avatar
Gilligan
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Providence, RI

Post by Gilligan »

I can definitely see 2, but 3 would probably only come up in a triples game.
Image
User avatar
wicked
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Post by wicked »

I don't think it'll clutter at all. If someone's on a small screen, they're used to things being on multiple lines anyway. :wink:
User avatar
Gilligan
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Providence, RI

Post by Gilligan »

wicked wrote:I don't think it'll clutter at all. If someone's on a small screen, they're used to things being on multiple lines anyway. :wink:


Dude...er...dudette you got some serious defensive lines. 8)
Image
User avatar
BeastofBurson
Posts: 185
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 9:55 pm

Post by BeastofBurson »

Seeing your partners cards........... I like the idea...

What about a card "pool" for all your teams cards to go into that all team members have access to them at any time?....

It would still make people communicate in the game...by discussing how and when to use them..

Just an idea.....probably a bad one....

I'm gonna get flamed aren't I?.......:shock:
Last edited by BeastofBurson on Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Dancing Mustard wrote:Are you flirting with me? Your angry posts are just the equivalent of school-yard pigtail-pulling.
wicked wrote:We like to give the mental patients a chance to get back on their meds.
User avatar
Gilligan
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Providence, RI

Post by Gilligan »

Teammates. Not opponents, that would be some bull crap.
Image
User avatar
FlyinHi
Posts: 132
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:42 pm

Post by FlyinHi »

I's definitely not needed, but would be a fine addition. I think it should be put on low priority.
User avatar
Phobia
Posts: 1497
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 2:11 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Sheffield, England

Post by Phobia »

Thumbs up!
User avatar
Keredrex
Posts: 400
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 1:41 am
Gender: Male
Location: New York

Post by Keredrex »

Awesome Idea...It definitely will help Strategy... and would help if a player communicated the Wrong info By Accident.... Like if he put Guineas instead of Guyana Or New Guinea or Like in Chinese checkers.. Center I but he meant Center l....also it is easier then asking in a triples game what 5 cards each player has
User avatar
Gilligan
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Providence, RI

Post by Gilligan »

The poll is doing pretty good
Image
User avatar
Gilligan
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Providence, RI

Post by Gilligan »

Can someone say something on why they voted no?
Image
User avatar
The1exile
Posts: 7140
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 7:01 pm
Location: Devastation
Contact:

Post by The1exile »

I like it. Sure you say that you can ask your team mate, but often they might not get online in the 24 hours in which you have to take your turn - especially if you wasted 12 hours before getting on due to having to sleep.
Image
User avatar
AndyDufresne
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
Contact:

Post by AndyDufresne »

I would've voted 'I don't care either way' if the option was available.


--Andy
Post Reply

Return to “Archived Suggestions”