War lover or strategist?
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
War lover or strategist?
Just a quick question
how many people on this site are here because they love the idea of war? How many are here because they simply like the idea of strategy and out witting people?
There seems to be a few people who love the war factor - let me know so i can put you on my ignore list.
HA!
how many people on this site are here because they love the idea of war? How many are here because they simply like the idea of strategy and out witting people?
There seems to be a few people who love the war factor - let me know so i can put you on my ignore list.
HA!
- tiberiusaquila
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 8:50 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Orlando, Florida
I love the strategy aspect and competing with people who are good, tough opponents and who don't take these games and themselves too seriously.
I love chess and CC is like playing a variation of chess in some ways.
I've served in the military. War doesn't appeal to me in the least.
I love chess and CC is like playing a variation of chess in some ways.
I've served in the military. War doesn't appeal to me in the least.
A fronte praecipitium a tergo lupi
high score 2143 10.26.11
high score 2143 10.26.11
- jako
- Posts: 1022
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 4:50 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: A lost soul with no-one to stalk.
i like both factors hehehe
but im not much good at either, the fighting/conquering terrs aaspect of risk makes me want to play, but the strategy aspect of risk keeps me playing.
but we all know risk is 90% luck 10% skill
, at least thats what i tell myself when and if i lose to a new recruit 
but im not much good at either, the fighting/conquering terrs aaspect of risk makes me want to play, but the strategy aspect of risk keeps me playing.
but we all know risk is 90% luck 10% skill

Time to retire this much loved sig of mine with a new clan.
- MR. Nate
- Posts: 951
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 10:59 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Locked in the warehouse.
- Contact:
Yeah, it's got to be the strategy. If I loved war, I'd buy Halo or some other 1st person shooter. But Risk is not only the strategy, it's often a good dose of psychology in the chat. You can't win all the time, but sometimes you can psyche out your opponents even when you don't deserve to win.
AAFitz wrote:There will always be cheaters, abusive players, terrible players, and worse. But we have every right to crush them.
MeDeFe wrote:This is a forum on the internet, what do you expect?
End the Flame Wars.
-
Wild_Tiger
- Posts: 809
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 3:39 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Netherlands
-
Ronaldinho
- Posts: 3069
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 5:35 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Dorset, England.
- misterman10
- Posts: 9412
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 1:48 pm
- Location: Out on the Pitch.
- Contact:
MR. Nate wrote:Yeah, it's got to be the strategy. If I loved war, I'd buy Halo or some other 1st person shooter. But Risk is not only the strategy, it's often a good dose of psychology in the chat. You can't win all the time, but sometimes you can psyche out your opponents even when you don't deserve to win.
Halo is strategy as well
Pleasant Chaps still suck cock.
Yakuza power.
Yakuza power.
-
chessplaya
- Posts: 1875
- Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 1:46 pm
- Kinnison
- Posts: 1187
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 5:27 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Generation One Autobot HQ (or, Texas)
Strategist..
Long-time player of strategic games. PnP games, small (and not-so-small) piles of little cardboard counters, computer games, cards, figs...
Some of my favorites:
ANYTHING computerized... (turn-based, never liked RT strategy, too much clicking)
STARFIRE 3rd Ed or later
EMPIRE deluxe
CATAN Settlers, Starfarers, Seafarers, whatever...
ROBORALLY
EMPIRE BUILDER
AXIS and ALLIES (the original. spinoffs need not apply)
DIPLOMACY and SUPREMACY, although either can turn into a flamewar with unreasonable amounts of hurt feelings, depending on the players...
Some of my favorites:
ANYTHING computerized... (turn-based, never liked RT strategy, too much clicking)
STARFIRE 3rd Ed or later
EMPIRE deluxe
CATAN Settlers, Starfarers, Seafarers, whatever...
ROBORALLY
EMPIRE BUILDER
AXIS and ALLIES (the original. spinoffs need not apply)
DIPLOMACY and SUPREMACY, although either can turn into a flamewar with unreasonable amounts of hurt feelings, depending on the players...
Strategy-hound here.... always loved chess and draughts when i was growing - loved Risk, too...
get pretty bored of the most of the so-called RTS on computers - they're not strategy, they're "outbuild and wipeout", and not particularly challenging...
that said - Civ and Total War are both kicka$$ series...
and loving all these on-line strategy games on the internet now - great to play against a brain rather than a set of algorithms
get pretty bored of the most of the so-called RTS on computers - they're not strategy, they're "outbuild and wipeout", and not particularly challenging...
that said - Civ and Total War are both kicka$$ series...
and loving all these on-line strategy games on the internet now - great to play against a brain rather than a set of algorithms
- Dancing Mustard
- Posts: 5442
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:31 pm
- Location: Pushing Buttons
- Dodo C. Snotts
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 11:46 am
- Location: Texas
Stopper wrote:My main reason for playing is to pretend I'm a visionary leader who spreads socialism all over the world, defeating evil capitalists and fascist pigs on the way, and brings peace and harmony to the human race. Which is why I only play games that I start, as then I'm always red.
haha... awesome
-- share what ya got --
Strategic War
I don't particularly like the idea of a war, but I am a pretty good strategist. I like to outwit my opponents if I can't overpower them, and if I can overpower them, I do both.

