NHL LEAGUE [WINNER: Clive]

Tournaments completed in 2008.

Moderator: Tournament Directors

Post Reply
User avatar
Optimus Prime
Posts: 9665
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 9:33 pm
Gender: Male

Post by Optimus Prime »

He told us it would take a long time to finish anyways, it's not that big of a deal. Those of us with premium can always occupy ourselves with other games. Having a couple in a tournament that is a little slower doesn't really make a difference in the end.
User avatar
tabsnake
Posts: 242
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 7:20 pm
Gender: Male
Location: California

Post by tabsnake »

Edmonton beat Colorado

game 623986
beanyuk
Posts: 143
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:30 am
Location: Stockton on Tees. The birthplace of the Train

Post by beanyuk »

The Islanders have beaten the Bruins and Ducks to go to 4-0


Games 623960 and 623909
Lukeplastow
Posts: 211
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 4:41 pm

Post by Lukeplastow »

Do we have to post the result if we win?

Also ive got 4 games yet to start because my opponent hasnt turned up.
dcc1220
Posts: 825
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:15 pm
Location: Pella, Iowa

Reserve

Post by dcc1220 »

Please place me on the reserve list.
Image
User avatar
spidey
Posts: 713
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 11:04 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Regina, SK

Post by spidey »

dcc you are on the reserves list. you don't need to post your results on here and unfortunatly I couldn't restrict the tourney to only premiums, I needed to get my tourney rights first. they seem to be keeping up ok, there are some premium people who are just as slow.
User avatar
Aerial Attack
Posts: 1132
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:59 pm
Location: Generation One: The Clan

Game #624245

Post by Aerial Attack »

Game #624245

Tampa defeats Washington on the road
User avatar
dussle
Posts: 902
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 4:00 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Indiana, USA

Re: Game #624245

Post by dussle »

Aerial Attack wrote:Game #624245

Tampa defeats Washington on the road



spidey wrote:you don't need to post your results on here
User avatar
Aerial Attack
Posts: 1132
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:59 pm
Location: Generation One: The Clan

Tie-Breakers

Post by Aerial Attack »

I'm not sure that I like the Goals For/Goals Against Tie-Breaker (at least not as the first level).

What this does is give an advantage to newer players (like myself). Newer players don't have high rankings - therefore we don't give/lose large point totals in our matches.

Older players either win and barely get anything or lose large chunks of points. As for older players with low ranks, they either won't win enough earn the big point bonuses OR they are much better 1 v 1 strategists than overall players. This is fine.

I think the tie-breakers should be as follows (If at any point a team is eliminated - you take the remaining teams and start over or declare a winner):

To determine a Division Winner:

1. Head To Head
2. Division Record
3. Conference Record
NOTE: 4 Through 7 are basically equal for me, I just have slight preferences
4. Road Wins (You NEED Road Wins during the Playoffs)
5. Goals For (You won against people you "weren't supposed to" - although this rewards early season victories more, as your rank is lower then)
6. Goals Against (You didn't lose to people you "weren't supposed to" - although this penalizes early season losses more, as their ranks were lower then)
7. Home Wins (You PICKED your map - you gotta be able to defend it)
8. Coin Flip/Spidey's decision/elimination game(s)

Use the same matrix to determine Conference Seeding (except the division record thing).

I guess whichever team wins the All-Star Game determines home ice in the Stanley Cup Finals?
Last edited by Aerial Attack on Sat Jul 14, 2007 1:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Aerial Attack
Posts: 1132
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:59 pm
Location: Generation One: The Clan

Re: Game #624245

Post by Aerial Attack »

dussle wrote:
Aerial Attack wrote:Game #624245

Tampa defeats Washington on the road



spidey wrote:you don't need to post your results on here


He said we didn't NEED to, not that we shouldn't

Besides, I've posted all my other results.
Clive
Posts: 2306
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:09 pm

Re: Tie-Breakers

Post by Clive »

Aerial Attack wrote:I'm not sure that I like the Goals For/Goals Against Tie-Breaker (at least not as the first level).

What this does is give an advantage to newer players (like myself). Newer players don't have high rankings - therefore we don't give/lose large point totals in our matches.

Older players either win and barely get anything or lose large chunks of points. As for older players with low ranks, they either won't win enough earn the big point bonuses OR they are much better 1 v 1 strategists than overall players. This is fine.

I think the tie-breakers should be as follows (If at any point a team is eliminated - you take the remaining teams and start over or declare a winner):

To determine a Division Winner:

1. Head To Head
2. Division Record
3. Conference Record
NOTE: 4 Through 7 are basically equal for me, I just have slight preferences
4. Road Wins (You NEED Road Wins during the Playoffs)
5. Goals For (You won against people you "weren't supposed to" - although this rewards early season victories more, as your rank is lower then)
6. Goals Against (You didn't lose to people you "weren't supposed to" - although this penalizes early season losses more, as their ranks were lower then)
7. Home Wins (You PICKED your map - you gotta be able to defend it)
8. Coin Flip/Spidey's decision

Use the same matrix to determine Conference Seeding (except the division record thing).

I guess whichever team wins the All-Star Game determines home ice in the Stanley Cup Finals?


Coin flip, are you joking? i would refuse to accept that...a head to head match sounds like the best idea
User avatar
Aerial Attack
Posts: 1132
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:59 pm
Location: Generation One: The Clan

Post by Aerial Attack »

Clive,

Those were just suggestions. Elimination game[s] (on a neutral site) is also a good idea

I'll update my matrix
Clive
Posts: 2306
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:09 pm

Post by Clive »

spidey wrote:dcc you are on the reserves list. you don't need to post your results on here and unfortunatly I couldn't restrict the tourney to only premiums, I needed to get my tourney rights first. they seem to be keeping up ok, there are some premium people who are just as slow.


Sorry for slowing down the games, I shall be quick when i return next friday :)
User avatar
lostatlimbo
Posts: 1386
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 3:56 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Post by lostatlimbo »

I am still waiting for players in 3 games (Nashville will be starting soon, but Pittsburgh & Phoenix are no shows) and no active games. :(

Perhaps it is time to bump the no-shows for reserves?

Or maybe the next round of games while we wait?

(sorry, to be impatient, just want to cue up some more)
michiganfan22
Posts: 612
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 7:34 pm
Location: Rochester, NY

Post by michiganfan22 »

just won a lot of games
7-1
Last edited by michiganfan22 on Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
dyingfetus
Posts: 231
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 2:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: New York

Post by dyingfetus »

alright spidey, I'm back, I'll go join my games
User avatar
spidey
Posts: 713
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 11:04 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Regina, SK

Post by spidey »

lostatlimbo: I will be trying to add more games tomorrow, or i should say today as it is Sunday here now, also 2 of the 3 teams that you mentioned are non-prmium members and they are trying to keep up with us premiums, but one of them will be getting turfed and one of our reserves will be taking their place.
As for the ties at the end of the year. I will try to use the same format as the NHL does for tie-breakers, but as we all know that may or may not work that well here. I realize the GA/GF might be a little skewed, so we may not go with that. I think that is a hurdle we will look more closely at later on in the season. I hope that you are all having fun so far and I will have an updated stats page later this weekend. I hope. :D
User avatar
AlexZG
Posts: 33
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 9:53 am
Location: Croatia
Contact:

!!!

Post by AlexZG »

Hi, Join me in if you can

San Jose Sharks:) if avaleable
User avatar
Forza AZ
Posts: 4546
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 9:27 am
Gender: Male
Location: Alkmaar, Netherlands

Post by Forza AZ »

......
Last edited by Forza AZ on Sun Jul 15, 2007 3:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Forza AZ
Posts: 4546
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 9:27 am
Gender: Male
Location: Alkmaar, Netherlands

Post by Forza AZ »

anaheim beat edmonton (624303)
Highest score: 3130 (9 July 2009)
User avatar
Optimus Prime
Posts: 9665
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 9:33 pm
Gender: Male

Post by Optimus Prime »

I am having a blast, despite starting the season 5-0 only to lose my next four. You are doing a great job spidey. Keep it up.
User avatar
dussle
Posts: 902
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 4:00 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Indiana, USA

Post by dussle »

Spidey I'm really impressed. Making gam after game and sending pm after pm, not to mention tracking down no-shows, keeping stats, and answering questions, can be a hell of a lot of work. At the moment I'm 6-3 (despite only ever having played 1 1 vs 1 game and losing) and having tons of fun with this. Keep it up!
User avatar
Optimus Prime
Posts: 9665
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 9:33 pm
Gender: Male

Post by Optimus Prime »

I think we need to get this moved over to "Ongoing Tournaments" though. Unless we are still looking for some reserves.
User avatar
Forza AZ
Posts: 4546
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 9:27 am
Gender: Male
Location: Alkmaar, Netherlands

Post by Forza AZ »

anaheim beat LA (624266)
Highest score: 3130 (9 July 2009)
User avatar
tabsnake
Posts: 242
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 7:20 pm
Gender: Male
Location: California

Post by tabsnake »

Edmonton beat Vancouver...home and away games.

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=624150
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=624136

I have 4 W and 2 L
Post Reply

Return to “Completed 2008”