Game 6848. Two accounts for one person or unspoken collusion? If not either of the two, then one player is just an idiot.
The green player (conquervolcano) has taken 12 countries so far in a 3-person game... all of them from me. He hasn't even attacked the red player (grinter87) once. Every opportunity available both people have weakened one of my countries for the other user to take. Meanwhile, the red player is just steamrolling through the whole game.
Seems fishy
Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
- lackattack
- Posts: 6097
- Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:34 pm
- Location: Montreal, QC
This reminds me of a play call Gocolts he attacked and attacked and never had more than 1 army in any of his land we were going to take him out but the otehrs managed to distarct us while a n00bish empire was rising right under our noses
we took the piss out of him but he helped the enemy win the game he is not as useless as we previously thought(but he needs to learn the meaning of border countries)
dont ask me why but it does remind me of him and our tragic defeat to the player with the worst possible strategy
we took the piss out of him but he helped the enemy win the game he is not as useless as we previously thought(but he needs to learn the meaning of border countries)
dont ask me why but it does remind me of him and our tragic defeat to the player with the worst possible strategy