Epstein Client List

[Pack Rat]

Epstein's birthday book!




The Epstein Files will be released soon.

[jusplay4fun]

I see no there there.

And that is TRUE no matter how many silly videos the parrot rat posts.

Give it up, pee rat. No one is looking at your incessant posting of meaningless videos. They are like crazy, silly, and repetitious rants by a drunken fool. And how many of your posts have I ignored in recent days? I know you are salivating as you LOOK for another video to post in response.

[Pack Rat]

I guess I'm hitting a nerve, heh. Your personal attacks is proof of that.

[jusplay4fun]

pee rat, you are COMPELLED to reply in just over two hours. Admit it, I made YOUR day. What a LOSER.

Hit a nerve? because you post more drivel? Hardly. You obviously give yourself FAR TOO much credit and influence. I proved that you influence NO ONE here on CC. DOUBLE Loser.

And there is no there there.

[Pack Rat]

I definitely hit a nerve, lol!

[Pack Rat]

Now back on the subject:

[jusplay4fun]

Alex Acosta, former US attorney who negotiated Epstein's plea deal, appears before House Oversight Committee

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/alex-ac ... =125731737

and

Melania Trump's team has aggressively knocked down Epstein-related 'falsehoods'
The normally reserved first lady is upset by what her team calls ‘defamatory’ Epstein rumors, and her office has taken a direct approach in pushing back, earning retractions. (...)

The Daily Beast retracted a story headlined “Melania Trump ‘Very Involved’ in Epstein Scandal: Author,” based on an interview with Michael Wolff, who claimed that Epstein was involved in introducing her to Trump. (...)

A spokesman for the first lady, Nick Clemens, told NBC News in a statement: “First Lady Melania Trump’s attorneys are actively ensuring immediate retractions and apologies by those who spread malicious, defamatory falsehoods. The true account of how the First Lady met President Trump is in her best-selling book, ‘Melania.’”

In the book, Melania Trump said she first met her husband at a party at the Kit Kat Club in September 1998 in New York City and that they were introduced by someone else, not Epstein.

These were just the latest in a series of retractions related to the first lady and the Epstein saga. References to Melania Trump were also removed from a new book about Britain’s Prince Andrew, released last month. It’s unclear whether the publisher received any kind of legal notice from the first lady’s attorneys or whether it decided to pull the material on its own.

I think the parrot pee rat helped spread lies about Melania.
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... w#p5362881

[Pack Rat]

Release the Epstein Files!

Spoiler

STOP PROTECTING CHILD PREDATORS!

[/size][/b]

[jusplay4fun]

Release the Epstein Files!

STOP PROTECTING CHILD PREDATORS![/spoiler]

Do you mean Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew? Must be.

The place was starting to SMELL better, until the rat moved back in. SAD.

You are about as PATHETIC as Jimmy Kimmel and Stephen Colbert; you all have only ONE POOR attempt at humor and no one is buying it (well, if 300,000 viewers is worth all the money paid to them). NO wonder two large outlet refuse to carry Kimmel. Kimmel's skill as a comedian is nearly as bad as pee rat's skills as a debater blogger.

Now pee rat is SO HAPPY that he will now post at least 15 more silly and worthless videos that NO ONE watches. Get a Grip, pee rat; your vision of reality is simply WRONG, and no one here is buying your TRASH.

[Pack Rat]

See how this pedo protector tries to wave Clinton's name for a whataboutthis bull shit!

Unlike your support of a cover up of obvious sexual crimes to children. I want all these monsters brought to justice, regardless of wealth, party affiliation and even British royalty.

There needs to be stronger regulations and enforcement of laws to protect children from adults who prey on the innocence of children, especially day care centers, schools (public, private and religious).

There's something creepy about someone who is involved with children who supports the cover up the sexual crimes against children.

[Pack Rat]

Oh my...Epstein made videos.

[jusplay4fun]

As I said several times already, there is NO THERE THERE:

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c2dr3z9egljt

The three emails released by House Democrats

As we've been reporting, Democrats on the US House Oversight Committee have released correspondence between Jeffrey Epstein, and associate Ghislaine Maxwell and author Michael Wolff.

Here are the emails which have been released:

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c2dr3z9egljt

AND THIS is the Dems BEST SHOT? Conclusion: There is NO THERE THERE.

And one of the Main accusers of Epstein, Virginia Giuffre, who committed suicide, said Trump treated her well AND DID NOT HAVE SEX with her.

Virginia Giuffre, the most prominent victim of late convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, took her own life Thursday — just weeks after she made headlines for saying she had “four days to live” following a collision with a bus.

https://nypost.com/2025/04/25/us-news/j ... s-to-live/

and:

Executive Summary

Virginia Giuffre’s sworn deposition in 2016 and later public accounts consistently deny that Donald Trump sexually assaulted or had sex with her, while confirming she worked at Mar‑a‑Lago and met Trump there; her posthumous memoir and reporting add context but do not allege criminal conduct by Trump. Media coverage and statements from Trump and his defenders have emphasized different narratives—Trump saying Epstein “stole” workers from Mar‑a‑Lago, Giuffre’s family expressing shock, and Giuffre’s own accounts stressing encounters but not implicating Trump in Epstein’s trafficking ring [1] [2] [3].

1. What Giuffre actually said under oath — the clear denial that reshaped the record

Virginia Giuffre’s deposition testimony has been repeatedly cited for one clear, consequential statement: she denied that Donald Trump flirted with her, had sex with her, or was involved in sexual encounters with any girls who were in Epstein’s network during the time she knew Epstein. That categorical denial is central to the factual record and was reported in coverage of her 2016 deposition released publicly years later [1]. The testimony also confirmed more prosaic facts: she worked as a locker‑room or spa attendant at Mar‑a‑Lago around 2000 and met Trump there on multiple occasions. Those work and meeting details are corroborated across her memoir and reporting but, importantly, the deposition separates attendance and acquaintance from any allegation of wrongdoing by Trump [4] [1].

2. How Giuffre’s later memoir and public remarks added texture without changing the core denial

Giuffre’s posthumous memoir and interviews elaborate on her early life, her work at Mar‑a‑Lago, and encounters with high‑profile figures including Trump, Prince Andrew, and Ghislaine Maxwell; the memoir does not accuse Trump of sexual misconduct, instead depicting him as part of the social backdrop at Mar‑a‑Lago in 2000 [4]. Media summaries and her ghostwriter’s comments paint Giuffre as having viewed Trump as kind in some encounters and, at times, politically supportive because he discussed releasing Epstein files—yet none of those accounts alter the deposition’s denial of sexual contact with Trump. The memoir and publicity thus provide personal detail and context while leaving the deposition’s substance intact [3] [4].

h[url]ttps://factually.co/fact-checks/justice/virginia-giuffre-epstein-deposition-donald-trump-statements-157c5e[/url]

and
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/vi ... nnections/

"I didn't physically see [Trump] have sex with any of the girls, so I can't say who he had sex with in his whole life or not, but I just know it wasn't with me when I was with other girls," Giuffre went on to say.

"I worked for Donald Trump, and I've met him probably a few times," she said further.

Giuffre said she worked at Trump's Mar-A-Lago resort and said her father spoke to Trump when Trump was at the facility.

And the House released 23,000 pages of Epstein documents, while the Dems cherry-pick THREE and they SHOW nothing. AND critics will keep insisting there is MORE when there is NO MORE, no proof of any wrong doing(s) by Trump. PERIOD. Sorry Dems.

There is NO THERE THERE.

[Dukasaur]

[jusplay4fun]

Humor. Good One, Duk.

Unfortunately for you and others with TDS, this answers NOTHING I posted. There was NO REFUTATION, getting near the level (of worthless videos) of our missing parrot with TDS.

[Dukasaur]

Humor. Good One, Duk.

Unfortunately for you and others with TDS, this answers NOTHING I posted. There was NO REFUTATION, getting near the level (of worthless videos) of our missing parrot with TDS.

There's no point debating this with you. You say there's nothing there. You can't prove a negative, so that's as far as you can go.

Any reasonable person would conclude that there has to be SOMEthing there, or the Turmp administrations wouldn't be so adamant about not showing the evidence. If there's nothing to hide, why hide it?

Dozens of very credible women have testified about Trump's sexual assaults. The fact that his multimillion-dollar legal budget has been sufficient to prevent any criminal convictions is irrelevant. People can look at the evidence and draw their own conclusion. If your hero worship doesn't permit you to look, so be it. No skin off my ass.

Knowing that Trump has many times abused his power and wealth to make (at the very least) indecent assaults on young women, and knowing that his close friend and associate Epstein (and yes, you cannot dispute that they were close friends until they had their falling-out) was a pimp and pedophile, it just seems an inescapable conclusion that Trump would (at least at some time) have taken advantage of Epstein's stable. Regardless of how well they manage to bury the evidence, that is the reasonable conclusion.

[mookiemcgee]

"Trump knows about the girls"

-Jeffrey Epstein in 2011 email


"There is no there, there"

-Jusplay 2025

LOL

[DirtyDishSoap]

It's still amazing to me how much people wanted this damn list, up until Trump said that it's not important. Like... you really have to dig deep into the bullshit hat to make up excuses at this point.

[jusplay4fun]

"Trump knows about the girls"

-Jeffrey Epstein in 2011 email


"There is no there, there"

-Jusplay 2025

LOL

Yeah, Trump knows about the girls that Epstein was "knowing." Proves nothing. LoL

[riskllama]

yep, it boggles the mind how many passes his voters have given him over the years lying about being a Christian when he's clearly never even opened a bible in his life, cheating on his pregnant wife, what is it now, convicted of 34 felonies? and now this Epstein business. it's pretty obvious Trump banged one or nine of these girls back in the day - I mean, c'mon , let's get real here, people - the guy has clearly been into jailbait since the ,80's. Donald Trump is not a good person, period. far fucking from it, and yet, he's a two term president. only in America, lol. even Epstein himself was ripping on him - I forget exactly what was said, but the words "stupid" , "horrible" & "nasty" were all used. but for me personally, the most shocking thing to come out of those emails so far is that Epstein said Bill Clinton never visited his island. wasn't expecting to hear that, lol. this period of US history is not going to age well. everyone that voted for him should be ashamed of themselves, he is just all around disgusting.

[jusplay4fun]

"Trump knows about the girls"

-Jeffrey Epstein in 2011 email


"There is no there, there" <<<JUST NOW CONFIRMED: IT IS TRUE....LOL

-Jusplay 2025

LOL

Yeah, Trump knows about the girls that Epstein was "knowing." Proves nothing. LoL

Further, I read ALL of the three emails released by the Dems. By recacting the name of ONE VICTIM, Virginia Giuffre, they tried to imply Trump spent lots of time with some unknown victim. Here is the truth: Trump spent time with her AND she testified that NOTHING HAPPENED. Again, there is NO THERE THERE.

Mookie and Dems are trying to form a FALSE Narrative. hmmm....I am SHOCKED. NOT. NO THERE there. Try again, Mookie. Maybe you can find a gem in the 23,000 pages released by the GOP from the SAME Epstein files. Until you find something REAL, there is no point in responding to those who suffer from TDS.

[DirtyDishSoap]

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-b ... y-11046836

Lol

[jusplay4fun]

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-b ... y-11046836

Lol

Again, nothing there.

[ConfederateSS]

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-b ... y-11046836

Lol

Again, nothing there.

------------ ............If releasing the Epstein Files was so important to Democrats...To Stop TRUMP..........WHY DIDN'T THEY BEG BIDEN TO RELEASE THE FILES...FOR 4 YEARS...THEY SHUT UP ABOUT EPSTEIN....WHEN BIDEN COULD OF RELEASED THE FILES.....WHY???......BECAUSE THERE IS NOTHING THERE THAT COULD HURT TRUMP....OR THE DEMS....WOULD OF HAD BIDEN DO IT...BEFORE THE 2024A.D. PREZ. ELECTION...Plus Speaker Pelosi and Shummer in the Senate,in that time frame...STOP LOOKING FOR SOMETHING THAT ISN'T THERE....YOU DEMS. WOULD BE BETTER TO GO AFTER BIGFOOT and NESSY...YOU'D HAVE BETTER LUCK AT FINDING SOMETHING... ... ConfederateSS.out!(The Blue and Silver Rebellion)...

[jusplay4fun]

ConfedSS has a point, something I made a while back: If the Dems had anything on Trump, why was such evidence NOT RELEASED

A) in the 2024 election campaign or

B) during the time Biden had access to the Epstein files via the FBI and DOJ?

Please note:

no criminal wrongdoing has ever been established against Trump in connection with Epstein's crimes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relations ... ey_Epstein

and

Executive Summary

The evidence assembled in the provided analyses shows no verified instance of a Jeffrey Epstein victim formally accusing Donald Trump of participating in or committing sexual abuse; victims’ statements and memoirs referenced do not directly allege Trump’s involvement (...)

6. Bottom line for readers weighing the claim

Based on the assembled analyses, the correct, evidence‑based conclusion is clear: Victims of Jeffrey Epstein have not, in the provided reporting and memoir excerpts, accused Donald Trump of involvement in Epstein’s abuse. There is documented association and public controversy, and there are continuing questions about the thoroughness of investigations that keep the topic politically charged and newsworthy; but association and political debate do not equal victim accusations or proven participation [1] [4]

https://factually.co/fact-checks/justic ... use-ef6f8f

BOTTOM LINE for me: without credible evidence to the contrary, there is NO THERE there. So put up or shut up.

[DirtyDishSoap]

Well, let's do some real critical thinking, boys and girls.
What happened 4 to 5 years ago? Oh yeah, COVID! Who was president at the time when that happened and said that was fake too? You can take a guess. Who also was president at the time when we wanted those files released before Biden? You can also take a guess.

Why is COVID important though? Whether you want to admit it or not, it's incredibly important because everything shut down, you now have to try and juggle that shit show, while also reassuring everyone that we're gonna make it. On top of that, try and save the economy that will no doubt be in the shitter for it.

Feds argument really isn't valid. Epstein died under Trumps first term, before COVID, and we wanted those files then. We wanted the files under that empty fuckin head Joe too, but you dorks keep making up bullshit excuses about the left, right, center, up, down and in my gooch.

Edit- TL/DR Alot happened that made those files really not that important when you have the world shutting down for a world pandemic. Some other things if i recollect like pulling out of Afghanistan already posted about that non sense but here we are.