The bias of the two moderators was obvious, especially when the rules stated NO Fact Checking by the Moderators and THEY violated that Rule. SAD. (Read my previous post in this thread if you are unclear on this specific issue.) This confirms the left-leaning bias by the mainstream press.pmac666 wrote:When one side is whining about fact checks you know everything you need to know.
Esp when its lies that endangers whole communities.....
VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
- jusplay4fun
- Posts: 8375
- Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:21 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Virginia
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
JP4Fun


- jonesthecurl
- Posts: 4617
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:42 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: disused action figure warehouse
- Contact:
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
HitRed, serious question: did you know that the Smithsonian is now selling a facsimile of Jefferson's 'bible'? I wondered what your thought s on it were.
instagram.com/garethjohnjoneswrites
- jonesthecurl
- Posts: 4617
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:42 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: disused action figure warehouse
- Contact:
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Oh, and less seriously, what God thinks about it.
instagram.com/garethjohnjoneswrites
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Not a good week to be a Democrat named Tim!
Trump-endorsed Hung Cao DESTROYED Tim Caine in the Virginia Senate debate tonight!

Trump-endorsed Hung Cao DESTROYED Tim Caine in the Virginia Senate debate tonight!

Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
You must love when a black community is endangered by those racist lies.jusplay4fun wrote:The bias of the two moderators was obvious, especially when the rules stated NO Fact Checking by the Moderators and THEY violated that Rule. SAD. (Read my previous post in this thread if you are unclear on this specific issue.) This confirms the left-leaning bias by the mainstream press.pmac666 wrote:When one side is whining about fact checks you know everything you need to know.
Esp when its lies that endangers whole communities.....
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
It's not a lie. The eating of dogs, cats, and other animals perceived as not being food in the West, is widespread and well-documented.pmac666 wrote:When one side is whining about fact checks you know everything you need to know.
Esp when its lies that endangers whole communities.....
If you wnat to argue that dogs and cats should be on the menu, in the name of multi-cultural diversity, that might at least be reasonable, though of course, ...no accounting for taste.
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Votanic wrote:It's not a lie. The eating of dogs, cats, and other animals perceived as not being food in the West, is widespread and well-documented.pmac666 wrote:When one side is whining about fact checks you know everything you need to know.
Esp when its lies that endangers whole communities.....
If you wnat to argue that dogs and cats should be on the menu, in the name of multi-cultural diversity, that might at least be reasonable, though of course...no accounting for taste.
No accounting for taste? How many times have you been exiled from the forums? You tendencies to vomit nonsense, hate and absurdity is your trademark.
- jusplay4fun
- Posts: 8375
- Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:21 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Virginia
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Pack Rat wrote:Votanic wrote:It's not a lie. The eating of dogs, cats, and other animals perceived as not being food in the West, is widespread and well-documented.pmac666 wrote:When one side is whining about fact checks you know everything you need to know.
Esp when its lies that endangers whole communities.....
If you wnat to argue that dogs and cats should be on the menu, in the name of multi-cultural diversity, that might at least be reasonable, though of course...no accounting for taste.[/size]
No accounting for taste? How many times have you been exiled from the forums? You tendencies to vomit nonsense, hate and absurdity is your trademark.
Spoken by one who has served several Forum bans. How many times have you been banned, from this Forum, pee-rat..............?????????....??? I lost track after 10.
Look who is calling the kettle BLACK. Let me offer you a video so you can comprehend.
The same is TRUE for your vile bile, pee-rat.
JP4Fun


Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Still sniffing Saxi's behind, lol.
Saxi might as well eat a bullet, if he needs help from you, rotflmao!
Saxi might as well eat a bullet, if he needs help from you, rotflmao!
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
jusplay4fun wrote:Pack Rat wrote:Votanic wrote:It's not a lie. The eating of dogs, cats, and other animals perceived as not being food in the West, is widespread and well-documented.pmac666 wrote:When one side is whining about fact checks you know everything you need to know.
Esp when its lies that endangers whole communities.....
If you wnat to argue that dogs and cats should be on the menu, in the name of multi-cultural diversity, that might at least be reasonable, though of course...no accounting for taste.[/size]
No accounting for taste? How many times have you been exiled from the forums? You tendencies to vomit nonsense, hate and absurdity is your trademark.
Spoken by one who has served several Forum bans. How many times have you been banned, from this Forum, pee-rat..............?????????....??? I lost track after 10.
Look who is calling the kettle BLACK. Let me offer you a video so you can comprehend.
The same is TRUE for your vile bile, pee-rat.
You don't have a pot to piss in, pee-rat.
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 8#p5337189
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
News to jusplay4MAGA and Votanic...I have not been banned in this Forum.
You trumpers are all lying, a trait that is ridiculously common among the cult followers. Besides being a bunch of pompous all knowing bullsh!tters.
You trumpers are all lying, a trait that is ridiculously common among the cult followers. Besides being a bunch of pompous all knowing bullsh!tters.
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Well Saxi pretends to never heard of Tina Peters. The all knowing ends quickly when its their own.Pack Rat wrote:News to jusplay4MAGA and Votanic...I have not been banned in this Forum.
You trumpers are all lying, a trait that is ridiculously common among the cult followers. Besides being a bunch of pompous all knowing bullsh!tters.
Which is a lie ofc and only serves to play down that Trump wanted to steal the election.
Heard someone very smart speculating that Trump might face a sedicious conspiracy indictment after he lost to Kamala.
Based on what is NOT in Jack Smith writings.
Wouldnt that be awesome? lol
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
This is the only and most important reason Trump needs to win in November.
Victory or Prison!
Victory or Prison!
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
It's true enough, but I don't think it has much impact.jusplay4fun wrote:The bias of the two moderators was obvious, especially when the rules stated NO Fact Checking by the Moderators and THEY violated that Rule. SAD. (Read my previous post in this thread if you are unclear on this specific issue.) This confirms the left-leaning bias by the mainstream press.pmac666 wrote:When one side is whining about fact checks you know everything you need to know.
Esp when its lies that endangers whole communities.....
“Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
― Voltaire
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
jusplay4fun wrote:The bias of the two moderators was obvious, especially when the rules stated NO Fact Checking by the Moderators and THEY violated that Rule. SAD. (Read my previous post in this thread if you are unclear on this specific issue.) This confirms the left-leaning bias by the mainstream press.pmac666 wrote:When one side is whining about fact checks you know everything you need to know.
Esp when its lies that endangers whole communities.....
Vance basically lied on every topic and got fact checked once on the one racist lie that endangers a whole community.
And maga is crying that they didnt allow him to lie on that one topic.....
Yeah so biased.
Check your freaking moral compass mr. sunday school teacher. Baby Jeebus is weeping.
More than 30 bomb threats have been made against schools, government buildings and city officials’ homes since last week, forcing evacuations and closures. Springfield also canceled its annual celebration of diversity, arts and culture in response to the threats, and on Tuesday, state police were deployed to city schools.
https://apnews.com/article/springfield- ... 98409418cc
- jusplay4fun
- Posts: 8375
- Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:21 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Virginia
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Thanks for admitting to the Truth, Duk, unlike pee-mac. The VP Debate may not matter THAT much, BUT in an election that most say is SO CLOSE, that debate and the biases of the moderators may be a factor. The point is, to me, is that Vance handled that well without being nasty and vile, as Trump likely would have.Dukasaur wrote:It's true enough, but I don't think it has much impact.jusplay4fun wrote:The bias of the two moderators was obvious, especially when the rules stated NO Fact Checking by the Moderators and THEY violated that Rule. SAD. (Read my previous post in this thread if you are unclear on this specific issue.) This confirms the left-leaning bias by the mainstream press.pmac666 wrote:When one side is whining about fact checks you know everything you need to know.
Esp when its lies that endangers whole communities.....
JP4Fun


Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
When youre so pedandic into rules you surely dont vote for Trump, right?
Wanna talk about the myriad of rules he broke?
Vance got away with every lie but the one that actively endangers ppl.
You should be happy they fact checked him on that one.
Unless you want those ppl to be in danger.....
Wanna talk about the myriad of rules he broke?
Vance got away with every lie but the one that actively endangers ppl.
You should be happy they fact checked him on that one.
Unless you want those ppl to be in danger.....
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
But, JD Vance lies with civility! What a fukn excuse.jusplay4fun wrote:Thanks for admitting to the Truth, Duk, unlike pee-mac. The VP Debate may not matter THAT much, BUT in an election that most say is SO CLOSE, that debate and the biases of the moderators may be a factor. The point is, to me, is that Vance handled that well without being nasty and vile, as Trump likely would have.Dukasaur wrote:It's true enough, but I don't think it has much impact.jusplay4fun wrote:The bias of the two moderators was obvious, especially when the rules stated NO Fact Checking by the Moderators and THEY violated that Rule. SAD. (Read my previous post in this thread if you are unclear on this specific issue.) This confirms the left-leaning bias by the mainstream press.pmac666 wrote:When one side is whining about fact checks you know everything you need to know.
Esp when its lies that endangers whole communities.....
- jusplay4fun
- Posts: 8375
- Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:21 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Virginia
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Pack Rat wrote:But, JD Vance lies with civility! What a fukn excuse.jusplay4fun wrote:Thanks for admitting to the Truth, Duk, unlike pee-mac. The VP Debate may not matter THAT much, BUT in an election that most say is SO CLOSE, that debate and the biases of the moderators may be a factor. The point is, to me, is that Vance handled that well without being nasty and vile, as Trump likely would have.Dukasaur wrote:It's true enough, but I don't think it has much impact.jusplay4fun wrote:The bias of the two moderators was obvious, especially when the rules stated NO Fact Checking by the Moderators and THEY violated that Rule. SAD. (Read my previous post in this thread if you are unclear on this specific issue.) This confirms the left-leaning bias by the mainstream press.pmac666 wrote:When one side is whining about fact checks you know everything you need to know.
Esp when its lies that endangers whole communities.....
And when YOU, pee-rat, talk about CIVILITY, you have to curse. That is NOT civility, btw.
JP4Fun


Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
STFU!
[/b]
Spoiler
Abbreviation ok?
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
The dude who cant spell names and votes for a rapist is upset about cursing?
Now thats a fkin high horse.
Now thats a fkin high horse.
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Actually he's offended by the gross hypocrisy both Pee-rat and you constnatly display.pmac666 wrote:The dude who cant spell names and votes for a rapist is upset about cursing?
Now thats a fkin high horse.
Curse and promote violence on your oenemies all you want, ...everyone knows you will anyway.
Just knock it off with the pearl-clutching, blowing mods for bans, and other double-standard cancel-culture tactics that you regularly try to employ.
- jusplay4fun
- Posts: 8375
- Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:21 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Virginia
