Improving 2 player games

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Post Reply
User avatar
futoomph
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 6:57 pm
Location: Leicestercestershire, England
Contact:

Improving 2 player games

Post by futoomph »

The person going first in a sequential 2 player game has a major advantage. How about the first person not being able to attack, but can fortify instead?
User avatar
gimil
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Post by gimil »

this still leaves the 1st player an advantage because the 1nd player is bulked which stop the 2nd player taking anything out
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
futoomph
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 6:57 pm
Location: Leicestercestershire, England
Contact:

Post by futoomph »

Which happens anyway.
Spritzking
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 7:19 pm
Gender: Male

Post by Spritzking »

well i have played 2 player games a couple of times, but it is not any fun, there are just 2 things that matter in a 2 player game: country placement and dice. Since both are random 2 player games are not quite fun, for strategy is rarely involved.

Still, it would be an good option. also for freestyle, for in freestyle the player to join is mostly the "first" player.

it gives player 1 the advantage to have more armies, but player 2 to do the first attack. i think i quite like it
User avatar
Diablo Returns
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 3:37 pm

Post by Diablo Returns »

i dont agree with this option, just because you yourself can be the first player to play in sequencial so whats the big deal?

you can win even if your the second to play. i have done it alot.
User avatar
Forza AZ
Posts: 4546
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 9:27 am
Gender: Male
Location: Alkmaar, Netherlands

Re: Improving 2 player games

Post by Forza AZ »

futoomph wrote:The person going first in a sequential 2 player game has a major advantage. How about the first person not being able to attack, but can fortify instead?

Good idea. Now often the 1st player can already take a small continent, and then the 2nd player is already almost lost. When the 1st player can't attack this leaves the 2nd player with a more equal chance. He now can't take a small continent that easy as the 1st player already have forted or deployed to defend.
But I think this is only needed in Unlimited games. Adjacent or Chained already gives much less advantage to the 1st player.
User avatar
BobHacket
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 1:37 am
Location: Iowa

Post by BobHacket »

I like this idea in theory... it causes more strategy to be used and could be an option that could be chosen at the begining of the game and people could choose to play it like that or not.
Bob Hacket is my middle name
Image
User avatar
RobinJ
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 1:56 pm
Location: Northern Ireland

Post by RobinJ »

I was thinking about something like this when I had a brilliant drop but went second and was annihilated. However, I 've just switched to playing 2-player as a freestyle game - it requires a bit more skill
nmhunate wrote:Speak English... It is the language that God wrote the bible in.


Highest Score: 2437
Highest Place: 84
Post Reply

Return to “Archived Suggestions”