https://www.conquerclub.com/player.php? ... t_id=12155
How this still can exist? 20 y of CC?
Realy?
Winner path;
Round 1 - 7-0 eliminated dont play
Round 2 - 3-4 eliminated acctualy win the round
Round 3 - 5-2 clear victory
Round 4 - 7-0 clear victory
Round 5 - 2-5 clear defeat
And that is a winner of tournament?
big shame for CC.
I hope somebody will change this because this is literally shit
https://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?mode=autotournament&t
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
-
nemapredaje
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:20 am
- IcePack
- Multi Hunter

- Posts: 16847
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: California
Re: https://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?mode=autotourname
You’re mad cuz you got beat?

fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
-
nemapredaje
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:20 am
Re: https://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?mode=autotourname
Hah,realy I am fine ,thank you for taking care.IcePack wrote:You’re mad cuz you got beat?
I understand rules are now like how it is.
I just want better CC.
And I dont understand how you guys still let this settings possible.
Isnt possible mix Apples and Pears(league and tree settings)
Or is possible? Lol now I see it is.
But how this looks?
Looks like some Amateur first time make Tournament .
OFC I dont want offend anybody,just like I say...I want better CC
Re: https://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?mode=autotourname
If I'm understanding correctly, the complaint is that the player with the worse record won the tournament due to the tiebreaker rules.
But that's life. It isn't just CC. In every game and sport, there are situations where a weak team wins because they were lucky enough to land in the right division or whatever. That's just the nature of games and tournaments. Sometimes things just stack up in your favour.
But that's life. It isn't just CC. In every game and sport, there are situations where a weak team wins because they were lucky enough to land in the right division or whatever. That's just the nature of games and tournaments. Sometimes things just stack up in your favour.
“Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
― Voltaire
-
nemapredaje
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:20 am
Re: https://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?mode=autotourname
Tell me one more sport or game with this Tournament settings.Dukasaur wrote:If I'm understanding correctly, the complaint is that the player with the worse record won the tournament due to the tiebreaker rules.
But that's life. It isn't just CC. In every game and sport, there are situations where a weak team wins because they were lucky enough to land in the right division or whatever. That's just the nature of games and tournaments. Sometimes things just stack up in your favour.
I say also that I dont complain anything about Winner,he just play and win( he also dont know he will win )
I want to show you that it is impossible to have a mixed league and cup system competition in one tournament like this one.
Do you understand me?
If it is played 1 on 1 throughout the tournament, if it is eliminated after each round.
Then it can only be a cup system, which means that the only possible setting is Winner of Round advance to next Round.
I just want make this site better nothing else.
- MichelSableheart
- Posts: 781
- Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 5:10 pm
Re: https://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?mode=autotourname
I kind of have to agree with nema here. This tournament setting puts enormous pressure on the luck of which opponent you draw early.
Zipper drew the corporal NCalchuo in round 1. NCalchuo never showed up, so Zipper was credited with a 7-0 win.
ReDBuLLs drew the lieutenant Larry46, playing a tight round, which he won 4-3.
Then in the second round, Zipper and ReDBuLLs were paired. To continue to round 3, you needed at least 9 wins, plus luck with tiebreakers. Because he drew a no show, Zipper could afford to lose 4-3 and proceed, or even 5-2 with lucky tiebreakers. ReDBuLLs had drawn an equal opponent in round 1, which means he needed to win at least 5-2 to have a chance at proceeding. The eventual result of 4-3 to ReDBuLLs meant that Zipper continued on, whereas ReDBuLLs was eliminated.
Theoretically, it's possible that the two finalists enter the final round with an insurmountable deficit for a player (28 vs 20 wins means that the player with 20 wins can't win the tournament).
This is the announced tournament format, so in that sense it's fair, but I have to agree that it doesn't feel like a good tournament format. If you're counting game wins, a round robin format where everyone plays the same opponents would make far more sense.
Zipper drew the corporal NCalchuo in round 1. NCalchuo never showed up, so Zipper was credited with a 7-0 win.
ReDBuLLs drew the lieutenant Larry46, playing a tight round, which he won 4-3.
Then in the second round, Zipper and ReDBuLLs were paired. To continue to round 3, you needed at least 9 wins, plus luck with tiebreakers. Because he drew a no show, Zipper could afford to lose 4-3 and proceed, or even 5-2 with lucky tiebreakers. ReDBuLLs had drawn an equal opponent in round 1, which means he needed to win at least 5-2 to have a chance at proceeding. The eventual result of 4-3 to ReDBuLLs meant that Zipper continued on, whereas ReDBuLLs was eliminated.
Theoretically, it's possible that the two finalists enter the final round with an insurmountable deficit for a player (28 vs 20 wins means that the player with 20 wins can't win the tournament).
This is the announced tournament format, so in that sense it's fair, but I have to agree that it doesn't feel like a good tournament format. If you're counting game wins, a round robin format where everyone plays the same opponents would make far more sense.
MichelSableheart,
Een van de Veroveraars der Lage Landen
And a member of the Republic
Een van de Veroveraars der Lage Landen
And a member of the Republic
Re: https://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?mode=autotourname
I thought it was a tournament running by a member, but it was not.
So: +1 for nema
So: +1 for nema
Re: https://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?mode=autotourname
This isn't literally shit, it's literally a cumulative score with no resets between rounds.
You entered a contest without understanding the rules and have complained that you did not win when the advertised rules were implemented.
You entered a contest without understanding the rules and have complained that you did not win when the advertised rules were implemented.
- squamps
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 12:26 am
- Location: I rolled on every cee-lo corner that I know inside the city
- Contact:
Re: https://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?mode=autotourname
I agree that this format is flawed. At minimum, score should reset once the final round begins.
4-5-6
I gotta be nice to the dice so I'm talking to em... I step back, gave a tap on the sidewalk and threw em
I gotta be nice to the dice so I'm talking to em... I step back, gave a tap on the sidewalk and threw em