so you are cheering for no one?iAmCaffeine wrote:cheering for my good mates in this one!
[CC11] R2: FALL (27) vs A^ (22) - FALL Wins - Final 7/12/21
Moderator: Clan Directors
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
- hopalong
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:15 am
- Location: not sure ... but it feels kindof good.
Re: [CC11] Round 2: FALL (3) vs A^ (2)
- iAmCaffeine
- Posts: 11699
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm
Re: [CC11] Round 2: FALL (5) vs A^ (4)
Seems FALL hasn't filled A^ home games within the 6 week allotted by the CD's.
As Shoop says in his rules, "There will be no mercy". Seems punishments are on their way, hopefully, FALL can get these filled before they forfeit too many more games or get disqualified.
As Shoop says in his rules, "There will be no mercy". Seems punishments are on their way, hopefully, FALL can get these filled before they forfeit too many more games or get disqualified.

Re: [CC11] Round 2: FALL (5) vs A^ (4)
We are aware of the 6 week deadline, and are in contact already with the CD's and opposing clan contacts.
Even a little kid knows whats the name of my country... http://youtu.be/XFxjy7f9RpY
Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!
Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!
- hopalong
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:15 am
- Location: not sure ... but it feels kindof good.
Re: [CC11] Round 2: FALL (5) vs A^ (4)
Their heads have FALLEN!Caymanmew wrote:Seems FALL hasn't filled A^ home games within the 6 week allotted by the CD's.
As Shoop says in his rules, "There will be no mercy". Seems punishments are on their way, hopefully, FALL can get these filled before they forfeit too many more games or get disqualified.
Re: [CC11] Round 2: FALL (13) vs A^ (9)
I was not going to make a comment in the thread about FALLEN missing the 6 week deadline. I thought everything had been handled internally between the 2 clans involved and an amicable solution had been reached. However, I have been asked by several people to respond, so I will.
It was brought to my attention on Monday, May 10 that FALLEN had missed the May 9 deadline for their away invites. FALLEN had misinterpreted the rules and believed creating games included sending out home invites. They came to the agreement that they would send out invites the next day. All games were filled by Wednesday the 12th. IMO this settled the issue.
Please understand that this ruling is just for this case. This does not give clans a green light or free pass to miss deadlines.
It was brought to my attention on Monday, May 10 that FALLEN had missed the May 9 deadline for their away invites. FALLEN had misinterpreted the rules and believed creating games included sending out home invites. They came to the agreement that they would send out invites the next day. All games were filled by Wednesday the 12th. IMO this settled the issue.
Please understand that this ruling is just for this case. This does not give clans a green light or free pass to miss deadlines.
- Donelladan
- Posts: 3681
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:48 am
Re: [CC11] Round 2: FALL (13) vs A^ (9)
You meant they interpreted it meant sending the invite should be done within the deadline, but not accepting them ?FALLEN had misinterpreted the rules and believed creating games included sending out home invites
Re: [CC11] Round 2: FALL (13) vs A^ (9)
Their interpretation was home deadline means creating games and sending home invites, not creating games and leaving home teams empty. They thought they had 1 week after home teams had accepted invites.Donelladan wrote:You meant they interpreted it meant sending the invite should be done within the deadline, but not accepting them ?FALLEN had misinterpreted the rules and believed creating games included sending out home invites
Re: [CC11] Round 2: FALL (18) vs A^ (9)
Is this over or just darn close? I thought there would be more drama.
Re: [CC11] Round 2: FALL (18) vs A^ (9)
By my count of leaners, it's not over, but we have some serious work to do in the remaining games. It's been a fun battle, but they have the edge so far.
mdhill
mdhill
[bigimg]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/_FaokRtlfTEyodiaznq0LjfitYDSN9kO2ZTQOrUQhRTIOwPlaQqCMMKpgWTRzKl1szPQ2FEgvJXkxe0PWsIBaXz6pPJ1F48NMJD4okmMTZRcPvIgaGWzKLVVTSOj63EqTB5IpLcaygg=w2400[/bigimg]
- Swimmerdude99
- Posts: 2580
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:07 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: North Carolina
Re: [CC11] Round 2: FALL (18) vs A^ (9)
Just a quick look through, seems 25-23 with leans. So VERY tight from a quick outsider view 
- hopalong
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:15 am
- Location: not sure ... but it feels kindof good.
Re: [CC11] Round 2: FALL (18) vs A^ (9)
why do you sign your posts?mdhill wrote:By my count of leaners, it's not over, but we have some serious work to do in the remaining games. It's been a fun battle, but they have the edge so far.
mdhill
hop
Re: [CC11] Round 2: FALL (18) vs A^ (9)
It's kind of like an NFT. If I sign it, everyone who sees it thinks they're getting to see an mdhill original, and it's more valuable.
If I wanted people to discount what I said and think it less valuable, I'd sign as elddir.
Bariclaw
If I wanted people to discount what I said and think it less valuable, I'd sign as elddir.
Bariclaw
- Keefie
- Clan Director

- Posts: 6746
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 1:05 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Sleepy Hollow
Re: [CC11] Round 2: FALL (18) vs A^ (9)
This could catch on.mdhill wrote:It's kind of like an NFT. If I sign it, everyone who sees it thinks they're getting to see an mdhill original, and it's more valuable.
If I wanted people to discount what I said and think it less valuable, I'd sign as elddir.
Bariclaw
PaulatPeace

Re: [CC11] Round 2: FALL (18) vs A^ (9)
It's not over but my estimation is 28-21
- Extreme Ways
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:02 am
Re: [CC11] Round 2: FALL (18) vs A^ (9)
Honor and integrity will prevail.
PaulatPeace
PaulatPeace
TOFU, ex-REP, ex-VDLL, ex-KoRT.
- 2007spaceodyssey
- Posts: 585
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 3:11 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: [CC11] Round 2: FALL (18) vs A^ (9)
mdhill wrote:It's kind of like an NFT. If I sign it, everyone who sees it thinks they're getting to see an mdhill original, and it's more valuable.
If I wanted people to discount what I said and think it less valuable, I'd sign as elddir.
Bariclaw
Re: [CC11] Round 2: FALL (5) vs A^ (4)
Ours or yours?hopalong wrote:Their heads have FALLEN!Caymanmew wrote:Seems FALL hasn't filled A^ home games within the 6 week allotted by the CD's.
As Shoop says in his rules, "There will be no mercy". Seems punishments are on their way, hopefully, FALL can get these filled before they forfeit too many more games or get disqualified.
Even a little kid knows whats the name of my country... http://youtu.be/XFxjy7f9RpY
Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!
Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!
Re: [CC11] Round 2: FALL (22) vs A^ (14)
Ours or yours?hopalong wrote:Their heads have FALLEN!Caymanmew wrote:Seems FALL hasn't filled A^ home games within the 6 week allotted by the CD's.
As Shoop says in his rules, "There will be no mercy". Seems punishments are on their way, hopefully, FALL can get these filled before they forfeit too many more games or get disqualified.
Even a little kid knows whats the name of my country... http://youtu.be/XFxjy7f9RpY
Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!
Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!
- hopalong
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:15 am
- Location: not sure ... but it feels kindof good.
Re: [CC11] Round 2: FALL (22) vs A^ (14)
What?GoranZ wrote:Ours or yours?hopalong wrote:Their heads have FALLEN!Caymanmew wrote:Seems FALL hasn't filled A^ home games within the 6 week allotted by the CD's.
As Shoop says in his rules, "There will be no mercy". Seems punishments are on their way, hopefully, FALL can get these filled before they forfeit too many more games or get disqualified.
- IcePack
- Multi Hunter

- Posts: 16847
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: California
Re: [CC11] Round 2: FALL (22) vs A^ (14)
Chicken Butthopalong wrote:What?GoranZ wrote:Ours or yours?hopalong wrote:Their heads have FALLEN!Caymanmew wrote:Seems FALL hasn't filled A^ home games within the 6 week allotted by the CD's.
As Shoop says in his rules, "There will be no mercy". Seems punishments are on their way, hopefully, FALL can get these filled before they forfeit too many more games or get disqualified.

fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
- hopalong
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:15 am
- Location: not sure ... but it feels kindof good.
Re: [CC11] Round 2: FALL (22) vs A^ (14)
Oh - so his.IcePack wrote:Chicken Butthopalong wrote:What?GoranZ wrote:Ours or yours?hopalong wrote:Their heads have FALLEN!Caymanmew wrote:Seems FALL hasn't filled A^ home games within the 6 week allotted by the CD's.
As Shoop says in his rules, "There will be no mercy". Seems punishments are on their way, hopefully, FALL can get these filled before they forfeit too many more games or get disqualified.
Re: [CC11] Round 2: FALL (22) vs A^ (17)
Thank you all. Well faught
Re: [CC11] Round 2: FALL (22) vs A^ (17)
Nice win, FALL. Good luck in the rest of the Cup.
mdhill
mdhill
[bigimg]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/_FaokRtlfTEyodiaznq0LjfitYDSN9kO2ZTQOrUQhRTIOwPlaQqCMMKpgWTRzKl1szPQ2FEgvJXkxe0PWsIBaXz6pPJ1F48NMJD4okmMTZRcPvIgaGWzKLVVTSOj63EqTB5IpLcaygg=w2400[/bigimg]

