Nut Shot's Historical Player Rankings
Moderator: Clan Directors
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
-
Nut Shot Scott
- Posts: 1432
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 3:03 pm
Nut Shot's Historical Player Rankings
There's another thread for the active player rankings. This is for historical player rankings. Like the current season, these are more of a power ranking that takes into account the data that is available. Win %, Home Wins, Away Wins, Home Losses, Dubs/Trips/Quads Wins and a luck factor have been calculated. If you look at the bottom tabs of the below Google Sheet, you'll see an All Time List that has everyone who completed a season along with their best finishes in some key categories as well as an All Time Top 10 List for score, per game score and win %.
Completed Seasons:
CL9
CL10
CL11
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing
CL 11 Top 25
CL 10 Top 25
CL 9 Top 25
Completed Seasons:
CL9
CL10
CL11
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing
CL 11 Top 25
CL 10 Top 25
CL 9 Top 25
Last edited by Nut Shot Scott on Mon Mar 08, 2021 11:54 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Re: Nut Shot's Historical Player Rankings
Interesting.
I always thought that league favored specialists more than cup does, but maybe its not so skewed.
I always thought that league favored specialists more than cup does, but maybe its not so skewed.
- iAmCaffeine
- Posts: 11699
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm
Re: Nut Shot's Historical Player Rankings
if anything it would be the other way around no?rockfist wrote:I always thought that league favored specialists more than cup does, but maybe its not so skewed.

Re: Nut Shot's Historical Player Rankings
I don’t think so, I think it’s pretty easy to send maps that you have specialists on for each one with 8 game sets so if you play away maps you face a specialist. In a 24,27, or 30 map exchange it’s more difficult. I know for us if we have a specialist on a map they take it, but if we don’t I usually get drafted (I’m above 55% away games).
It’s possible that my experience is not what most people experience though.
It’s possible that my experience is not what most people experience though.
-
Nut Shot Scott
- Posts: 1432
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 3:03 pm
Re: Nut Shot's Historical Player Rankings
My little system attempts to reward the all around player - away wins are very valuable and home losses sting - so if you play a balanced schedule and win, you'll be ranked high. If you only play home games as a map/settings specialist, you might win 75% of them but it will hurt you in the scoring due to the lack of variety. So I tried to kind of make it rather difficult for a specialist to be rewarded for specializing.rockfist wrote:I don’t think so, I think it’s pretty easy to send maps that you have specialists on for each one with 8 game sets so if you play away maps you face a specialist. In a 24,27, or 30 map exchange it’s more difficult. I know for us if we have a specialist on a map they take it, but if we don’t I usually get drafted (I’m above 55% away games).
It’s possible that my experience is not what most people experience though.

- iAmCaffeine
- Posts: 11699
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm
Re: Nut Shot's Historical Player Rankings
how is it more difficult? you're still going to use 99% the same maps in the League as you do in a regular war so at least from a home map perspective, you'll play all the same specialist maps as usual minus 1 or 2 if you know don't favour your team over the opposing clan's on that particular map. same for away games, it's rare a clan doesn't have a team for every map these days.rockfist wrote:I don’t think so, I think it’s pretty easy to send maps that you have specialists on for each one with 8 game sets so if you play away maps you face a specialist. In a 24,27, or 30 map exchange it’s more difficult. I know for us if we have a specialist on a map they take it, but if we don’t I usually get drafted (I’m above 55% away games).
It’s possible that my experience is not what most people experience though.

- IcePack
- Multi Hunter

- Posts: 16847
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: California
Re: Nut Shot's Historical Player Rankings
So are you hurt if you don’t take home maps and only do aways and do better then expected?Nut Shot Scott wrote:My little system attempts to reward the all around player - away wins are very valuable and home losses sting - so if you play a balanced schedule and win, you'll be ranked high. If you only play home games as a map/settings specialist, you might win 75% of them but it will hurt you in the scoring due to the lack of variety. So I tried to kind of make it rather difficult for a specialist to be rewarded for specializing.rockfist wrote:I don’t think so, I think it’s pretty easy to send maps that you have specialists on for each one with 8 game sets so if you play away maps you face a specialist. In a 24,27, or 30 map exchange it’s more difficult. I know for us if we have a specialist on a map they take it, but if we don’t I usually get drafted (I’m above 55% away games).
It’s possible that my experience is not what most people experience though.

fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
-
Nut Shot Scott
- Posts: 1432
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 3:03 pm
Re: Nut Shot's Historical Player Rankings
IcePack wrote:So are you hurt if you don’t take home maps and only do aways and do better then expected?Nut Shot Scott wrote:
My little system attempts to reward the all around player - away wins are very valuable and home losses sting - so if you play a balanced schedule and win, you'll be ranked high. If you only play home games as a map/settings specialist, you might win 75% of them but it will hurt you in the scoring due to the lack of variety. So I tried to kind of make it rather difficult for a specialist to be rewarded for specializing.
That would depend upon on how you expect to fair on a home map. The real issue would be that you're not playing half the games. Tough to compete score-wise in these rankings with a player who plays 15-20 more games than you and plays halfway decent.

-
Nut Shot Scott
- Posts: 1432
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 3:03 pm
Re: Nut Shot's Historical Player Rankings
loutil wrote:That CL 10 ranking must be wrong....
you smashed. 70% win rate on 44 games.

-
MTIceman41
- Posts: 1104
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
- Location: Orange County, CA
Re: Nut Shot's Historical Player Rankings
loutil wrote:That CL 10 ranking must be wrong....
Nah it got evened out with some CCup battles in some years
I remember one war against you guys you couldn’t buy a 2 on a dice roll...
Nut shot love what you are doing....
I would propose a coolness medal or a contribution medal for your hard work here...

- BabySasuke
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Sat May 13, 2017 8:31 am
- IcePack
- Multi Hunter

- Posts: 16847
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: California
Re: Nut Shot's Historical Player Rankings
There is precedent for doing the rankings to get a medal after certain length of time keeping it up / level of regular effort.MTIceman41 wrote:loutil wrote:That CL 10 ranking must be wrong....
Nah it got evened out with some CCup battles in some years![]()
I remember one war against you guys you couldn’t buy a 2 on a dice roll...
Nut shot love what you are doing....
I would propose a coolness medal or a contribution medal for your hard work here...

fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
Re: Nut Shot's Historical Player Rankings
I’m not willing to publicly discuss all of the details and facts supporting what I am saying so I’ll just concede the point.iAmCaffeine wrote:how is it more difficult? you're still going to use 99% the same maps in the League as you do in a regular war so at least from a home map perspective, you'll play all the same specialist maps as usual minus 1 or 2 if you know don't favour your team over the opposing clan's on that particular map. same for away games, it's rare a clan doesn't have a team for every map these days.rockfist wrote:I don’t think so, I think it’s pretty easy to send maps that you have specialists on for each one with 8 game sets so if you play away maps you face a specialist. In a 24,27, or 30 map exchange it’s more difficult. I know for us if we have a specialist on a map they take it, but if we don’t I usually get drafted (I’m above 55% away games).
It’s possible that my experience is not what most people experience though.
Re: Nut Shot's Historical Player Rankings
MTIceman41 wrote:loutil wrote:That CL 10 ranking must be wrong....
Nah it got evened out with some CCup battles in some years![]()
I remember one war against you guys you couldn’t buy a 2 on a dice roll...
Re: Nut Shot's Historical Player Rankings
CL11 had 9 clans. There were 9 rounds but each clan had a bye round and only played 8.
So Max 48 games.
So Max 48 games.
-
Nut Shot Scott
- Posts: 1432
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 3:03 pm
Re: Nut Shot's Historical Player Rankings
JPlo64 wrote:CL11 had 9 clans. There were 9 rounds but each clan had a bye round and only played 8.
So Max 48 games.
Good looking out. I shall adjust accordingly - I wasn't paying attention to that, really only looked at # of rounds ha

Re: Nut Shot's Historical Player Rankings
This is amazing.
I went from 22nd in CL10 to 130th in CL11. #Decline
I went from 22nd in CL10 to 130th in CL11. #Decline

Highest score: 3772
Highest rank: 15
-
Nut Shot Scott
- Posts: 1432
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 3:03 pm
Re: Nut Shot's Historical Player Rankings
CL9 is on the way. We'll see how you fared that year hahaniMic wrote:This is amazing.
I went from 22nd in CL10 to 130th in CL11. #Decline

- IcePack
- Multi Hunter

- Posts: 16847
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: California
Re: Nut Shot's Historical Player Rankings
Is it bad that I searched for my name from the bottom up? 

fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
Re: Nut Shot's Historical Player Rankings
Same here.
Went from 42nd to 173rd.
Looks like I made the right decision to step away from CC for a bit
Went from 42nd to 173rd.
Looks like I made the right decision to step away from CC for a bit
niMic wrote:This is amazing.
I went from 22nd in CL10 to 130th in CL11. #Decline
-
Nut Shot Scott
- Posts: 1432
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 3:03 pm
-
Nut Shot Scott
- Posts: 1432
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 3:03 pm
Re: Nut Shot's Historical Player Rankings
CL8 coming soon.
josko with the most dominant season i've seen yet, damn.
josko with the most dominant season i've seen yet, damn.

Re: Nut Shot's Historical Player Rankings
I'm not surprised to hear that, as I said in the other thread I thought I was very good in CL8, but he was something other worldly.

