iAmCaffeine wrote:Rd3 of Germany, aad0906 and I are about to play for the 3rd time in a row. We haven't played vs anyone else in this particular tournament.
iAmCaffeine wrote:Rd3 of Germany, aad0906 and I are about to play for the 3rd time in a row. We haven't played vs anyone else in this particular tournament.
It's not fair, why does aad0906 get it so easy
....can't explain those type of odd mate....must something else we don't know about it
2nd post updated... , one last Ancient Greece to fill (8 spots), and more than likely last Tamriel iteration that will be up (16 spots).
A hard fought battle with Bamage gave me tourney win no 7. Incidentally Bamage is the highest placed player without a win yet an increasing hard to find species in the top 50. Just a matter of time of course...
Clanlord Carl wrote:A hard fought battle with Bamage gave me tourney win no 7. Incidentally Bamage is the highest placed player without a win yet an increasing hard to find species in the top 50. Just a matter of time of course...
I'm 10 points behind him & Loose Canon and same as both, no win yet...So far staying in the Top-50
Is there a chance the rules can be modified for turn order to be at least one person starts one game each time? I'm tired of every cook I face, acing me with bonuses and 3 starts... might be done playing these
swimmerdude99 wrote:Is there a chance the rules can be modified for turn order to be at least one person starts one game each time? I'm tired of every cook I face, acing me with bonuses and 3 starts... might be done playing these
Statistically speaking each start scenario should happen 1/4 of the time. 3-0, 2-1, 1-2, 0-3. But I haven't seen the averages even out yet.
swimmerdude99 wrote:Is there a chance the rules can be modified for turn order to be at least one person starts one game each time? I'm tired of every cook I face, acing me with bonuses and 3 starts... might be done playing these
Statistically speaking each start scenario should happen 1/4 of the time. 3-0, 2-1, 1-2, 0-3. But I haven't seen the averages even out yet.
swimmerdude99 wrote:Is there a chance the rules can be modified for turn order to be at least one person starts one game each time? I'm tired of every cook I face, acing me with bonuses and 3 starts... might be done playing these
Statistically speaking each start scenario should happen 1/4 of the time. 3-0, 2-1, 1-2, 0-3. But I haven't seen the averages even out yet.
According to my statistics, your statistics are incorrect.
swimmerdude99 wrote:Is there a chance the rules can be modified for turn order to be at least one person starts one game each time? I'm tired of every cook I face, acing me with bonuses and 3 starts... might be done playing these
Statistically speaking each start scenario should happen 1/4 of the time. 3-0, 2-1, 1-2, 0-3. But I haven't seen the averages even out yet.
Dhallmeyer you may wish to check out binomial expansions a way to calculate stuff like this. If there are n games it can be shown that the chance of getting r first starts is n!/(n-r)!r! /2^n
Where n! = n x (n-1) x (n-2)x ......x 1. And 0! =1
The middle options are far more likely than extreme results.
So for three games 0 first starts = 1/8 (as stated above by sloop) 1 first start = 3/8 2 first start = 3/8 3 first start = 1/8
And for five games 0 first starts = 1/32 1 first start = 5/32 2 first start = 10/32 3 first start = 10/32 4 first start = 5/32 5 first start = 1/32
Well Hong Kong gave me my 8th tourney win out of 20 completed so far - taking me a single point ahead - well played Dragons Dor tough fight as ever. Long long way to go ending sometime in 2024 when someone can honestly claim to be the best ever CC singles player.