[CC9] R4: LHDD (32) vs S&M (23) - LHDD Wins - Final 12/5/19
Moderator: Clan Directors
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (23) - S&M (15)
3!
ok, there are at least 3 games that we are cleaning up, even if it's not completely official... back to the finals!
Good war S&M, I guess we were more often than you guys on the lucky side this time.
FOED get ready!
ok, there are at least 3 games that we are cleaning up, even if it's not completely official... back to the finals!
Good war S&M, I guess we were more often than you guys on the lucky side this time.
FOED get ready!

- Donelladan
- Posts: 3681
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:48 am
Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (25) - S&M (16)
As betiko said, it's not "official" yet but LHDD got 28 wins secured.
Final score should be between 28-27 and 32-23.
Some words may have been exchanged but well, we're both highly competitive, nothing wrong with that.
That put aside I've had a log of highly competitive game, and really enjoyed the war.
Couldn't have expected a better result for our first war and really proud to become the 3rd clan to defeat S&M in a regular war !
Final score should be between 28-27 and 32-23.
Some words may have been exchanged but well, we're both highly competitive, nothing wrong with that.
That put aside I've had a log of highly competitive game, and really enjoyed the war.
Couldn't have expected a better result for our first war and really proud to become the 3rd clan to defeat S&M in a regular war !
Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (25) - S&M (16)
You mean 4th?
- Donelladan
- Posts: 3681
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:48 am
Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (25) - S&M (16)
I thought only FALL and TOFU defeated S&M.
Which war am I missing ?
Which war am I missing ?
Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (25) - S&M (16)
OSA en RL7
".....Under Phucumol treatment....."
https://youtu.be/zlusWzDY4qw
https://youtu.be/zlusWzDY4qw
Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (25) - S&M (16)
Donelladan wrote:I thought only FALL and TOFU defeated S&M.
Which war am I missing ?
It made me have a look, and no, just the 2 you mentionned. I looked quickly though. Their record says 5 losses, 4 against tofu 1 against fall? Damn i'm lazy to recheck, but those league skirmish results are a pain in the ass in the middle the war results. I've said it before but there should be some sort of tabs that could classify results by competition or something. Or just put a simple colour code... something! This is just unreadable as it is.

Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (25) - S&M (16)
I’m pretty sure we are 3-3 against them so you have one wrong.
-
MTIceman41
- Posts: 1104
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
- Location: Orange County, CA
Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (25) - S&M (16)
Lhdd played well and are focused. They deserve the win. There are 4 games which were utterly botched by S&M that were the difference.
I like French wine, cheese, culture, and women...but same goes for Italian and American as well. GL LHDD in the finals you earned it...zabeast I still love you
I like French wine, cheese, culture, and women...but same goes for Italian and American as well. GL LHDD in the finals you earned it...zabeast I still love you

- IcePack
- Multi Hunter

- Posts: 16847
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: California
Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (25) - S&M (16)
betiko wrote:Donelladan wrote:I thought only FALL and TOFU defeated S&M.
Which war am I missing ?
It made me have a look, and no, just the 2 you mentionned. I looked quickly though. Their record says 5 losses, 4 against tofu 1 against fall? Damn i'm lazy to recheck, but those league skirmish results are a pain in the ass in the middle the war results. I've said it before but there should be some sort of tabs that could classify results by competition or something. Or just put a simple colour code... something! This is just unreadable as it is.
You can filter out league results by going to clan war tab instead of clan tab, and using drop down and selecting S&M. You can also filter by league on the clan league tab I believe, but not by event for wars.
Ties aren’t marked as wins or loses, S&M has 30 wins, and one tie vs G1.
But the issue lies within https://www.conquerclub.com/public.php? ... nWarId=203. From back in the KORT days of controversy.
But this dates back to chemefreak even, he marked that war as a tie due to its controversial end (I know cuz I inquired about the discrepancy when I took over the database).
However the score being marked as 1-1 is new not sure who / when that changed (after I left), before it was a confusing entry cuz it showed KORT win via score, but was manually entered as a tie. So over ridden the system.
That’s the one win not marked as a win. Otherwise, S&M/KORT have one loss vs FALL, and 3 vs TOFU. 4 losses, and one weird entry that’s been that way forever.
——
Anyway came to congratulate LHDD

fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (25) - S&M (16)
IcePack wrote:But the issue lies within https://www.conquerclub.com/public.php? ... nWarId=203. From back in the KORT days of controversy.
But this dates back to chemefreak even, he marked that war as a tie due to its controversial end (I know cuz I inquired about the discrepancy when I took over the database).
However the score being marked as 1-1 is new not sure who / when that changed (after I left), before it was a confusing entry cuz it showed KORT win via score, but was manually entered as a tie. So over ridden the system.
It's been that way for several years. That is definitely not a recent change. I think there are a couple other oddities in the war register with wars that had some issues associated with them that were manually reset to 1-1 as the logged score.

- IcePack
- Multi Hunter

- Posts: 16847
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: California
Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (25) - S&M (16)
Doc_Brown wrote:IcePack wrote:But the issue lies within https://www.conquerclub.com/public.php? ... nWarId=203. From back in the KORT days of controversy.
But this dates back to chemefreak even, he marked that war as a tie due to its controversial end (I know cuz I inquired about the discrepancy when I took over the database).
However the score being marked as 1-1 is new not sure who / when that changed (after I left), before it was a confusing entry cuz it showed KORT win via score, but was manually entered as a tie. So over ridden the system.
It's been that way for several years. That is definitely not a recent change. I think there are a couple other oddities in the war register with wars that had some issues associated with them that were manually reset to 1-1 as the logged score.
Interesting, news to me. I don’t remember ever having that discussion / changing it. I know it’s been marked as a tie forever, but the physical 1-1 score I thought was different. Doesn’t matter really, the impact (30/35) is the same / the reason for the discrepancy which Isn’t a new thing.

fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (26) - S&M (20)
i know i botched one game, and think i could have had better strategy as a leader in the other. but very well fought war by you guys.
congrats! it was super fun.
congrats! it was super fun.
Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (29) - S&M (21) /// LHDD
5 games remaining, may not complete before year end...
Game 19298885
Game 19339296
Game 19339362
Game 19339716
Game 19339724
Game 19298885
Game 19339296
Game 19339362
Game 19339716
Game 19339724
".....Under Phucumol treatment....."
https://youtu.be/zlusWzDY4qw
https://youtu.be/zlusWzDY4qw
- Jdsizzleslice
- Posts: 3576
- Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 9:55 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: [CC9] Round 4 (Semi-Final) LHDD (29) - S&M (21) /// LHDD
Tournament privileges removed, databases updated, medals issued.
This war has been completed, and this topic has been MOVED.
This war has been completed, and this topic has been MOVED.
