[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
MagnusGreeol wrote:Its a difficult thing to remove the names? Don't believe Mokes & tfh deserve to have their names plastered here for 3 months? If there are no new reports, I ask why can't the heading be changed to just " ARCHIVED C&A REPORTS?". Like to see how long it stays that way? ")> No war on it, just asking?
\MGM/
[edit]- sorry, 3 weeks! Can we please clear it before New Years? ")>
I can go down to the courthouse and read transcripts of suits that were brought before the court 100 years ago. Why would it be different anywhere else? The whole point of transparency is that cases are available to be read and studied at any point in the future.
Yes, But in each case in the courthouse, Once the case has been judged, It is logged and archived, Not even the next day unless you go into archives, Will you see the same case posted, It would be archived, and the next case would be presented, then judged, then archived, Never will that same case be brought forth or seen, Until next offense?
I'm not sure what you're saying. In most places you can look at archival records any time you want. There are exceptions, sure, but in most cases archives are available to be looked at any time.
Not saying we don't have an archive, Of course we do, anyone can go there, Just saying not to keep the last case up forever until next case?? Can we clear the names of Moke and thf off and just have in the forums say [C&A ARCHIVE REPORTS]
What’s the problem with having their name there? All it means is that they were accused. Doesn’t mean they were punished. And it isn’t an active accusation, they can even use it to show they were cleared of any wrongdoing.
fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
iAmCaffeine wrote:I think Mags is just picking stupid arguments wherever he can as a kind of Christmas celebration.
Just asked if we could clear their names off the forum C&A list Caff, That's all I asked, Then came a hail storm like I was trying to re-write the book?
You're talking like they did nothing wrong, when in fact they've been blocked from playing together which would suggest they did in fact do something wrong. Let's remove the names of anyone who's been found guilty of secret diplomacy too then?
iAmCaffeine wrote:I think Mags is just picking stupid arguments wherever he can as a kind of Christmas celebration.
Just asked if we could clear their names off the forum C&A list Caff, That's all I asked, Then came a hail storm like I was trying to re-write the book?
You're talking like they did nothing wrong, when in fact they've been blocked from playing together which would suggest they did in fact do something wrong. Let's remove the names of anyone who's been found guilty of secret diplomacy too then?
Asking to clear their names off forum, And try entering New Year with no reports seen or noticeable in forums,,,,Is a bad thing?? Didn't say they did nothing knowingly wrong,,,Don't put words in my mouth!! Asking to just "officially" archive that report, and See a clear forum entering new year is so terrible!!?? C'mon, Your witch hunting??
iAmCaffeine wrote:I think Mags is just picking stupid arguments wherever he can as a kind of Christmas celebration.
Just asked if we could clear their names off the forum C&A list Caff, That's all I asked, Then came a hail storm like I was trying to re-write the book?
You're talking like they did nothing wrong, when in fact they've been blocked from playing together which would suggest they did in fact do something wrong. Let's remove the names of anyone who's been found guilty of secret diplomacy too then?
Asking to clear their names off forum, And try entering New Year with no reports seen or noticeable in forums,,,,Is a bad thing?? Didn't say they did nothing knowingly wrong,,,Don't put words in my mouth!! Asking to just "officially" archive that report, and See a clear forum entering new year is so terrible!!?? C'mon, Your witch hunting??
I'm not even sure you know what you're saying at this point.
iAmCaffeine wrote:I think Mags is just picking stupid arguments wherever he can as a kind of Christmas celebration.
Just asked if we could clear their names off the forum C&A list Caff, That's all I asked, Then came a hail storm like I was trying to re-write the book?
You're talking like they did nothing wrong, when in fact they've been blocked from playing together which would suggest they did in fact do something wrong. Let's remove the names of anyone who's been found guilty of secret diplomacy too then?
Asking to clear their names off forum, And try entering New Year with no reports seen or noticeable in forums,,,,Is a bad thing?? Didn't say they did nothing knowingly wrong,,,Don't put words in my mouth!! Asking to just "officially" archive that report, and See a clear forum entering new year is so terrible!!?? C'mon, Your witch hunting??
It is officially archived. All closed C&A reports go into the Closed C&A reports forum. This is the official archive. There are 12053 topic in 242 page dating back to 2006 in this forum. Where else do you think THIS specific closed report belongs? If you don't think it belongs where all other closed reports are where do you think it belongs?
