Ascending Chained

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Post Reply
Rybal
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 10:04 pm

Ascending Chained

Post by Rybal »

In a two player game, going with unlimited fortifications gives way too much of an advantage to the first player whereas it is sometimes nice to be able to fortify more than one territory in a turn.

What if you could fortify based on the number of turns?

You could also have it so that you can choose the factor (from a dropdown box) to set the max number of fortifications in a round.

Just a thought - let me know what you think.
User avatar
hecter
Posts: 14632
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:27 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Tying somebody up on the third floor
Contact:

Post by hecter »

I'm leaning closer to no on this subject… I tend to do most of my fortifications on the first turn in Unlimited, and I'd like to keep it that way.
In heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine... You got your things, and I've got mine.
Image
User avatar
gimil
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Post by gimil »

i think the purpose of ajecent and chained only allowing you one move is becasue teh more moves you allow the MORE like UNLIM it becomes.
Rybal
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 10:04 pm

Post by Rybal »

You are both right - and those are both reasons why I suggested this.

In a smaller game (or even a team game), the player/team with first move has a greater advantage when playing unlimited. With my suggestion, the game starts as though it is just chained, but becomes more like unlimited as it progresses, gradually increasing the flexibility that you have while not giving one player/team too much of an advantage.
Post Reply

Return to “Archived Suggestions”