CYOC #5 [5/16] ENDGAME [DINO DOWN]

[madmitch]

Looks like everyone has an opion on Dakky but has anyone wonder why Kwanton keeps voting for himself? I find that strange , maybe he wants to die or he is a jester ?

[Skittles!]

Looks like everyone has an opion on Dakky but has anyone wonder why Kwanton keeps voting for himself? I find that strange , maybe he wants to die or he is a jester ?

He does this every game regardless of alignment. He will play properly come day 2. It's his way of voting no lynch.

[mandalorian2298]

unvote vote dakky

Firstly, I don't believe that there are VTs in this game. I never played in TFO's game before, but he strikes me as someone who would consider a VT to be a waste of a role.

Secondly, he voted No Lynch. I don't care what kids these days say, with their fidget spinners and genetically engineered pet dragons, but voting No Lynch day 1 is a scum tell. Always have been, always will be.

Thirdly, Skoffin, whom I suspect both generally and in this game, voted for No Lynch after the wagon on Dakky became ample. I smell an unholly alliance between those two and Dakky turning scum could prove it.

Fourthly, Skittles made an argument against Dakky on the last page. It was a well written argument so I can say that I am following his lead in this. Then, if he is wrong and Town loses I can give him shit about his stubborness costing us the game

[dakky21]

Firstly, I don't believe that there are VTs in this game. I never played in TFO's game before, but he strikes me as someone who would consider a VT to be a waste of a role.

I am not "a" VT, I am "the" VT. Pretty much the same except my character is called Vanilla Townie. And as The Vanilla Townie I have a super mega ultra power of being able to vote! Yay!

[BuJaber]

That wasn't me giving up. I don't need to defend myself because I did nothing suspicious. But you did link my fate to dakky's, so I commented on that. Giving up is doing nothing, logging off, and playing a different game.

It's almost as if I'm seeing a Deja Vu from Hobbit, minus the bomb scenario.

The fact that this game and this scenario is repeating itself so soon makes me think dakky is town. His antics clearly failed last time, why would he try again?
People are claiming they are giving dakky credit for being smart, yet they think he would repeat his mistake so soon. Make up your minds.

Based on posts, skoffin is scummier than dakky so far.

[Metsfanmax]

Firstly, I don't believe that there are VTs in this game. I never played in TFO's game before, but he strikes me as someone who would consider a VT to be a waste of a role.

There's part of me that finds the claim believable in the sense that I could envision TFO actually throwing his hands up and trolling us by doing that. But I don't [i]believe[/it] it in the sense that I doubt he actually did it. So I won't be surprised if we lynch dakky and he flips VT, but I do think it's unlikely enough that I'm willing to potentially lynch a VT on D1.

The fact that this game and this scenario is repeating itself so soon makes me think dakky is town. His antics clearly failed last time, why would he try again?
People are claiming they are giving dakky credit for being smart, yet they think he would repeat his mistake so soon. Make up your minds.

dakky does this every game and sometimes it works out for him. It's not about him being smart or stupid, it's about him being dakky.

[strike wolf]

I'm in agreement with Mandy on Skoffin. The way she backed off from the no lynch vote but redoubled it as if to distract from Dakkys shenanigans has me all suspicious eyed. I'm pretty sure I had put out a vote on Dakky as a joke but right now I don't see reason enough to change it. I could kinda see TFO being tempted to do that but I don't think he actually would. Also as Mets said, Dakky doing something crazy is pretty par for the course. It's not very alignment indicative.

Skittles on Buj. I find it interesting. I find Buj responses more telling then the initial case, in that he seems to be trying to throw the accusations back on Skittles without directly saying Skittles behavior is scummy.

[DirtyDishSoap]

That wasn't me giving up. I don't need to defend myself because I did nothing suspicious. But you did link my fate to dakky's, so I commented on that. Giving up is doing nothing, logging off, and playing a different game.

It's almost as if I'm seeing a Deja Vu from Hobbit, minus the bomb scenario.

The fact that this game and this scenario is repeating itself so soon makes me think dakky is town. His antics clearly failed last time, why would he try again?
People are claiming they are giving dakky credit for being smart, yet they think he would repeat his mistake so soon. Make up your minds.

Based on posts, skoffin is scummier than dakky so far.

Because he was useless if he didn't get lynched. His antics succeeded in getting himself killed, killing a cop and a mason the following night. If that's a fail to you, then holy shit, what's succeeding?

I would say vote for the guy, but count me out on a count of I don't want to get hit by a stupid revenge kill again.

[aage]

Firstly, I don't believe that there are VTs in this game. I never played in TFO's game before, but he strikes me as someone who would consider a VT to be a waste of a role.

I am not "a" VT, I am "the" VT. Pretty much the same except my character is called Vanilla Townie. And as The Vanilla Townie I have a super mega ultra power of being able to vote! Yay!

And you're using it to vote no lynch. Worst. VT. Ever.

[Skoffin]

"Skoffin is dicking around, how completely out of character for her!"

[dakky21]

And you're using it to vote no lynch. Worst. VT. Ever.

It's day one and I still have no clue who to really vote. I'll change it later to someone or hammer if I get a chance. But then again, I could hammer a cop or a doctor, so I still think it's best to hammer myself if I get to L-1.

[BuJaber]

That wasn't me giving up. I don't need to defend myself because I did nothing suspicious. But you did link my fate to dakky's, so I commented on that. Giving up is doing nothing, logging off, and playing a different game.

It's almost as if I'm seeing a Deja Vu from Hobbit, minus the bomb scenario.

The fact that this game and this scenario is repeating itself so soon makes me think dakky is town. His antics clearly failed last time, why would he try again?
People are claiming they are giving dakky credit for being smart, yet they think he would repeat his mistake so soon. Make up your minds.

Based on posts, skoffin is scummier than dakky so far.

Because he was useless if he didn't get lynched. His antics succeeded in getting himself killed, killing a cop and a mason the following night. If that's a fail to you, then holy shit, what's succeeding?

I would say vote for the guy, but count me out on a count of I don't want to get hit by a stupid revenge kill again.

I feel that I can't talk about it more since the hobbit game is still going on. But yes I do see it as a fail. (Judging dakky's actions alone - regardless of how good or bad the outcome was).

Yup sorry skoffin that's how it goes. Don't pretend you don't enjoy it
You just have one of those fun loving personalities that makes you suspicious by default.

[The Weird One]

Wow...I go dark for three days or so, and I'm not crucified for inactivity. You guys are ruining my theory about the world revolving around me.

As for Dakky, his claim sound believable...A backup role of VT would just be too tempting for any mod.

As for the no lynch wagon, I'm rather on the fence about it. While skoffin's logic does make sense, TFO did openly state that he made no promises as to the balance of the game. Therefore, it could be weighted heavily against town with potentially multiple 3rd parties involved. In theory, it would be possible to skew your role selection toward a specific role and/or alignment slightly [for instance, having jim jones down would choosing that character unlikely unless they were to be a cult leader], so I'd rather not discount the chance that people may have done that. I'd like to think that the game is balanced and fair for the sake of optimism, but best to keep in mind that it might not be. Pushing for a no lynch might be good for town, here, yes, but it should be realized that there's a fair chance that it won't be weighted as heavily in that direction as skoffin is arguing.

[Skoffin]

Yup sorry skoffin that's how it goes. Don't pretend you don't enjoy it
You just have one of those fun loving personalities that makes you suspicious by default.

I don't know how to feel about this. I'm offended?

TWO has a point that I somewhat forgot; there very may well be cults and/or other parties in the game. But I must confess, my desire for a no lynch isn't purely for best interests of myself or anyone, it's purely that I joined this game for it's crazy nature and I want to see what shenanigans might go down. My No-lynch vote here may be technically dumb but at least I am not boring like you muppets


As for dakky, that's the only case worth pursuing; skittles made some good points against him that I cannot dispute. I had previously thought that dakky was just a shit town player but a brilliant scum player, turns out I was wrong and he's being demoted back to scrub deck.

[madmitch]

NO USE KEEPING MY VOTE WHERE IT IS ,JUST BEING WASTED UNVOTE

[aage]

And you're using it to vote no lynch. Worst. VT. Ever.

It's day one and I still have no clue who to really vote. I'll change it later to someone or hammer if I get a chance. But then again, I could hammer a cop or a doctor, so I still think it's best to hammer myself if I get to L-1.

So let me get this straight. You choose to stir the pot and claim your VT-ship, let's leave the legitimacy of that aside for now, and after several pages of discussion and people choosing sides between lynching you, the obvious choice, or voting No Lynch, the useless choice, and you have decided to join team useless? There's 6 people voting you! Aren't you even going to analyse that vote pattern? What is the point of you right now?

[dakky21]

aage... 6 people voting me because they don't know who to vote else. Just like I don't know. I understand them, lynching a VT is better than lynching a cop or a doc and with info we have, we can't lynch scum, only by luck. So I voted no lynch because I don't want to lynch some PR.

[BuJaber]

WE ALL LIVE IN A YELLOW SCUMMARINE, A YELLOW SCUMMARINE, A YELLOW SCUMMARINE.

Okay - Mitch doesn't want to lynch dakky but he's giving up on getting more votes on someone else when all we need to avoid a dakky lynch is one or two people changing their vote from dakky. Odd to say the least.

Strike and Mandy - You've hinted at what it would mean if dakky flips scum. What about if dakky flips town, what would be your thoughts if that happens. Also if your assumption is correct, and skoffin is trying to protect dakky, why lynch the person scapegoating themselves, instead of the person trying to hide?
Btw skoffin voted no lynch twice... once before dakky started talking too much:

I have amended my ways and have since discovered that no lynch is obviiouuusly the way to go.

Unvote vote no lynch plox

First came this post. (Could be just a joke, though most people who aren't in favor of no lynch don't even joke no lynch as it doesn't normally cross their mind, but still could be an ironic joke) Then after dakky posted his 'insight' into the game, skoffin said she might actually consider no lynch in this game. Then finally she go ahead and officially votes no lynch. Are you saying she not only is dakky's scum buddy, but that she knew he was gonna post this crap and get himself lynched?

I offered a "backup role" of Vanilla Townie

Ah, rookie mistake. You got trolled hard, my friend.

Great choices for the three actual picks though, props for that!

Was this a joke or did you change your mind? When I first read this I thought you believed him. Just want to know if you were laying some sort of trap here for dakky or anyone else, or if you genuinely changed your mind.

[mandalorian2298]

BuJaber, if dakky flips Town then we will have information on which to proceed in Day 2, as is always the case when a lynchee flips Town. I am not married to this lynch, since dakky often ends up looking guilty through over-sharing, regardless of this role.

...

As for dakky, that's the only case worth pursuing; skittles made some good points against him that I cannot dispute. I had previously thought that dakky was just a shit town player but a brilliant scum player, turns out I was wrong and he's being demoted back to scrub deck.

This quote is interesting to me because, for it to make logical sense, Skoffin would have to know that dakky is scum (because she already has a bad opinion of his play as Town, so it wouldn't change by his play in this game if he is playing Town)

[aage]

I offered a "backup role" of Vanilla Townie

Ah, rookie mistake. You got trolled hard, my friend.

Great choices for the three actual picks though, props for that!

Was this a joke or did you change your mind? When I first read this I thought you believed him. Just want to know if you were laying some sort of trap here for dakky or anyone else, or if you genuinely changed your mind.

Initially I was going to give him the benefit of the doubt, cause his story was so silly it might be true, but he doesn't behave like a VT. Besides, he's still the best lynch since we have people trying to vote no lynch (THE HERESY) and I'm curious to see if there's alternate motives at play.

[DirtyDishSoap]

Sorry, I'm a known heretic. This whole scenario with Dakky is similar to the previous game where he was a bomb of sorts, I personally think he's trying to get himself lynched to take advantage of whatever role he may have that requires his death by lynch. I don't think there's any real question at this moment if he's scum, but rather what he gains from being lynched. He might be a revenge kill, again, or a jester, I don't know, but I'm not willing to put myself back on the spot to get killed again.

Anywho, I'd say have a vig kill him at night and move on from there, it'd be a safer bet rather than risking to lose a power role due to a stupid revenge kill.

[Metsfanmax]

Sorry, I'm a known heretic. This whole scenario with Dakky is similar to the previous game where he was a bomb of sorts, I personally think he's trying to get himself lynched to take advantage of whatever role he may have that requires his death by lynch. I don't think there's any real question at this moment if he's scum, but rather what he gains from being lynched. He might be a revenge kill, again, or a jester, I don't know, but I'm not willing to put myself back on the spot to get killed again.

Anywho, I'd say have a vig kill him at night and move on from there, it'd be a safer bet rather than risking to lose a power role due to a stupid revenge kill.

dakky already offered to hammer himself. Let's take him up on that

[dakky21]

Well I'm still not on L-1...

[madmitch]

@ Dakky YOU WANT L1 YOU GOT IT VOTE DAKKY

[TheForgivenOne]

Vote Count

Skoffin: BuJaber (1)
Kwanton: The Weird One, kwanton (2)
Dakky21: aage, strike wolf, Metsfanmax, benga, Pikanchion, skittles!, mandalorian2298 (7) L-2
Skittles!: madmitch (1)
No Lynch: dirtydishsoap, Samlen, Skoffin, dakky21 (4)

Not Voting: thorthoth

With 16 alive, it takes 9 to lynch. Deadline set for October 29th at 17:00CCT