benga wrote:@nag
did you just claim doc? why would you do that?
Because Nag is not very good at mafia?
However, can you explain what leads you to believe that there is a Doc in the game D1?
Moderator: Community Team
benga wrote:@nag
did you just claim doc? why would you do that?
Skoffin wrote:
@Wing Look sir, we can't both barely pay attention; one of us has to win this game for town
But it seems Benga did not claim Germany, he just implied it with flavour comments.
@Mitch I will accept this for now. Cheers sir
Samlen wrote:Blech I just reread my pm and realized that the way it is worded makes it highly unlikely that the third one is the way this game is setup since it seems there is an actual town whom are considered the 'civilized' nations. So my *new* theory is that it's the second option and the reason that these civs are 'uncivilzed' is because they are trying to take over the world whereas the civilized civs are trying to live in relative peace.
[/spoiler]nagerous wrote:benga wrote:nagerous wrote:benga wrote:nagerous wrote:
Are you going to answer this or conveniently ignore it? I will happily ask multiple times like a Paxman interview (British reference that I couldn't resist and NO not a soft claim of British empire) until you give me a satisfactory response.
I find your exchange with samlen at the bottom of page six HIGHLY questionable
I have already answered, maybe you skipped it.
No you haven't you have posted twice since I asked my question to you and neither answer why you think we all have different objectives? If your answer is because the game is a FFA then that is not good enough. My objective in this game is very clear and if you are not aligned with the town objective then you are th enemy vote benga
LOL not sure what you mean here
were did I say that my goal isn't clear?
you having clear goal doesn't make you town
where did I state I am not aligned with town
I am just stating these:benga wrote:I don't have anything about uncivilized in pm, I draw my conclusion from my experience with civ games and about dakky from my past experience with him.benga wrote:dakky21 wrote:Re-reading last few pages I noticed I did bring up the possibility of uncivilized nations and even said my PM said so, but actually I was very wrong. There was no mention of uncivilized, that's just what I assumed as the opposite to civilized is ... uncivilized. So barbarians and similar bad guys should be possible as well.
touche!
the classic dakky, just rambling whatever drops on his mind
Like always, I don't draw conclusions out of thin air.
So far I have been right.
samlen apprently has his objective set to play as solo or third party, until I am sure no point in acting upon it
And we clearly have all different objectives either pro town, pro scum, pro 3rd party
I just didn't want dakky lynched fast like he always gets, w/o any valid reason.
Benga, maybe it is that English is not your first language so your meaning has been misconstrued but that is not what you said. You said ' guess we all have different objectives then' and suggested there is a FFA element - basing these comments on what Samlen also incorrectly posted. My guess is one of you is scum who has slipped up but I am focusing* my attentions on you for now because there have been a couple of other things you have done that I have found questionable. Now you have bastardised your initial statement by saying we all do as in you meant town, third party and Mafia - that is not a case of us all having different objectives or 'FFA' but only three separate potential objectives. By saying we all have different objectives suggested to me that you didn't get a town PM.
benga wrote:Guess we all have different objectives then, maybe that's all the part of FFA.
benga wrote:samlen apprently has his objective set to play as solo or third party
benga wrote:@nag
did you just claim doc? why would you do that?
about my 'softclaim' I was just joking as I thought dakky was joking with his statements
telling people are a specific nation based on how they were confirming
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
HotShot53 wrote:Fircoal wrote:HotShot53 wrote:madmitch wrote:VOTE BENGA His statement to to Nag about being a docter shows he has not the same goals as we (town) do.
I'm not sure what his comment asking why Nag (he thought) claimed doc has anything to do with his goals? Skimming yeah, since Nag corrected it in the next post.
Because claiming as a doc seems like a weird claim to make, doesn't it?
Well, yeah, I assumed benga thought it weird too, because he asked if nag was actually making a doc claim, and if so, why. Seems a reasonable question if you think someone might have claimed doc on day 1. Why benga didn't see the corrected next post though, I have no idea.

nagerous wrote:HotShot53 wrote:Fircoal wrote:HotShot53 wrote:madmitch wrote:VOTE BENGA His statement to to Nag about being a docter shows he has not the same goals as we (town) do.
I'm not sure what his comment asking why Nag (he thought) claimed doc has anything to do with his goals? Skimming yeah, since Nag corrected it in the next post.
Because claiming as a doc seems like a weird claim to make, doesn't it?
Well, yeah, I assumed benga thought it weird too, because he asked if nag was actually making a doc claim, and if so, why. Seems a reasonable question if you think someone might have claimed doc on day 1. Why benga didn't see the corrected next post though, I have no idea.
Yes but within this set up a doctor claim at day 1 would make even less sense
ga7 wrote:Indeed, what jumped to me is that contrary to Samlen, Benga was very clearly going with the flow of it all without having any idea of the real answer... And no means to check it.
ga7 wrote:I dunno about the doc thing, it's a scummy thing to point out but that I could see as a noob move also. The rest, not so much.
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:benga wrote:@nag
did you just claim doc? why would you do that?
Because Nag is not very good at mafia?
However, can you explain what leads you to believe that there is a Doc in the game D1?
benga wrote:okay my time to claim I guess
I am minor civilization Celts , I win the game solely by surviving till the end
It doesn't matter which side wins
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Fircoal wrote:benga wrote:okay my time to claim I guess
I am minor civilization Celts , I win the game solely by surviving till the end
It doesn't matter which side wins
A REALLY early claim + a survivor claim? It's so scummy it almost makes me believe you.
Unvote. Vote: Benga
Almost.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.

Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.

strike wolf wrote:*Devils advocate* actually the free for all comment does make a bit more sense coming from a third party who legitimately not know town or scum win cons. *end Devils advocate*
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Skittles! wrote:Claim after only 3 or 4 votes? What gives benga? What made you feel like you had to claim?
strike wolf wrote:*Devils advocate* actually the free for all comment does make a bit more sense coming from a third party who legitimately not know town or scum win cons. *end Devils advocate* it does not explain why he felt so driven on defending Dakky.

WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Precisely Rage.
Fircoal is scum. Tim is scum. Dakky might be. Samlen might be. Benga is not. Ga7 is not.

TimWoodbury wrote:sorry benga im not buying that claim early claim and claiming something only another 3rd party can verify sounds skummy to meunvote vote benga
PS to mod why in the world on the VC it say im a enchaner im confused there