The Great War

Archival storage for Announcements. Peruse old Announcements here!

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Locked
User avatar
Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
Posts: 28215
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara

Re: The Great War

Post by Dukasaur »

Tviorr wrote:Is it copy-righted? ;-)


I ask because Im hopefully getting into teaching and if so will probably be involved in History and English lessons. - The above would serve rather well as reading material. Its fairly short, fairly recent and while the lix-number is probably high for a second language class even with older pupils, extra time, group work and/or a provided vocabulary should work.

A bit of snipping would of course be required with regards to the tournament and cc-references. - So hmmm could I borrow from it if the situation arises and if so, what name should I credit?

Much of the material is quoted from wikipedia, as are most of the graphics.

The original parts are mine. I don't mind you borrowing it. You can PM me for my real name if you want to attribute it. Probably right to set a good example for the students and make proper footnotes...:)
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
Posts: 28215
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara

Re: The Great War

Post by Dukasaur »

Archive of tournaments in the Seventh Quarter of the War.

[spoiler=kosovo offensive april 5 to 12]Kosovo Offensive

After the debacle in Vardar Macedonia, the Serbian Army was in rapid retreat. It had been at war for 15 months and had surprised the world with the robustness of its defense against attacks by the much larger Austro-Hungarian Empire. The entry of Bulgaria into the war, however, totally unbalanced the situation and led to Serbia's rapid collapse.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosovo_Offensive_%281915%29
wikipedia wrote:The battle began with the forcing of the South Morava by the Bulgarian 1st Army and ended with the total defeat of the Serbian army. The main blow was made by the 1st Army at the direction Niš-Pristina. For 2 days, the Serbian army seized Prokuplje, where they mounted a short-lived resistance.

The greatly outnumbered Serbian army retreated, then made a futile stand near the city of Gnjilane. The Serbs then tried a desperate counter-attack towards Vranje and Kumanovo to join the Anglo-French troops but were again defeated. The 6th and 9th Infantry Divisions of 1st Army easily took Priština on 24 November. Then the whole of the Bulgarian army advanced, supported from the north by parts of 11th German Army and the Austro-Hungarian 3rd Army. The battle ended on 4 December when Debar was captured.


The battle raged from November 10th to December 4th. In terms of commemorating all Great War battles on their 100th anniversary, I am more than four months late with this. My apologies. I have no real excuse, except that I just don't have as much time for this project as I wish I did.

Each round in this tournament will have 3 games on the same 3 maps: Austro-Hungarian Empire, Macedonia, and Balkan Peninsula. The settings and game types will vary from round to round. There is an innovation. For the first time, I will be using the feature BW has added to the autotourney engine that allows different numbers of points for different games in the same tourney. Games will score as follows:
  • 1 base point for each player in the game (2 points for 2-player, 5 points for 5-player, etc.)
  • 1 extra point for every added difficulty (1 point for fog, 1 point for trench, 1 point for any spoils other than escalating, 1 point for any reinforcement other than chained or parachute)
  • 2 extra points for Assassin games.

24 players begin

Round 1: Serbia had been at war for 15 months
2-p games, default settings (2 points)

Round 2: Serbia's tough defence against Austria had amazed the world
2-p games, flat rate, parachute, trench (4 points)

21 players advance

Round 3: The entry of Bulgaria into the war totally unbalanced the situation
3-p games, nuclear (4 points)

Round 4: With the forcing of the South Morava, the road to Kosovo was opened
7-p games, fog (8 points)

15 players advance

Round 5: The Serbs tried to hold the line at Prokuplje and then at Gnjilane
5-p games, flat rate, fog, trench, adjacent (9 points)

Round 6: They even tried to counter and link up with the Anglo-French forces
3-p games, fog (4 points)

9 players advance

Round 7: Led by the 9th Infantry Division, the Bulgarians advanced
9-p games, parachute, fog, trench (11 points)

6 players advance

Round 8: The carnage was brutal
6-p games, zombie, parachute (7 points)

Round 9: The battle ended with the fall of Debar
6-p games, assassin (8 points)

-- DK[/spoiler]
[spoiler=evacuation of gallipoli]Evacuation of Gallipoli
http://www.firstworldwar.com/battles/evacuation_dec15.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gallipoli_Campaign#Evacuation
http://www.gallipoli.gov.au/north-beach-and-the-sari-bair-range/evacuation-of-anzac.php

After the failure of the great August Offensive,
firstworldwardotcom wrote:Mediterranean Commander-in-Chief Sir Ian Hamilton telegraphed London in a state of increasing despondency. In his telegram Hamilton requested a further 95,000 reinforcements from British war minister Lord Kitchener. He was offered barely a quarter, 25,000.

Allied confidence in the Gallipoli operation was fading fast. Numerous considerations militated against a resumption of offensive operations on the peninsula. The bulk of officers on the Western Front, including the French high commander Joffre and the British high commader considered it a criminal waste of troops who were desperately needed elsewhere. The entry of Bulgaria into the war and the collapse of Serbian resistance was changing the strategic situation in the Balkans. After the fall of Serbia, there was a continuous rail link from Berlin to Istanbul. The Allies' chances of knocking Turkey out of the war seemed remote even if the Gallipoli peninsula was taken. The need to hold Thessaloniki and defend Greece put a further strain on Allied resources in the Mediterranean.

Reports of catastrophes at Gallipoli were being published in British and Australian newspapers despite censorship rules. Jean Augagneur, the only major French personality in favour of the operation, was removed from his post in October of 1915. Winston Churchill, the great advocate for the Gallipoli operation in the British Cabinet, was demoted in October and resigned in November. The departures of Augagneur and Churchill left the operation without major political proponents.

Simultaneously with the demotion of Churchill from the Admiralty, Hamilton was removed from the command on land. Sir Charles Munro was brought in. Munro quickly saw the situation was lost and made the rational decision to begin an evacuation. Some see Munro's decision as being courageous, accepting reality instead of persisting in his predecessor's self-delusion. Others disagree.
firstworldwardotcom wrote:Winston Churchill however viewed Monro's achievement with a somewhat jaundiced eye: "he came, he saw, he capitulated" he wrote of Monro, and the sneer has remained through the years to blight Monro's correct decision and remarkable follow-through.

Kitchener came himself to survey the situation on November 13th. He quickly confirmed Munro's decision.
Image
Lieutenant-General Sir William Birdwood, Commander, Mediterranean Expeditionary force; Field Marshal Lord Kitchener; Major-General Alexander Godley, Commander, New Zealand and Australian Division; and Major-General John Maxwell at North Beach, 13 November 1915. [AWM A00880] http://www.gallipoli.gov.au/north-beach-and-the-sari-bair-range/evacuation-of-anzac.php

In preparation for the withdrawal, numerous ruses were arranged to make the Turks think that it was business-as-usual on the front.
wikipedia wrote:The evacuation was the best-executed segment of the entire Allied campaign.[181][182] Suvla and Anzac were to be evacuated in late December, the last troops leaving before dawn on 20 December 1915. Troop numbers had been slowly reduced since 7 December 1915 and ruses, such as William Scurry's self-firing rifle,[183] which had been rigged to fire by water dripped into a pan attached to the trigger, were used to disguise the Allied departure. At Anzac Cove troops maintained silence for an hour or more, until curious Ottoman troops ventured to inspect the trenches, whereupon the Anzacs opened fire. A mine was detonated at the Nek which killed 70 Ottoman soldiers.[184] The Allied force was embarked, with the Australians suffering no casualties on the final night,[181][185] but large quantities of supplies and stores fell into Ottoman hands.[186]

The evacuation of Anzac Cove and Suvla took place from December 10th to December 20th. In addition to the various ruses used by the Allies, a great snowstorm at the end of November helped cover the retreat and the evacuation preparations. The Allies expected tens of thousands of casualties; instead they suffered three. After nine months of horrific casualties, the Anzacs withdrew in good order.

Cape Hellas was held a little longer. The withdrawal from Hellas began on December 28th and was completed by January 9th. The last unit to leave was the Royal Newfoundland Regiment. Forty-six weeks after the initial bombardment of the Dardanelles forts began, the Gallipoli campaign was over.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The tournament:

32 players begin

Phase 1: Carnage at Gallipoli had been ongoing for 8 months
Eight 8-player games on WWI Gallipoli, randomly flat, escalating, and no spoils, random fog and trench, randomly chained, adjacent, unlimited, and parachute. (10 points per win)

30 players advance

Phase 2: The Bulgarian declaration of war and the Serbian collapse changed the strategic picture
Four 6-player games on Balkan Peninsula, randomly flat, escalating, and no spoils, random fog and trench, randomly chained, adjacent, unlimited, and parachute. (8 points per win)

Phase 3: The political winds in London turned against Churchill, Augagneur, and Hamilton
Three 5-player games on Classic Cities London, randomly flat, escalating, and no spoils, random fog and trench, randomly chained, adjacent, unlimited, and parachute. (7 points per win)

Scores reset, 24 players advance

Phase 4: A Charles Munro took over and organised the withdrawal
Six 4-player games on Alexander's Empire, Pelo War, WWI Ottoman, Middle East, Eurasia Mini, and Transsib1914, randomly flat, escalating, and no spoils, random fog and trench, randomly chained, adjacent, unlimited, and parachute. (6 points per win)

Phase 5: A massive snowstorm helped hide the final preparations
Six 8-player Terminator games on Antarctica, escalating and foggy (9 points per win)

Phase 6: The ANZACs embarked with few casualties
Eight 6-player games on Australia, New Zealand, Oceania, and WWII Australia, randomly flat and escalating, half foggy, randomly chained and parachute. (7 points per win)

Scores reset, 14 players advance

Phase 7: The evacuation of Hellas began a week later
Seven 7-player games on Random map, randomly flat, escalating, and no spoils, random fog and trench, randomly chained, adjacent, unlimited, and parachute. (9 points per win)

10 players advance

Phase 8: The Royal Newfoundland Regiment was the last to embark
Seven 5-player games on Golfe de St. Laurent, flat rate and otherwise default (6 points per win)

8 players advance

Phase 9: Farewell to Gallipoli
Nine 8-player games on WWI Gallipoli, randomly flat, escalating, and no spoils, random fog and trench, randomly chained, adjacent, unlimited, and parachute. (10 points per win)

-- DK[/spoiler]
[spoiler=the fokker scourge]The Fokker Scourge

Image

Although fighter aircraft manufactured by Fokker were used almost the entire war from beginning to end, the term "Fokker Scourge" is used to refer to a period running approximately from August of 1915 to June of 1916, when the Fokker Eindecker ruled the skies and gave the Germans air superiority over the Western Front.

http://www.firstworldwar.com/airwar/fokkerscourge.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fokker_Scourge

Early fighter aircraft used guns fired from inside the cockpit or on top of the cockpit. The ideal was a gun that would fire straight forward from the nose, so that aiming the aircraft would also aim the gun. How to avoid damage to the propeller was the key problem. In the early days of the war, the Allies began working with deflector gear, which were metal plates on the back of the propeller that would simply deflect bullets if they were in danger of hitting the propeller blades. They also experimented with synchronization gear, which would fire the gun correctly timed to not hit the propeller. Although the Allies began their experiments in this regard first, they finished second. It was the German (Dutch-born, working in Germany) designer Anthony Fokker who perfected the first really reliable synchronization gear. Whether he developed this, as he claimed, in 48 hours of brilliant thinking, or whether he copied much of his design from other inventors, has always been debated. It really doesn't matter. He perfected the idea while others failed.

Image
By Gsl - Version with English text of Image:Interrupter_gear_diagram.png, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1820853

Fokker first demonstrated the new Eindecker in May of 1915. By July of 1915 it was having an effect, wresting air control away from the Allies. In the period of December 1915 to April 1916, the Germans enjoyed almost total air supremacy, and this was a major factor in the fact that the French had almost no air reconnaissance in the opening phase of the Battle of Verdun. During that battle, the new French Fighter, the Nieuport 11 "Bébé", was being introduced, and by July of 1916 the Eindecker was essentially obsolete. Its reign, therefore, was pretty close to one year. In April of 1916, the Allies lost 2 aircraft for every German aircraft lost. In August of 1916, it was exactly the opposite, with 2 Germans going down for every Allied pilot.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The tournament.

Although fighters sometimes faced each other in large groups, the classic picture of an aerial dogfight is one-on-one, mano a mano. Consequently, this will be a straightforward 1v1 elimination bracket.

Spoils are randomly escalating, flat, nuclear, and none. There is sometimes fog and sometimes not, just as in the real thing. There is never trench. Fortifications follow a progression that reflects the evolution of aerial combat. The slow-moving, almost static, nature of balloons and kites gives Adjacent, the invention of the airplane switches us to Chained, and the outbreak of war adds Parachute.

The number of games per round follows an unusual progression: five in phase 1, three in phase 2, seven in phase 3, nine in phase 4, and eleven in phase 5.

Phase 1: Air warfare originates with balloons and kites.
    The map selection commemorates the following:
    • Three Kingdoms of Korea - kites were used both for signalling and propaganda in ancient Korean warfare
    • Steamworks - ballooning in general
    • Three Kingdoms of China - use of balloons as a signaling device in Three Kingdoms war
    • Napoleonic Europe - use of hot-air balloons for surveillance by Napoleonic forces
    • American Civil War - expanded role of balloon surveillance by Union Balloon Corps

Phase 2: Soon after the invention of the airplane, it became a weapon
    The map selection commemorates the following:
    • USA Southeast - invention of the airplane at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina
    • Africa - first bomb dropped from an airplane, by Italian attacking Turkish positions in Lybia
    • Balkan Peninsula - first co-ordinated air/naval strike, by Bulgarians in First Balkan War

Phase 3: Britain, France, and Italy had an early lead in aircraft production at the outbreak of war
    The map selection commemorates the following:
    • London, British Isles, England, Celtic Nations, Eastern Hemisphere (British Empire) - (Britain)
    • France, France 2.1, France1789 - (France)
    • Italy, Unification Italy, Imperium Romanum - (Italy)

Phase 4: It was Germany, however, and specifically Anthony Fokker, who created the first really effective fighter aircraft
    The map selection commemorates the following:
    • Netherlands - Fokker's original citizenship
    • Unification Germany, Germany -- (Germany)

Phase 5: The Fokker Eindecker ruled the skies for 11 months
    The map selection commemorates the following:
    • Random - in the wild days of aerial combat, anything could happen

-- DK[/spoiler]
[spoiler=the Armenian Genocide]The Armenian Genocide

A tournament for 18 players, this will commemorate the history of the Armenian people and the shameful attempt by the Ottoman Turks to exterminate them.

Settings: All games will be Standard, with Automatic deployment, 24-hour Sequential turns.
Reinforcement: randomly Chained/Parachute.
Spoils: Randomly Escalating (representing escalating violence) Nuclear (representing destruction) and Zombie (representing death.)
Trench: No Trench in any round.
Fog: Randomly Fog/No Fog.

Part 1: Ancient Armenia.

Armenia has a long and fascinating history. The existence of this nation in some form goes back at least 6,000 years and probably more. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Armenia We mark the 6 millenia of Armenian history with 6-player games. The Areni-1 cave complex has been explored and found to contain artisans' workshops for the manufacture of wine, dresses, and the world's first known leather shoe. (Commemorate ancient artisans with the Age of Merchants map.) The first known use of the term "Armenia" is on an Akkadian inscription dated to 2300 B.C. (Commemorate Akkadian neighbours with Gilgamesh map.) Armenia was eventually absorbed into the Persian Empire, after which it became one of Alexander's conquests and on his death became an important part of the Seleucid Empire. (Commemorate the Persian-Macedonian-Seleucid phase with the Alexander's Empire map.) Herodotus placed Armenia near the centre of his world map. (Commemorate Herodotus' ellipsoid world map with Vertex map.) Armenia changed hands between the Parthians and the Romans a few times before finally becoming a self-governing vassal state of the Roman Empire. (Commemorate Roman Armenia with Imperium Romanum map.)

Part 2 and 3: Medieval and Crusade-era Armenia.

Armenia was mostly Zoroastrian in the pre-Christian era. It was Christianized fairly early in its history. According to legend, two of Jesus' original disciples, Thaddeus and Bartholomew, preached there from 42 to 62 A.D. Armenia became the world's first officially Christian kingdom in 301 A.D., a decade before Constantine promulgated the Edict of Milan. During a brief occupation by the Sassanids, Zoroastrianism was forcibly restored, leading to a period of religious civil war. By the Treaty of Nvarsak, religious freedom was guaranteed.

Armenia had the misfortune of being seen as a cushion or buffer state between the Roman world to the west and the Persian world to the east. As is common with such buffer states, its sovereignty was frequently violated by both sides and its territory inexorably eroded. After the Muslim conquest of Persia, Islam took the place of Zoroastrianism in competing for dominance in the region. The Christian vs. Zoroastrian wars became Christian vs. Muslim wars without any notable period of peace in between. The first of many Muslim occupations took place in 645.

The ties between Armenia and the Byzantine empire were many -- religious, cultural, economic, military, and dynastic. Several Byzantine emperors were ethnically Armenian. As more and more of Armenia was conquered by Muslims, the remainder was more vigorously defended by its Christian majority and by the Byzantines. The final conquest of Armenia after the Battle of Manzikert is seen as the defining moment when Turkish power in Asia Minor exceeded Greek power. The only independent Armenian kingdom surviving after the debacle of Manzikert was Cilicia.

During the Crusades, Cilicia was a faithful ally of the Crusader states and gave them very significant help. A third religious faction arose, following the Roman Catholic rite, distinct not only from the Muslims but also significantly different from the Armenian Apostolic Christians. After the failure of the Third Crusade, Cilicia was the only significant Christian presence in the Middle East.

The only Conquer Club map that represents the Middle East during the Crusading/Medieval era is Third Crusade. We will commemorate this period through two phases. First, a round of six-player games (representing Armenians, Greeks, Romans, Persian, Arabs, and Turks) and then a round of five-player games (representing Zoroastrian, Muslim, Armenian Apostolic, Greek Orthodox, and Roman Catholic influences.) Between these rounds we will cut the field from 18 to 15 players and after Phase 3 we will have a further reduction to 14 players.

Phase 4: Persecution and Slavery

In the early days of the Ottoman Empire, the Armenians had a significant degree of self-government within the Empire. As time went on, however, their autonomy was steadily eroded, and relations between the (overwhelmingly Muslim) Turks and (mostly Christian) Armenians became worse. By the 19th century, the Armenians were treated as a slave race.

[bigimg]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/0/05/20110929232326%21Ethnic_map_of_Asia_Minor_and_Caucasus_in_1914.jpg[/bigimg]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_Genocide#Armenians_under_Ottoman_rule
Armenia had come largely under Ottoman rule during the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. The vast majority of Armenians, grouped together under the name Armenian millet (community) and led by their spiritual head, the Armenian Patriarch of Constantinople, were concentrated in the eastern provinces of the Ottoman Empire (commonly referred to as Turkish Armenia or Western Armenia), although large communities were also found in the western provinces, as well as in the capital Constantinople. The Armenian community was made up of three religious denominations: the Armenian Apostolic to which the overwhelming majority of Armenians belonged, and the Armenian Catholic and Armenian Protestant communities. Through the millet system, the Armenian community were allowed to rule themselves under their own system of governance with fairly little interference from the Ottoman government. With the exception of the empire's urban centers and the extremely wealthy, Constantinople-based Amira class, a social elite whose members included the Duzians (Directors of the Imperial Mint), the Balyans (Chief Imperial Architects) and the Dadians (Superintendent of the Gunpowder Mills and manager of industrial factories), most Armenians – approximately 70% of their population – lived in poor and dangerous conditions in the rural countryside.[32][33] Ottoman census figures clash with the statistics collected by the Armenian Patriarchate. According to the latter, there were almost three million Armenians living in the empire in 1878 (400,000 in Constantinople and the Balkans, 600,000 in Asia Minor and Cilicia, 670,000 in Lesser Armenia and the area near Kayseri, and 1,300,000 in Western Armenia itself).[34] In the eastern provinces, the Armenians were subject to the whims of their Turkish and Kurdish neighbors, who would regularly overtax them, subject them to brigandage and kidnapping, force them to convert to Islam, and otherwise exploit them without interference from central or local authorities.[33] In the Ottoman Empire, in accordance with the dhimmi system implemented in Muslim countries, they, like all other Christians and also Jews, were accorded certain freedoms. The dhimmi system in the Ottoman Empire was largely based upon the Pact of Umar. The client status established the rights of the non-Muslims to property, livelihood and freedom of worship but they were in essence treated as second-class citizens in the empire and referred to in Turkish as gavours, a pejorative word meaning "infidel" or "unbeliever". While the Pact of Umar prohibited non-Muslims from building new places of worship, it was not enforced in all regions of the Ottoman Empire. Since there were no laws concerning religious ghettos, the prohibition of non-Muslims building new places of worship led to their clustering around existing ones.[35][36] Writing in the late 1890s after a visit to the Ottoman Empire, the British ethnographer William Ramsay described the conditions of Armenian life as follows:
We must, however, go back to an older time, if we want to appreciate what uncontrolled Turkish rule meant, alike to Armenians and to Greeks. It did not mean religious persecution; it meant unutterable contempt ... They were dogs and pigs; and their nature was to be Christians, to be spat upon, if their shadow darkened a Turk, to be outraged, to be the mats on which he wiped the mud from his feet. Conceive the inevitable result of centuries of slavery, of subjection to insult and scorn, centuries in which nothing that belonged to the Armenian, neither his property, his house, his life, his person, nor his family, was sacred or safe from violence – capricious, unprovoked violence – to resist which by violence meant death![37]


In addition to other legal limitations, Christians were not considered equals to Muslims and several prohibitions were placed on them. Their testimony against Muslims by Christians and Jews was inadmissible in courts of law wherein a Muslim could be punished; this meant that their testimony could only be considered in commercial cases. They were forbidden to carry weapons or ride atop horses and camels. Their houses could not overlook those of Muslims; and their religious practices were severely circumscribed (e.g., the ringing of church bells was strictly forbidden).[35][38]


With the outbreak of the Russo-Turkish War, hope arose that the Armenians might be liberated from the more onerous aspects of Ottoman rule. The Russians did, indeed attempt to get Armenian self-government guaranteed in the peace treaties, but the terms were first watered down and then ignored completely. An Armenian liberation movement was born, but rapidly repressed, and the familiar cycle of violence and repression accelerated.

By 1894 intentional massacres of Armenians were being carried out under the rule of Sultan Abdul Hamid II. These Hamidian massacres can be seen as the beginning of the Genocide, although the term is generally only applied to larger massacres that took place from 1915. Still, between 1894 and 1896 it is believed that 100,000 to 300,000 Armenians were intentionally murdered.
Image
By W. L. Sachtleben. (d. 1953) - "The Graphic" December 7th 1895., Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2225204

Map: WWI Ottoman, 7-p.
Players reduced from 14 to 12.

Part 5: Respite

As a result of corruption, the Ottoman monarchy was weakened and Hamid was deposed in 1908 during the Young Turk Revolution. The "Young Turk" movement was composed of both liberals (who believed in protecting the rights of minorities) and conservatives (who did not, but were willing to play along in order to win friends in liberal Europe). During this time, the oppression of the Armenians was much reduced. It was a brief respite.

A round of 2-player games on Orient Express.

Part 6: Oppression resumes.

A reactionary wave of Turkish nationalism and Islamic extremism swept the country, resulting in many random acts of violence against Armenians. In Adana province, Army units that were called in to suppress the violence actually joined in and participated, resulting in the deaths of 30,000 Armenians.

Worse was yet to come. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_Genocide#The_Balkan_Wars
wikipedia wrote:In 1912, the First Balkan War broke out and ended with the defeat of the Ottoman Empire as well as the loss of 85% of its European territory. Many in the empire saw their defeat as "Allah's divine punishment for a society that did not know how to pull itself together".[38]:84 The Turkish nationalist movement in the country gradually came to view Anatolia as their last refuge. That the Armenian population formed a significant minority in this region later figured prominently in the calculations of the Three Pashas, who carried out the Armenian Genocide.

An important consequence of the Balkan Wars was also the mass expulsion of Muslims (known as muhacirs) from the Balkans. Beginning in the mid-19th century, hundreds of thousands of Muslims, including Turks, Circassians, and Chechens, were expelled or forced to flee from the Caucasus and the Balkans (Rumelia) as a result of the Russo-Turkish wars and the conflicts in the Balkans. Muslim society in the empire was incensed by this flood of refugees. A journal published in Constantinople expressed the mood of the times: "Let this be a warning ... O Muslims, don't get comfortable! Do not let your blood cool before taking revenge".[38]:86 As many as 850,000 of these refugees were settled in areas where the Armenians were resident from the period of 1878–1904. The muhacirs resented the status of their relatively well-off neighbors and, as historian Taner Akçam and others have noted, the refugees came to play a pivotal role in the killings of the Armenians and the confiscation of their properties during the genocide


We mark the significance of the Balkan Wars on events in the Ottoman Empire with a round of 6-p games on the Balkan Peninsula map, followed by the elimination of 4 more players and a score reset.

From here on in, all games are 8-player and there are no more eliminations or score resets.

Part 7: World War I and Directive 8682

In November of 1914, the Ottoman Empire entered World War 1 and declared war on Russia. There were Armenians on both side of the border, and both were actively courted by the opposition. Russia encouraged Armenians in the Ottoman Empire to revolt, and the Ottomans encouraged Armenians in the Russian empire to revolt. There was little success in raising revolts on either side, but much paranoia about the possibility.

Enver Pasha, Talaat Pasha, and other significant Young Turks who had preached that "the Committee stood for the unionization of all the races in the empire" abruptly abandoned all pretense of ethnic equality and cloaked themselves in extreme Turkish nationalism.

wikipedia wrote:On 25 February 1915, the Ottoman General Staff released the War Minister Enver Pasha's Directive 8682 on "Increased security and precautions" to all military units calling for the removal of all ethnic Armenians serving in the Ottoman forces from their posts and for their demobilization. They were assigned to the unarmed Labour battalions (Turkish: amele taburlari). The directive accused the Armenian Patriarchate of releasing State secrets to the Russians. Enver Pasha explained this decision as "out of fear that they would collaborate with the Russians".[49] Traditionally, the Ottoman Army only drafted non-Muslim males between the ages of 20 and 45 into the regular army. The younger (15–20) and older (45–60) non-Muslim soldiers had always been used as logistical support through the labour battalions. Before February, some of the Armenian recruits were utilized as labourers (hamals), though they would ultimately be executed.[50]

Transferring Armenian conscripts from active combat to passive, unarmed logistic sections was an important precursor to the subsequent genocide. As reported in The Memoirs of Naim Bey, the execution of the Armenians in these battalions was part of a premeditated strategy of the CUP. Many of these Armenian recruits were executed by local Turkish gangs

The removal of Armenians from important posts may have been justified by security considerations, but their subsequent executions unquestionably escalated this from being a security operation to outright brutish genocide.

This puts one in mind of Stalin's purges, so we'll do a round of games on the Soviet Union map.

Part 8: The Siege of Van

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_of_Van_%281915%29

On 19 April 2015, Jevdet Bey, governor of Van district, ordered the Armenians of Van to immediately supply 4,000 "conscripts" for military service. By this point, the murders of Armenians in the Army were common knowledge, and Jevdet Bey had already conducted massacres in nearby villages, so the citizens of Van believed (and almost certainly were correct) that the 4,000 men were to be killed. They therefore did not comply. To avoid being portrayed as outright rebels, they offered 500 men and exemption money for the rest. Nonetheless, Jevdet Bey would not hear of compromise. He immediately declared the town to be in a state of rebellion and proclaimed that any resistance to his troops would result in summary executions.

The next day, Ottoman soldiers seized a woman who was attempting to enter the city. Two Armenian men who came to her aid were shot dead, and the battle was on. The Armenian militia easily won the first few encounters and fortified the city as well as they could. Nonetheless, the usual supply problems of a besieged place would have almost certainly have resulted in eventual starvation and defeat. The salvation of the city came with the arrival of the Russian Army. A month after the initial Turkish attacks, Russian troops were in control of key areas near Van, and by 31st of May the siege was over.

The entry of the Russian Army, while it did supply Van with a happy ending, allowed the Turks to claim that they had been right all along: the Armenians would be happy to co-operate with the invading Russians. It did not seem to concern them that their own barbaric treatment of the heretofore mostly-loyal minority had led to this situation.

I thought about a number of maps to mark this event. The "Siege" map, despite the name, doesn't really do a great job of portraying a siege. Stalingrad is closer to what I want to portray here, but it seems too big and complex for a relatively small conflict. In the end, I think Texan Wars will do, with its connotations of the siege of the Alamo and other places.

Part 9: The Great Deportations Begin

In May of 1915 a "Temporary Law of Deportation" was passed, giving the Pashas (military governors) the legal power to deport anyone they sensed as a threat to national security. Almost immediately, it became obvious that the "deportations" were genocidal death marches.
wikipedia wrote:Historian Hans-Lukas Kieser states that, from the statements of Talaat Pasha[61] it is clear that the officials were aware that the deportation order was genocidal.[62] Another historian Taner Akçam states that the telegrams show that the overall coordination of the genocide was taken over by Talaat Pasha.[63]

The Armenians were marched out to the Syrian town of Deir ez-Zor and the surrounding desert. There is no evidence that the Ottoman government provided the extensive facilities and supplies that would have been necessary to sustain the life of hundreds of thousands of Armenian deportees during their forced march to the Syrian desert or after.[64] By August 1915, The New York Times repeated an unattributed report that "the roads and the Euphrates are strewn with corpses of exiles, and those who survive are doomed to certain death. It is a plan to exterminate the whole Armenian people".[65] Talaat Pasha and Djemal Pasha were completely aware that by abandoning the Armenian deportees in the desert they were condemning them to certain death.[66] A dispatch from a "high diplomatic source in Turkey, not American, reporting the testimony of trustworthy witnesses" about the plight of Armenian deportees in northern Arabia and the Lower Euphrates valley was extensively quoted by The New York Times in August 1916:
New York Times wrote: The witnesses have seen thousands of deported Armenians under tents in the open, in caravans on the march, descending the river in boats and in all phases of their miserable life. Only in a few places does the Government issue any rations, and those are quite insufficient. The people, therefore, themselves are forced to satisfy their hunger with food begged in that scanty land or found in the parched fields.

Naturally, the death rate from starvation and sickness is very high and is increased by the brutal treatment of the authorities, whose bearing toward the exiles as they are being driven back and forth over the desert is not unlike that of slave drivers. With few exceptions no shelter of any kind is provided and the people coming from a cold climate are left under the scorching desert sun without food and water. Temporary relief can only be obtained by the few able to pay officials.

Similarly, Major General Friedrich Freiherr Kress von Kressenstein noted that "The Turkish policy of causing starvation is an all too obvious proof, if proof was still needed as to who is responsible for the massacre, for the Turkish resolve to destroy the Armenians"


[bigimg]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5c/Armenian_Genocide_Map-en.svg/1280px-Armenian_Genocide_Map-en.svg.png[/bigimg]
Source: wikipediahttps://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AArmenian_Genocide_Map-en.svg
By Sémhur [GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html) or CC BY-SA 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

English: Map of the Armenian Genocide in 1915.
  • Each size shows a massacre. There are three types of massacre: in a control centre (red dot), in a station (pink dot), in a concentration and annihilation center (black dot). The size of the dot shows the relative number of killed Armenians.
  • Each pair of swords shows an area of Armenian resistance: greater resistance (red swords) or lesser resistance (black swords). The different size of swords is to save space into the map, it means nothing.
  • Dots in Black Sea representing Armenians (mainly women and children) drowned into the sea (see Armenian Genocide for references).


Map: Middle East

Part 10: The Full Horror Unfolds

Eyewitness reports from Syria seem stunningly similar to eyewitness reports of the Jewish Holocaust a generation later.
wikipedia wrote:German engineers and labourers involved in building the railway also witnessed Armenians being crammed into cattle cars and shipped along the railroad line. Franz Gunther, a representative for Deutsche Bank which was funding the construction of the Baghdad Railway, forwarded photographs to his directors and expressed his frustration at having to remain silent amid such "bestial cruelty".[35]:326 Major General Otto von Lossow, acting military attaché and head of the German Military Plenipotentiary in the Ottoman Empire, spoke to Ottoman intentions in a conference held in Batum in 1918:
The Turks have embarked upon the "total extermination of the Armenians in Transcaucasia ... The aim of Turkish policy is, as I have reiterated, the taking of possession of Armenian districts and the extermination of the Armenians. Talaat's government wants to destroy all Armenians, not just in Turkey but also outside Turkey. On the basis of all the reports and news coming to me here in Tiflis there hardly can be any doubt that the Turks systematically are aiming at the extermination of the few hundred thousand Armenians whom they left alive until now.[38]:349


Rape was an integral part of the genocide;[67] military commanders told their men to "do to [the women] whatever you wish", resulting in widespread sexual abuse. Deportees were displayed naked in Damascus and sold as sex slaves in some areas, including Mosul according to the report of the German consul there, constituting an important source of income for accompanying soldiers.[68] Rössler, the German consul in Aleppo during the genocide, heard from an "objective" Armenian that around a quarter of young women, whose appearance was "more or less pleasing", were regularly raped by the gendarmes, and that "even more beautiful ones" were violated by 10–15 men. This resulted in girls and women being left behind dying.[69]

Concentration camps

A network of 25 concentration camps was set up by the Ottoman government to dispose of the Armenians who had survived the deportations to their ultimate point.[70] This network, situated in the region of Turkey's present-day borders with Iraq and Syria, was directed by Şükrü Kaya, one of Talaat Pasha's right-hand men. Some of the camps were only temporary transit points. Others, such as Radjo, Katma, and Azaz, were briefly used for mass graves and then vacated by autumn 1915. Camps such as Lale, Tefridje, Dipsi, Del-El, and Ra's al-'Ayn were built specifically for those whose life expectancy was just a few days.[71] According to Hilmar Kaiser, the Ottoman authorities refused to provide food and water to the victims, increasing the mortality rate, and Muslim men obtained Armenian women through recorded marriages, while the deaths of their husbands were not recorded.[72]

Bernau, an American citizen of German descent, traveled to the areas where Armenians were incarcerated and wrote a report that was deemed factual by Rössler, the German Consul at Aleppo. He reports mass graves containing over 60,000 people in Meskene and large numbers of mounds of corpses, as the Armenians died due to hunger and disease. He reported seeing 450 orphans, who received at most 150 grams of bread per day, in a tent of 5–6 square meters. Dysentery swept through the camp and days passed between the instances of distribution of bread to some. In "Abu Herrera", near Meskene, he described how the guards let 240 Armenians starve, and wrote that they searched "horse droppings" for grains.[73]

(...)

Mass burnings

Lt. Hasan Maruf of the Ottoman army describes how a population of a village were taken all together and then burned.[85] The Commander of the Third Army Vehib's 12-page affidavit, which was dated 5 December 1918, was presented in the Trabzon trial series (29 March 1919) included in the Key Indictment,[86] reporting such a mass burning of the population of an entire village near Muş: "The shortest method for disposing of the women and children concentrated in the various camps was to burn them".[87] Further, it was reported that "Turkish prisoners who had apparently witnessed some of these scenes were horrified and maddened at remembering the sight. They told the Russians that the stench of the burning human flesh permeated the air for many days after".[88] Vahakn Dadrian wrote that 80,000 Armenians in 90 villages across the Muş plain were burned in "stables and haylofts"


Armenians were transported in overcrowded cattle cars in the desert heat, with little or no food and little or no water. Women were raped; children sold into slavery. Villages were burned. Property was confiscated with the thinnest veneer of legality. Prisoners were used in outlandish medical experiments. Everything about the inhumanity of the "deportation" procedures and the concentration camps foreshadows Hitler's genocide against the Jews, Slavs, and other peoples. Indeed, Hitler even said so himself. In the Obersalzberg Speech,
Adolf Hitler wrote:Our strength consists in our speed and in our brutality. Genghis Khan led millions of women and children to slaughter – with premeditation and a happy heart. History sees in him solely the founder of a state. It’s a matter of indifference to me what a weak western European civilization will say about me. I have issued the command – and I’ll have anybody who utters but one word of criticism executed by a firing squad – that our war aim does not consist in reaching certain lines, but in the physical destruction of the enemy. Accordingly, I have placed my death-head formation in readiness – for the present only in the East – with orders to them to send to death mercilessly and without compassion, men, women, and children of Polish derivation and language. Only thus shall we gain the living space (Lebensraum) which we need. Who, after all, speaks to-day of the annihilation of the Armenians?[13]


Due to all these parallels we will mark this phase with games on the WW II Europe map.

Nobody knows with certainty how many died during the peak of the Genocide. Estimates range from 600,000 to 1,500,000. Record-keeping in the Ottoman Empire was shoddy to begin with, and the combination of a Revolution, a World War, a Civil War, and a Genocide did nothing to improve it. The main part of the Genocide began in May of 1915, peaked late in 1915, and was mostly finished by the summer of 1916.

Part 11: Wind-down and Aftermath

After May of 1916 the policy did not immediately change, but there were few intact Armenian communities left to terrorize. The majority of the Armenian population had either died, fled, or been deported. Thus, the Genocide was winding down through a shortage of victims. In 1918, with defeat in the Great War looming over their heads, Turks began to show remorse. One can't help but be cynical. It is not that different from the Germans who suddenly found their conscience in the spring of 1945.

On the night of the 2nd to 3rd of November, the "Three Pashas" (Mehmed Talaat Pasha, Ismail Enver Pasha, and Ahmed Djemal Pasha) who had ruled Turkey since 1913 as a triumvirate, were overthrown and fled the country. They were tried and sentenced to death in absentia. The sentences were never carried out, but two of the three were eventually assassinated by members of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation. (Map: WW I Ottoman)

Between 1919 and 1921, a number of officials responsible for the genocide were transported to Malta to be tried by the Allied governments for crimes against humanity. However, unlike Nuremberg a generation later, in 1919 there was no generally accepted legal framework for such a trial, and all the officials were returned to Turkey with no result. (Map: Malta)

Also during the years 1920 to 21, a small war was fought between the new Turkish Government and the newly-independent First Armenian Republic. This war, though small and brief, showed that the ethnic hatred remained undiluted. Probably 90,000 Armenian civilians, and possibly more, were slaughtered by the new Turkish army.

The word "genocide" did not exist in 1920. It was coined in 1943 by Raphael Lemkin, a Polish Jew. Lemkin fought in Warsaw in 1939 before fleeing to Lithuania and thence to Sweden. Parallels between the Armenian and Jewish genocides were clear to Lemkin:
coined the term "genocide" in 1943, with the fate of the Armenians in mind; he later explained that:
Lemkin wrote: ...it happened so many times ... It happened to the Armenians, then after the Armenians Hitler took action.[197]

(Map: Baltic States)

The New York Times from beginning to end was crucial in bringing news of the Armenian genocide to the western world and keeping the issue in the public's eye. The Times advocated for western aid and intervention from beginning to end, with mixed results. (Map: NYC).

Despite overwhelming evidence of the Genocide, Turkish diplomatic efforts have succeeded in persuading many nations to accept the official Turkish version of events, in which the Armenians were simply being deported for security reasons and the deaths which occurred were mostly unintentional. Only 29 of the world's countries officially recognize the Armenian Genocide, those marked in dark green below:
Image
(The countries marked in light green, including the United States and Australia, are countries where the federal government does not officially recognize the Genocide but many of the individual States have passed resolutions doing so.)

[bigimg]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/ad/Larnaca_monument.jpg/1024px-Larnaca_monument.jpg[/bigimg]
Armenian genocide monument in Larnaca, Cyprus. Cyprus was among the first countries to recognize the genocide. By Alexander-Michael Hadjilyra - Own work, CC BY 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.p ... d=10744199
(Map: Cyprus)

-- DK[/spoiler]
back to main index


There were only four new tournaments launched in the 7th quarter, by far my lowest production since the start of this project. I will try very hard to do better in the 8th.

A new tournament about the Battle of Sheikh Saad launches later today.
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
Posts: 28215
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara

Re: The Great War

Post by Dukasaur »

Ready to go when the Olympics are over:
[spoiler=battle of the wadi]wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Wadi_(1916)
wikipedia wrote:The Battle of Wadi, occurring on 13 January 1916,[2] was an unsuccessful attempt by British forces fighting in Mesopotamia (present-day Iraq) during World War I to relieve beleaguered forces under Sir Charles Townshend then under siege by the Ottoman Sixth Army at Kut-al-Amara.[3][4]

Pushed by regional British Commander-in-Chief Sir John Nixon, General Fenton Aylmer launched an attack against Ottoman defensive positions on the banks of the Wadi River.[5][6] The Wadi was a steep valley of a stream that ran from the north into the River Tigris, some 6 miles (9.7 km) upstream towards Kut-al-Amara from Sheikh Sa'ad.[7] The attack is generally considered as a failure, as although Fenton managed to capture the Wadi, it cost him 1,600 men. The British failure led to Townshend's surrender, along with 10,000 of his men, in the largest single surrender of British troops up to that time. However, the British recaptured Kut in February 1917, on their way to the capture of Baghdad sixteen days later on 11 March 1917


firstworldwar.com page: http://www.firstworldwar.com/battles/wadi.htm
first world war dot com wrote:The first attempt to relieve Sir Charles Townshend's beleaguered force under siege by the Turks at Kut-al-Amara had ended in costly failure at Sheikh Sa'ad. Pushed however by regional British Commander-in-Chief Sir John Nixon, General Aylmer was obliged to rapidly launch another attempt within a week of Sheikh Sa'ad.

While Aylmer was developing a somewhat sceptical view of his prospects of successfully relieving Kut, Nixon had no such doubts. He believed that Aylmer's force of 10,000 men, added to Townshend's 10,000 in Kut, would prove sufficient to break the notoriously unreliable and ill-disciplined Turkish army.

(...)

Aylmer began operations on 13 January 1916. Initially intended to begin during early morning the attack was delayed pending dissipation of a morning mist. However this took rather longer than anticipated, until almost 1pm; meanwhile Aylmer's artillery laboriously crossed the Wadi in readiness to shell the Turk positions.

Meeting little opposition, at least initially, British infantry advanced in thin numbers. So thin indeed that in many places the British advanced directly past Turkish posts, exposing themselves to withering fire from behind.

Quickly becoming bogged down as the element of surprise was lost - 28th Brigade's frontal attack was entirely repulsed - and forced to deal with the unusual circumstances of having to defend from behind, the British advance rapidly slowed. Now aware of British plans Khalil's force swiftly redeployed from a north-south facing position to east-west to avoid being outflanked.


For this tournament, we will try something a little different.

Phase 1: 16 players divided into 2 groups will play a single winner-takes-all game on the Oasis map. The settings will be Automatic Sequential Flat Rate Adjacent Forts Foggy Trench, which should let strategy triumph over luck.

Phase 2: The winners of the two Phase 1 games will go directly to a best-of-nine final on WW I Ottoman, Mesopotamia, Indian Empire, Eastern Hemisphere, Tribal War Israel, British Isles, Middle East, World 2.1 and King of the Mountains. The final will be on site default settings. I figure having gone through the gruelling Phase 1 game, you'll be ready for some quickie action.


-- DK[/spoiler]
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
notyou2
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Gender: Male
Location: In the here and now

Re: The Great War

Post by notyou2 »

In please
Image
User avatar
Symmetry
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: The Great War

Post by Symmetry »

Dukasaur wrote:
Tviorr wrote:Is it copy-righted? ;-)


I ask because Im hopefully getting into teaching and if so will probably be involved in History and English lessons. - The above would serve rather well as reading material. Its fairly short, fairly recent and while the lix-number is probably high for a second language class even with older pupils, extra time, group work and/or a provided vocabulary should work.

A bit of snipping would of course be required with regards to the tournament and cc-references. - So hmmm could I borrow from it if the situation arises and if so, what name should I credit?

Much of the material is quoted from wikipedia, as are most of the graphics.

The original parts are mine. I don't mind you borrowing it. You can PM me for my real name if you want to attribute it. Probably right to set a good example for the students and make proper footnotes...:)


Plagiarism is a tough issue. Wiki is particularly poor about this. Wiki tends to plagiarise stuff on the grounds that it it's out of copyright. You would be very foolish to treat Wikipedia as a reliable source on tgose grounds
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
Posts: 28215
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara

Re: The Great War

Post by Dukasaur »

Symmetry wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
Tviorr wrote:Is it copy-righted? ;-)


I ask because Im hopefully getting into teaching and if so will probably be involved in History and English lessons. - The above would serve rather well as reading material. Its fairly short, fairly recent and while the lix-number is probably high for a second language class even with older pupils, extra time, group work and/or a provided vocabulary should work.

A bit of snipping would of course be required with regards to the tournament and cc-references. - So hmmm could I borrow from it if the situation arises and if so, what name should I credit?

Much of the material is quoted from wikipedia, as are most of the graphics.

The original parts are mine. I don't mind you borrowing it. You can PM me for my real name if you want to attribute it. Probably right to set a good example for the students and make proper footnotes...:)


Plagiarism is a tough issue. Wiki is particularly poor about this. Wiki tends to plagiarise stuff on the grounds that it it's out of copyright. You would be very foolish to treat Wikipedia as a reliable source on tgose grounds

Writing a complete history of the Great War from scratch is a ten-year project for a professional historian. For someone volunteering part-time, it's utterly impossible. Of necessity, I have to rely on wikipedia and firstworldwar.com for the bulk of the prose, so that what time I have available can be devoted to the actual design and coding of the tournaments. They may not be the greatest sources, but they're a lot better than nothing.
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
Posts: 28215
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara

Re: The Great War

Post by Dukasaur »

Finally, a new tournament in the series:


[spoiler=Battle of Hanna]With time running out for the beleaguered garrison at Kut-el-Amara, General Aylmer made a third attempt to rescue Townshend's forces. Once again it ended in failure. Short on ammunition, Aylmer ordered a very brief artillery bombardment. It did very little damage to the Turks and really only served to spoil what little element of surprise might have been possible.

The British position on the Tigris was going from bad to worse. Not only was each attempt to reach Kut failing more dramatically, but the Turks were gaining confidence and experience, while the British were losing confidence and losing veteran troops. Once again the shortage of doctors was a tragic factor, and many casualties died from relatively minor injuries, while others waited weeks for transport to hospitals in Basra.

For more complete descriptions:
http://www.firstworldwar.com/battles/hanna.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Hanna

The tournament:
This will be a simple 1v1 bracket tourney. To represent the heavily-entrenched Turkish positions, all games will be Trench. To represent the lack of surprise, all games will be Sunny. To represent the poor supply position, we will mix Adjacent and Chained forts. All 5 spoils options will be used.

Round 1: The desperation of Townshend's trapped troops at Kut brings to mind Leonidas' troops at Thermopylae.
    3 games on Ancient Greece

Round 2: In past tournaments in the Mesopotamian Campaign, we have used Gilgamesh (representing the Tigris and Euphrates rivers), Middle East, Battle for Iraq, and WW I Ottoman to represent the region, and Indian Empire (representing the Indian troops that made up the bulk of the British army in Mesopotamia.)
    5 games, 1 each on Gilgamesh, Middle East, Battle for Iraq, WW I Ottoman, and Indian Empire

Round 3: Aylmer's battle plan was rather unimaginative. After Townshend's brilliant victories the previous year had elevated the reputation of the British, Aylmer's clumsy campaign was lowering it again.
    7 games on WW II Gazala

Round 4: By the end of the battle, the British were almost completely without hope.
    9 games on Austerlitz


-- dk[/spoiler]
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
Posts: 28215
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara

Re: The Great War

Post by Dukasaur »

I have been asked again about the helmet prizes being given to players who end in various positions.

The current policy is this. Two helmets are given out in every tournament. One goes to the first-place player. The other is given to a player finishing in a randomly-chosen non-winning position.

The history of this is as follows. First, there was pamoa's suggestion to give participation ribbons of some kind to everyone who plays in one of these tournaments. For several reasons, I decided against that. I did, however, start randomly choosing one non-winning position per tournament to get a helmet as a kind of random bonus.

When the tournament description says that a helmet is given for 18th place or whatever, it only means 18th place. It does NOT mean all places up to and including 18th. This is a quasi-random participation bonus.
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
ConfederateSS
Posts: 4029
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 1:50 pm
Location: THE CONFEDERATE STATES of AMERICA and THE OLD WEST!

Re: The Great War

Post by ConfederateSS »

-----I joined The Battle of Hanna ...won one game out of three...Does not look like I will advance to the next round...I went to TGW Icon...It still has The Battle of Hanna up(A new set of players has been put up)...Am I allowed to join again in this part of the War?...Thank You Kindly, :D ConfederateSS.out!(The Blue and Silver Rebellion)... :D
User avatar
Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
Posts: 28215
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara

Re: The Great War

Post by Dukasaur »

ConfederateSS wrote:-----I joined The Battle of Hanna ...won one game out of three...Does not look like I will advance to the next round...I went to TGW Icon...It still has The Battle of Hanna up(A new set of players has been put up)...Am I allowed to join again in this part of the War?...Thank You Kindly, :D ConfederateSS.out!(The Blue and Silver Rebellion)... :D

No, only one chance at each Battle.... but I'll have a new battle up in a day or two.... :D :D :D :D
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
Symmetry
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: The Great War

Post by Symmetry »

Dukasaur wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
Tviorr wrote:Is it copy-righted? ;-)


I ask because Im hopefully getting into teaching and if so will probably be involved in History and English lessons. - The above would serve rather well as reading material. Its fairly short, fairly recent and while the lix-number is probably high for a second language class even with older pupils, extra time, group work and/or a provided vocabulary should work.

A bit of snipping would of course be required with regards to the tournament and cc-references. - So hmmm could I borrow from it if the situation arises and if so, what name should I credit?

Much of the material is quoted from wikipedia, as are most of the graphics.

The original parts are mine. I don't mind you borrowing it. You can PM me for my real name if you want to attribute it. Probably right to set a good example for the students and make proper footnotes...:)


Plagiarism is a tough issue. Wiki is particularly poor about this. Wiki tends to plagiarise stuff on the grounds that it it's out of copyright. You would be very foolish to treat Wikipedia as a reliable source on tgose grounds

Writing a complete history of the Great War from scratch is a ten-year project for a professional historian. For someone volunteering part-time, it's utterly impossible. Of necessity, I have to rely on wikipedia and firstworldwar.com for the bulk of the prose, so that what time I have available can be devoted to the actual design and coding of the tournaments. They may not be the greatest sources, but they're a lot better than nothing.


Was any of it your own research?
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
Posts: 28215
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara

Re: The Great War

Post by Dukasaur »

Symmetry wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
Tviorr wrote:Is it copy-righted? ;-)


I ask because Im hopefully getting into teaching and if so will probably be involved in History and English lessons. - The above would serve rather well as reading material. Its fairly short, fairly recent and while the lix-number is probably high for a second language class even with older pupils, extra time, group work and/or a provided vocabulary should work.

A bit of snipping would of course be required with regards to the tournament and cc-references. - So hmmm could I borrow from it if the situation arises and if so, what name should I credit?

Much of the material is quoted from wikipedia, as are most of the graphics.

The original parts are mine. I don't mind you borrowing it. You can PM me for my real name if you want to attribute it. Probably right to set a good example for the students and make proper footnotes...:)


Plagiarism is a tough issue. Wiki is particularly poor about this. Wiki tends to plagiarise stuff on the grounds that it it's out of copyright. You would be very foolish to treat Wikipedia as a reliable source on tgose grounds

Writing a complete history of the Great War from scratch is a ten-year project for a professional historian. For someone volunteering part-time, it's utterly impossible. Of necessity, I have to rely on wikipedia and firstworldwar.com for the bulk of the prose, so that what time I have available can be devoted to the actual design and coding of the tournaments. They may not be the greatest sources, but they're a lot better than nothing.


Was any of it your own research?


No, of course not.
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
Symmetry
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: The Great War

Post by Symmetry »

Dukasaur wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
Tviorr wrote:Is it copy-righted? ;-)


I ask because Im hopefully getting into teaching and if so will probably be involved in History and English lessons. - The above would serve rather well as reading material. Its fairly short, fairly recent and while the lix-number is probably high for a second language class even with older pupils, extra time, group work and/or a provided vocabulary should work.

A bit of snipping would of course be required with regards to the tournament and cc-references. - So hmmm could I borrow from it if the situation arises and if so, what name should I credit?

Much of the material is quoted from wikipedia, as are most of the graphics.

The original parts are mine. I don't mind you borrowing it. You can PM me for my real name if you want to attribute it. Probably right to set a good example for the students and make proper footnotes...:)


Plagiarism is a tough issue. Wiki is particularly poor about this. Wiki tends to plagiarise stuff on the grounds that it it's out of copyright. You would be very foolish to treat Wikipedia as a reliable source on tgose grounds

Writing a complete history of the Great War from scratch is a ten-year project for a professional historian. For someone volunteering part-time, it's utterly impossible. Of necessity, I have to rely on wikipedia and firstworldwar.com for the bulk of the prose, so that what time I have available can be devoted to the actual design and coding of the tournaments. They may not be the greatest sources, but they're a lot better than nothing.


Was any of it your own research?


No, of course not.


Then why the kerfuffle about how difficult it is to do research? If you're legitimately refeferring to historians, just give them a heads up, and say that you're using their research.

Sorry dude, but passing off work done by others as your own is kinda shitty as historical research.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
Posts: 28215
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara

Re: The Great War

Post by Dukasaur »

Symmetry wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
Symmetry wrote:Plagiarism is a tough issue. Wiki is particularly poor about this. Wiki tends to plagiarise stuff on the grounds that it it's out of copyright. You would be very foolish to treat Wikipedia as a reliable source on tgose grounds

Writing a complete history of the Great War from scratch is a ten-year project for a professional historian. For someone volunteering part-time, it's utterly impossible. Of necessity, I have to rely on wikipedia and firstworldwar.com for the bulk of the prose, so that what time I have available can be devoted to the actual design and coding of the tournaments. They may not be the greatest sources, but they're a lot better than nothing.


Was any of it your own research?


No, of course not.


Then why the kerfuffle about how difficult it is to do research? If you're legitimately refeferring to historians, just give them a heads up, and say that you're using their research.

Sorry dude, but passing off work done by others as your own is kinda shitty as historical research.


There was no kerfuffle about how difficult it is to do research. Nobody is claiming to be doing any research here. Some of the writing is original, but all of it is based on previous sources. When I can, I try to do some original writing for each tournament, but much of it is just linked to wikipedia and/or firstworldwar.com or other history sites. They are always linked and cited.

Wikipedia may not be perfect, but it does a reasonably good job of properly attributing things, and of course it gets better over time.
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
Symmetry
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: The Great War

Post by Symmetry »

Dukasaur wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
Symmetry wrote:Plagiarism is a tough issue. Wiki is particularly poor about this. Wiki tends to plagiarise stuff on the grounds that it it's out of copyright. You would be very foolish to treat Wikipedia as a reliable source on tgose grounds

Writing a complete history of the Great War from scratch is a ten-year project for a professional historian. For someone volunteering part-time, it's utterly impossible. Of necessity, I have to rely on wikipedia and firstworldwar.com for the bulk of the prose, so that what time I have available can be devoted to the actual design and coding of the tournaments. They may not be the greatest sources, but they're a lot better than nothing.


Was any of it your own research?


No, of course not.


Then why the kerfuffle about how difficult it is to do research? If you're legitimately refeferring to historians, just give them a heads up, and say that you're using their research.

Sorry dude, but passing off work done by others as your own is kinda shitty as historical research.


There was no kerfuffle about how difficult it is to do research. Nobody is claiming to be doing any research here. Some of the writing is original, but all of it is based on previous sources. When I can, I try to do some original writing for each tournament, but much of it is just linked to wikipedia and/or firstworldwar.com or other history sites. They are always linked and cited.

Wikipedia may not be perfect, but it does a reasonably good job of properly attributing things, and of course it gets better over time.


Thank goodness there's no kerfuffle. :roll:

Seriously though- do try to credit the historians you plagiarise in future. Just because you trust a dude called donkeypunch69 on wikipedia, doesn't make it an accurate source
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
mookiemcgee
Posts: 5765
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:33 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Northern CA

Re: The Great War

Post by mookiemcgee »

Symmetry wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:Plagiarism is a tough issue. Wiki is particularly poor about this. Wiki tends to plagiarise stuff on the grounds that it it's out of copyright. You would be very foolish to treat Wikipedia as a reliable source on tgose grounds

Writing a complete history of the Great War from scratch is a ten-year project for a professional historian. For someone volunteering part-time, it's utterly impossible. Of necessity, I have to rely on wikipedia and firstworldwar.com for the bulk of the prose, so that what time I have available can be devoted to the actual design and coding of the tournaments. They may not be the greatest sources, but they're a lot better than nothing.


Was any of it your own research?

No, of course not.


Then why the kerfuffle about how difficult it is to do research? If you're legitimately refeferring to historians, just give them a heads up, and say that you're using their research.

Sorry dude, but passing off work done by others as your own is kinda shitty as historical research.


There was no kerfuffle about how difficult it is to do research. Nobody is claiming to be doing any research here. Some of the writing is original, but all of it is based on previous sources. When I can, I try to do some original writing for each tournament, but much of it is just linked to wikipedia and/or firstworldwar.com or other history sites. They are always linked and cited.

Wikipedia may not be perfect, but it does a reasonably good job of properly attributing things, and of course it gets better over time.


Thank goodness there's no kerfuffle. :roll:

Seriously though- do try to credit the historians you plagiarise in future. Just because you trust a dude called donkeypunch69 on wikipedia, doesn't make it an accurate source



Why are you trying to cause a kurfuffle DSIOV? Until you actually join a great war tourney series or actually play the game, you should probably shut up as you have no place in this discussion.

Or would you rather we delay playing our game here on this site for a few years so Duku can take some time away to research and write a book or two of his own about the war so he can come into this more prepared next time and won't have to rely on the research of others? That way he won't offend any douchebag trolls who start shit over nothing because he/she/it... is bored.
MellonWar!
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2016 3:58 pm

Re: The Great War

Post by MellonWar! »

Do you have to be a premium member to join?
User avatar
Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
Posts: 28215
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara

Re: The Great War

Post by Dukasaur »

MellonWar! wrote:Do you have to be a premium member to join?

Each tournament has it's own rules. Probably 85% or so are premium-only, but some allow freemies.
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
gigi_b
Posts: 145
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Bucuresti

Re: The Great War

Post by gigi_b »

Man what are you writing about?!?
Dukasaur is as genuine and original and as it gets!

Look...one example: The Battle of Loos took place between 25th of sep and 15 of oct 1915..ok?
Now Dukasaur's tournament for the same event (or at least my iteration) started 15th of oct 2015. Now we're on 28th of oct 2016, so 1 year and 2 weeks in and we're midway round 6 of 17...that's roughly 16 games out of 53. At this pace Duka's Battle of Loss would hold for at least 3 years (or 2 years from this point): beat that historians!
Image
User avatar
Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
Posts: 28215
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara

Re: The Great War

Post by Dukasaur »

gigi_b wrote:Man what are you writing about?!?
Dukasaur is as genuine and original and as it gets!

Look...one example: The Battle of Loos took place between 25th of sep and 15 of oct 1915..ok?
Now Dukasaur's tournament for the same event (or at least my iteration) started 15th of oct 2015. Now we're on 28th of oct 2016, so 1 year and 2 weeks in and we're midway round 6 of 17...that's roughly 16 games out of 53. At this pace Duka's Battle of Loss would hold for at least 3 years (or 2 years from this point): beat that historians!

:lol:

Sorry about the long delays. Been a hectic time for me. I really will write some new tournaments soon. I'm hoping by November 2nd to have something up.
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
macbone
Posts: 6217
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:12 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Running from a cliff racer
Contact:

Re: The Great War

Post by macbone »

Symmetry wrote:Thank goodness there's no kerfuffle. :roll:

Seriously though- do try to credit the historians you plagiarise in future. Just because you trust a dude called donkeypunch69 on wikipedia, doesn't make it an accurate source


Symm, the sources are in the Wikipedia page. It would be tedious to include every single secondary citation for the purpose of a forum post giving background information on a tournament on a gaming site focusing on iterations of the board game Risk. He's not claiming original research, and he's providing links. I mean, bro, do you even Wikipedia?

Here's one set for the Armenian massacre from the Wikipedia page:

Adalian, Rouben Paul (2010). Historical Dictionary of Armenia (2 ed.). Scarecrow Press. p. 337. ISBN 978-0810874503.

Barsoumian, Hagop (1982), "The Dual Role of the Armenian Amira Class within the Ottoman Government and the Armenian Millet (1750–1850)", in Braude, Benjamin; Lewis, Bernard, Christians and Jews in the Ottoman Empire: The Functioning of a Plural Society, I, New York: Holmes & Meier.

Barsoumian, Hagop (1997), "The Eastern Question and the Tanzimat Era", in Hovannisian, Richard G, The Armenian People From Ancient to Modern Times, II: Foreign Dominion to Statehood: The Fifteenth Century to the Twentieth Century, New York: St. Martin's, pp. 175–201, ISBN 0-312-10168-6.

(Armenian) Hambaryan, Azat S. (1981). "Հայաստանի սոցիալ-տնտեսական և քաղաքական դրությունը 1870-1900 թթ." [Armenia's social-economic and political situation, 1870-1900] in Հայ Ժողովրդի Պատմություն [History of the Armenian People], ed. Tsatur Aghayan et al. Yerevan: Armenian Academy of Sciences, vol. 6, p. 22.

A ́goston, Ga ́bor; Alan Masters, Bruce (2010). Encyclopedia of the Ottoman Empire. Infobase Publishing. pp. 185–6. ISBN 978-1-4381-1025-7. Retrieved 15 April 2016.

Balakian, Peter (2003). The Burning Tigris: The Armenian Genocide and America's Response. New York: HarperCollins. pp. 25, 445. ISBN 0-06-019840-0.

Ramsay, W.M. (1897). Impressions of Turkey during Twelve Years' Wanderings. London: Hodder and Stoughton. pp. 206–207.

Akçam, Taner (2006). A Shameful Act: The Armenian Genocide and the Question of Turkish Responsibility. New York: Metropolitan Books. ISBN 0-8050-7932-7.

Etc., etc. It's all in the footnotes in the Wikipedia article.

Of course you and I wouldn't accept something like this for a student essay, or something published in an organization's newsletter, but requiring citations for forum posts? That's a bit of a stretch. I doubt even the editors at the APA and MLA style manuals would go that far.
User avatar
Symmetry
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: The Great War

Post by Symmetry »

I don't really want to keep going on about this, but if you're going to use research done by other people, acknowledging their work isn't really all that difficult, or onerous. Passing it off as your own work when people are paying for it? That seems a bit wrong to me.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
Posts: 28215
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara

Re: The Great War

Post by Dukasaur »

Symmetry wrote:I don't really want to keep going on about this, but if you're going to use research done by other people, acknowledging their work isn't really all that difficult, or onerous. Passing it off as your own work when people are paying for it? That seems a bit wrong to me.

Rather than talk in generalities, please point to a specific example of something that you feel was passed off as someone's own work.
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
Posts: 28215
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara

Re: The Great War

Post by Dukasaur »

A new Great War tourney begins today!

[spoiler=Le Mort-Homme]Le Mort-Homme

Image
[url](http://www.wereldoorlog1418.nl/battleverdun/battleverdun33/linkeroever01.jpg)[/url]

With the main advance at Verdun completely stalled, Crown Prince Wilhelm decided to try a flanking movement, pivoting on the left bank of the Meuse and taking out the French artillery batteries along the Bois Bourrus Ridge (see map above). On the way to Bois Bourrus was a large hill ominously named Le Mort-Homme (the Dead Man). This had to be seized, and it was here and on neighbouring Hill 304 that some of the bloodiest encounters of the Verdun campaign took place.

A really excellent account of the battle is available at:
http://www.wereldoorlog1418.nl/battleverdun/battleverdun33/index.htm
    I would really, really recommend that you read it.

The carnage really is hard to fathom. Numerically, it's difficult to separate this phase of the battle from the rest of the Verdun campaign. Overall, 700,000 died at Verdun and a similar number were wounded. At least a quarter of that number and probably more were the result of this phase. The link above mentions 89,000 French dead and 82,000 German, although it's not clear if that is for the whole left bank operation or only the initial assault. On May 3rd, 10,000 died in a single day. Several divisions completely ceased to exist. It was not unusual for an infantry battalion to attack with 500 men and return to base with 125.

As was now becoming a common experience on the Western Front, the battlefield was a muddy morass. The incredible volume of artillery shelling destroyed the integrity of the ground itself. The rains and the constant digging of trenches and tunnels further turned the shattered ground into a soupy mess, through which all movement was a chore, even for short distances. In this disgusting wet mess, corpses lay everywhere, their stench filling the air. Supply was unreliable, and the men often went for days without food or fresh water. There are multiple stories of men desperate enough to drink water from the filthy trenches.

In France, Verdun had taken over the national consciousness. Every German advance was felt as a disaster, and every successful counter-attack was celebrated. General Nivelle's famous exhortation "On ne passe pas!" (They shall not pass!) became a motto for defenders not only for Verdun but at many desperate battles since.

So much devastation was wrought that the land itself changed. Hill 304 was 7 metres lower after the battle than before, and Le Mort-Homme hill was reduced by 12 metres. The town of Cumières and several other villages were completely levelled. Le-Mort-Homme is what is known as a "ghost commune" -- one of the areas of France that were declared unfit for humans to live and were never rebuilt after the war. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumi%C3%A8res-le-Mort-Homme

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The tournament:
All games are Automatic, Sequential, 24-hour, randomly escalating or nuclear, randomly sun and fog, with a 30-round limit.
Each round has five games except for the final which has eleven.
There is a score reset after Phase 4.

Phase 1: Crown Prince Wilhelm resolved to try to turn the Allies left Flank
This is reminiscent of Austerlitz in its conception.
50 players in 1v1 games, parachute and no trench.
1 point per win

Phase 2: For two days the French are badly mauled and the Germans have many successes
The early success of the Germans against the French is reminiscent of the Western Front in WWII.
33 players in 11-player Terminator games, chained and no trench.
5 points per win

Phase 3: On the third day, a French counter-attack stabilizes the line
So successful was the French counter-attack, that they regained all of the ground they had lost in the previous two days. This back-and-forth fighting puts one in mind of the constant change of fortunes at Gazala.
20 players in 5-player Standard games, parachute and trench.
4 points per win

Phase 4: What followed was two weeks of the bloodiest fighting imaginable
One of the iconic examples of trench warfare: Muddy, cold, dirty, hungry, thirsty troops fought and died in staggering numbers. Entire battalions cease to exist; quite likely 10,000 men died on each day of these two weeks. The artillery barrage is unrelenting, chewing up men, horses, buildings and even the earth itself. The French 29th Division is obliterated; only 3,000 men survived to march into German prison camps.
12 players in Polymorphic Dubs games, adjacent and no trench.
3 points per win

Phase 5: The next six weeks saw a gradual slackening of the battle
With agonizing slowness, the Germans advanced until finally the Bois Bourrus was reached. Events progresses slower than in the opening phases of the battle, but were no less unpleasant. This grinding phase brings to mind the War of the Triple Alliance.
8 players in 8-player Assassin games, parachute and no trench.
3 points per win

Phase 6: Today, the land is a ghost commune
The lucky ones have gravestones. Many do not. Halloween Hallows will get the tap here.
5 players in 5-player Standard games, chained and trench.
2 points per win

-- DK[/spoiler]
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
Symmetry
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: The Great War

Post by Symmetry »

Dukasaur wrote:
Symmetry wrote:I don't really want to keep going on about this, but if you're going to use research done by other people, acknowledging their work isn't really all that difficult, or onerous. Passing it off as your own work when people are paying for it? That seems a bit wrong to me.

Rather than talk in generalities, please point to a specific example of something that you feel was passed off as someone's own work.


I simply think that the historians who did the groundwork deserve a bit of credit. Are you really asking me to do your work for you?
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
Locked

Return to “Announcement Archives”