Elemental Conquest #9 [Abandoned]

Have an idea for a map? Discuss ideas and concepts here.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Is this playable? Should i continue

 
Total votes: 0

mizzoufan333
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 7:50 pm
Location: you dont need to know

Re: Elemental Conquest #4

Post by mizzoufan333 »


      Mod Edit: Please don't quote images like that, especially if you're not going to actually post anything in response.
      User avatar
      Kaplowitz
      Posts: 3088
      Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 5:11 pm

      Post by Kaplowitz »

      Edit #5, more color changes, changed some country names, fixed "Ground"

      Spockers wrote:Seriously, you are wasting your time.

      Compare this to any of the maps out there... there is a massive difference in quality, this one just does not, and will not, cut it.


      No offense, but i really cant listen to you right now, because i dont think ive ever seen you write something positive about a new map.
      Image
      User avatar
      plysprtz
      Posts: 471
      Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 2:43 pm
      Location: chicago

      Post by plysprtz »

      ok how bout this make them all equal at like 4 but if you control fire and water you lose 2 bonues on the fire one.. and if you control fire water and grass you could get minus 2 on fire(because of water) minus 2 on grass(because of fire) and plus 2 on grass(because of water)

      really like the idea dont listen to that idiot........ great idea keep it up and maybe talk to some of the other map creaters to help you out with graphics


      edit:
      grass+fire=-2
      wood+earth=+2
      wind+fire=-2
      water+wind=+1
      wood+fire=-2

      anothe idea is if you have spirit but not a single other army on any other army -2 and that control all armies +1 is stupid take it out
      1546 - top score
      User avatar
      Spockers
      Posts: 390
      Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 11:11 pm

      Post by Spockers »

      Perhaps you need to read more of my posts, Kaplowitz. I give credit where it's due... it's just due unfortunately little.
      User avatar
      Gilligan
      Posts: 12478
      Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
      Gender: Male
      Location: Providence, RI

      Post by Gilligan »

      All of these bonuses are wayyyyyy to low
      Image
      User avatar
      mbs
      Posts: 10
      Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 4:49 am
      Location: Austin, TX

      Post by mbs »

      I think the map should be redrawn with the empty space between the territories reduced; too much of the "real estate" is taken up by empty "ocean" space. Wood should definitely be bigger.
      User avatar
      civver
      Posts: 76
      Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 8:41 am

      Post by civver »

      plysprtz wrote:ok how bout this make them all equal at like 4 but if you control fire and water you lose 2 bonues on the fire one.. and if you control fire water and grass you could get minus 2 on fire(because of water) minus 2 on grass(because of fire) and plus 2 on grass(because of water)

      really like the idea dont listen to that idiot........ great idea keep it up and maybe talk to some of the other map creaters to help you out with graphics


      edit:
      grass+fire=-2
      wood+earth=+2
      wind+fire=-2
      water+wind=+1
      wood+fire=-2

      anothe idea is if you have spirit but not a single other army on any other army -2 and that control all armies +1 is stupid take it out

      This works too. :)
      User avatar
      Kaplowitz
      Posts: 3088
      Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 5:11 pm

      Post by Kaplowitz »

      New version based on plysprtz' idea (the only difference is that i change wind+fire).
      Image

      I only changed the bonuses, I didnt really change the graphics or anything else (ill get to it). IM not really sure what to do about the islands, so plz respond.

      THE OTHER CHOICE IS ON THE FIRST POST
      Image
      User avatar
      Kaplowitz
      Posts: 3088
      Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 5:11 pm

      Post by Kaplowitz »

      Can someone plz give some feedback, i myself like v6 better than v5, but i want to work on it somemore. PLz respond.
      Image
      User avatar
      Herakilla
      Posts: 4283
      Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 8:33 pm
      Location: Wandering the world, spreading Conquerism

      Post by Herakilla »

      combine the two sets of bonuses, give every element a bonus based on size and borders then give more bonuses or negatives depending on what you hold.

      example is in eight thoughts if you hold mind you get -1 for every thought you hold as well but thoughts give their own bonus
      Come join us in Live Chat!
      User avatar
      Herakilla
      Posts: 4283
      Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 8:33 pm
      Location: Wandering the world, spreading Conquerism

      Post by Herakilla »

      also make more territories, 35 means in a six player game there are 5 neutral territories.

      36 is farily ideal, it distributes evenly on 6,4,3 players and only leaves one neutral with 5

      i myself, prefer more territories lol, six player games starting with (assume you make it 36 territories) 6 territories doesnt sound like much fun lol
      Come join us in Live Chat!
      User avatar
      Spockers
      Posts: 390
      Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 11:11 pm

      Post by Spockers »

      Kaplowitz wrote:Can someone plz give some feedback, i myself like v6 better than v5, but i want to work on it somemore. PLz respond.



      Mate. let it go. this map is just not going to happen.
      User avatar
      The Weird One
      Posts: 7059
      Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 8:21 pm
      Location: cursing the spiteful dice gods

      Post by The Weird One »

      it's coming along
      User avatar
      Sparqs
      Posts: 173
      Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 5:52 am

      Post by Sparqs »

      The first thing I'll say is that I like the concept. The negative responses here are disappointing - I hope people are a little kinder when I post my first rough drafts. Of course, the initial post needed a lot of work, but I took it as "here's a concept," not "here's a map I think is ready to play."

      I think the art has made improvements, needs more work: background texture; tone down the colors a little; maybe fire-water-etc. textures for the elements; reduce the territory label text; remove explanation of attack lines, cleaner or more stylized borders, maybe cool element-specific army-display circles.

      As for gameplay, I agree that it is similar to 8 Thoughts, but there are differences. And considering the number of maps that have no "features" but are still interesting, I don't see similarities as a big problem.

      I like the Island bonus. Perhaps they could attack each other, but only in a ring (A->B->C->D->A)?

      I also like the suggestion about having both continent bonuses and synergy bonuses. Maybe something like:
      Element Bonus: hold continent for +2 to +3, size dependent.
      Element Synergy: opposite pairs +2.
      Element Conflict: neighboring pairs -2.
      Spirit Unity: no continent bonus, new territory bonus on center (bonus armies auto-deploy there), neutral start center, large bonus for holding Spirit + any Element.
      Island Bonus: hold Islands for +2.
      User avatar
      Kaplowitz
      Posts: 3088
      Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 5:11 pm

      Post by Kaplowitz »

      v7:
      Image

      UPDATE: 6/4/07

      added changes to the graphics, still need some more opinions about gameplay. Sorry, Spockers: im not ready to give up yet. I believe (maybe its just a hope) that all maps can be playable with a lot of tweaking. I mean, its only update 7! aom has 74 updates!

      well, hopefully, with some help, this map may be playable one day. so...plz give some feedback!


      EDIT: :-D
      Image
      User avatar
      unriggable
      Posts: 8037
      Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm

      Post by unriggable »

      Spockers wrote:
      Kaplowitz wrote:Can someone plz give some feedback, i myself like v6 better than v5, but i want to work on it somemore. PLz respond.



      Mate. let it go. this map is just not going to happen.


      Agree.
      Image
      User avatar
      edocsil
      Posts: 102
      Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:09 am
      Gender: Male
      Location: The Great State Of Minnesota

      Post by edocsil »

      keep it up i would say completely redo the colors and make wood BIGGER. People tend to like paler colors im still trying to work on the colors of my map and im having simmilar problems.

      Btw whatever happens !IGNORE SPOCKERS!
      User avatar
      pepperonibread
      Posts: 954
      Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:33 pm
      Location: The Former Confederacy

      Post by pepperonibread »

      Maybe try to make the odd glow on the line between water and fire a little less obvious somehow. Anyway, looks a lot better than it did originally.
      Image
      User avatar
      Kaplowitz
      Posts: 3088
      Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 5:11 pm

      Post by Kaplowitz »

      unriggable wrote:
      Spockers wrote:
      Kaplowitz wrote:Can someone plz give some feedback, i myself like v6 better than v5, but i want to work on it somemore. PLz respond.



      Mate. let it go. this map is just not going to happen.


      Agree.


      Could you plz say why it is not going to happen, that way it can happen. Many maps start off pretty bad, i never said it was finished.
      Image
      User avatar
      Solus
      Posts: 75
      Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 6:20 pm
      Location: Pennsylvania

      I have an opinion on this

      Post by Solus »

      It might be great for a normal game, but I kinda don't like the idea of losing armies for holding two opposing elements. If anything it should be you gain defense or are weak against the opposing elements...but with the way this game is played I don't really see it happening. Don't get me wrong, its a good idea I just don't see the concept working out.(Is that a double negative?) The map might make people confused especially newcomers so an rt with a newcomer is out of the question.

      Bottom line I like it but others probably won't because they're babies. :roll:
      Keep working on it you'll eventually get it right

      P.S. I didn't expect to write an essay LOL
      You don't have an income like mine, plus you've never even ridden in my amazing rocket car... Maybe if I get bored I'll bench press it for you.

      Click here to get turned into a monster http://s3.bitefight.org/c.php?uid=76785
      User avatar
      Kaplowitz
      Posts: 3088
      Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 5:11 pm

      Post by Kaplowitz »

      I redid a lot!!

      Image

      v9.....

      i redid Wood to make it a lot larger
      added one more place to make 36
      Fooled around with the graphics

      I hope you like it!
      Image
      User avatar
      unriggable
      Posts: 8037
      Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm

      Post by unriggable »

      Sorry to be mean but...


      This map really needs to be revamped.
      Image
      fireedud
      Posts: 1704
      Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 10:06 pm

      Post by fireedud »

      You need to have Earth in a negative bonus, possibly with air?
      User avatar
      Unit_2
      Posts: 1834
      Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 12:59 pm
      Gender: Male
      Location: Pennsylvania, U.S.A, North America, Earth, Milky Way, Universe.

      Post by Unit_2 »

      i think its too much like 8 thoughts
      Image
      User avatar
      Kaplowitz
      Posts: 3088
      Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 5:11 pm

      Post by Kaplowitz »

      Unit_2 wrote:i think its too much like 8 thoughts


      the theme is similar but the gamepaly is very different.
      Image
      Post Reply

      Return to “Melting Pot: Map Ideas”