silversun6 wrote:this will end 29-26 to the dragons.
If not.... ill edit this post
Lol!
At the end of the day Donche sent me a whatsapp to take a few games since i wasn t even on the site since loutil put some more gallipoli. Damn, now 3 games kind of feels too little
silversun6 wrote:this will end 29-26 to the dragons.
If not.... ill edit this post
Lol!
At the end of the day Donche sent me a whatsapp to take a few games since i wasn t even on the site since loutil put some more gallipoli. Damn, now 3 games kind of feels too little
I had suggested skipping Gallipoli as I do not feel I have any advantage over you on that map. But, I was told you were not active so we sent the games .
Tie-breaker: Triples on Classic, sunny, chained, no spoils (does not count toward player game maximum) will be created by LHDD on the 1st set
I'm pretty sure by default this IS counted towards the game count restriction. There is nothing that I saw that designates this as not counting in the default rules.
I believe either 1) this is an exception to the default and needs to be highlighted in red (and approved by Lindax) which I'm not sure that this was amongst the negotiable terms; or 2) this needs to be changed to reflect the default rule that it's included in the game counts.
Just thought I would throw that out there and the two parties can discuss / check in with Lindax about it. I could be wrong (but don't think I am based on what I see and understand from the default thread)
fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
Tie-breaker: Triples on Classic, sunny, chained, no spoils (does not count toward player game maximum) will be created by LHDD on the 1st set
I'm pretty sure by default this IS counted towards the game count restriction. There is nothing that I saw that designates this as not counting in the default rules.
I believe either 1) this is an exception to the default and needs to be highlighted in red (and approved by Lindax) which I'm not sure that this was amongst the negotiable terms; or 2) this needs to be changed to reflect the default rule that it's included in the game counts.
Just thought I would throw that out there and the two parties can discuss / check in with Lindax about it. I could be wrong (but don't think I am based on what I see and understand from the default thread)
Thanks for bringing this up, I went and checked the Main Thread and you seem to be wrong. It's there in the Clan Wars portion of the first post 'The Tie-Breaker game for all the rounds will be Triples on Classic, sunny, chained, no spoils (does not count toward player game maximum)' the same as we have here.
Tie-breaker: Triples on Classic, sunny, chained, no spoils (does not count toward player game maximum) will be created by LHDD on the 1st set
I'm pretty sure by default this IS counted towards the game count restriction. There is nothing that I saw that designates this as not counting in the default rules.
I believe either 1) this is an exception to the default and needs to be highlighted in red (and approved by Lindax) which I'm not sure that this was amongst the negotiable terms; or 2) this needs to be changed to reflect the default rule that it's included in the game counts.
Just thought I would throw that out there and the two parties can discuss / check in with Lindax about it. I could be wrong (but don't think I am based on what I see and understand from the default thread)
Thanks for bringing this up, I went and checked the Main Thread and you seem to be wrong. It's there in the Clan Wars portion of the first post 'The Tie-Breaker game for all the rounds will be Triples on Classic, sunny, chained, no spoils (does not count toward player game maximum)' the same as we have here.
Hmm...interesting, thanks. I did check it before when the S&M / FALL thread was created. Apparently I missed something. Good to know tho, thanks
fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
Those numbers include won games, solid leads, and leans for each side. Its quite early to call a 2nd round game even a lean but due to us going first, a missed first turn by LHDD, and very good dice on our 2nd turn, I think it is.
rockfist wrote:For the first exchange of games I have it:
LHDD 8, Even 4, TOFU 7
For the 2nd exchange of games I have it:
LHDD 0, Even 17, TOFU 1
Those numbers include won games, solid leads, and leans for each side. Its quite early to call a 2nd round game even a lean but due to us going first, a missed first turn by LHDD, and very good dice on our 2nd turn, I think it is.
Yep... pretty much the same here... I have it at 2-0 for you in the 2nd set... but I see it the same way as you do! Really close war as expected!
I like the fact that we are able to give you a challenge on your big unlimited maps... but we have trouble winning our home maps!
betiko wrote:yeah.... excepet when we start second and i miss turn 1 on actium unlimited... your welcome tofu, that was a real challenge for you!
After the missed turn I wish I could've bottled that luck for another time, but at least it will be quick, and at least each of you will get to play one turn.
I'm pretty pleased with how the 2nd set has opened for us.
Still very early though, lots to go.
That 2nd round game I said we were leading in may be my first finished contest (and win) of this war, I'm really shocked at how fast that game has gone, I've really never seen anything like it.
rockfist wrote:I'm pretty pleased with how the 2nd set has opened for us.
Still very early though, lots to go.
That 2nd round game I said we were leading in may be my first finished contest (and win) of this war, I'm really shocked at how fast that game has gone, I've really never seen anything like it.
actium? lol yeah. i saw dako's first turn taking a bonus that would be unbreakable, then I was sleeping at my inlaws with my daughter crying a lot that night... at 10am when my turn was over i was sleeping and got on the computer at 10:30... and knew I just gave you the game before we even pressed start turn once... didn't take a lot of time to clean up and finish!
nah, not married, but it's shorter than calling them my daughter's grandparents, the ones that aren't my parents... or maybe i could just sa my girfriend's parents lol