Polymorphic Games with More than 2 Players

[chapcrap]

Concise description:

• Allow polymorphic games that have 3 or more players.

Specifics/Details:

• We already have polymorphic games with 2 players.
• We have team games with more than 2 teams.
• We should have polymorphic games with more than 2 players.

How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:

• This will benefit people who are not good at team games with more than 2 teams in order to let them practice more.
• This will benefit people who are good at team games with more than 2 teams, because they can have some better polymorphic competition against each other.
• This will let me run sweet tournaments (and presumably other TO's as well).

[chapcrap]

Thinking more about this and about this: viewtopic.php?f=4&t=218363

It almost seems as if a reclassification is needed for the game types.

Instead of Singles (standard, assassin, terminator, and polymorphic) and Teams (doubles, trips, quads, etc.), what it really should be is two new categories. The first is to define the team/turn structure: singles, doubles, triples, quadruples, and polymorphic. The second is the type of game: standard, assassin, terminator.

This is how it needs to happen.

[Swifte]

team polymorphic! team polymorphic!!!!!!!!!!!
*faints*

[Razorvich]

Oh man I love this idea...

[FreeFalling123]

Seems all encompassing...

Team term was an issue and team poly 2x2 vs 2x2 seems okay...

I think there becomes an issue with freestyle in this format that you laid out... but otherwise if there is a will there is a way xD

[WingCmdr Ginkapo]

suggested YEARS AGO and it was deemed too difficult to do. tell you what, send them the coding, so they can insert it and we'll get this option that you want. easy peasy... resolved... the black jesus has now dressed the duck for cooking...-Jésus noir

[chapcrap]

suggested YEARS AGO and it was deemed too difficult to do. tell you what, send them the coding, so they can insert it and we'll get this option that you want. easy peasy... resolved... the black jesus has now dressed the duck for cooking...-Jésus noir

Fixed the quote code, so maybe that's enough?

If not, I guess my awesome suggestion could just be ignored because of lack of time/knowledge/caring/whatever. In summation, slamming a suggestion for being difficult to code while using incorrect code to quote Black Jesus seems lame. You seem lame.

[FreeFalling123]

suggested YEARS AGO and it was deemed too difficult to do. tell you what, send them the coding, so they can insert it and we'll get this option that you want. easy peasy... resolved... the black jesus has now dressed the duck for cooking...-Jésus noir

Fixed the quote code, so maybe that's enough?

If not, I guess my awesome suggestion could just be ignored because of lack of time/knowledge/caring/whatever. In summation, slamming a suggestion for being difficult to code while using incorrect code to quote Black Jesus seems lame. You seem lame.

I agree with chap... -1 monkey man

[-1-1-3-]

Thx chapcrap for putting that in a topic.
Im sure we are numerous to think about it... since the introduction of poly games.
I remember my surprise the first time i realized it was not possible to play more than 2 players poly games.

So +1

And sorry... i dont go here into more details. see you

[TotoroHat]

Did this idea die?

[chapcrap]

Thinking more about this and about this: viewtopic.php?f=4&t=218363

It almost seems as if a reclassification is needed for the game types.

Instead of Singles (standard, assassin, terminator, and polymorphic) and Teams (doubles, trips, quads, etc.), what it really should be is two new categories. The first is to define the team/turn structure: singles, doubles, triples, quadruples, and polymorphic. The second is the type of game: standard, assassin, terminator.

This is how it needs to happen.

Did this idea die?

I hope not!!

[TotoroHat]

I love this idea at least as it relates to having more than two players do polymorphic games. I also thought there could/should be a game type for teams or polymorphic whereby they can play Assasins as a team. Say in a quad games with 8 players team #1 has ONE of the four other players as the Assasins and team #2 has ONE of team #1's players. You would have to protect your own teammate from being assassinated by the other 4 guys (or 2 or 3) who would be hunting them down.


Or maybe if you are playing teams and you have more than 2 teams then you could Assasins with each team having another team as a target.

[chapcrap]

Thinking more about this and about this: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 4&t=218363

It almost seems as if a reclassification is needed for the game types.

Instead of Singles (standard, assassin, terminator, and polymorphic) and Teams (doubles, trips, quads, etc.), what it really should be is two new categories. The first is to define the team/turn structure: singles, doubles, triples, quadruples, and polymorphic. The second is the type of game: standard, assassin, terminator.

This is how it needs to happen.

Did this idea die?

I hope not!!

My idea is so good that duplicate threads are being created!!

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=229109

[betiko]

Lol i added a few other stuff, basically i guess we all had the idea because it would obviously be awesome.