possible to play a map that can have no winners?
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
possible to play a map that can have no winners?
I am currently playing: Das Schloss - Terminator, Nuclear, Parachute, Fog, Trench - Round 18
https://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=16059334
for quite some time i have only had 3 territories on an incoming parachute track. The way from this area back into the rest of the map is through the access point...which reverts to 2 neutral.
Given the trench warfare setting I am thus unable to proceed with this game in any meaningful fashion other than throwing the random nuclear set out.
anyway this got me wondering...if enough nuclear or zombie sets were thrown around and somehow everyone got stuck on the parachute track...the game would stalemate?
are there other maps like this? In which trench warfare could potentially stalemate a game?
what should I do?
keep playing and contribute to the game by collecting cards and tossing nukes or just stop taking my turn?
what would you do?
and btw I am not faulting the map for anything, its a great map...just some settings dont play good with some maps
what do you think?
https://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=16059334
for quite some time i have only had 3 territories on an incoming parachute track. The way from this area back into the rest of the map is through the access point...which reverts to 2 neutral.
Given the trench warfare setting I am thus unable to proceed with this game in any meaningful fashion other than throwing the random nuclear set out.
anyway this got me wondering...if enough nuclear or zombie sets were thrown around and somehow everyone got stuck on the parachute track...the game would stalemate?
are there other maps like this? In which trench warfare could potentially stalemate a game?
what should I do?
keep playing and contribute to the game by collecting cards and tossing nukes or just stop taking my turn?
what would you do?
and btw I am not faulting the map for anything, its a great map...just some settings dont play good with some maps
what do you think?
- iAmCaffeine
- Posts: 11699
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm
Re: possible to play a map that can have no winners?
Access Point is a killer neutral, and in trench games you can take a killer neutral and then another region. So, from C2 (for example) you can take Access Point and then Sdt. Kip without having to stop. This applies to all killer neutral territories on any map when playing trench.

- owenshooter
- Posts: 13297
- Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx
Re: possible to play a map that can have no winners?
yeah, just because you don't understand a map, don't come whining in the forums about poor design/etc... *snicker*...-Jésus noir

Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
- iAmCaffeine
- Posts: 11699
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm
Re: possible to play a map that can have no winners?
owenshooter wrote:yeah, just because you don't understand a map, don't come whining in the forums about poor design/etc... *snicker*...-Jésus noir
backspin wrote:and btw I am not faulting the map for anything, its a great map...

- owenshooter
- Posts: 13297
- Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx
Re: possible to play a map that can have no winners?
iAmCaffeine wrote:owenshooter wrote:yeah, just because you don't understand a map, don't come whining in the forums about poor design/etc... *snicker*...-Jésus noirbackspin wrote:and btw I am not faulting the map for anything, its a great map...
*cough*

Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
Re: possible to play a map that can have no winners?
When people play special gameplay maps, there are never any winners.
On a related note, what happens if in a nuclear elimination game someone eliminates themselves using their nuclear spoils?
On a related note, what happens if in a nuclear elimination game someone eliminates themselves using their nuclear spoils?
- iAmCaffeine
- Posts: 11699
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm
Re: possible to play a map that can have no winners?
mrswdk wrote:On a related note, what happens if in a nuclear elimination game someone eliminates themselves using their nuclear spoils?
They die..
@Owen - I know you're game, just maybe don't play it against the newer players. It doesn't help.

Re: possible to play a map that can have no winners?
Actually, Promontory Summit is known for never being played by winners.
░▒▒▓▓▓▒▒░
- owenshooter
- Posts: 13297
- Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx
Re: possible to play a map that can have no winners?
DoomYoshi wrote:Actually, Promontory Summit is known for never being played by winners.
i believe the qualifying statement of "map", excludes that shit storm from the discussion...-Jésus noir
this is where new maps come from:

Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
Re: possible to play a map that can have no winners?
iAmCaffeine wrote:mrswdk wrote:On a related note, what happens if in a nuclear elimination game someone eliminates themselves using their nuclear spoils?
They die..
I mean pointwise, smart ass.
- owenshooter
- Posts: 13297
- Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx
Re: possible to play a map that can have no winners?
iAmCaffeine wrote:mrswdk wrote:On a related note, what happens if in a nuclear elimination game someone eliminates themselves using their nuclear spoils?
They die..
@iAmCaffeine - I know you're game, just maybe don't play it against the newer players. It doesn't help. The black jesus has spoken...-Jésus noir

Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
Re: possible to play a map that can have no winners?
@ mrs : if you nuke/zombie yourself out of a terminator game, you don't lose any points. i'm actually waiting for a soup can to take my last 2 of 3 terits so I can pull this awesome stunt for the third time. it's almost as satisfying as winning...
also,
I think promontory summit is kinda fun soo...f*ck you guys.
also,
I think promontory summit is kinda fun soo...f*ck you guys.

- ConfederateSS
- Posts: 4032
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 1:50 pm
- Location: THE CONFEDERATE STATES of AMERICA and THE OLD WEST!
Re: possible to play a map that can have no winners?
------Yes, It could happen. On the Eastern Hemisphere map someone once was left with 10 on the Naval Admil.. When they started their turn. The Neutral took them out and their cards. So you could have 1 terr. attack a killer neut. stop with two terrs. The other player could have 2 terrs. left and 5 cards in a nuke setting to start their turn. 2 terrs. on the cards his 2,and your only good one. BOOM he is forced to nuke himself out of the game. Nuking your only good one. When you start your turn. The Killer Neutral kills you on that terr. The Killer Neutral wins the game...ConfederateSS.out!(The Blue and Silver Rebellion).
Re: possible to play a map that can have no winners?
riskllama wrote:@ mrs : if you nuke/zombie yourself out of a terminator game, you don't lose any points.
I don't think this is true, I think the eventual winner of the game will get your points if you nuke yourself. And if, in an exceptional case, the three spoils are used to nuke the last 2 or 3 territories on the map (yours and someone else's), I think the person holding the territory of the last-played spoil is the winner. At least, that's how it used to be.

Re: possible to play a map that can have no winners?
I have zombied myself out of a game before,
neutral player eliminated backspin from the game
I thought it was it was funny
Didn't know about the attack from a neutral, thought the rule of trench warfare applied to everything on the map so i didnt even try to attack from that point
Live and learn...
neutral player eliminated backspin from the game
I thought it was it was funny
Didn't know about the attack from a neutral, thought the rule of trench warfare applied to everything on the map so i didnt even try to attack from that point
Live and learn...
- TheForgivenOne
- Posts: 5998
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 8:27 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Lost somewhere in the snow. HELP ME
Re: possible to play a map that can have no winners?
JBlombier wrote:riskllama wrote:@ mrs : if you nuke/zombie yourself out of a terminator game, you don't lose any points.
I don't think this is true, I think the eventual winner of the game will get your points if you nuke yourself. And if, in an exceptional case, the three spoils are used to nuke the last 2 or 3 territories on the map (yours and someone else's), I think the person holding the territory of the last-played spoil is the winner. At least, that's how it used to be.
This.
If you nuke yourself out, the eventual winner get's your points. I think you have it correct on the winner if you nuke the last remaining players as well.
Re: possible to play a map that can have no winners?
thanks alot, you assholes. my night is ruined... 

Re: possible to play a map that can have no winners?
JBlombier wrote:riskllama wrote:@ mrs : if you nuke/zombie yourself out of a terminator game, you don't lose any points.
I don't think this is true, I think the eventual winner of the game will get your points if you nuke yourself. And if, in an exceptional case, the three spoils are used to nuke the last 2 or 3 territories on the map (yours and someone else's), I think the person holding the territory of the last-played spoil is the winner. At least, that's how it used to be.
What does this mean? How is the 'last-played' of the three spoils determined?
Re: possible to play a map that can have no winners?
mrswdk wrote:JBlombier wrote:riskllama wrote:@ mrs : if you nuke/zombie yourself out of a terminator game, you don't lose any points.
I don't think this is true, I think the eventual winner of the game will get your points if you nuke yourself. And if, in an exceptional case, the three spoils are used to nuke the last 2 or 3 territories on the map (yours and someone else's), I think the person holding the territory of the last-played spoil is the winner. At least, that's how it used to be.
What does this mean? How is the 'last-played' of the three spoils determined?
My guess reading the spoils from left to right
-
clangfield
- Posts: 601
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 6:57 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Kent, UK
Re: possible to play a map that can have no winners?
I think in Poison Rome you can get yourself to a point where you get 0 troops each turn... not sure if it's possible for all players to do that, but if it is, then I guess you end up with no winner.
Re: possible to play a map that can have no winners?
clangfield wrote:I think in Poison Rome you can get yourself to a point where you get 0 troops each turn... not sure if it's possible for all players to do that, but if it is, then I guess you end up with no winner.
I think you mean Conquer Rome. There's no negative bonuses in Poison Rome, but there is in Conquer Rome, where if you hold too many barbarians on the same side as your emperor you can get zero deploy. Still, if you were doing that, you'd still be getting the autodeploys on the excessive barbarians, so you'd still be gaining troops.
The Cartography boys are pretty careful to make sure that stalemates are impossible. When Baseball was in early Beta, it was possible to get stuck on a Home Run, but they fixed that with a special defeat condition that eliminates you if a Home Run is the only thing you have.
“Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
― Voltaire
- iAmCaffeine
- Posts: 11699
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm
Re: possible to play a map that can have no winners?
backspin wrote:Didn't know about the attack from a neutral, thought the rule of trench warfare applied to everything on the map so i didnt even try to attack from that point
Live and learn...
Only killer neutrals, not all neutrals. Killers are the ones that reset the next turn.
Also, mrswdk, left to right is correct. It's basically the order you received the cards.

Re: possible to play a map that can have no winners?
waauw wrote:mrswdk wrote:JBlombier wrote:riskllama wrote:@ mrs : if you nuke/zombie yourself out of a terminator game, you don't lose any points.
I don't think this is true, I think the eventual winner of the game will get your points if you nuke yourself. And if, in an exceptional case, the three spoils are used to nuke the last 2 or 3 territories on the map (yours and someone else's), I think the person holding the territory of the last-played spoil is the winner. At least, that's how it used to be.
What does this mean? How is the 'last-played' of the three spoils determined?
My guess reading the spoils from left to right
Yes, that's it. You can click them any way you like, but the sequence is already determined before you take your turn.

Re: possible to play a map that can have no winners?
If you nuke/zombify yourself out of a terminator game you don't lose any points. I've done it several times. With standard games you still lose the points at the end like normal.
neutral player eliminated Quirk from the game

"Zungguzungguguzungguzeng"
-Yellowman
pancakemix wrote:Quirk, you are a bastard. That is all.
Re: possible to play a map that can have no winners?
Really? Can you post a game number, please. I wanna see how it goes.


