dice sucks

[jgordon1111]

Ok, I have been a long time CC player, recently returned, and dice suck sometimes, that being said,don't auto assault, if you see the dice aren't with you stop, wait for next turn,i the real board game if you had crap dice would you continue or stop, if you continue the fault is yours. Think about it.

[owenshooter]

Ok, I have been a long time CC player, recently returned, and dice suck sometimes, that being said,don't auto assault, if you see the dice aren't with you stop, wait for next turn,i the real board game if you had crap dice would you continue or stop, if you continue the fault is yours. Think about it.

great advice... and nobody ever heeds it... the only time i auto attack is the last few turns of a game, when it is LEGIT over... otherwise, i will manually attack and stop when i know the dice aren't with me... i mean, i could easily invoke my black jesus powers and give myself all winning rolls, but that would take the fun out of it... i prefer to give my followers/believers better dice odds, than to myself... the black jesus has spoken... do not auto attack!!!-Jésus noir

[iAmCaffeine]

I lost 20v2.

[Dukasaur]

I got a rock.

[iAmCaffeine]

I got a rock.

I got scissors.

[demonfork]

Fucking dude just went 6 v 14 v 2 and had 5 left


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAH


This site is a fucking joke!

[Condestável]

This is the reason why i'm absent for months, when I come back it's the same absurd shit all over again.

Then I realize it's not only me taking 3 turns and wasting 12 units to defeat 1 unit, just to mention the worst.

Recent dice rolls (25 battles)

Condestável 4.9 all opponents
Luck Avg Roll 1's 2's 3's 4's 5's 6's Luck Avg Roll 1's 2's 3's 4's 5's 6's
Assault -10% 3.26 17 12 14 11 11 11 +10% 3.74 6 5 6 9 9 7
Defend -11% 3.22 31 30 25 20 19 22 -3% 3.43 42 62 46 47 58 36
Total -11% 3.23 48 42 39 31 30 33 -1% 3.47 48 67 52 56 67 43

Of course I'm completely stupid when I realize that in this new game against bots dice are absolutely normal. Must be my "perception".

Now some game basement dweller please patronize me with some aspie punchline.

You should really play an online rival of this game which starts with the letter M and witness what's normal randomness.

[BrutalBob]

This shit happens all the time! And not just to me.

Come to CC where they think "random" means wildly fucking improbable happens 50% of the time

Also wish I had some figures on how often I lose 3v1 five or more times in a row.

[BrutalBob]

Oh look. Next day, same shit.

Theoretical odds of getting 5 sixes in a row 1:7776
CC odds 1:day

[Beast Of Burson]

Keep track of your dice. They will get worse now that you complained about them.

My dice were fine until I paid these douche bags. Then I made a complaint about possible multi's (which all of a sudden I was accused of being a multi. I came back clean of course). Since then, my dice have been shit. I can't even take 10 against 1 without losing 7.

All they are doing is re-hashing a script with numbers in a line. It's simply repeating a group of numbers in a line.

It may be calling a line of numbers randomly, but it's not picking each number randomly. Nothing more than a scam.

They will never get another dime from me.

[Condestável]

Recent dice rolls (25 battles)

Condestável 4.8 all opponents
Luck Avg Roll 1's 2's 3's 4's 5's 6's Luck Avg Roll 1's 2's 3's 4's 5's 6's
Assault -29% 2.78 18 15 10 8 7 5 -4% 3.41 8 7 3 6 7 6
Defend +9% 3.72 9 6 7 5 5 14 +17% 3.93 7 19 10 11 11 26
Total -13% 3.18 27 21 17 13 12 19 +11% 3.77 15 26 13 17 18 32

Recent dice rolls (25 battles)

Condestável 4.8 all opponents
Luck Avg Roll 1's 2's 3's 4's 5's 6's Luck Avg Roll 1's 2's 3's 4's 5's 6's
Assault -29% 2.78 18 15 10 8 7 5 -4% 3.41 8 7 3 6 7 6
Defend +9% 3.72 9 6 7 5 5 14 +17% 3.93 7 19 10 11 11 26
Total -13% 3.18 27 21 17 13 12 19 +11% 3.77 15 26 13 17 18 32


Recent battle outcomes (25 battles)

Condestável 4.8 vs all opponents
3 vs 2 3 vs 1 2 vs 2 2 vs 1 1 vs 2 1 vs 1
Luck Kills Losses Luck Kills Losses Luck Kills Losses Luck Kills Losses Luck Kills Losses Luck Kills Losses
Assault -21% 6 12 -37% 2 5 +28% 4 2 +9% 2 1 0 0 -8% 1 2
Defend -21% 5 15 -5% 4 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 +42% 12 0
Total -21% 11 27 -16% 6 15 +28% 4 2 +9% 2 1 0 0 +32% 13 2

Recent battle outcomes (25 battles)

Condestável 4.8 vs blerpblerp 4.6
3 vs 2 3 vs 1 2 vs 2 2 vs 1 1 vs 2 1 vs 1
Luck Kills Losses Luck Kills Losses Luck Kills Losses Luck Kills Losses Luck Kills Losses Luck Kills Losses
Assault -12% 10 14 +9% 6 2 0 0 +42% 2 0 0 0 +58% 1 0
Defend -29% 3 15 -3% 5 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total -20% 13 29 +1% 11 13 0 0 +42% 2 0 0 0 +58% 1 0



Classic, Adjacent, Flat.

I had 3+3+3 in Australia, got it first round and made a 7 men defence in Jakarta.

In adjacent, this meant almost certain win.

But in 3 turns with a 3 men army plus deploy of 4, he destroyed the 7 men defence, conquered all Australia, made a 3 men block, conquered Africa 2 times and killed all my blocks losing 3 units only in all attacks.

There's no possible tactic in this crap.

[Condestável]

Ok, moving onto the next game I think my "luck" as they sarcastically calling it to mock players hasn't changed.

My opponent missed a turn, so i got 19 units to take a neutral 3 and her 2.

Impossible. I lost 13 taking the neutral 3 and the remaining trying (in vain) to take his 2.

And the stats are wrong because they don't count failed attacks from multiple regions:
Condestável 4.8 vs Graciana 4.6
3 vs 2 3 vs 1 2 vs 2 2 vs 1 1 vs 2 1 vs 1
Luck Kills Losses Luck Kills Losses Luck Kills Losses Luck Kills Losses Luck Kills Losses Luck Kills Losses
Assault -42% 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -42% 0 1
Defend +4% 1 1 -34% 0 1 -61% 0 2 +58% 1 0 0 0 +42% 1 0
Total -32% 2 8 -34% 0 1 -61% 0 2 +58% 1 0 0 0 0% 1 1

Perception, they say. I played the board game long before this and I never witnessed anything like it.

Then the owners wonder why is this site falling into oblivion. I wonder if they ever played real dice and realized that this has nothing to do with reality.

Oh my god, when they come with those unrelated academic explanations.

[Beast Of Burson]

Perception, they say. I played the board game long before this and I never witnessed anything like it.

Then the owners wonder why is this site falling into oblivion. I wonder if they ever played real dice and realized that this has nothing to do with reality.

Oh my god, when they come with those unrelated academic explanations.

Real dice can't be manipulated, unless you cheat with "loaded" dice. Scripted dice CAN be... simple coding is all that is required.

I wonder if the owner(s) of this site actually play here.

All those "thousands" of members they claim to have can be nothing more than a shit load of multi accounts to beef up false membership to attract new people.

[IcePack]

Perception, they say. I played the board game long before this and I never witnessed anything like it.

Then the owners wonder why is this site falling into oblivion. I wonder if they ever played real dice and realized that this has nothing to do with reality.

Oh my god, when they come with those unrelated academic explanations.

Real dice can't be manipulated, unless you cheat with "loaded" dice. Scripted dice CAN be... simple coding is all that is required.

I wonder if the owner(s) of this site actually play here.

All those "thousands" of members they claim to have can be nothing more than a shit load of multi accounts to beef up false membership to attract new people.

Yes the owner plays all the time.

[Condestável]

Well, the fact is the system deviates a lot from reality and they 're happy with it, as bad as it is.

They have a file with 50 000 rolls that is shared by all players and repeated over and over. The uniformity of distribution proves to be absolutely pathetic. It's worse than anyone could ever imagine. But they think it's perfectly ok to have 7 ones and 27 sixes in 100 rolls.

It's our "perception" that tends to focus on bad things, they say.

If on top of that they adjust outcomes based on your rating or condition, that's another story. But I'll stick to facts and fact is 7 ones and 27 sixes in 100 rolls is a terrible distribution aberration.

[Condestável]

Moving on to next game.

Playing very safe. Only 3 attacks on 3 units. Split luck. Ok.

From then on only attacks on 1 units: total disaster.

7 against 1:

222 4
311 4
465 6
111 5

Another game ruined. More "biased perception".

[Condestável]

Ok, I got rainbow spoils at 4th round, can I change my "luck"as they call it?

Total number in Delhi = 3 + 14 deploy.
Enemy units around me = 7.
Outcome, I lose 12, enemy loses 6.

God. What a piece of shit lopsided game.

Has been like this for almost 5 years and I can't simply climb rank.

[Condestável]

[ben.cleuch]

get over it

[Extreme Ways]

Lets see here.

show

Seems like average to me.

[waauw]

CC-logic:
bad luck = conspiracy!
good luck = pure skill

[iAmCaffeine]

CC-logic:
bad luck = conspiracy!
good luck = pure skill

Not to anyone who has a clue.

The dice are sourced from a limited pool, ergo, they are not random.

[waauw]

CC-logic:
bad luck = conspiracy!
good luck = pure skill

Not to anyone who has a clue.

The dice are sourced from a limited pool, ergo, they are not random.

Oh please... How many people do you see complaining about their good dice?
The fact that they only post their bad dice proves the motive is a negative bias. Just not worth listening to.

[WingCmdr Ginkapo]

CC-logic:
bad luck = conspiracy!
good luck = pure skill

Not to anyone who has a clue.

The dice are sourced from a limited pool, ergo, they are not random.

That doesnt make them biased though. It does mean that everyone is facing the same dice issues.

[Metsfanmax]

CC-logic:
bad luck = conspiracy!
good luck = pure skill

Not to anyone who has a clue.

The dice are sourced from a limited pool, ergo, they are not random.

No source of "random" numbers is purely random. If you can't make a more nuanced argument, then GTFO of this thread.