Game 14795324
2014-08-29 20:32:58 - Sir Riddick: stfu you homo
2014-08-29 20:33:04 - innocentkaoss: watch the language
2014-08-29 20:33:30 - charliebnt: if you fck stains get out of my dam way
2014-08-29 20:33:46 - Meatcat: no hair pulling girls
2014-08-29 20:34:12 - JaLoMen: no i'm sick of his shit
2014-08-29 20:34:24 - Sir Riddick: your gay and stupid stfu
2014-08-29 20:34:33 - Sir Riddick: im sick of your gayness bs
2014-08-29 20:34:35 - innocentkaoss: report him
2014-08-29 20:34:44 - charliebnt: why do you love men , jack?
2014-08-29 20:34:51 - JaLoMen: you're*
2014-08-29 20:34:54 - Sir Riddick: go find a pot of gold at the end of your rainbow bitch f*ck
2014-08-29 20:34:59 - innocentkaoss: grow up ridd
2014-08-29 20:35:28 - JaLoMen: how do i report someone?
2014-08-29 20:35:44 - Sir Riddick: you message the admin
2014-08-29 20:35:55 - Sir Riddick: tell him your a whiny bitch
2014-08-29 20:36:00 - Sir Riddick: and report yourself
The accused are suspected of:
Verbal abuse
Game number(s):
14795324
and a number of others. will look them up if need be.
Comments: Continuously uses homophobic comments against me. I will use this as evidence of a hate crime if it gets to that level.
Sir Riddick [ka]
Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
-
Major.Bossman
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 8:41 pm
Re: Sir Riddick
If you can present more evidense of continual verbal abuse from other games that might help your case. If you have not done so already you might want to foe the accused so you do not have to deal with the language while this gets judged by the mods.
Re: Sir Riddick
The homophobia is enough for a warning. However,
this cracks me up. Dude, chill. It's the interwebz. Very rarely does nonsensical banter lead to actual crimes.
Bollocks.
JaLoMen wrote:I will use this as evidence of a hate crime if it gets to that level.
this cracks me up. Dude, chill. It's the interwebz. Very rarely does nonsensical banter lead to actual crimes.
Bollocks.
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
- Edric Wolfswift
- Posts: 245
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 9:27 am
- Location: Anywhere but here...f*ck Conquer Club
Re: Sir Riddick
I looked through all of the 49 games you have played with him, and I see no proof of how he "Continuously uses homophobic comments". However, I did see what appears to be a jovial banter you two have developed, and a rather disturbing moment where you admitted to trying to have sex with your own dog in Game 14611876
Last edited by Edric Wolfswift on Sat Aug 30, 2014 7:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- MagnusGreeol
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 5:39 pm
- Location: ¥- ♎ BOSTONIA ♎ -¥
- Contact:
Re: Sir Riddick
^ I agree.
-
Major.Bossman
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 8:41 pm
Re: Sir Riddick
- king achilles
- Support Admin

- Posts: 13393
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:55 pm
- Gender: Male
- Contact:
Re: Sir Riddick
Since you and Sir Riddick have played 49 games together and this looks to be the first time the unpleasantry in the game chat became intolerable for you, I suggest that you put him on your foe list. Using the foe list is your right so don't be afraid to use it once you feel uncomfortable playing with someone. Although I can agree that this can be seen as homophobic or offending, I think I would need more than just this game alone to warrant some official action as of now. I have contacted him to be more careful of his trash talking. This report shall be noted in his records in case he repeats this kind of trash talk once again.
Re: Sir Riddick [ka]
Arent there two cases here?
The questiong of bullying/harassment and the question of inappropriate language/bigotry. I dont think harassment /bullying can be proven since this is the first documented instance. By definition, it is a cycle that occurs over a period of time. But, the second can be proven. This should at least be a warning and not noted based on the guidelines of CC.
I do agree with noting it for the first part, but not the second.
The questiong of bullying/harassment and the question of inappropriate language/bigotry. I dont think harassment /bullying can be proven since this is the first documented instance. By definition, it is a cycle that occurs over a period of time. But, the second can be proven. This should at least be a warning and not noted based on the guidelines of CC.
I do agree with noting it for the first part, but not the second.
Best Score: 3476
1/9/12
1/9/12
- iAmCaffeine
- Posts: 11699
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm
Re: Sir Riddick [ka]
jackal31 wrote:Arent there two cases here?
The questiong of bullying/harassment and the question of inappropriate language/bigotry. I dont think harassment /bullying can be proven since this is the first documented instance. By definition, it is a cycle that occurs over a period of time. But, the second can be proven. This should at least be a warning and not noted based on the guidelines of CC.
I do agree with noting it for the first part, but not the second.
+1
