[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1091: Undefined array key 0 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1091: Trying to access array offset on null [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Undefined array key 0 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Trying to access array offset on null [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Undefined array key 0 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Trying to access array offset on null GOP Presidential Nominees - Page 5 - Conquer Club
Phatscotty wrote:That's what I mean...Rand Paul get support from both end of the spectrum.
Fascists and Communists? I'm not sure that's a strong base, but perhaps I'm wrong.
What a stupid comment. Communists are not in the least interested in Libertarian policies and facists are pro an aggressive military. The two groups you mentioned are among the groups least likely to support his policies. You're as stupid and misinformed as the people calling Obama a communist, shame on you.
Hey, Scotty was the one claiming Paul's support came from both ends of the spectrum...
And you were the one was being an idiot.
AoG for President of the World!! I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
Phatscotty wrote:That's what I mean...Rand Paul get support from both end of the spectrum.
Fascists and Communists? I'm not sure that's a strong base, but perhaps I'm wrong.
What a stupid comment. Communists are not in the least interested in Libertarian policies and facists are pro an aggressive military. The two groups you mentioned are among the groups least likely to support his policies. You're as stupid and misinformed as the people calling Obama a communist, shame on you.
Hey, Scotty was the one claiming Paul's support came from both ends of the spectrum...
And you were the one was being an idiot.
Fine, what do you consider to be the ends of the political spectrum?
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
Phatscotty wrote:That's what I mean...Rand Paul get support from both end of the spectrum.
Fascists and Communists? I'm not sure that's a strong base, but perhaps I'm wrong.
What a stupid comment. Communists are not in the least interested in Libertarian policies and facists are pro an aggressive military. The two groups you mentioned are among the groups least likely to support his policies. You're as stupid and misinformed as the people calling Obama a communist, shame on you.
Hey, Scotty was the one claiming Paul's support came from both ends of the spectrum...
And you were the one was being an idiot.
Fine, what do you consider to be the ends of the political spectrum?
In this context obviously hard left Democrats and hard right Republicans. Neither of which are Facists or Communists.
Edit: If you were talking about Swedish politics your statement would make more sense, the communists and facists are pretty big over here, both these views are somewhat represented in our politics. The "left party" which has about 7 percent of the votes has been led by numerous self described communists and the Swedish Democrats used to be a neonazi party where they would meet in nazi uniforms. They have about 9 percent now but have cleaned up their politics a bit. In the US you have two parties that completely dominate your politics and neither of them are even remotely close to communism or facism.
AoG for President of the World!! I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
Symmetry wrote: Fine, what do you consider to be the ends of the political spectrum?
In this context obviously hard left Democrats and hard right Republicans. Neither of which are Facists or Communists.
Edit: If you were talking about Swedish politics your statement would make more sense, the communists and facists are pretty big over here, both these views are somewhat represented in our politics. The "left party" which has about 7 percent of the votes has been led by numerous self described communists and the Swedish Democrats used to be a neonazi party where they would meet in nazi uniforms. They have about 9 percent now but have cleaned up their politics a bit. In the US you have two parties that completely dominate your politics and neither of them are even remotely close to communism or facism.
So the spectrum encompasses communists and fascists. But only in Sweden. Ok, I disagree.
Edit: I don't really need to type this, as I have the last post, but hey, apparently you can put the bulk of your irrelevant argument here. This is fun.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
Symmetry wrote: Fine, what do you consider to be the ends of the political spectrum?
In this context obviously hard left Democrats and hard right Republicans. Neither of which are Facists or Communists.
Edit: If you were talking about Swedish politics your statement would make more sense, the communists and facists are pretty big over here, both these views are somewhat represented in our politics. The "left party" which has about 7 percent of the votes has been led by numerous self described communists and the Swedish Democrats used to be a neonazi party where they would meet in nazi uniforms. They have about 9 percent now but have cleaned up their politics a bit. In the US you have two parties that completely dominate your politics and neither of them are even remotely close to communism or facism.
So the spectrum encompasses communists and fascists. But only in Sweden. Ok, I disagree.
Edit: I don't really need to type this, as I have the last post, but hey, apparently you can put the bulk of your irrelevant argument here. This is fun.
You're such a fruitcake, you have a two party system where neither party is communist nor facist, we have a different system where there are parties that could be called facist and communist.
AoG for President of the World!! I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
Symmetry wrote: Fine, what do you consider to be the ends of the political spectrum?
In this context obviously hard left Democrats and hard right Republicans. Neither of which are Facists or Communists.
Edit: If you were talking about Swedish politics your statement would make more sense, the communists and facists are pretty big over here, both these views are somewhat represented in our politics. The "left party" which has about 7 percent of the votes has been led by numerous self described communists and the Swedish Democrats used to be a neonazi party where they would meet in nazi uniforms. They have about 9 percent now but have cleaned up their politics a bit. In the US you have two parties that completely dominate your politics and neither of them are even remotely close to communism or facism.
So the spectrum encompasses communists and fascists. But only in Sweden. Ok, I disagree.
Edit: I don't really need to type this, as I have the last post, but hey, apparently you can put the bulk of your irrelevant argument here. This is fun.
You're such a fruitcake, you have a two party system where neither party is communist nor facist, we have a different system where there are parties that could be called facist and communist.
Were you under the impression that I was American? You're lot's of fun Gilli, but you've been a bit silly here.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
Symmetry wrote: Fine, what do you consider to be the ends of the political spectrum?
In this context obviously hard left Democrats and hard right Republicans. Neither of which are Facists or Communists.
Edit: If you were talking about Swedish politics your statement would make more sense, the communists and facists are pretty big over here, both these views are somewhat represented in our politics. The "left party" which has about 7 percent of the votes has been led by numerous self described communists and the Swedish Democrats used to be a neonazi party where they would meet in nazi uniforms. They have about 9 percent now but have cleaned up their politics a bit. In the US you have two parties that completely dominate your politics and neither of them are even remotely close to communism or facism.
So the spectrum encompasses communists and fascists. But only in Sweden. Ok, I disagree.
Edit: I don't really need to type this, as I have the last post, but hey, apparently you can put the bulk of your irrelevant argument here. This is fun.
You're such a fruitcake, you have a two party system where neither party is communist nor facist, we have a different system where there are parties that could be called facist and communist.
Were you under the impression that I was American? You're lot's of fun Gilli, but you've been a bit silly here.
American or British I can't tell the difference, you write in the same manner and seem to have similar values, your culture is virtually identical and the only way to tell you apart is through your accents. You'd like to think there's so much difference but to an outsider there really isn't.
Having said that, we were speaking about american politics weren't we? I'm pretty sure PS wasn't talking about British politics when he talked about Rand Paul's appeal in the political spectrum.
AoG for President of the World!! I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
Symmetry wrote: Fine, what do you consider to be the ends of the political spectrum?
In this context obviously hard left Democrats and hard right Republicans. Neither of which are Facists or Communists.
Edit: If you were talking about Swedish politics your statement would make more sense, the communists and facists are pretty big over here, both these views are somewhat represented in our politics. The "left party" which has about 7 percent of the votes has been led by numerous self described communists and the Swedish Democrats used to be a neonazi party where they would meet in nazi uniforms. They have about 9 percent now but have cleaned up their politics a bit. In the US you have two parties that completely dominate your politics and neither of them are even remotely close to communism or facism.
So the spectrum encompasses communists and fascists. But only in Sweden. Ok, I disagree.
Edit: I don't really need to type this, as I have the last post, but hey, apparently you can put the bulk of your irrelevant argument here. This is fun.
You're such a fruitcake, you have a two party system where neither party is communist nor facist, we have a different system where there are parties that could be called facist and communist.
Were you under the impression that I was American? You're lot's of fun Gilli, but you've been a bit silly here.
American or British I can't tell the difference, you write in the same manner and seem to have similar values, your culture is virtually identical and the only way to tell you apart is through your accents. You'd like to think there's so much difference but to an outsider there really isn't.
Having said that, we were speaking about american politics weren't we? I'm pretty sure PS wasn't talking about British politics when he talked about Rand Paul's appeal in the political spectrum.
I think the issue of American vs British English is mostly with u,
I thought I was commenting on the spectrum of politics.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
Sillypig wrote:You're such a fruitcake, you have a two party system where neither party is communist nor facist, we have a different system where there are parties that could be called facist and communist.
Were you under the impression that I was American? You're lot's of fun Gilli, but you've been a bit silly here.
American or British I can't tell the difference, you write in the same manner and seem to have similar values, your culture is virtually identical and the only way to tell you apart is through your accents. You'd like to think there's so much difference but to an outsider there really isn't.
Having said that, we were speaking about american politics weren't we? I'm pretty sure PS wasn't talking about British politics when he talked about Rand Paul's appeal in the political spectrum.
I think the issue of American vs British English is mostly with u,
I thought I was commenting on the spectrum of politics.
Well you were wrong on both accounts. Your cultures are eerily similar and you weren't commenting on the spectrum of politics in general, you were commenting on the spectrums of american politics.
AoG for President of the World!! I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
Sillypig wrote:You're such a fruitcake, you have a two party system where neither party is communist nor facist, we have a different system where there are parties that could be called facist and communist.
Were you under the impression that I was American? You're lot's of fun Gilli, but you've been a bit silly here.
American or British I can't tell the difference, you write in the same manner and seem to have similar values, your culture is virtually identical and the only way to tell you apart is through your accents. You'd like to think there's so much difference but to an outsider there really isn't.
Having said that, we were speaking about american politics weren't we? I'm pretty sure PS wasn't talking about British politics when he talked about Rand Paul's appeal in the political spectrum.
I think the issue of American vs British English is mostly with u,
I thought I was commenting on the spectrum of politics.
Well you were wrong on both accounts. Your cultures are eerily similar and you weren't commenting on the spectrum of politics in general, you were commenting on the spectrums of american politics.
Was I? Thank you for pointing that out to me. I hadn't realised that I was being so eerie. Thanks for telling me that although I was commenting on the spectrum of political thought, that I actually wasn't.
It was a shock to me.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
Sillypig wrote:You're such a fruitcake, you have a two party system where neither party is communist nor facist, we have a different system where there are parties that could be called facist and communist.
Were you under the impression that I was American? You're lot's of fun Gilli, but you've been a bit silly here.
American or British I can't tell the difference, you write in the same manner and seem to have similar values, your culture is virtually identical and the only way to tell you apart is through your accents. You'd like to think there's so much difference but to an outsider there really isn't.
Having said that, we were speaking about american politics weren't we? I'm pretty sure PS wasn't talking about British politics when he talked about Rand Paul's appeal in the political spectrum.
I think the issue of American vs British English is mostly with u,
I thought I was commenting on the spectrum of politics.
Well you were wrong on both accounts. Your cultures are eerily similar and you weren't commenting on the spectrum of politics in general, you were commenting on the spectrums of american politics.
Was I? Thank you for pointing that out to me. I hadn't realised that I was being so eerie. Thanks for telling me that although I was commenting on the spectrum of political thought, that I actually wasn't.
It was a shock to me.
You don't fool me mister, I don't think you are capable of learning anything at this point, your mind has already been set.
AoG for President of the World!! I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
Symmetry wrote: Was I? Thank you for pointing that out to me. I hadn't realised that I was being so eerie. Thanks for telling me that although I was commenting on the spectrum of political thought, that I actually wasn't.
It was a shock to me.
You don't fool me mister, I don't think you are capable of learning anything at this point, your mind has already been set.
I've learned that fascism and communism can't exist in the US. Thanks Gilli!
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
Well I voted for Perry because surely it's impossible to lose against a man who has ordered Texas prisons not to follow rape prevention laws,and who presided over the execution in Aug 2012 of an imbecile with an IQ of 61.Of course he wont win the nomination,that would be political suicide..