Large world war is brewing over here...

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
Post Reply
User avatar
T7
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 3:40 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Large world war is brewing over here...

Post by T7 »

This looks incredible to me. Is it, or is this a normal occurance?

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=396119

Gonna be a lot of armies shot to pieces when that gun goes off...!!
Highest score: 2039 24/6/11 (1910 16/2/10, 1903 6/1/09)
User avatar
s.xkitten
Posts: 6911
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:56 pm
Gender: Female
Location: I dunno
Contact:

Post by s.xkitten »

thats nothing....there is one with thousands of armies out there somewhere...
User avatar
alex_white101
Posts: 1992
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:05 am

Post by alex_white101 »

yah i have a build game goin at the mo.........

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=354517

there was one game who got cash-ins to 1000, cant remember the number tho........
''Many a true word is spoken in jest''
User avatar
T7
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 3:40 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Reply

Post by T7 »

Wow, that game is like a muscle-bound flex-a-tron after a workout!

What happens with those build hobbies? Do you all keep going 'till you get bored, or does someone get annoyed at someone else and suddenly all hell breaks loose?

I'd love to see an auto-attack between two of those big suckers!!
Highest score: 2039 24/6/11 (1910 16/2/10, 1903 6/1/09)
User avatar
alex_white101
Posts: 1992
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:05 am

Post by alex_white101 »

we gonna go till cashins are worth 1000, and then i think well play properly from there, altho once youo get to that many armies, if you attack, you will most definately lose. so the one who stays out of the battles will win......leading to a stalemate.
''Many a true word is spoken in jest''
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Post by MeDeFe »

Nope, more = better chances for the attacker.

I think the chance of winning a 1000 vs. 1000 is slightly better than winning a 100 vs. 100, just to name an example. The attacker has a slightly better chance of winning a "standard" throw with 3 vs. 2 dices, so the more throws the closer the real result should be to the expected result, which is that the attacker wins.
User avatar
alex_white101
Posts: 1992
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:05 am

Post by alex_white101 »

yes however you will inevitably lose a significant amount of armies, leaving you vulnerable to the third player who still has their 1000 armies. so it is a stand off.......
''Many a true word is spoken in jest''
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Post by MeDeFe »

Well, but that kind of losing isn't determined by the dices, well, usually it isn't.
User avatar
alster
Posts: 3083
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 12:35 pm
Location: Sweden...

Post by alster »

MeDeFe wrote:Nope, more = better chances for the attacker.

I think the chance of winning a 1000 vs. 1000 is slightly better than winning a 100 vs. 100, just to name an example. The attacker has a slightly better chance of winning a "standard" throw with 3 vs. 2 dices, so the more throws the closer the real result should be to the expected result, which is that the attacker wins.


Hmm... yes, sort of. The way statistics works is that each throw must be seen individually. But, the more individual throws you have, the entire amount of throws tend to close in on the statistical values. But that is merely due to the way percentage works. With 1 throw, that throw amounts to 100%. With ten throws, each throw only amounts to 10% of the total, while 1000 throws gives each throw the weight of 0.1% of the total.

But, you may very well loose 1000 straight throws. The likelyhood to win a throw doesn't increase just because you throw the dice again and again. For each throw (3v.2), you have a 20-something % chance to loose both your attacking armies. Conceptually, it is annoying.
Gengoldy wrote:Of all the games I've played, and there have been some poor sports and cursing players out there, you are by far the lowest and with the least class.
User avatar
joeyjordison
Posts: 1170
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 9:10 am

Post by joeyjordison »

build games are stupid. you want a long game where people are actually trying to win
User avatar
alex_white101
Posts: 1992
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:05 am

Post by alex_white101 »

joeyjordison wrote:build games are stupid. you want a long game where people are actually trying to win


:wink: its fun to do it once. i mean pointlessly building. i have a few other games which seem to be just building but in which we are competing. however i still think its fun to do one long pointless build game :D
''Many a true word is spoken in jest''
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Post by MeDeFe »

That's why I said "the chance of winning", alstergren.
User avatar
Gustaf Wasa
Posts: 198
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 1:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: The Swedish outpost of Atlantis
Contact:

Post by Gustaf Wasa »

alex_white101 wrote:yah i have a build game goin at the mo.........

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=354517

there was one game who got cash-ins to 1000, cant remember the number tho........


Wow!

Image
User avatar
ConquererKing
Posts: 278
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 8:23 am

Post by ConquererKing »

Best Score: 2889, Colonel, 97th place, 29% wins
User avatar
The Weird One
Posts: 7059
Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 8:21 pm
Location: cursing the spiteful dice gods

Post by The Weird One »

:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: I pity the light green guy. He's just screwed!
User avatar
ABSOLUTE_MASTER
Posts: 278
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:44 pm

Post by ABSOLUTE_MASTER »

ConquererKing wrote:I hate to brag but... http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=295020

:P


i don't get it...why does neutral have so many armies?
"You have undertaken to cheat me. I won't sue you, for the law is too slow. I'll ruin you." -- Cornelius Vanderbilt
User avatar
wcaclimbing
Posts: 5598
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: In your quantum box....Maybe.
Contact:

Post by wcaclimbing »

Image
User avatar
s.xkitten
Posts: 6911
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:56 pm
Gender: Female
Location: I dunno
Contact:

Post by s.xkitten »

ABSOLUTE_MASTER wrote:
ConquererKing wrote:I hate to brag but... http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=295020

:P


i don't get it...why does neutral have so many armies?


someone deadbeated, so their armies turned neutral :wink:
User avatar
ABSOLUTE_MASTER
Posts: 278
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:44 pm

Post by ABSOLUTE_MASTER »

s.xkitten wrote:
ABSOLUTE_MASTER wrote:
ConquererKing wrote:I hate to brag but... http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=295020

:P


i don't get it...why does neutral have so many armies?


someone deadbeated, so their armies turned neutral :wink:


duh!! why didn't i think of that?
"You have undertaken to cheat me. I won't sue you, for the law is too slow. I'll ruin you." -- Cornelius Vanderbilt
User avatar
ritz627
Posts: 458
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 7:17 pm
Gender: Male

Post by ritz627 »

Keep in mind though, that those other games are all escalating, the one that T7 is talking about is flat rate, in which case, a game w/ that many armies is relatively rare.

But yea, either way, those escalating games have some pretty big numbers.
"They couldn't hit an elephant at this dist-"
- Last words of Gen. John Sedgwick
Post Reply

Return to “Conquer Club Discussion”