MoB Deadly wrote:BPB also joined the game long after TNC had already joined. Not sure why a snap was not taken upon joining. That would have avoided the issue as well.
And yet there is a rule that's been violated. Go figure, right? Seems that such a rule is unnecessary if everyone could just take a snap when joining.
Just out of curiousity, when I violate the rule in one of these games, what will be the punishment? Frankly, watching any soccer game might be punishment enough.
Fruitcake wrote:Rules of Engagement: - Fog Courtesy is in effect, the rule does not apply to conquest maps or where the starting team just deploys/forts without attacks. In the event that it is broken, team that has broken the rule must reveal the move
So the punishment for violating the fog rule is to reveal the move
dazza2008 wrote:I played before they looked without thinking. I have lots of games going so normally just get them done. We posted what I did so what is the problem?
Great question! According to clan war rules, by playing before they looked you violated the fog rule, the punishment for which appears to be having to declare the move you made publicly. Additionally, we've found out in this thread that it is incumbent (or should be incumbent) upon team two to "snap" the map when the players join to avoid the type of situation that the rule looks to avoid. I admittedly do not know what that situation is, but it is undoubtedly some type of unfairness.
In sum, like much in life, for example anti-drug laws and laws against armed robbery, no one knows why we have the rules and what the problem is when we violate them.
dazza2008 wrote:I played before they looked without thinking. I have lots of games going so normally just get them done. We posted what I did so what is the problem?
Great question! According to clan war rules, by playing before they looked you violated the fog rule, the punishment for which appears to be having to declare the move you made publicly. Additionally, we've found out in this thread that it is incumbent (or should be incumbent) upon team two to "snap" the map when the players join to avoid the type of situation that the rule looks to avoid. I admittedly do not know what that situation is, but it is undoubtedly some type of unfairness.
In sum, like much in life, for example anti-drug laws and laws against armed robbery, no one knows why we have the rules and what the problem is when we violate them.
Yes but we posted the moves I made. I don't get why it is still being discussed.
dazza2008 wrote:I played before they looked without thinking. I have lots of games going so normally just get them done. We posted what I did so what is the problem?
Great question! According to clan war rules, by playing before they looked you violated the fog rule, the punishment for which appears to be having to declare the move you made publicly. Additionally, we've found out in this thread that it is incumbent (or should be incumbent) upon team two to "snap" the map when the players join to avoid the type of situation that the rule looks to avoid. I admittedly do not know what that situation is, but it is undoubtedly some type of unfairness.
In sum, like much in life, for example anti-drug laws and laws against armed robbery, no one knows why we have the rules and what the problem is when we violate them.
Yes but we posted the moves I made. I don't get why it is still being discussed.
I don't disagree. But I'm questioning why we have this rule in the first place and the effectiveness of the punishment given that it apparently does not deter folks (much like drug users and armed robbers aren't deterred by laws). I'm clearly no expert.
dazza2008 wrote:I played before they looked without thinking. I have lots of games going so normally just get them done. We posted what I did so what is the problem?
Great question! According to clan war rules, by playing before they looked you violated the fog rule, the punishment for which appears to be having to declare the move you made publicly. Additionally, we've found out in this thread that it is incumbent (or should be incumbent) upon team two to "snap" the map when the players join to avoid the type of situation that the rule looks to avoid. I admittedly do not know what that situation is, but it is undoubtedly some type of unfairness.
In sum, like much in life, for example anti-drug laws and laws against armed robbery, no one knows why we have the rules and what the problem is when we violate them.
Yes but we posted the moves I made. I don't get why it is still being discussed.
I don't disagree. But I'm questioning why we have this rule in the first place and the effectiveness of the punishment given that it apparently does not deter folks (much like drug users and armed robbers aren't deterred by laws). I'm clearly no expert.
dazza2008 wrote:I played before they looked without thinking. I have lots of games going so normally just get them done. We posted what I did so what is the problem?
Great question! According to clan war rules, by playing before they looked you violated the fog rule, the punishment for which appears to be having to declare the move you made publicly. Additionally, we've found out in this thread that it is incumbent (or should be incumbent) upon team two to "snap" the map when the players join to avoid the type of situation that the rule looks to avoid. I admittedly do not know what that situation is, but it is undoubtedly some type of unfairness.
In sum, like much in life, for example anti-drug laws and laws against armed robbery, no one knows why we have the rules and what the problem is when we violate them.
Yes but we posted the moves I made. I don't get why it is still being discussed.
I don't disagree. But I'm questioning why we have this rule in the first place and the effectiveness of the punishment given that it apparently does not deter folks (much like drug users and armed robbers aren't deterred by laws). I'm clearly no expert.
Good, I'm glad you also agree that this is an unnecessary rule.
dazza2008 wrote:Yes but we posted the moves I made. I don't get why it is still being discussed.
it is still being discussed being Fog is not supposed to be used in clan wars. that is why it is being discussed and it is why you should forfeit accordingly or team CC should award us the victory for the violation... the black jesus has spoken from up on his mountain top...-el Jesus negro
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
dazza2008 wrote:Yes but we posted the moves I made. I don't get why it is still being discussed.
it is still being discussed being Fog is not supposed to be used in clan wars. that is why it is being discussed and it is why you should forfeit accordingly or team CC should award us the victory for the violation... the black jesus has spoken from up on his mountain top...-el Jesus negro
Calm down Gary.
Also:
squishyg wrote:
dazza2008 wrote:I don't SEE why it is still being discussed.