BOB version 1.2 [was CC Greasemonkey script - unofficial]

Archival storage to keep things organized and uncluttered. Can't find what you need? Search for old topics here.

Moderator: Tech Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Locked

What should the name of this script be?

Poll ended at Fri May 18, 2007 5:51 am

Bob
11
28%
TSAR
7
18%
TSAR BOMBA
6
15%
B.O.M.B.
5
13%
Trojan
1
3%
Trojan Horse
9
23%
 
Total votes: 39

User avatar
tahitiwahini
Posts: 964
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:26 pm

Post by tahitiwahini »

Mylittlepuddykat wrote:But wheres the personal list? can someone take me thru step by step fromt he beginning as I am really confused


OK.

On this page see the menus on the left hand side of the page (you may have to scroll to the very top of the page). It's right under the large CONQUER CLUB banner and under [logout Mylittlepuddykat]. The first menu is the Game Menu, the second Interaction Menu, and the third Personal Menu. If you have installed "Bob," stocksr's greasemonkey script when you open a game window you will see another (fourth) menu called Greasemonkey Menu.

Click on My Games, then click to enter one of your active games. See it now? This is where you change the options for the "Bob" script.

Good luck.
Cheers,
Tahitiwahini
User avatar
yeti_c
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am
Gender: Male

Post by yeti_c »

Is it official then?

The script is now called "Bob".

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
cicero
Posts: 1358
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:51 pm
Location: with the infected neutrals ... handing out maps to help them find their way to CC

Post by cicero »

yeti_c wrote:Is it official then?

The script is now called "Bob".

C.


Not sure if it's official yet, but since it seems highly likely to become so, I do think it should be "BOB" rather than "Bob" - so that the fact it is a three letter acronym (TLA) indicating "Battle Observation Briefing" is given emphasis. [Notwithstanding that it was listed as "Bob" in the poll.]

Also I think it is better aesthetically in upper case.


cicero
FREE M-E-Mbership and simple rules. Conquer Club - it's not complicated.

random me statistic @ 13 December 2008 - 1336 posts : 232nd most public posts (not counting Tower of Babble) of all time.
User avatar
tahitiwahini
Posts: 964
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:26 pm

Post by tahitiwahini »

cicero wrote:
yeti_c wrote:Is it official then?

The script is now called "Bob".

C.


Not sure if it's official yet, but since it seems highly likely to become so, I do think it should be "BOB" rather than "Bob" - so that the fact it is a three letter acronym (TLA) indicating "Battle Observation Briefing" is given emphasis. [Notwithstanding that it was listed as "Bob" in the poll.]

Also I think it is better aesthetically in upper case.


cicero


No, not official. The official announcement will come from stocksr. I take your point, it probably should be "BOB," rather than "Bob." I was only going on how it was listed in the poll, and the fact that it seemed to have the most support.
Cheers,
Tahitiwahini
User avatar
cicero
Posts: 1358
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:51 pm
Location: with the infected neutrals ... handing out maps to help them find their way to CC

Post by cicero »

I like that Trojan Horse could still sneak in and win ;)

cicero
FREE M-E-Mbership and simple rules. Conquer Club - it's not complicated.

random me statistic @ 13 December 2008 - 1336 posts : 232nd most public posts (not counting Tower of Babble) of all time.
weirdbro
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 6:33 pm

Post by weirdbro »

Yeah, just 2 more votes for a tie.
We could try to be very accurate, just keep eliminating the one in last each time, until only 1 was left.
User avatar
yeti_c
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am
Gender: Male

Post by yeti_c »

weirdbro wrote:Yeah, just 2 more votes for a tie.
We could try to be very accurate, just keep eliminating the one in last each time, until only 1 was left.


Actually one of the TH votes was changed to BOB anyway!!!

I was going on the fact that 7 days had passed since the start of the poll... and I assume the poll will have stopped now?

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
yeti_c
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am
Gender: Male

Post by yeti_c »

I was just reading a thread here - and I suspect that we've missed a colourblind aspect...

The colours of the cards might be hard to distinguish if you are colour blind...

I don't know how you can do this nicely though...

Any ideas on how we can portray the colours of the cards?

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
tahitiwahini
Posts: 964
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:26 pm

Post by tahitiwahini »

yeti_c wrote:I was just reading a thread here - and I suspect that we've missed a colourblind aspect...

The colours of the cards might be hard to distinguish if you are colour blind...

I don't know how you can do this nicely though...

Any ideas on how we can portray the colours of the cards?

C.


My Cards (bold if owned): Ontario (R), Yakutsk (G), Siam (B)
Cheers,
Tahitiwahini
User avatar
stocksr
Posts: 132
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 11:30 am
Location: South Coast, UK

The poll is now closed

Post by stocksr »

Thanks for the votes guys, it is official this script will be renamed to BOB. Additionally I am moving from version 0.9 to 1.0

Just a heads up though, when I do release BOB v1.0 as a side effect of the rename you will have to manually remove the current script and you will lose all your settings, but I shall cover that in more detail in the release notes.

Also I may delay the release for a few days because the current version of Greasemonkey has a bug when removing scripts.
r.
User avatar
stocksr
Posts: 132
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 11:30 am
Location: South Coast, UK

Post by stocksr »

tahitiwahini wrote:
yeti_c wrote:I was just reading a thread here - and I suspect that we've missed a colourblind aspect...

The colours of the cards might be hard to distinguish if you are colour blind...

I don't know how you can do this nicely though...

Any ideas on how we can portray the colours of the cards?

C.


My Cards (bold if owned): Ontario (R), Yakutsk (G), Siam (B)


It's on the TODO list,

cicero as a colour blind player could you confirm that this suggestion helps, also can you tell the difference between bold and not bold? or would it help to have that included as well.

Thanks
r.
User avatar
yeti_c
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am
Gender: Male

Re: The poll is now closed

Post by yeti_c »

stocksr wrote:Thanks for the votes guys, it is official this script will be renamed to BOB. Additionally I am moving from version 0.9 to 1.0

Just a heads up though, when I do release BOB v1.0 as a side effect of the rename you will have to manually remove the current script and you will lose all your settings, but I shall cover that in more detail in the release notes.

Also I may delay the release for a few days because the current version of Greasemonkey has a bug when removing scripts.


YAY for BOB!!

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
cicero
Posts: 1358
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:51 pm
Location: with the infected neutrals ... handing out maps to help them find their way to CC

Post by cicero »

tahitiwahini, helpful as ever, wrote:
yeti_c, with a few more words which I have edited out for some reason, wrote:I suspect that we've missed a colourblind aspect...

The colours of the cards might be hard to distinguish if you are colour blind...

Any ideas on how we can portray the colours of the cards?

C.


My Cards (bold if owned): Ontario (R), Yakutsk (G), Siam (B)


As a colourblind type("severe red green" I think, but that may not be technically correct) I don't have any problem with identifying the colours of the cards.

More specifically whilst I may not have been able to identify the colours of the cards I can distinguish that there are three different colours. I think that this is probably because they are tonally (as in light/dark) quite distinct.

Not that I'm attempting to veto the idea, but as a member of the potential target audience I don't think we need it. Other colourblinders please disagree as you see fit ...

cicero
FREE M-E-Mbership and simple rules. Conquer Club - it's not complicated.

random me statistic @ 13 December 2008 - 1336 posts : 232nd most public posts (not counting Tower of Babble) of all time.
User avatar
cicero
Posts: 1358
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:51 pm
Location: with the infected neutrals ... handing out maps to help them find their way to CC

Post by cicero »

stocksr wrote:
tahitiwahini wrote:
yeti_c wrote:etc

C.


etc


It's on the TODO list,

cicero as a colour blind player could you confirm that this suggestion helps, also can you tell the difference between bold and not bold? or would it help to have that included as well.

Thanks


Sorry, didn't notice you'd contributed too R.

See my previous post. And no, there are no problems for me distinguishing bold from non-bold.


cicero
FREE M-E-Mbership and simple rules. Conquer Club - it's not complicated.

random me statistic @ 13 December 2008 - 1336 posts : 232nd most public posts (not counting Tower of Babble) of all time.
weirdbro
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 6:33 pm

Post by weirdbro »

Yeah, I'm colorblind too. The colors are fine for me as it is. I didn't need to use the colorblindness setting for games until i started playing with more than 4 people.
And bold is fine. I may be colorblind, but I'm not thickness-blind or plain blind.
User avatar
yeti_c
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am
Gender: Male

Post by yeti_c »

cicero wrote:
tahitiwahini, helpful as ever, wrote:
yeti_c, with a few more words which I have edited out for some reason, wrote:I suspect that we've missed a colourblind aspect...

The colours of the cards might be hard to distinguish if you are colour blind...

Any ideas on how we can portray the colours of the cards?

C.


My Cards (bold if owned): Ontario (R), Yakutsk (G), Siam (B)


As a colourblind type("severe red green" I think, but that may not be technically correct) I don't have any problem with identifying the colours of the cards.

More specifically whilst I may not have been able to identify the colours of the cards I can distinguish that there are three different colours. I think that this is probably because they are tonally (as in light/dark) quite distinct.

Not that I'm attempting to veto the idea, but as a member of the potential target audience I don't think we need it. Other colourblinders please disagree as you see fit ...

cicero


That's good then... Upto you Rob whether you upgrade BOB with this!

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
andreweberman
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:56 pm

Post by andreweberman »

how about an odds calculator in the next update?
weirdbro
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 6:33 pm

Post by weirdbro »

What, tell you the odds for attacking or autoattacking, or both?
andreweberman
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:56 pm

Post by andreweberman »

autoattacking, attacking is always the same
User avatar
stocksr
Posts: 132
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 11:30 am
Location: South Coast, UK

Post by stocksr »

cicero wrote:More specifically whilst I may not have been able to identify the colours of the cards I can distinguish that there are three different colours. I think that this is probably because they are tonally (as in light/dark) quite distinct.

Not that I'm attempting to veto the idea, but as a member of the potential target audience I don't think we need it. Other colourblinders please disagree as you see fit ...

cicero


based on your statement above, say you are in a fixed rate game and have 3 cards all the same colour are they red or green?

Is this a situation when you might need help to tell the difference?

BTW it is a VERY easy thing to add so I don't mind either way, but my feeling is that using colour as the only way to convey a bit of information has the potential to cause some people problems.

BTW do we have any other types of colour blindness other than red/green represented here?
r.
User avatar
stocksr
Posts: 132
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 11:30 am
Location: South Coast, UK

Post by stocksr »

andreweberman wrote:how about an odds calculator in the next update?


You mean something like: you set up your attack in the two drop downs and next to the auto attack button appears some text saying

You have a 1 in 200 chance of taking the territory if you auto-attack, and will have on average 5.45 armies left

I like the idea, but I will need some help from the maths bods (tahitiwahini?) could you provide the body for this function

Code: Select all


function willIWin (attackingWith, attackingAgainst)
{
  var n = 1;
  var d = 100;
  var a = 5.75;

  // I Need some maths here


  return "You have a " + n + " in " + d + " chance of winning if you auto-attack, and will have on average " + a + " armies left"
}


If we do this it will be in BOB v1.1 not the next release which is BOB v1.0
r.
User avatar
yeti_c
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am
Gender: Male

Post by yeti_c »

Hey Rob,

Do you like the new name?

Do you ever get called Bob? Do you hate being called Bob?

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
stocksr
Posts: 132
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 11:30 am
Location: South Coast, UK

Post by stocksr »

yeti_c wrote:Hey Rob,

Do you like the new name?

Do you ever get called Bob? Do you hate being called Bob?

C.


Yeah I like the new name, it's working for me.

I don't think I have ever been called Bob myself so there is no confusion. though in my time I have answered to:

Rob
Robert
Mr Stocks
Bert - this I did hate, I think that's why they kept doing it.
Rob Rob Rob Rob - don't ask
Oi You
Philip - My brothers name but my mum was having a bad day so we have to let her off.
r.
User avatar
yeti_c
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am
Gender: Male

Post by yeti_c »

Excellent - I'm glad you like it.

stocksr wrote:Philip - My brothers name but my mum was having a bad day so we have to let her off.


My mum gets me and my bro mixed up sometimes... lame isn't it!!!

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
tahitiwahini
Posts: 964
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:26 pm

Post by tahitiwahini »

stocksr wrote:
andreweberman wrote:how about an odds calculator in the next update?


You mean something like: you set up your attack in the two drop downs and next to the auto attack button appears some text saying

You have a 1 in 200 chance of taking the territory if you auto-attack, and will have on average 5.45 armies left

I like the idea, but I will need some help from the maths bods (tahitiwahini?) could you provide the body for this function

Code: Select all


function willIWin (attackingWith, attackingAgainst)
{
  var n = 1;
  var d = 100;
  var a = 5.75;

  // I Need some maths here


  return "You have a " + n + " in " + d + " chance of winning if you auto-attack, and will have on average " + a + " armies left"
}


If we do this it will be in BOB v1.1 not the next release which is BOB v1.0


Some initial thoughts about this:

1) The calculations are accomplished through recursion (I believe) so it's a computationally expensive operation. If you get up in the range of more than 50 armies it becomes a slow operation. I'm not sure it's the sort of thing you want running whenever a user picks a country to attack in a drop down list.

2) The main reason I use the battle odds calculator (Gambit) is to calculate my odds of success for eliminating one of my opponents. That is, I identify an attacking force and then a comma-separated list of the defender's remaining armies. The user interface suggested above wouldn't really support this use.

3) There's no callable interface to either the Gambit or Bartell battle odds calculators, so one would have create a battle odds calculator from scratch. Since I'm basically lazy I'm not sure I'd want to tackle this. If someone wanted to pursue this I could offer some suggestions and ideas on how to go about it. [Basically there are six attacks (3v2, 3v1, 2v2, 2v1, 1v1, 1v2) for which the probabilities are known and it's possible to reduce any attack to a combination of these known attack probabilities.]

4) As an alternative, perhaps you could offer a link to a battle odds calculator on the game page. I would suggest the Gambit one. As a practical matter if I'm going to use Auto-Attack (which I don't by the way) I would be willing to click on the link to the Gambit calculator, enter my armies and the defender's armies and click calculate, before using the Auto-Attack button.

5) Both the Gambit and Bartell calculators are capped at a certain number of armies. Bartell is limited to 50 armies. Not sure what the limit for Gambit is, but it is limited also. There might be a very good reason for these limits as the calculation may take an unacceptably long time if they are exceeded.
Cheers,
Tahitiwahini
Locked

Return to “Tool Archives”