2dimes wrote:Too many people claiming they were given unfair bad ratings.
Bah...the ratings system they have now is too vague...I mean, it's easy to use, but, for that very reason, most people have obscenenely inflated ratings....Most people -my lazy ass included- will just leave fives across the board, for most people...Before you could at least get some idea of why...
That abbreviated ramble aside, I can understand the reasoning....thanks for the response, sir.
I hate the ratings. All it shows are a bunch of numbers on the screen. That may tell me something but it doesn't tell me everything. With feedback you were able to express yourself as well as you could words. I look through my own feedback and see what I was like back in the day. Who was doing what. I read some of the glowing reviews and I feel proud. I can see exactly how people felt. Now I just see a bunch of 5's most everywhere. Basically all I can tell now is who is nice and who isn't. Before you could probably tell more of how nice. Meh, I feel the ratings just aren't personal enough.
That's my exact issue...I'll admit, there is some level of ego stroking involved with my like of the old feedback system...a decent number of my glowing reviews saying good strategy were from high-ranked [or at least they now are] individuals...that really means nothing, in the grand scheme of things...The checkboxes they have, now, are better than nothing, but they just can't have enough to fill out all the possibilities...
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
2dimes wrote:Too many people claiming they were given unfair bad ratings.
Bah...the ratings system they have now is too vague...I mean, it's easy to use, but, for that very reason, most people have obscenenely inflated ratings....Most people -my lazy ass included- will just leave fives across the board, for most people...Before you could at least get some idea of why...
That abbreviated ramble aside, I can understand the reasoning....thanks for the response, sir.
I hate the ratings. All it shows are a bunch of numbers on the screen. That may tell me something but it doesn't tell me everything. With feedback you were able to express yourself as well as you could words. I look through my own feedback and see what I was like back in the day. Who was doing what. I read some of the glowing reviews and I feel proud. I can see exactly how people felt. Now I just see a bunch of 5's most everywhere. Basically all I can tell now is who is nice and who isn't. Before you could probably tell more of how nice. Meh, I feel the ratings just aren't personal enough.
That's my exact issue...I'll admit, there is some level of ego stroking involved with my like of the old feedback system...a decent number of my glowing reviews saying good strategy were from high-ranked [or at least they now are] individuals...that really means nothing, in the grand scheme of things...The checkboxes they have, now, are better than nothing, but they just can't have enough to fill out all the possibilities...
I don't know. I think it's better to hear it in their own words. And besides the extra effort that someone had to do to say what they needed to say instead of click 5-5-5, shows the more deservedness of the feedback you got. Besides it's just really nice to hear from people's feedback, reading nice stuff is nice :3
Vote: Mandy Eddie35: hi everyone Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
2dimes wrote:Too many people claiming they were given unfair bad ratings.
Bah...the ratings system they have now is too vague...I mean, it's easy to use, but, for that very reason, most people have obscenenely inflated ratings....Most people -my lazy ass included- will just leave fives across the board, for most people...Before you could at least get some idea of why...
That abbreviated ramble aside, I can understand the reasoning....thanks for the response, sir.
I hate the ratings. All it shows are a bunch of numbers on the screen. That may tell me something but it doesn't tell me everything. With feedback you were able to express yourself as well as you could words. I look through my own feedback and see what I was like back in the day. Who was doing what. I read some of the glowing reviews and I feel proud. I can see exactly how people felt. Now I just see a bunch of 5's most everywhere. Basically all I can tell now is who is nice and who isn't. Before you could probably tell more of how nice. Meh, I feel the ratings just aren't personal enough.
That's my exact issue...I'll admit, there is some level of ego stroking involved with my like of the old feedback system...a decent number of my glowing reviews saying good strategy were from high-ranked [or at least they now are] individuals...that really means nothing, in the grand scheme of things...The checkboxes they have, now, are better than nothing, but they just can't have enough to fill out all the possibilities...
I don't know. I think it's better to hear it in their own words. And besides the extra effort that someone had to do to say what they needed to say instead of click 5-5-5, shows the more deservedness of the feedback you got. Besides it's just really nice to hear from people's feedback, reading nice stuff is nice :3
I quite agree...That being said, the flipside is that people would be using them for excessive and unnescessary attacks on someone's tactics.
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
"Forum Days" are DoomYoshi's personal "holiday" that apparently occurs when the Off Topics forum retains the same name for 136 to 143 days. No one knows what any of this means.
