LackAttack I have a letter for you.......Spamalot Crisis

Vincent M · Post by **Vincent M** » Wed May 16, 2007 3:52 pm

I want to say

Any People passing themselves off as Multis in Benift of Spamalot are morons. Please I implore you dont do it again

freezie · Post by **freezie** » Wed May 16, 2007 3:55 pm

Vincent...in benefit or not to spamalot...multis are morons.

Just had to point this to you.

Vincent M · Post by **Vincent M** » Wed May 16, 2007 3:56 pm

freezie wrote:Vincent...in benefit or not to spamalot...multis are morons.

Just had to point this to you.

true

Gilligan · Post by **Gilligan** » Wed May 16, 2007 4:12 pm

Wow...that post that he didn't delete got deleted.

jnd94 · Post by **jnd94** » Wed May 16, 2007 4:13 pm

hey guys, how is the revolution goin?

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Wed May 16, 2007 4:14 pm

If you guys want to carry on a random conversation, please take it to chat, or one of the many threads in the social lounge, else I'll lock this.

Any multi's posting here on banned accounts (legalaccount) will have their posts deleted, so don't bother responding to him.

Gilligan · Post by **Gilligan** » Wed May 16, 2007 4:15 pm

wicked wrote:If you guys want to carry on a random conversation, please take it to chat, or one of the many threads in the social lounge, else I'll lock this.

Any multi's posting here on banned accounts (legalaccount) will have their posts deleted, so don't bother responding to him.

Ohh so that's why his posts are going away.

Has lack seen this?

jnd94 · Post by **jnd94** » Wed May 16, 2007 4:20 pm

Gilligan wrote:
wicked wrote:If you guys want to carry on a random conversation, please take it to chat, or one of the many threads in the social lounge, else I'll lock this.

Any multi's posting here on banned accounts (legalaccount) will have their posts deleted, so don't bother responding to him.

Ohh so that's why his posts are going away.

Has lack seen this?

maybe that is why they are locking it.

duday53 · Post by **duday53** » Wed May 16, 2007 4:21 pm

Wicked, where did the hecter for mod thread go?( do you even know?)

And maybe you should lock this thread until we get a reply from AK or Lack.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Wed May 16, 2007 4:24 pm

Any mod and reply to a locked thread and/or unlock it. I won't lock it unless it's getting spammed, which is where it looked like it was headed.

Vincent M · Post by **Vincent M** » Wed May 16, 2007 4:26 pm

Look Guys stop talking here make posts about observations of what happened but dont carry the conversation here

duday53 · Post by **duday53** » Wed May 16, 2007 4:26 pm

Ok, but what about the hecter for mod thread? Did it get deleted?

Dancing Mustard · Post by **Dancing Mustard** » Wed May 16, 2007 4:29 pm

Seriously guys. Quit with the spam already. It isn't exactly helping our case, and I think (and I suspect Vincent and Hecter think) that it's important this thread stays open; in order to give us a place in which to entertain a genuine dialogue with both the moderators, and the community at large.

So please. I doubt I'll ever say it again; but quit with the spam.
Sorry if that sounds harsh, but I'd really hate to see this locked.

Gilligan · Post by **Gilligan** » Wed May 16, 2007 4:33 pm

So what did AK hate about Spamalot in the first place?

wcaclimbing · Post by **wcaclimbing** » Wed May 16, 2007 4:37 pm

I dont know. Probably a mix of hating spam and not wanting Spamalot to pass the Longest thread, thread.

But no one really knows except AK himself. lets talk about something else.

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Wed May 16, 2007 4:43 pm

Well guys, I'm back on. I don't know for how long though. Any updates?

Vincent M · Post by **Vincent M** » Wed May 16, 2007 4:46 pm

hecter wrote:Well guys, I'm back on. I don't know for how long though. Any updates?

No word from lack.

Just andy and wicked.

I think they are working on it I THINK and HOPE

Nephilim · Post by **Nephilim** » Wed May 16, 2007 4:46 pm

Vincent M wrote:Guys please dont post unless it is something useful to Spamalot cause

Dancing Mustard wrote:Seriously guys. Quit with the spam already. It isn't exactly helping our case, and I think (and I suspect Vincent and Hecter think) that it's important this thread stays open; in order to give us a place in which to entertain a genuine dialogue with both the moderators, and the community at large.

So please. I doubt I'll ever say it again; but quit with the spam.
Sorry if that sounds harsh, but I'd really hate to see this locked.

oh the irony.....

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Wed May 16, 2007 4:55 pm

Re: the Iliad forum ban

He was posting the same thing in tons of threads that had nothing to do with the situation. I unbanned him and hopefully he's calm enough now to not overreact anymore.

If Iliad can behave, he can stick around. If not, we won't be so nice the 2nd time around.

jnd94 · Post by **jnd94** » Wed May 16, 2007 4:58 pm

wicked wrote:Re: the Iliad forum ban

He was posting the same thing in tons of threads that had nothing to do with the situation. I unbanned him and hopefully he's calm enough now to not overreact anymore.

If Iliad can behave, he can stick around. If not, we won't be so nice the 2nd time around.

yu banned him because he posted too much in a thread? Anyhoo, will AK ever talk in this thread, I want to hear something from the guy. I want to hear his reasoning or else Im just assuming he did it just becuase he didnt like spamalot, which is totally unethical.

Gilligan · Post by **Gilligan** » Wed May 16, 2007 5:00 pm

jnd94 wrote:
wicked wrote:Re: the Iliad forum ban

He was posting the same thing in tons of threads that had nothing to do with the situation. I unbanned him and hopefully he's calm enough now to not overreact anymore.

If Iliad can behave, he can stick around. If not, we won't be so nice the 2nd time around.

yu banned him because he posted too much in a thread? Anyhoo, will AK ever talk in this thread, I want to hear something from the guy. I want to hear his reasoning or else Im just assuming he did it just becuase he didnt like spamalot, which is totally unethical.

I agree. He won't post in a thread that has to do with one that he deleted.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Wed May 16, 2007 5:03 pm

No jnd, he was basically throwing a childish temper tantrum by posting the same off-topic thing in multiple threads. I just cleaned up one of the threads he derailed.

sfhbballnut · Post by **sfhbballnut** » Wed May 16, 2007 5:05 pm

its interesting to me that this many people are this passionate and loyal to a thread

Gilligan · Post by **Gilligan** » Wed May 16, 2007 5:07 pm

sfhbballnut wrote:its interesting to me that this many people are this passionate and loyal to a thread

Well, I mean, it had almost 1000 pages. Somewhere in 960-970, right?

mandalorian2298 · Post by **mandalorian2298** » Wed May 16, 2007 5:14 pm

sfhbballnut wrote:its interesting to me that this many people are this passionate and loyal to a thread

It's not about the thread. I never posted in a thread. It's about the atmosphere on the forums wich used to be fantastic. Then one bully decided to delete a thread in wich peope hung around, talked and generally tried to create a good atmosphere, just because he felt left out. The question that we have to ask ourselves is: What he feels left out by my thread, next time? Perhaps it's time for CC users to start saving stuff that matters to them on their HD, because leaving it on forums doesn't appear to be safe anymore.