Rail Europe [Quenched]
Moderator: Cartographers
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
- thenobodies80
- Posts: 5400
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:30 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Milan
Re: Rail Europe [Quenched]
Images updated. 
Re: Rail Europe [Quenched]
thenobodies80 wrote:Images updated.
certainly have been, they look good, thank-you

* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
-
nolefan5311
- Posts: 1768
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:51 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Florida
Re: Rail Europe [Quenched]
Hard to believe this map could look any better, but it does. Well done cairns.
Re: Rail Europe [Quenched]
nolefan5311 wrote:Hard to believe this map could look any better, but it does. Well done cairns.
thanks nolefan5311
now it looks like a real spaghetti junction

* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
-
ManBungalow
- Posts: 3431
- Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:02 am
- Location: On a giant rock orbiting a star somewhere
Re: Rail Europe [Quenched]
Hi, I dropped by today to post two things:
1.
The image the site uses is a .jpg file:
http://maps.conquerclub.com/Rail_Europe2.L.jpg
The image cairns has on the first page of this thread is a .png:
http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... update.png
The cairns version has lovely crisp colours, which are washed out on the 'official' image, and there's some fuzziness all over the .jpg. Consider re-uploading to the map index?
2.
I came to say that the F line bonus is under-valued. And the M line over-valued. But then, having read through the last few pages of bonus discussion, I think it's best to leave it be. Cairns has put a lot of effort into this map, and I don't want to stir up a huge change now when we can sit back and enjoy it as it is.
1.
The image the site uses is a .jpg file:
http://maps.conquerclub.com/Rail_Europe2.L.jpg
The image cairns has on the first page of this thread is a .png:
http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... update.png
The cairns version has lovely crisp colours, which are washed out on the 'official' image, and there's some fuzziness all over the .jpg. Consider re-uploading to the map index?
2.
I came to say that the F line bonus is under-valued. And the M line over-valued. But then, having read through the last few pages of bonus discussion, I think it's best to leave it be. Cairns has put a lot of effort into this map, and I don't want to stir up a huge change now when we can sit back and enjoy it as it is.
Re: Rail Europe [Quenched]
ManBungalow wrote:Hi, I dropped by today to post two things:
1.
The image the site uses is a .jpg file:
http://maps.conquerclub.com/Rail_Europe2.L.jpg
The image cairns has on the first page of this thread is a .png:
http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... update.png
The cairns version has lovely crisp colours, which are washed out on the 'official' image, and there's some fuzziness all over the .jpg. Consider re-uploading to the map index?
Change this immediately

Re: Rail Europe [Quenched]
I think this is part of the "downsizing the bytage" process, is it not?

* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
-
ManBungalow
- Posts: 3431
- Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:02 am
- Location: On a giant rock orbiting a star somewhere
Re: Rail Europe [Quenched]
Wow, yes, I'm prepared to take back what I said.
For contrast, Kings Court II (which comes to mind when I think of a big map file) is 402.84 KB.
This is 809.04 KB.
It just seems a shame to not use the pristine image.
For contrast, Kings Court II (which comes to mind when I think of a big map file) is 402.84 KB.
This is 809.04 KB.
It just seems a shame to not use the pristine image.
Re: Rail Europe [Quenched]
ManBungalow wrote:Wow, yes, I'm prepared to take back what I said.
For contrast, Kings Court II (which comes to mind when I think of a big map file) is 402.84 KB.
This is 809.04 KB.
It just seems a shame to not use the pristine image.
Perhaps the differrence in size comes down to the number of colours used.
I think King's Court uses many of the same colours whereas this one has many differing colour pixels spread wide.

* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
Re: Rail Europe [Quenched]
cairnswk wrote:ManBungalow wrote:Wow, yes, I'm prepared to take back what I said.
For contrast, Kings Court II (which comes to mind when I think of a big map file) is 402.84 KB.
This is 809.04 KB.
It just seems a shame to not use the pristine image.
Perhaps the differrence in size comes down to the number of colours used.
I think King's Court uses many of the same colours whereas this one has many differing colour pixels spread wide.
The amount of colors makes a file's size increase? Really?

Re: Rail Europe [Quenched]
Gilligan wrote:cairnswk wrote:ManBungalow wrote:Wow, yes, I'm prepared to take back what I said.
For contrast, Kings Court II (which comes to mind when I think of a big map file) is 402.84 KB.
This is 809.04 KB.
It just seems a shame to not use the pristine image.
Perhaps the differrence in size comes down to the number of colours used.
I think King's Court uses many of the same colours whereas this one has many differing colour pixels spread wide.
The amount of colors makes a file's size increase? Really?
I beleive so, it is the 0+1s combinations for each colour that make up the extra bytes of info.

* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
- thenobodies80
- Posts: 5400
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:30 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Milan
Re: Rail Europe [Quenched]
In past images were compressed by lackattack.
Now all images are compressed before to be sent for the upload. In this way (and using a different system) i can keep the quality high and not waste all the hard work you guys do here.
Anyway, this is what I would like to send for the upload fi you are fine with them.
I think you can't see any loss of quality but files are small anyway.
[bigimg]http://wcforums.org/CC/europefiles/Rail_Europe.L.jpg[/bigimg]

Now all images are compressed before to be sent for the upload. In this way (and using a different system) i can keep the quality high and not waste all the hard work you guys do here.
Anyway, this is what I would like to send for the upload fi you are fine with them.
I think you can't see any loss of quality but files are small anyway.
[bigimg]http://wcforums.org/CC/europefiles/Rail_Europe.L.jpg[/bigimg]

Re: Rail Europe [Quenched]
thenobodies80 wrote:In past images were compressed by lackattack.
Now all images are compressed before to be sent for the upload. In this way (and using a different system) i can keep the quality high and not waste all the hard work you guys do here.
Anyway, this is what I would like to send for the upload fi you are fine with them.
I think you can't see any loss of quality but files are small anyway.![]()
[bigimg]http://wcforums.org/CC/europefiles/Rail_Europe.L.jpg[/bigimg]
I think they are fine! Thanks.

* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
- thenobodies80
- Posts: 5400
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:30 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Milan
- thenobodies80
- Posts: 5400
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:30 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Milan
Re: Rail Europe [Quenched]
The images have been replaced.
Nobodies
Nobodies
Re: Rail Europe [Quenched]
thenobodies80 wrote:The images have been replaced.
Nobodies
Thank-you

* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
