Gilligan wrote:I don't think so? That was under the noo menegemant
exactly... we got lots of new smilies in LC, which is why I'm saying this should be marked as implemented... unless you want more else where in which case you probably need to modify the suggestion.
10:16:35 ‹Ace Rimmer› haven't looked at work in ages 10:42:43 ‹Sackett58› fine, I'll take my panties elsewhere
Gilligan wrote:I don't think so? That was under the noo menegemant
exactly... we got lots of new smilies in LC, which is why I'm saying this should be marked as implemented... unless you want more else where in which case you probably need to modify the suggestion.
Gilligan wrote:I don't think so? That was under the noo menegemant
exactly... we got lots of new smilies in LC, which is why I'm saying this should be marked as implemented... unless you want more else where in which case you probably need to modify the suggestion.
modify it to what?
the op is pretty specific.
well I suppose if that's the only one you want... :shrug:
10:16:35 ‹Ace Rimmer› haven't looked at work in ages 10:42:43 ‹Sackett58› fine, I'll take my panties elsewhere
Gilligan wrote:I don't think so? That was under the noo menegemant
exactly... we got lots of new smilies in LC, which is why I'm saying this should be marked as implemented... unless you want more else where in which case you probably need to modify the suggestion.
modify it to what?
the op is pretty specific.
It's a little misleading because the thread title says smilies, but you only list one.