USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Care to peruse completed maps? Take a stroll through the Atlas.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
Foreverman
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 12:22 pm
Location: Texas

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Foreverman »

Albert Lea cannot attack Des Moines but CAN attack Sioux City.
isaiah40
Posts: 3990
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:14 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by isaiah40 »

Thank you for commenting, and we do know about it. The XML has been fixed, along with the small map, we are just waiting for rds to upload them. :)
random21
Posts: 126
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 10:09 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by random21 »

capitals 5 and 20. comes up as san francisco instead of sacranmento, and charleston instead of 33 columbia fort interstate bonus. unless i am mistaken
User avatar
Gilligan
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Providence, RI

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Gilligan »

random21 wrote:capitals 5 and 20. comes up as san francisco instead of sacranmento, and charleston instead of 33 columbia fort interstate bonus. unless i am mistaken


Yes, good call! I will fix this in the next update.
Image
User avatar
Awoodness
Posts: 212
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 9:39 am
Location: In your head.

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Awoodness »

Foreverman wrote:Albert Lea cannot attack Des Moines but CAN attack Sioux City.


I didn't notice that, but I got Des Moines can not attack Albert Lea, but Albert Lea can attack Des Moines
isaiah40
Posts: 3990
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:14 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by isaiah40 »

Awoodness wrote:
Foreverman wrote:Albert Lea cannot attack Des Moines but CAN attack Sioux City.


I didn't notice that, but I got Des Moines can not attack Albert Lea, but Albert Lea can attack Des Moines

Oooopps! Fixed for the next update.
Attachments
USA21.xml
Updated Version.
(116.75 KiB) Downloaded 936 times
User avatar
t4mcr53s2
Posts: 925
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 1:19 pm
Gender: Male
Location: maryland, usa

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by t4mcr53s2 »

Thanks for the map ... fun to see how it plays ...

today Des Moines could not see Albert Lea
User avatar
greenoaks
Posts: 9977
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:47 am

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by greenoaks »

why does NYC not have a star like the other capitals?
User avatar
Gilligan
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Providence, RI

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Gilligan »

greenoaks wrote:why does NYC not have a star like the other capitals?


NYC isn't the capital of New York. Albany is.
Image
User avatar
greenoaks
Posts: 9977
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:47 am

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by greenoaks »

Gilligan wrote:
greenoaks wrote:why does NYC not have a star like the other capitals?


NYC isn't the capital of New York. Albany is.

that makes sense. :oops:
JeopardyTempest
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 12:58 am

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by JeopardyTempest »

Seems the army numbers for 38 (Augusta, GA) is left of where it should be, at least for me. At least in fog as ??.

Also, any thoughts on making Michigan +4 instead of +3? It's 8 territories, and 3 borders. Yes, it's low on borders, but seems like a throwaway territory right now. Though I could see some reasoning, I've found MN\WI to be a great opening move so far.
benga
Posts: 6925
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:15 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by benga »

This map hurts my eyes too much, other big maps aren't that eye annoying.
User avatar
Gilligan
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Providence, RI

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Gilligan »

benga wrote:This map hurts my eyes too much, other big maps aren't that eye annoying.


IMO kings court Ii is more annoying.
Image
User avatar
Mr_Adams
Posts: 1987
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 8:33 pm
Gender: Male

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Mr_Adams »

somewhere between V2 and V3 my home town disappeared. :(
Image
User avatar
iancanton
Foundry Foreman
Foundry Foreman
Posts: 2453
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 5:40 am
Location: europe

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by iancanton »

JeopardyTempest wrote:Seems the army numbers for 38 (Augusta, GA) is left of where it should be, at least for me. At least in fog as ??.

u're right, the troop count is too far left.

JeopardyTempest wrote:Also, any thoughts on making Michigan +4 instead of +3? It's 8 territories, and 3 borders. Yes, it's low on borders, but seems like a throwaway territory right now. Though I could see some reasoning, I've found MN\WI to be a great opening move so far.

michigan has only 2 border cities: ironwood and goshen. despite this, there is an argument for making michigan +4 if it turns out that no-one ever wants this bonus when it's +3. this is worth considering, especially when compared with south carolina, which is an easier +3.

anchorage is currently starting with n5 neutrals instead of the intended n2.

ian. :)
Image
User avatar
jefjef
Posts: 6026
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by jefjef »

Why didn't you make Iowa actually look like Iowa? (Instead of looking like Arkansas)
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
Image
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
hotfire
Posts: 528
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 7:50 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by hotfire »

why is minneapolis where fargo should be...and why is duluth so far from lake superior...in fact why is there no lake superior?
User avatar
Mishalex
Posts: 562
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 8:35 am
Gender: Male

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Mishalex »

There is a little mistake on the map, the troops on Augusta are not in the circle, but just at the left of it...
Image

Game 13160196 One of my best victory

"I noob, you noob, he/she noobs, we noob, you noob, they noob" Mishalex - Game 16115315
User avatar
joxter14
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 10:47 pm
Gender: Female
Location: California

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by joxter14 »

I'm just wondering why Anchorage airport is a 5 neutral when all the other airports are 2 neutral, unless they are a capitol as well? Alaska is the only state with 2 territories that are 5 neutral.
random21
Posts: 126
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 10:09 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by random21 »

i noticed there are two buffalo on this map. new york and wyoming. could not 1 be changed?

leaving directions/notes can be misleading, unnecessarily
User avatar
greenoaks
Posts: 9977
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:47 am

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by greenoaks »

where is USA 2.0 ?
User avatar
iancanton
Foundry Foreman
Foundry Foreman
Posts: 2453
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 5:40 am
Location: europe

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by iancanton »

joxter14 wrote:I'm just wondering why Anchorage airport is a 5 neutral when all the other airports are 2 neutral, unless they are a capitol as well? Alaska is the only state with 2 territories that are 5 neutral.

iancanton wrote:anchorage is currently starting with n5 neutrals instead of the intended n2.

already noted! i'm sure that isaiah will change this in his next xml update, along with any other fixes that come to light.

random21 wrote:i noticed there are two buffalo on this map. new york and wyoming. could not 1 be changed?

leaving directions/notes can be misleading, unnecessarily

other cities, such as berlin and augusta, also have twins in other states. i suggest that, in game chat, u use buffalo ny and buffalo wy to avoid confusion.

ian. :)
Image
User avatar
iancanton
Foundry Foreman
Foundry Foreman
Posts: 2453
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 5:40 am
Location: europe

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by iancanton »

hotfire wrote:why is minneapolis where fargo should be...and why is duluth so far from lake superior...in fact why is there no lake superior?

that was my fault! i asked isaiah to put in minneapolis, since it's by far the most famous city in minnesota and probably the only one that most foreigners can name. the current location is the only place available for minneapolis, without moving saint paul.

joxter14 wrote:I'm just wondering why Anchorage airport is a 5 neutral when all the other airports are 2 neutral, unless they are a capitol as well? Alaska is the only state with 2 territories that are 5 neutral.

iancanton wrote:anchorage is currently starting with n5 neutrals instead of the intended n2.

already noted! i'm sure that isaiah will change this in his next xml update, along with any other fixes that come to light.

random21 wrote:i noticed there are two buffalo on this map. new york and wyoming. could not 1 be changed?

leaving directions/notes can be misleading, unnecessarily

other cities, such as berlin and augusta, also have twins in other states. i suggest that, in game chat, u use buffalo ny and buffalo wy to avoid confusion.

ian. :)
Image
venom7878
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 6:39 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by venom7878 »

Very minor, but i believe Pendleton, Oregon is typo'd on the actual map.
User avatar
Iron Maid
SoC Training Adviser
Posts: 1169
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 4:51 pm
Gender: Male

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Iron Maid »

Why is Tuscon on the map? Never heard of that city. Maybe confused with Tucson? ;)
Image
Highest Rank: 60 (Brigadier) Score: 3139 Date: March 26th 2010
Winner of Official 2010 CC World Cup - Singles & Official 200 Maps Tournament
Post Reply

Return to “The Atlas”