ANOTHER IMPORTANT POLL
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
- Joe McCarthy
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 12:35 am
- Location: in the pink
dussle wrote:You first make a stupid thread that common sense should tell you is stupid and then you get angry when people point that out?
1. Show me where I got angry, this was all passion about an important Risk security issue
dussle wrote:I'm pretty sure the only reason that freestyle games are for "jerkoffs" is that you lose them.
2. Nonsense, I lose all kinds of games not just ones with jerkoffs
dussle wrote:This IS NOT an important issue, its a waste of binary code.
3. Of course this is an important issue sir, and its obvious that you have angenda in concealing the truth.
THE PRELIMINARY FINDING OF THE COMMITEE IS THAT YOU ARE A GIGANTIC DOUCHEBAG, FURTHER INVESTIGATION INTO YOUR POSSIBLE JERKOFFERY WILL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY.
- Mr.Catfish
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 4:58 pm
Joe McCarthy wrote:I have, in my jacket pocket, a list of individuals are or have been jerkoffs or jerkoff sympathisers. That is, people that start or double turns allowed games or support those who do so. More to come on this list in a later thread!
GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!!!
LOL! that is honnestly funny but i must say i ask you this. Is it cheap if you can do the exact same thing. Its not an advantage if both parties can take advantage of the double turns?
- minihaymanz
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 4:45 pm
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
its douchebag not dousch
anyways, personally, im kinda neutral. sequential only good for real time games (considering im not a premie and they take so BLOODY long).
freestyle no double turns are my favourite because then there is not an advantage
freestyle double turns are AVERAGE, but it requires a WHOLE new strategy. especially with doubles and triples matches (1 person holds out, other person takes turn, then person who held out double turns, person who took turn holds out etc.)
anyways, personally, im kinda neutral. sequential only good for real time games (considering im not a premie and they take so BLOODY long).
freestyle no double turns are my favourite because then there is not an advantage
freestyle double turns are AVERAGE, but it requires a WHOLE new strategy. especially with doubles and triples matches (1 person holds out, other person takes turn, then person who held out double turns, person who took turn holds out etc.)
- Joe McCarthy
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 12:35 am
- Location: in the pink
Very serious issue here JTFR. This poll has shown that thirty-nine right-thinking Risk players so far are in agreement with me that people that advocate freestyle w/double turns games are jerkoffs and wankers, which is good news.
What isnt established is why everyone at Conquer Club has not yet sworn their loyalty to non-jerkoff play. Thirty-nine is not enough. Why are jerkoffs still allowed to roam amongst us? Why have some refused to answer the poll, and what do they have to hide?
FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS INTO THESE IMPORTANT QUESTIONS WILL BE FORTHCOMING
What isnt established is why everyone at Conquer Club has not yet sworn their loyalty to non-jerkoff play. Thirty-nine is not enough. Why are jerkoffs still allowed to roam amongst us? Why have some refused to answer the poll, and what do they have to hide?
FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS INTO THESE IMPORTANT QUESTIONS WILL BE FORTHCOMING
- minihaymanz
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 4:45 pm
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario