And in some of their games, when one misses a turn, all miss lol. Maybe they play not only risk together, but all their entire life is done together!
I can't believe you're not baning these guys
Aces and Selma [Cleared]
Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
-
wilderbeast
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:30 am
-
wilderbeast
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:30 am
There is a difference between your playstyle and mine? Well idunno, maybe there is. After all, I strive to play a strategy-based game wherein the individual can make any decisions they want while obeying the rules in hopes of being last man (or woman) standing. On top of that, I dont cry about lost points, I just go to play again and have another good game, whether or not I know the people I am playing against has nothing to do with ingame decisions. Maybe there IS a small difference between our styles
Also...
Quote:
I remember you that you are one of them...
What are you trying to say here? I really am not sure. Are you saying you remember me? You are saying I am one of them, alright well that much I get, but, your phrasing makes no sense.
"I remember you that you are one of them" I've never heard that said before. Maybe you mean to say:
"I remind you that you are one of them..."
Oh well, I guess our levels of english differ between us as well as our gamestyle
I'm wondering if we shouldnt have a game (now, team game mind you, trip's or doub's or whatnot) Wherein any combo of selma/aces/crimson or myself would take on yourself and any friends you had. Please note I mentioned team game, you are obviously very sensitive about lost points in a standard game.
(For the record, if you also wanted to play a standard game with me, you could invite any or all friends you wanted, I wouldnt care or cry about it )
Still, I guess the above belongs in a callout thread. Just be more considerate when your falsely accusing people. You can think whatever you want, thats no crime and that doesnt bother any of us, its when you make public statements about those thoughts and continue to (I'll use the word...) "harass" people that they get irritated.
Also...
Quote:
I remember you that you are one of them...
What are you trying to say here? I really am not sure. Are you saying you remember me? You are saying I am one of them, alright well that much I get, but, your phrasing makes no sense.
"I remember you that you are one of them" I've never heard that said before. Maybe you mean to say:
"I remind you that you are one of them..."
Oh well, I guess our levels of english differ between us as well as our gamestyle
I'm wondering if we shouldnt have a game (now, team game mind you, trip's or doub's or whatnot) Wherein any combo of selma/aces/crimson or myself would take on yourself and any friends you had. Please note I mentioned team game, you are obviously very sensitive about lost points in a standard game.
(For the record, if you also wanted to play a standard game with me, you could invite any or all friends you wanted, I wouldnt care or cry about it )
Still, I guess the above belongs in a callout thread. Just be more considerate when your falsely accusing people. You can think whatever you want, thats no crime and that doesnt bother any of us, its when you make public statements about those thoughts and continue to (I'll use the word...) "harass" people that they get irritated.
-
wilderbeast
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:30 am
... and Relz0r...
Your comming off as fairly childish I find.
Risk is a player-based strategy wargame. I will break it down for you.
Wargame: It's a war. There will be one winner, you must do what you can to preserve your empire.
Strategy: You contemplate a plan, you anticipate the plans of your opponents.
Player-Based: Note the above "strategy". Then you attempt to pull off your plan according to your style, you may or may choose to attack a very powerful player, you may choose to attack a weak player, you may elect to not attack at all and preserve your armies. You may choose to remove a continent from a player or you may choose to make an alternative continent easy to capture by another player in hopes of producing some additional resistance....
All of the above is RISK and its the point of the game. You were obviously frustrated at one point when skyrim fell (or was given, I dont care really, it happens all the time) to another player and instead of trying to stop it yourself you asked other players to attack each other.
Do you think that's fair? Consider this, if they fight each other like you ask, that means they are not fighting you, if they are not fighting you, you are getting stronger. Is that RISK? Of course it is, thats you using diplomacy, very good young man! Is it right? Who cares? Probably is too, I mean, other empires ARE being attacked while you will go a round being ignored.... but the one place where you go overboard is bullying people with the "multi" accusation. the whole: "if you dont make the attacks I suggest, you are obviously multi" thing is pretty old and really makes you look like a spoiled child who cries if he doesnt get his way.
Your comming off as fairly childish I find.
Risk is a player-based strategy wargame. I will break it down for you.
Wargame: It's a war. There will be one winner, you must do what you can to preserve your empire.
Strategy: You contemplate a plan, you anticipate the plans of your opponents.
Player-Based: Note the above "strategy". Then you attempt to pull off your plan according to your style, you may or may choose to attack a very powerful player, you may choose to attack a weak player, you may elect to not attack at all and preserve your armies. You may choose to remove a continent from a player or you may choose to make an alternative continent easy to capture by another player in hopes of producing some additional resistance....
All of the above is RISK and its the point of the game. You were obviously frustrated at one point when skyrim fell (or was given, I dont care really, it happens all the time) to another player and instead of trying to stop it yourself you asked other players to attack each other.
Do you think that's fair? Consider this, if they fight each other like you ask, that means they are not fighting you, if they are not fighting you, you are getting stronger. Is that RISK? Of course it is, thats you using diplomacy, very good young man! Is it right? Who cares? Probably is too, I mean, other empires ARE being attacked while you will go a round being ignored.... but the one place where you go overboard is bullying people with the "multi" accusation. the whole: "if you dont make the attacks I suggest, you are obviously multi" thing is pretty old and really makes you look like a spoiled child who cries if he doesnt get his way.
