Phatscotty wrote:I wonder if that chik from the Muslim Brotherhood is running the show now (Anthony Weiner's wife)
Seems like just as everyone was starting to discover who she really is, the 9-11 attacks in Banghazi hit, and now nobody is talking about her, and now she has Hill-dawg takin the brunt for her....
What are you guys so uptight about? She has a blood clot on the brain! As soon as she is well, she will testify, for christ's sake! Meanwhile, why don't you guys ever bitch about Republicans being racist/sexist douche bags? That's REAL Bullshit IMO.
Army of GOD wrote:I joined this game because it's so similar to Call of Duty.
NBC News’ chief science correspondent Robert Bazell on Monday speculated that federal officials may not be telling the whole story regarding Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s recent hospitalization for a blood clot. Clinton was reportedly admitted to a New York hospital on Sunday after the discovery of a blood clot resulting from a concussion she sustained earlier this month.
(Scroll down for update)
“We really don’t know a lot about what’s going on here,” Bazell said, adding that the hospital “is not saying much.” So far, Clinton’s office has only said she is being treated with blood thinners for the blood clot. But something about that explanation didn’t sit right with the NBC reporter.
“The problem is that concussions, when they lead to blood clots — the blood clots are not usually treated with blood thinners, as they say she’s being treated,” he explained. “If she has a blood clot that occurred because she was sitting around or something, they would treat that with blood thinners, and that would be fine. But there may be more to this story that we don’t know.”
Bazell said more information should be released over the next few days. He did not speculate any further.
NBC News’ chief science correspondent Robert Bazell on Monday speculated that federal officials may not be telling the whole story regarding Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s recent hospitalization for a blood clot. Clinton was reportedly admitted to a New York hospital on Sunday after the discovery of a blood clot resulting from a concussion she sustained earlier this month.
(Scroll down for update)
“We really don’t know a lot about what’s going on here,” Bazell said, adding that the hospital “is not saying much.” So far, Clinton’s office has only said she is being treated with blood thinners for the blood clot. But something about that explanation didn’t sit right with the NBC reporter.
“The problem is that concussions, when they lead to blood clots — the blood clots are not usually treated with blood thinners, as they say she’s being treated,” he explained. “If she has a blood clot that occurred because she was sitting around or something, they would treat that with blood thinners, and that would be fine. But there may be more to this story that we don’t know.”
Bazell said more information should be released over the next few days. He did not speculate any further.
Maybe the CIA is taking her out for the 2008 statements she made to the Sioux Falls Argus Leader? Come on...there is no conspiracy happening here. Move along, people...move along!
Army of GOD wrote:I joined this game because it's so similar to Call of Duty.
NBC News’ chief science correspondent Robert Bazell on Monday speculated that federal officials may not be telling the whole story regarding Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s recent hospitalization for a blood clot. Clinton was reportedly admitted to a New York hospital on Sunday after the discovery of a blood clot resulting from a concussion she sustained earlier this month.
(Scroll down for update)
“We really don’t know a lot about what’s going on here,” Bazell said, adding that the hospital “is not saying much.” So far, Clinton’s office has only said she is being treated with blood thinners for the blood clot. But something about that explanation didn’t sit right with the NBC reporter.
“The problem is that concussions, when they lead to blood clots — the blood clots are not usually treated with blood thinners, as they say she’s being treated,” he explained. “If she has a blood clot that occurred because she was sitting around or something, they would treat that with blood thinners, and that would be fine. But there may be more to this story that we don’t know.”
Bazell said more information should be released over the next few days. He did not speculate any further.
Maybe the CIA is taking her out for the 2008 statements she made to the Sioux Falls Argus Leader? Come on...there is no conspiracy happening here. Move along, people...move along!
NBC News’ chief science correspondent Robert Bazell on Monday speculated that federal officials may not be telling the whole story regarding Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s recent hospitalization for a blood clot. Clinton was reportedly admitted to a New York hospital on Sunday after the discovery of a blood clot resulting from a concussion she sustained earlier this month.
(Scroll down for update)
“We really don’t know a lot about what’s going on here,” Bazell said, adding that the hospital “is not saying much.” So far, Clinton’s office has only said she is being treated with blood thinners for the blood clot. But something about that explanation didn’t sit right with the NBC reporter.
“The problem is that concussions, when they lead to blood clots — the blood clots are not usually treated with blood thinners, as they say she’s being treated,” he explained. “If she has a blood clot that occurred because she was sitting around or something, they would treat that with blood thinners, and that would be fine. But there may be more to this story that we don’t know.”
Bazell said more information should be released over the next few days. He did not speculate any further.
Maybe the CIA is taking her out for the 2008 statements she made to the Sioux Falls Argus Leader? Come on...there is no conspiracy happening here. Move along, people...move along!
Science is a conspiracy?
Science? Now this Bazell guy is a doctor? Give me a break!
But something about that explanation didn’t sit right with the NBC reporter.
“The problem is that concussions, when they lead to blood clots — the blood clots are not usually treated with blood thinners, as they say she’s being treated,” he explained. “If she has a blood clot that occurred because she was sitting around or something, they would treat that with blood thinners, and that would be fine. But there may be more to this story that we don’t know.”
If I read this correctly...something just didn't sit right with a medically untrained reporter?
Army of GOD wrote:I joined this game because it's so similar to Call of Duty.
Happy is just trying to stir up trouble. Everyone knows the Clintons never lie or deceive anyone about anything. The same type of people raised a fuss when Hillary told the truth about evading bullets fired on her in Bosnia. They hate her because she's a woman.
She said when she arrived in Bosnia on March 25, 1996, "I remember landing under sniper fire. There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base." But news video footage of her arrival at Tuzla shows Clinton, then the first lady, calmly walking from the rear ramp of a U.S. Air Force plane with her daughter, chelsea, then 16, at her side. Both Clintons held their heads up and did not appear to be rushed. The video shows Clinton spending several minutes talking with the group, including an 8-year-old Bosnian girl who presented her with a poem, and later greeting U.S. troops. Clinton used the description of a dangerous arrival to bolster her argument that she has the foreign policy experience needed to be commander in chief.
NBC News’ chief science correspondent Robert Bazell on Monday speculated that federal officials may not be telling the whole story regarding Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s recent hospitalization for a blood clot. Clinton was reportedly admitted to a New York hospital on Sunday after the discovery of a blood clot resulting from a concussion she sustained earlier this month.
(Scroll down for update)
“We really don’t know a lot about what’s going on here,” Bazell said, adding that the hospital “is not saying much.” So far, Clinton’s office has only said she is being treated with blood thinners for the blood clot. But something about that explanation didn’t sit right with the NBC reporter.
“The problem is that concussions, when they lead to blood clots — the blood clots are not usually treated with blood thinners, as they say she’s being treated,” he explained. “If she has a blood clot that occurred because she was sitting around or something, they would treat that with blood thinners, and that would be fine. But there may be more to this story that we don’t know.”
Bazell said more information should be released over the next few days. He did not speculate any further.
Wait, "blood clots are not usually treated with blood thinners."
Is this guy a doctor? If not, then why believe his statement?
Also, his statement implies that blood clots are sometimes--i.e. not usually--treated with blood thinners. So, in this case with Hilary, her blood clot is being treated by blood thinners.
NBC News’ chief science correspondent Robert Bazell on Monday speculated that federal officials may not be telling the whole story regarding Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s recent hospitalization for a blood clot. Clinton was reportedly admitted to a New York hospital on Sunday after the discovery of a blood clot resulting from a concussion she sustained earlier this month.
(Scroll down for update)
“We really don’t know a lot about what’s going on here,” Bazell said, adding that the hospital “is not saying much.” So far, Clinton’s office has only said she is being treated with blood thinners for the blood clot. But something about that explanation didn’t sit right with the NBC reporter.
“The problem is that concussions, when they lead to blood clots — the blood clots are not usually treated with blood thinners, as they say she’s being treated,” he explained. “If she has a blood clot that occurred because she was sitting around or something, they would treat that with blood thinners, and that would be fine. But there may be more to this story that we don’t know.”
Bazell said more information should be released over the next few days. He did not speculate any further.
Wait, "blood clots are not usually treated with blood thinners."
Is this guy a doctor? If not, then why believe his statement?
Also, his statement implies that blood clots are sometimes--i.e. not usually--treated with blood thinners. So, in this case with Hilary, her blood clot is being treated by blood thinners.
He said, to quote him accurately, blood clots from concussions...not all blood clots
Okay, PS. After adding "from concussions" into my position, my main points still hold.
1. The article provides crappy speculation. 2. What are the author's credentials? How does he know that "blood clots---FROM CONCUSSIONS---are not usually treated with blood thinners"?
And a new one:
3. Anyone who believes that the article has some credit is most likely striving to fit facts into their fictional accounts about Hillary Clinton's upcoming testimony on Benghazi.
BigBallinStalin wrote: 3. Anyone who believes that the article has some credit is most likely striving to fit facts into their accounts about Hillary Clinton's upcoming fictional testimony on Benghazi.
Fixed
Spazz Arcane wrote:If birds could swim and fish could fly I would awaken in the morning to the sturgeons cry. If fish could fly and birds could swim I'd still use worms to fish for them.
BigBallinStalin wrote:Okay, PS. After adding "from concussions" into my position, my main points still hold.
1. The article provides crappy speculation. 2. What are the author's credentials? How does he know that "blood clots---FROM CONCUSSIONS---are not usually treated with blood thinners"?
And a new one:
3. Anyone who believes that the article has some credit is most likely striving to fit facts into their fictional accounts about Hillary Clinton's upcoming testimony on Benghazi.
oh well...I thought it was worth a share. I am interested in all the details for this overall story. You might remember the thread I made at the time "pre 9-11 thinking". I'm stickin around.
There is some wicked dark shit going on with this one
BigBallinStalin wrote:Okay, PS. After adding "from concussions" into my position, my main points still hold.
1. The article provides crappy speculation. 2. What are the author's credentials? How does he know that "blood clots---FROM CONCUSSIONS---are not usually treated with blood thinners"?
And a new one:
3. Anyone who believes that the article has some credit is most likely striving to fit facts into their fictional accounts about Hillary Clinton's upcoming testimony on Benghazi.
oh well...I thought it was worth a share. I am interested in all the details for this overall story. You might remember the thread I made at the time "pre 9-11 thinking". I'm stickin around.
There is some wicked dark shit going on with this one
Based on the lack of credentials of the author and his loose speculation, then the chance of 'dark shit going on' is very low.
HapSmo19 wrote:She said when she arrived in Bosnia on March 25, 1996, "I remember landing under sniper fire. There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base." But news video footage of her arrival at Tuzla shows Clinton, then the first lady, calmly walking from the rear ramp of a U.S. Air Force plane with her daughter, chelsea, then 16, at her side. Both Clintons held their heads up and did not appear to be rushed. The video shows Clinton spending several minutes talking with the group, including an 8-year-old Bosnian girl who presented her with a poem, and later greeting U.S. troops. Clinton used the description of a dangerous arrival to bolster her argument that she has the foreign policy experience needed to be commander in chief.
This post is no more than blatant anti-feminist Clintonphobia!!!
